Tyranny Must Always Control The Message. By Any Means Necessary

Mr. T

Lets see how many people will come to the defense of Snopes?

They wont because they will continue to believe the lies so it won't upset everything they have been led to believe.

sadbrownsfan

I am confused so Kagan at the time of the those law suits was the Solicitor General, the person who represents the white house(president in these cases) in front of the Supreme Court is that what you are ranting about? Or that Snoops said she wasn't the person who's previous position was the Solicitor General? Or your lack of reading/research skills since the snopes article sites all of the cases you mentioned and provides links to the original cases that are not related to his birth certificate?

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/417/417.F3d.1172.-.04-15848.html

http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/081977.P.pdf

*edit*

Adding the link to the snopes.com article that cal was refering too(I think)

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/kagan.asp

calfoxwc

Sorry, I did forget the link to the article.

It is very, very concerning though, that every person Obamao puts in place,

is openly, or secretly, a radical on his side. and Soros' money,

is on Obamao's side.

I really do wonder what we are going to come to, with them wanting

to get rid of our way of life.

They really have to be considered dangerous to our freedoms, and our country.

MLD Woody

If someone is secretly radical how would you know?

sadbrownsfan

@calfoxwc said:

Sorry, I did forget the link to the article.

It is very, very concerning though, that every person Obamao puts in place,

is openly, or secretly, a radical on his side. and Soros' money,

is on Obamao's side.

I really do wonder what we are going to come to, with them wanting

to get rid of our way of life.

They really have to be considered dangerous to our freedoms, and our country.

You know not everyone who has a different opinion of how to run the country is an evil overload intent on destroying the US?

calfoxwc

#1. A secret radical, is one who had been found out. Like Holder. It's an "after they've been found out" lable. Get up to speed, Woody.

#2. You call getting rid of our Constitution, our economic and electoral systems, just a "different opinion of how to run thecountry" ???

Freedom. It's guaranteed. Libs don't like freedom, when they feel like it. Which means, for other people.

They are the only ones to get their desired, guaranteed freedoms. But others have different guaranteed freedoms,

and they don't like those? Well, those others should just lose theirs.

Libs pout, whine and bitch more than any other creatures in the universe, I think.

And that's even if there are millions of inhabited planets.

MLD Woody

Cal, prove anything u just said

calfoxwc

That's easy, but tedious.

Look at history - and see for yourself.

sadbrownsfan

@calfoxwc said:

That's easy, but tedious.

Look at history - and see for yourself.

This seems to be a pattern, you didn't defend anything in the original post that is just false information and just fell back on calling people a radical and trying to destroy our way of life. Seriously its as if you watch Fox News.

calfoxwc

No, it's because you libs emotionally FEEL instead of thinking. Been there, done that thing about "proving" and researching and posting

and explaining.

Then, after all that, and it REALLY proves your point,... a poutyface lib goes "haha" and changes the subject.

The # of posts is gone, but several of us have been there often in the past. It does no good to "prove".

It gets ignored, and whatever source it was, even CNN, gets blasted, and then the personal attacks start.

Ask around it that sounds familiar.