Skip to content

Redskins Have Made A Deal?

The Browns Board
161 52 11.3k
  • Look at the bright side fellas, we still have 2 1st rounders this year. We can upgrade the team considerably.

    @slimdawg said:

    Look at the bright side fellas, we still have 2 1st rounders this year. We can upgrade the team considerably.

    Yeah! but we still have a lame ass QB that can't throw... Damn... I really belived "AGAIN" 🙁

    the Browns would start to become a real NFL team...Why god...why!

  • Why not? Someone besides Z needs to get started...

    Zombo said:

    --But with that new right tackle, both of our guards will look guardier

    LOL...

    Actually I think the 'Skins made such a ridiculous offer that the Colts will wonder what they are missing, draft RG and the 'Skins will land Luck...

    Remember you read it here first...

  • @slimdawg said:

    Look at the bright side fellas, we still have 2 1st rounders this year. We can upgrade the team considerably.

    Yeah! but we still have a lame ass QB that can't throw... Damn... I really belived "AGAIN" 🙁

    the Browns would start to become a real NFL team...Why god...why!

    @jibz said:

    Yeah! but we still have a lame ass QB that can't throw... Damn... I really belived "AGAIN" 🙁

    the Browns would start to become a real NFL team...Why god...why!

    There's always Tannehill...

  • Why not? Someone besides Z needs to get started...

    Zombo said:

    --But with that new right tackle, both of our guards will look guardier

    LOL...

    Actually I think the 'Skins made such a ridiculous offer that the Colts will wonder what they are missing, draft RG and the 'Skins will land Luck...

    Remember you read it here first...

    @tour2ma said:

    Actually I think the 'Skins made such a ridiculous offer that the Colts will wonder what they are missing, draft RG and the 'Skins will land Luck...

    Remember you read it here first...

    Would not complain at all.

  • Tannehill sucks. I've watched a good number of his games. He's a scrub who was talked up by the people who hated the idea of giving up precious draft picks as an "alternative".

    He's closer to Akili Smith than Jay Cutler.

  • Best replies on the live feed

    Breaking News RG3 to Announce return to Baylor

    Dan Synder just woke up with 3 different semen samples in his underwear #Browns #Rams #Skins

    Dan Synder just traded a 5th round pick to the Jets for Firemen Ed

    Pat Shurmur just Recieved 6 million dollars in bonuses courtesy of the Rams.

    Need more !!!

    EDIT

    GREAT NOW THERES 2 BLACK GUYS IN DC WHO CANT GET ANYTHING DONE.

  • Excellent! Hail to the Redskins...

    But if there's any truth that we tried to match the 'Skins ridiculous offer (#1 and 2 in 2012, 2013's 1 and 2014's 1), I'd be seriously pissed at our FO...

    @tour2ma said:

    Excellent! Hail to the Redskins...

    But if there's any truth that we tried to match the 'Skins ridiculous offer (#1 and 2 in 2012, 2013's 1 and 2014's 1), I'd be seriously pissed at our FO...

    This. This is a Daniel Snyder move. Anyone that wanted the Browns to trade 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick to move up 2 spots in the draft is an idiot.

    I'm a fan of RG3, but that is the most lopsided trade I've ever seen in sports.

  • What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

  • @tour2ma said:

    Excellent! Hail to the Redskins...

    But if there's any truth that we tried to match the 'Skins ridiculous offer (#1 and 2 in 2012, 2013's 1 and 2014's 1), I'd be seriously pissed at our FO...

    This. This is a Daniel Snyder move. Anyone that wanted the Browns to trade 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick to move up 2 spots in the draft is an idiot.

    I'm a fan of RG3, but that is the most lopsided trade I've ever seen in sports.

    @snatch1 said:

    This. This is a Daniel Snyder move. Anyone that wanted the Browns to trade 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick to move up 2 spots in the draft is an idiot.

    I'm a fan of RG3, but that is the most lopsided trade I've ever seen in sports.

    It makes the Raiders deal for Palmer seem reasonable

  • What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

    @badnewsbrowns said:

    What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

    They had the balls to try and get him.....but they had more brains in letting it go

  • If the Browns really did match the Redskins offer I don't get why the Rams didn't pick us

    @mld-woody said:

    If the Browns really did match the Redskins offer I don't get why the Rams didn't pick us

    Yes, our picks were superior. Unless the Rams wanted to spread out the wealth- in case one of the picks they acquired busts.

    2012 A first and two seconds. 2013 two firsts. 2014 two firsts. That's enough firepower to do whatever the hell they please.

    So where's RGIII to da Cle now? Dum de dum- as I (and others) posited, St Louis can now offer one of the seconds (or next year's first) to the Browns to trade up and get Blackmon.

  • Honestly, if we were offering 3 1st's for the guy its kinda dumb we didn't want to throw in that extra 2nd. I mean come on. At that point, shit

  • @mld-woody said:

    If the Browns really did match the Redskins offer I don't get why the Rams didn't pick us

    Yes, our picks were superior. Unless the Rams wanted to spread out the wealth- in case one of the picks they acquired busts.

    2012 A first and two seconds. 2013 two firsts. 2014 two firsts. That's enough firepower to do whatever the hell they please.

    So where's RGIII to da Cle now? Dum de dum- as I (and others) posited, St Louis can now offer one of the seconds (or next year's first) to the Browns to trade up and get Blackmon.

    @hoorta said:

    Yes, our picks were superior. Unless the Rams wanted to spread out the wealth- in case one of the picks they acquired busts.

    2012 A first and two seconds. 2013 two firsts. 2014 two firsts. That's enough firepower to do whatever the hell they please.

    So where's RGIII to da Cle now? Dum de dum- as I (and others) posited, St Louis can now offer one of the seconds (or next year's first) to the Browns to trade up and get Blackmon.

    Fuck that. Why the hell would we trade with the Rams? If I'm Heckert and they want Blackmon, they can give us a first round pick for the next 3 years and that's a precondition to even begin negotiating. Either that or Bradford, Amendola, the 6th overall and a third and/or forth for Colt and the 4th overall. Granted they would never do either of those scenarios but I couldn't give two shits. That's like giving a guy tips on how to please your ex-wife who left you for him last week.

  • @snatch1 said:

    This. This is a Daniel Snyder move. Anyone that wanted the Browns to trade 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick to move up 2 spots in the draft is an idiot.

    I'm a fan of RG3, but that is the most lopsided trade I've ever seen in sports.

    It makes the Raiders deal for Palmer seem reasonable

    @taco918 said:

    It makes the Raiders deal for Palmer seem reasonable

    When the Skins start reeling off 10 win seasons like the Colts did, no one's going to miss those picks.

  • Now we'll watch them draft average players at average positions.

    In a few years Heckert,Holmgren,Lamonte and Shurmur will be long gone counting Randy's money.

    But hey, at least we kept our draft picks.

  • What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

    @badnewsbrowns said:

    What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

    honestly I think at that point they realized the magnitude of trading that much to get him, the 37th pick being a deal breaker just seems stupid since only about 1/3rd of the time is it an impact player, they probably just didn't want to risk that much because if it failed they would be done as a front office(fired).

    it's not a big deal, RG3 will be good but so will the player they pick at #4(and I know they won't as impactful, but thats 2 more good players vs 1 potentially great player). there will be other quarterbacks in the future similar to Luck I'm sure, guys like RG3 are a lot more rare but I guess it just wasn't meant to be.

    time to get matt flynn I guess, I really don't think Mccoy will be doing all that much even if they pick Blackmon.

    edit: also trading down is not out of the question according to heckert heh, I'm sure a lot of people would be annoyed if they did that.

  • You guys are all whiny pussies.

    Jesus Christ.

  • @taco918 said:

    It makes the Raiders deal for Palmer seem reasonable

    When the Skins start reeling off 10 win seasons like the Colts did, no one's going to miss those picks.

    @kerrigan91 said:

    When the Skins start reeling off 10 win seasons like the Colts did, no one's going to miss those picks.

    When that happens, I'll start sucking my own dick.

    RG3 isn't going to be your savior, dicktits.

  • @badnewsbrowns said:

    What's fucked about it is it's not like we were not trying to trade for him. According to Fox Sports Ohio the Browns were offering three first rounders for Griffin, but would not give up our 37 this year.

    So, they believed RG3 was their guy but did not have the balls to do what it takes to get him.

    http://www.foxsportsohio.com/03/10/12/Browns-finish-second-in-RG3-derby/landing_browns.html?blockID=684278&feedID=9926

    honestly I think at that point they realized the magnitude of trading that much to get him, the 37th pick being a deal breaker just seems stupid since only about 1/3rd of the time is it an impact player, they probably just didn't want to risk that much because if it failed they would be done as a front office(fired).

    it's not a big deal, RG3 will be good but so will the player they pick at #4(and I know they won't as impactful, but thats 2 more good players vs 1 potentially great player). there will be other quarterbacks in the future similar to Luck I'm sure, guys like RG3 are a lot more rare but I guess it just wasn't meant to be.

    time to get matt flynn I guess, I really don't think Mccoy will be doing all that much even if they pick Blackmon.

    edit: also trading down is not out of the question according to heckert heh, I'm sure a lot of people would be annoyed if they did that.

    @beefjerky said:

    honestly I think at that point they realized the magnitude of trading that much to get him, the 37th pick being a deal breaker just seems stupid since only about 1/3rd of the time is it an impact player, they probably just didn't want to risk that much because if it failed they would be done as a front office(fired).

    it's not a big deal, RG3 will be good but so will the player they pick at #4(and I know they won't as impactful, but thats 2 more good players vs 1 potentially great player). there will be other quarterbacks in the future similar to Luck I'm sure, guys like RG3 are a lot more rare but I guess it just wasn't meant to be.

    time to get matt flynn I guess, I really don't think Mccoy will be doing all that much even if they pick Blackmon.

    edit: also trading down is not out of the question according to heckert heh, I'm sure a lot of people would be annoyed if they did that.

    Well, Blackmon, Claiborne, or Richardson are the consolation prizes. If we re sign Hillis, we aren't drafting Richardson.

    I'm not real keen on another CB high as the Jets and Eagles flamed out last year with two stud corners.

  • @kerrigan91 said:

    When the Skins start reeling off 10 win seasons like the Colts did, no one's going to miss those picks.

    When that happens, I'll start sucking my own dick.

    RG3 isn't going to be your savior, dicktits.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    When that happens, I'll start sucking my own dick.

    RG3 isn't going to be your savior, dicktits.

    LOL, I think it's hilarious you people talk like the Browns make the playoffs every year. Your QB is Colt McCoy. Yes.....Colt McCoy. Besides Hayden you guys are absolutely terrible on Offense and Defense. I would never hype up the Redskins, but it's comical you people talk like the Browns are a playoff caliber team every year.