Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Current Mock Drafts

Current Mock Drafts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
18 Posts 13 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @htownbrown said:

    I just want to punch this thread right now!!!

    Why? I don't this actually puts us anywhere that we weren't before all the overblown RGIII hysteria started. The guy runs a fast 40 time and everyone thinks he is the second coming of Jim Brown.

    htownbrown htownbrownH Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 2k Posts
    • 685 Reputation
    htownbrownH htownbrown wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @the-gipper said:

    Why? I don't this actually puts us anywhere that we weren't before all the overblown RGIII hysteria started. The guy runs a fast 40 time and everyone thinks he is the second coming of Jim Brown.

    Your right, were right back where we started. As usual.

    Another year of McClueless. Another year of stagnation.

    β€œIt is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.”
    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • htownbrownH htownbrown

      @the-gipper said:

      Why? I don't this actually puts us anywhere that we weren't before all the overblown RGIII hysteria started. The guy runs a fast 40 time and everyone thinks he is the second coming of Jim Brown.

      Your right, were right back where we started. As usual.

      Another year of McClueless. Another year of stagnation.

      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
      • 57k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @htownbrown said:

      Your right, were right back where we started. As usual.

      Another year of McClueless. Another year of stagnation.

      Again, you blame McCoy.

      95% of the problem in on the HC/OC as far as I am concerned. Maybe with Chili in here it will help. Getting some weapons with our stockpile of draft picks....which is what we have needed to do all along should also help.

      VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • The GipperT The Gipper

        @htownbrown said:

        Your right, were right back where we started. As usual.

        Another year of McClueless. Another year of stagnation.

        Again, you blame McCoy.

        95% of the problem in on the HC/OC as far as I am concerned. Maybe with Chili in here it will help. Getting some weapons with our stockpile of draft picks....which is what we have needed to do all along should also help.

        VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 6k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @the-gipper said:

        Again, you blame McCoy.

        95% of the problem in on the HC/OC as far as I am concerned. Maybe with Chili in here it will help. Getting some weapons with our stockpile of draft picks....which is what we have needed to do all along should also help.

        Except Shurmer is still calling the plays. WTF is Childress on staff for, then?

        The GipperT D 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

          @the-gipper said:

          Again, you blame McCoy.

          95% of the problem in on the HC/OC as far as I am concerned. Maybe with Chili in here it will help. Getting some weapons with our stockpile of draft picks....which is what we have needed to do all along should also help.

          Except Shurmer is still calling the plays. WTF is Childress on staff for, then?

          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
          • 57k Posts
          • 4k Reputation
          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @vaportrail said:

          Except Shurmer is still calling the plays. WTF is Childress on staff for, then?

          Probably to handle the traffic and put a damper on a lot of the other confusion that goes on the sideline.

          I do think at times Shurmur got lost because he was distracted with things going on other than calling the plays. Hopefully Childress can help with that.

          Plus....I am sure there may be a large percentage of time where Chili will actually be suggesting plays to run in certain situations, even if the final call will be on Shurmur.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • AlbinoRhino40 A
            • 66 Posts
            • 11 Reputation
            A AlbinoRhino40 wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Where was the vote for trading down?

            Draft Tannehill and Steven Hill in the first, and pick up an extra 2nd... possibility?

            Maybe Mike Adams and a LB or CB in the 2nd

            I'm really into Tommy Streeter as well

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

              @the-gipper said:

              Again, you blame McCoy.

              95% of the problem in on the HC/OC as far as I am concerned. Maybe with Chili in here it will help. Getting some weapons with our stockpile of draft picks....which is what we have needed to do all along should also help.

              Except Shurmer is still calling the plays. WTF is Childress on staff for, then?

              DawginIT D
              • 278 Posts
              • 22 Reputation
              D DawginIT wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @vaportrail said:

              Except Shurmer is still calling the plays. WTF is Childress on staff for, then?

              Shurmur's going to be wearing the headset and "calling the plays." Doesn't necessarily mean he's going to choose them by himself.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • The GipperT The Gipper

                With the deal for RGIII gone, here is how 100 Mock drafters break down on their choice of whom the Browns are likely to pick witht Their #4 overall pick:

                Blackmon: 45%

                Claiborne: 24%

                Richardson: 21%

                Riley Rieeff: 2%

                Matt Kalil: 1%

                Coples: 1%

                DawginIT D
                • 278 Posts
                • 22 Reputation
                D DawginIT wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @the-gipper said:

                With the deal for RGIII gone, here is how 100 Mock drafters break down on their choice of whom the Browns are likely to pick witht Their #4 overall pick:

                Blackmon: 45%

                Claiborne: 24%

                Richardson: 21%

                Riley Rieeff: 2%

                Matt Kalil: 1%

                Coples: 1%

                Honestly, I wouldn't complain about getting Blackmon, Claiborne, or Richardson. All three can be very good and help this team a lot. Although I don't think CB is a huge NEED (because I think Skrine/Patterson/Brown can do an average job), I would have nightmares if I was Big Ben, Andy Dalton, or Joe Flacco of trying to throw against Haden and Claiborne. Blackmon would obviously be an instant #1 for the receiving corps and we don't need to postulate that one for more than a split second. Richardson would also be great upgrade (with of without resigning Hillis). However, the thought of having Hillis AND/OR Richardson on the field on every play is terrifying.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • BrownIndian BrownIndianB
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 39 Reputation
                  BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Blacmon please.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • choco chocoC
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 352 Reputation
                    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    drastic overestimation of rookie impacts. TR and hillis terrifying?

                    lmao....

                    USFBrownU 1 Reply Last reply
                    πŸ‘
                    Quote Reply
                    • jrb12711J jrb12711

                      I just have a hard time believing we would take a CB in the top 5 after just taking one high. At this point I'd bet the farm the plan is to trade down for someone who wants blackmon or Kalil/Claiborne/Reiff.

                      1 more season 1 more season1
                      • 659 Posts
                      • 30 Reputation
                      1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @jrb12711 said:

                      I just have a hard time believing we would take a CB in the top 5 after just taking one high. At this point I'd bet the farm the plan is to trade down for someone who wants blackmon or Kalil/Claiborne/Reiff.

                      If they trade down again I'm going to lose it. That will show their not looking to compete they are just existing in the NFL.

                      Soccer, Futball, Fusball, Futsal, Foosball, Europe ... Mods are all gay.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • ClevelandBigDawg C
                        • 571 Posts
                        • 8 Reputation
                        C ClevelandBigDawg wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        I'll take Blackmon in a heart beat. If it is true that 6 scouts were there and Pat Shurmer at his pro-day... were either looking to take him or Brandon Weedon. Or BOTH! I just dont want to reach on Weedon in the 2nd because of his age. Would rather him fall to round three, or trade up to the end of round 2.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • chocoC choco

                          drastic overestimation of rookie impacts. TR and hillis terrifying?

                          lmao....

                          USFBrown USFBrownU Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 2k Posts
                          • 270 Reputation
                          USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          @choco said:

                          drastic overestimation of rookie impacts. TR and hillis terrifying?

                          lmao....

                          If we WASTE our first pick on Richardson, it just means teams will put 8 - 9 men in the box the entire game. Same results as last season. Let's get Blackmon. If Little makes some progress and we get Blackmon, out receiving crew looks much improved this year.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Theme
                          • System
                          • Light
                          • Dark
                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Forums
                          • Recent
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Donate