Broncos Trade To 4?
-
no...you want stars.
we need football players.
We have plenty of football players. We need good ones. The teams who go to playoffs, win superbowls, they have stars.
Who do we have???
-
Denver gives us the 25, 67, and 87 this year, and their 2013 and 2014 first round picks to take Blackmon for Peyton Manning.
With Peyton Possibly having 3 decent/good years left or a little more i heard they might be interested in making the deals they need this year to contend for the superbowl right away for Manning.
As a Browns Fan
Yes or No?
Personally I would say no and take our play maker at 4 but i know some people LOVE the trade down scenerios so whats the answer?
Denver gives us the 25, 67, and 87 this year, and their 2013 and 2014 first round picks to take Blackmon for Peyton Manning.
Yes... The flexibility it would give us for the next three drafts would be tremendous. This year I would not set at 22 and 25. At least one of those gets bumped back up into the 10-12 area this year.
And not wishing Peyton ill, but should Denver's dice roll come up craps those future #1's would start moving higher and higher...
So yes, I'd pull the trigger on this one in a heartbeat... if only it were real...
We need a playmaker and we have some great options at 4.
We are not a "playmaker" away from anything. This trade is the type of trade that could set us up to be a playmaker away...
I look at it as: would you rather have T. Richardson or Doug Martin plus 3 more starters (2 1st round picks and a 2nd). For me, that is a no brainer. Richardson might be great, but is he THAT much better than the next tier that you would turn that down?? For me he is not. If he was a QB I would look at this differently.
Brilliant post... cuts right to the heart the matter.
Sounds like you've been hanging around with Jed Clampett.
More like Wayne LaPierre...
-
Faine was not bad. It was the trading of him for a guy that played one day for the Browns that was bad.
The others were products of poor talent evaluation, and some bad luck, for sure. I have more confidence now in the eye of Tom Heckert than that of any of the guys that made those picks. Oh, he can miss, like perhaps with Montario....but I will put better odds on him than on others we have had.
Well we traded him and our pick to move up in the draft, not for Bentley. Bentley was our big Free Agent signee.
Well we traded him and our pick to move up in the draft, not for Bentley. Bentley was our big Free Agent signee.
Refresh my memory on who we got with that traded up pick. I don't recall.
-
We have plenty of football players. We need good ones. The teams who go to playoffs, win superbowls, they have stars.
ok on the superbowl giants who are the stars? yes eli was coming out of college. a top 5 pick. cruz wasn't drafted. bradshaw (who is a second tier rb at best) was a seventh round pick. hixon was a fourth pick cut by the broncos and picked up off of waivers. the only offensive weapon manning has that was picked in the first round is hakeem nicks who is hardly a first tier receiver.
now on the defensive side kiwanuka, pierre-paul, rolle all first round. umi 2nd. and tuck 3rd.
i'd rather follow the business plan of a winner, most of which address defense first, beefing up lines on both sides of the ball, then looking to find rbs and wrs in the later rounds, than a team like oakland who always goes after the fastest receiver and rb with best college stats.
-
We have plenty of football players. We need good ones. The teams who go to playoffs, win superbowls, they have stars.
ok on the superbowl giants who are the stars? yes eli was coming out of college. a top 5 pick. cruz wasn't drafted. bradshaw (who is a second tier rb at best) was a seventh round pick. hixon was a fourth pick cut by the broncos and picked up off of waivers. the only offensive weapon manning has that was picked in the first round is hakeem nicks who is hardly a first tier receiver.
now on the defensive side kiwanuka, pierre-paul, rolle all first round. umi 2nd. and tuck 3rd.
i'd rather follow the business plan of a winner, most of which address defense first, beefing up lines on both sides of the ball, then looking to find rbs and wrs in the later rounds, than a team like oakland who always goes after the fastest receiver and rb with best college stats.
ok on the superbowl giants who are the stars? yes eli was coming out of college. a top 5 pick. cruz wasn't drafted. bradshaw (who is a second tier rb at best) was a seventh round pick. hixon was a fourth pick cut by the broncos and picked up off of waivers. the only offensive weapon manning has that was picked in the first round is hakeem nicks who is hardly a first tier receiver.
now on the defensive side kiwanuka, pierre-paul, rolle all first round. umi 2nd. and tuck 3rd.
i'd rather follow the business plan of a winner, most of which address defense first, beefing up lines on both sides of the ball, then looking to find rbs and wrs in the later rounds, than a team like oakland who always goes after the fastest receiver and rb with best college stats.
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
ok on the superbowl giants who are the stars? yes eli was coming out of college. a top 5 pick. cruz wasn't drafted. bradshaw (who is a second tier rb at best) was a seventh round pick. hixon was a fourth pick cut by the broncos and picked up off of waivers. the only offensive weapon manning has that was picked in the first round is hakeem nicks who is hardly a first tier receiver.
now on the defensive side kiwanuka, pierre-paul, rolle all first round. umi 2nd. and tuck 3rd.
i'd rather follow the business plan of a winner, most of which address defense first, beefing up lines on both sides of the ball, then looking to find rbs and wrs in the later rounds, than a team like oakland who always goes after the fastest receiver and rb with best college stats.
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
Ok, I guess the Giants dont work for you. How about the Packers?? We are going to leave QBs out of this because we cant draft a franchise QB with #4 (unless you reallllly wanna bring up Tannehill) so the conversation is irrelevant. So all the Packer's offensive "stars" (and by stars you are saying high picks which I dont agree with but for the sake of the argument..):
RB Starks 6th round, Grant Undrafted
WR Nelson 2nd round, Jennings 2nd round, J. Jones 3rd round, D. Driver 7th round
TE Finley 3rd round
Quantity does not necessarily outweigh quality, but 5 good players (outside 1st round) greatly outweigh that one "star". Ill trade back and pick up 2nd and 3rd rounders all day long...
-
ok on the superbowl giants who are the stars? yes eli was coming out of college. a top 5 pick. cruz wasn't drafted. bradshaw (who is a second tier rb at best) was a seventh round pick. hixon was a fourth pick cut by the broncos and picked up off of waivers. the only offensive weapon manning has that was picked in the first round is hakeem nicks who is hardly a first tier receiver.
now on the defensive side kiwanuka, pierre-paul, rolle all first round. umi 2nd. and tuck 3rd.
i'd rather follow the business plan of a winner, most of which address defense first, beefing up lines on both sides of the ball, then looking to find rbs and wrs in the later rounds, than a team like oakland who always goes after the fastest receiver and rb with best college stats.
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
Still not convinced? Fine lets go the the team with the most yards last year, the Saints:
RB Sproles 4th round, Thomas undrafted, Ingram 28th pick (and 3rd most effective RB)
TE Graham 3rd round
WR Colston 7th round, Moore Undrafted, Meachem #27 pick (and hardly a "star")
All these teams do have elite QBs but considering we dont have a shot anymore at an elite QB at 4, how about we build a team around a future one with a high quantity of quality players (1-3 rounders) maybe we can find a Colston with one of our 7ths but I wont count on it
-
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
I think we just let H & H do what they do and if u dont like go root for another team. I will be happy with what ever they do. Even if its not what I woulda done. Nothin is as bad as watching mangina on draft day.....tnat zhit was a phucking joke
"We are Americans. We don't quit doing something because it's wrong. We just keep doing the wrong thing till it turns out right." Browns maybe the most American Football team ever. -
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
Joe Haden.
-
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
I'll only look at what Heckert has done and ignore the awful talent evaluator that was Mangini, and the troubled Phil Savage. Id much rather have twice as much 2nd and high 3rd round talent than first round talent (excluding QBs). I believe that would make us a much better team both short and long term. IMO the top 10 is really valuable for QBs, LTs, a #1 CB, and Dline or a cant miss talent such as a Calvin Johnson (mayyyybe Trent is one of those, but I think the positional importance of one RB is very low). No chance at a QB this year, we have the LT and CB, and there is a lack of Dline talent this year. Obviously the best players will go top 10, and you have a better shot at getting for example a better WR in the top 10 than in the second round, but I'd argue that if you could get 2 second rounders by dropping 10 spots in the first round, you do it in a heartbeat this year.
-
Shit, the Giants don't have stars... they have a constellation. You might need something stronger than an over the counter soap to was the choco off your nuts..
Ok, I guess the Giants dont work for you. How about the Packers?? We are going to leave QBs out of this because we cant draft a franchise QB with #4 (unless you reallllly wanna bring up Tannehill) so the conversation is irrelevant. So all the Packer's offensive "stars" (and by stars you are saying high picks which I dont agree with but for the sake of the argument..):
RB Starks 6th round, Grant Undrafted
WR Nelson 2nd round, Jennings 2nd round, J. Jones 3rd round, D. Driver 7th round
TE Finley 3rd round
Quantity does not necessarily outweigh quality, but 5 good players (outside 1st round) greatly outweigh that one "star". Ill trade back and pick up 2nd and 3rd rounders all day long...
Ok, I guess the Giants dont work for you. How about the Packers?? We are going to leave QBs out of this because we cant draft a franchise QB with #4 (unless you reallllly wanna bring up Tannehill)
(the Packers drafte Rodgers at #22, so indeed it can be done)
so the conversation is irrelevant. So all the Packer's offensive "stars" (and by stars you are saying high picks which I dont agree with but for the sake of the argument..):
RB Starks 6th round, Grant Undrafted
WR Nelson 2nd round, Jennings 2nd round, J. Jones 3rd round, D. Driver 7th round
TE Finley 3rd round
Quantity does not necessarily outweigh quality, but 5 good players (outside 1st round) greatly outweigh that one "star". Ill trade back and pick up 2nd and 3rd rounders all day long...
I would not object to that strategy. The weakness of this Browns team is not that they might not have a couple of people capable of being "stars", it is that they have a plethora of holes in their lineup where they do not have quality NFL players filling them. We need to fill all those holes.
-
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
Oh, I agree. I definitely don't want to be trading out of the first round with either of our picks. But if in fact the Browns traded down to say 15, and picked up 2 second round picks, I would possibly welcome that scenario to fill those holes at WR/RT/RB/FS/CB/LB. I would welcome it if the Browns had 6 first and 2d round picks.
-
Sounds like you've been hanging around with Jed Clampett.
In a round about way, most of my life.
-
I think we just let H & H do what they do and if u dont like go root for another team. I will be happy with what ever they do. Even if its not what I woulda done. Nothin is as bad as watching mangina on draft day.....tnat zhit was a phucking joke
I think we just let H & H do what they do and if u dont like go root for another team. I will be happy with what ever they do. Even if its not what I woulda done. Nothin is as bad as watching mangina on draft day.....tnat zhit was a phucking joke
So sitting idly by and accepting whatever this regime does, good move or bad, is fine with you because you like these guys.
But whatever Mangini or (insert name here) did isn't acceptable, because you didn't want us to hire them in the first place.
Got it.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Everyone on the Browns save for Joe Thomas, Alex Mack and Phil Taylor are from outside the first round... Is it a coincidence that those are our best players? We need more first round talen on this team to compete. The Browns have 2 picks in the first round, they should add two big first round names to the above 3.
I'll only look at what Heckert has done and ignore the awful talent evaluator that was Mangini, and the troubled Phil Savage. Id much rather have twice as much 2nd and high 3rd round talent than first round talent (excluding QBs). I believe that would make us a much better team both short and long term. IMO the top 10 is really valuable for QBs, LTs, a #1 CB, and Dline or a cant miss talent such as a Calvin Johnson (mayyyybe Trent is one of those, but I think the positional importance of one RB is very low). No chance at a QB this year, we have the LT and CB, and there is a lack of Dline talent this year. Obviously the best players will go top 10, and you have a better shot at getting for example a better WR in the top 10 than in the second round, but I'd argue that if you could get 2 second rounders by dropping 10 spots in the first round, you do it in a heartbeat this year.
I'll only look at what Heckert has done and ignore the awful talent evaluator that was Mangini,
ok i have agreed with u until this statement. mangini a terrible talent evaluator? GTFO. he set up the jets for years to come learning from belibitch to build from the middle out. mangold a bad pick? how about revis? 2 guys that are def HOFs right now.
what/who did he pick while he was with cleveland? yeah, go back and check. you are wrong on this one cribbs.
BTW. can't we draft claiborn #4 to have him knock WRs and blitz the QB while he also returns Ps and KOs? meanwhile retiring cribbs to the bench where he belongs......unless he starts at QB where he should have been all along?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login