Skip to content

Totally Gorey

Political Discussion
39 8 1.9k
  • So you think the authors made the wrong conclusion?

    I agree about it not being the best sampling. Voluntary polls are not the best. I've lied before in an attempt to get into surveys and discussions that pay participants (only because I did one through the same site before and actually got paid)

  • Yes Woody, I think so. The authors wanted to show that those with higher math and science literacy would make the "right" decision and believe in AGW, climate change, severe weather - take your pick, it's a moving target LOL.

    What do you think about the study?

  • I think the level of scientific knowledge they graded on was so low it barely tells you anything about how someone's scientific understanding affects their perceived threat of global warming. My point was relating the scientists that actually study climate change to the average American. Not someone who barely got a GED to an average American (unless I am underestimating America...).

    If you do take there level of scientific testing as it is then I agree with their conclusion that a person's perceived threat of global warming is more determined by cultural and moral values than their scientific knowledge. This is seen in the graph that shows each spectrum of cultural views split on the threat. Increase someone's scientific knowledge and their data finds that they are only more firm in their position on whether or not global warming is a threat. This, as they pointed out, probably has a lot to do with how politicized the issue is.

    The authors of this study don't "want" to specifically show anything. They just want to do the best job they can in accurately reading the data and reaching the right conclusions. If it shows one thing, so be it. If it shows the opposite, that's fine too.

    The only saving grace is that both cultural/moral sects believed nuclear power was less of a threat as their intelligence went up. This gives me some hope for the future of that industry.

  • The study was biased because the point of it all was to find out how to make skeptics believe in global warming. The answer: peer pressure and collectivism. That was also the point of the "science is settled" survey of scientists, it was a false conclusion advertised to convince the weak minded.

    Turn it around - we can say that people with less literacy in science and math are more likely to believe in global warming. so, taking your opinion that the test for science and math literacy was set very low, the people who believe in GW must be morons.

  • Bunker said:

    woody doesn't think, he waits to be told what to say or just hops on some green weenie band wagon even if its a bunch of lies.

    But you are a Christian because...

  • Actually, no. Don't respond to that.

    I shouldn't use that as a way to show you make no sense. That's only gonna get us off track and piss people off.

    I should know better than to even respond to you.

  • Actually, no. Don't respond to that.

    I shouldn't use that as a way to show you make no sense. That's only gonna get us off track and piss people off.

    I should know better than to even respond to you.

    @mld-woody said:

    Actually, no. Don't respond to that.

    I shouldn't use that as a way to show you make no sense. That's only gonna get us off track and piss people off.

    I should know better than to even respond to you.

    This

  • Once again, Little Johnny Woodpecker chucks wood emotionally,

    because he doesn't have a clue otherwise.

    And, isn't very smart. No common sense.

    Little Johnnie Woodpecker has nothin but insults to try to prove

    he has a clue.

    So, there ya go.

    He doesn't have one. He and Heck are quite a pair.

  • Once again, Little Johnny Woodpecker chucks wood emotionally,

    because he doesn't have a clue otherwise.

    And, isn't very smart. No common sense.

    Little Johnnie Woodpecker has nothin but insults to try to prove

    he has a clue.

    So, there ya go.

    He doesn't have one. He and Heck are quite a pair.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Once again, Little Johnny Woodpecker chucks wood emotionally,

    because he doesn't have a clue otherwise.

    And, isn't very smart. No common sense.

    Little Johnnie Woodpecker has nothin but insults to try to prove

    he has a clue.

    So, there ya go.

    He doesn't have one. He and Heck are quite a pair.

    You're Retarded

    call that whatever reaction you'd like

    but you're Retarded

  • Dang, you just emotiionally cried like the

    sicko lib freak whiner in at the top of the thread.

    Congrats. You just proved us right again.

    and again. and again.

  • Lol, I should just know better than to respond to you or Bunker

    I also noticed I owe Z a reply