Skip to content

Anal And Oral Sex Taught To... 5Th Graders?

Political Discussion
72 9 2.6k
  • before enough is enough?

    It's a war on American families - because they want to break the link of Americanism from parents to children.

    Like... the naxi youth camps did.

    This calls for serious action - criminal charges are in order, I figure.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/raping-their-innocence-parents-outraged-after-school-principal-allegedly-teaches5th-graders-about-oral-anal-sex/

  • Americanism? I didn't even know that was a word...

    I think we should just tell kids God doesn't want them to do it until they're married. Tell them they can only have sex once they get married. Then, don't tell them anything else. Don't talk about the dangers or the act of doing it or anything. Just let them go with no info and the fear of God in their heads.

    I mean, that totally works right?..................

    awesome quote from a parent

    “Basically, how I feel is, it’s just the same as raping somebody..."

  • On the bright side woody can supplement his college in come by performing classroom demonstrations....

    😮

    WSS

  • On the bright side woody can supplement his college in come by performing classroom demonstrations....

    😮

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    On the bright side woody can supplement his college in come by performing classroom demonstrations....

    😮

    WSS

    .... Are.... Are you saying you want to suck my dick?

    That might be commonplace in the theater world Steve but it's kinda throwing me off now.

  • @westside-steve said:

    On the bright side woody can supplement his college in come by performing classroom demonstrations....

    😮

    WSS

    .... Are.... Are you saying you want to suck my dick?

    That might be commonplace in the theater world Steve but it's kinda throwing me off now.

    @mld-woody said:

    .... Are.... Are you saying you want to suck my dick?

    That might be commonplace in the theater world Steve but it's kinda throwing me off now.

    In the words of coach Sandusky "Now It's your turn."

    😉

    WSS

  • And, just an f y I, that was indeed common place amongst the theater community.

    Which is probably the biggest reason my views on that subject are as liberal as they are.

    But just an aside: have you noticed across the board tendency here to insult each other by suggesting that one's opponent is gay?

    WSS

  • And, just an f y I, that was indeed common place amongst the theater community.

    Which is probably the biggest reason my views on that subject are as liberal as they are.

    But just an aside: have you noticed across the board tendency here to insult each other by suggesting that one's opponent is gay?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And, just an f y I, that was indeed common place amongst the theater community.

    Which is probably the biggest reason my views on that subject are as liberal as they are.

    But just an aside: have you noticed across the board tendency here to insult each other by suggesting that one's opponent is gay?

    WSS

    lol, outside of this instance I rarely do that. I mean, in this case I made the joke more because it was set up.

    The real offenders are T, Cal, Bunker and the like. They throw down the gay insults all the time. I think it has to do with the fact they don't like gays and are therefore insulting someone else like that is a real insult in their eyes.

    But yeah, we're like middle schoolers

    I'm sure being one of the few straight guys made you pretty popular among the ladies though.

  • @westside-steve said:

    And, just an f y I, that was indeed common place amongst the theater community.

    Which is probably the biggest reason my views on that subject are as liberal as they are.

    But just an aside: have you noticed across the board tendency here to insult each other by suggesting that one's opponent is gay?

    WSS

    lol, outside of this instance I rarely do that. I mean, in this case I made the joke more because it was set up.

    The real offenders are T, Cal, Bunker and the like. They throw down the gay insults all the time. I think it has to do with the fact they don't like gays and are therefore insulting someone else like that is a real insult in their eyes.

    But yeah, we're like middle schoolers

    I'm sure being one of the few straight guys made you pretty popular among the ladies though.

    @mld-woody said:

    lol, outside of this instance I rarely do that. I mean, in this case I made the joke more because it was set up.

    The real offenders are T, Cal, Bunker and the like. They throw down the gay insults all the time. I think it has to do with the fact they don't like gays and are therefore insulting someone else like that is a real insult in their eyes.

    But yeah, we're like middle schoolers

    I'm sure being one of the few straight guys made you pretty popular among the ladies though.

    Among the guys too.....😮!!!!

    But let's just say in theatre department there are more kathy bates than jennifer connelly's.

    WSS 😉

  • @mld-woody said:

    lol, outside of this instance I rarely do that. I mean, in this case I made the joke more because it was set up.

    The real offenders are T, Cal, Bunker and the like. They throw down the gay insults all the time. I think it has to do with the fact they don't like gays and are therefore insulting someone else like that is a real insult in their eyes.

    But yeah, we're like middle schoolers

    I'm sure being one of the few straight guys made you pretty popular among the ladies though.

    Among the guys too.....😮!!!!

    But let's just say in theatre department there are more kathy bates than jennifer connelly's.

    WSS 😉

    @westside-steve said:

    Among the guys too.....😮!!!!

    But let's just say in theatre department there are more kathy bates than jennifer connelly's.

    WSS 😉

    lol

    Then second joke was probably funny too but I'll have to Google those names later haha

  • This class should be taught by Sandusky.

  • which is just one more reason that libs demand that schools be funded without depending on property taxes.

    They do this perversion garbage to kids... people can slam the prop tax door in their faces and make them be sorry.

    with automatic fed funding.... the perverts can do anything they want, and they aren't accountable to the people in the

    school district.

    Ditto, the vile opposition to school vouchers to private schools.

    It's trend. Anybody not see it?

    (Little Johnnie Woodpecker isn't smart enough to have a valid answer, so excuse him... anybody else?)

  • Yeah. I also don't have an answer to why the broccoli monster keeps eating children...

    Homeschool you kids so they can become awkward as fuck.

    Or take them to a private school so they can feel stuck up and better than everyone else

    your choice

    (just what I've noticed)

  • Yeah. I also don't have an answer to why the broccoli monster keeps eating children...

    Homeschool you kids so they can become awkward as fuck.

    Or take them to a private school so they can feel stuck up and better than everyone else

    your choice

    (just what I've noticed)

  • "Where is your scientific data for that, you ignorant ass"

    heh.

  • Getting back to the SUBJECT OF THE THREAD...

    I never said anything about gay nothin.

    It's about arrogantly, and destructively attacking the American family. It isn't just about gay fraudulent "marriage"..

    it's about taking the role and respect away from parents.

    That's how they intend to change the fabric of society.

    In the short term, there needs to be criminal charges.

    Or, the parents need to stop the funding of such a school system that would condone this garbage.

    Protect the children from this LIBERAL sickness.

  • So, this is the article on the story that's not off of Fox News or TheBlaze... and shockingly its a lot more level headed

    Some in Onalaska say sex education talk went too far

    SEATTLE—

    In the small town of Onalaska, some parents are upset after their 5th-grade students were given a sex education class that they believe was too graphic and racy for 10- and 11-year-old children.

    Because of the sex education class given students last week, parent Curtis Pannkuk said, “Our daughter did not want to go back to school, she cried all the way to school today.”

    The class was about HIV and STDs, but some parents said that when the school's principal, who was also the instructor, was asked by a 5th-grade student about oral and anal sex, she explained about those sex acts and her answer, according to some parents, was borderline pornographic.

    “When you hit those levels in the sexual acts, might as well hand them a Kama Sutra book or something, you know?” parent James Gilliland said. “It’s just not right for kids to learn.”

    Since 1988, state law has required some sort of sex education beginning at 5th grade. Superintendent Scott Fentor said the principal stuck to state requirements.

    “In reality, she stuck to the curriculum, it`s pretty difficult to talk about STDs or sexually transmitted diseases without explaining what that is,” or how it’s transmitted, he said.

    “Kids leaving 5th grade and moving into middle school start getting exposed to a lot more information, and we know that`s the age where many children start to become sexually active, unfortunately. And that`s a scary thought, (but) that`s the truth,” Fenter said.

    He added that the district sent a notice to parents on March 26, he said, telling of the program and that they had a right to review the curriculum April 10. Three parents showed up, he said, and only one to two parents opted to pull their kids out of the program.

    Onalaska, in Lewis County, is about 73 miles south of Tacoma.

    Tell me Cal, how would you have reacted if a 5th grade student asked you about oral and anal sex in a sex ed class?

    "Those don't exist! Jesus and God always watch you! You can't toch anyone until you're married!"

  • 1. You didn't say where your story was from. link. Come on, apply your own snideness to yourself just once.

    2. If I had been the principal? I I wouldn't have had the class in the first place in that manner.There are many ways

    to talk about the birds and the bees without giving kids a preview of what they should know about 5 years down the line.

    It's the PARENTS who should be teaching their children. Dammit, it isn't up to the stupid ass state gov or schools to

    teach graphic garbage. Not all children are the same in development - and inquisitiveness. Parents. The state and

    NEA etc etc, all lib dirtbags... need to get their noses out of trying to replace parents altogether, and make sure kids learn

    to READ, and do MATH and SCIENCE well.

    Add in the taking of a kids' lunch away from him - and the antagonism towards kids' Christian PERSONAL prayers,

    and the political indoctrination (the Obamao song, etc), and the anti-American hatefulness by some teachers...

    it's a serious taking America apart - stopping parents from teaching their children THEIR OWN VALUES.

    Libs in teaching want to give children the liberal/perverted values... of their own. It has to stop. The backlash is coming.

    I hope Obamao doesn't get his "civilian security force" in place before then....

    The liberals/marxists/progressives/perverts are at war with the rest of America - they are battling at every front.

  • So I had a link at the beginning.... Click it for the source

    You went on a little rant there, I'm not sure if any of it is true but whatever.

    The parents were able to get a preview of the material and pull their kids if they liked. No one was forced.

    And you want to wait until kids are sophomores to teach them sex ed? What fantasy world do you live in? Same one where abstinence only ed works I guess...

  • the thread title was not part of the material.

    It was an impromptu addition by the perverted principal.

    It was unnecessary. And the idea that you should teach and gross out fifth graders

    because you don't want to wait until they are sophomores?

    The parents should decide.

    Face it, Woody. You aren't old enough to not be a kid, you have no life experience to

    know what you are talking about.

    It's time to grow up into an adult, and stop looking to Heck for your bottle.

  • You're Retarded.

    I don't know what you are attacking about my source, the link is right there.

    Also, the parents were able to remove their kids if they wanted. No one is forcing then to take this class.

    Great, you don't want to "gross out" fifth graders. But whatever fantasy world you live in where you think waiting until 10th grade is ridiculous.

    Finally, you never answered my question. You're there, a kid asks you about anal and oral sex. How do you answer? Saying "Well I'd never have the class to begun with" is not an answer.