Josh Gordon Signs
-
I wonder what number Gordon is going to wear? Colt has 12, but I'm sure if they get rid of Colt soon (which I hope they don't) he'll wear 12.
I wonder what number Gordon is going to wear? Colt has 12, but I'm sure if they get rid of Colt soon (which I hope they don't) he'll wear 12.
He is a wide receiver. He needs to wear a number in the 80s. Since 3s are wild (BW3, TR33) make it 83.
-
What if he wore 13? Then we'd have 3, 13, 23, 33, and 43 locked down by awesome players.
-
What if he wore 13? Then we'd have 3, 13, 23, 33, and 43 locked down by awesome players.
What if he wore 13? Then we'd have 3, 13, 23, 33, and 43 locked down by awesome players.
Thirteen is taken. Here are the wearers of all the "3" numbers:
3 Brandon Weeden
13 Rod Windsor
23 Joe Haden
33 Trent Richardson
43 TJ Ward
53 Garth Gerhart
63 Jake Anderson
73 Joe Thomas
83 Bert Reed
93 John "The Sausage King" Hughes
-
Yo, this is it though, in a few more days T-3300 will sign and then Weeden will sign and then the commish can sign the superbowl trophy over to the Browns.
The Browns just went into BEASTMODE yo! This cat Gordon will be like a putty, he's so young and raw, but he is just prototype material to be shaped into a killing machine. 6'10" wingspan!@!@ - This kid can could almost hit his head on a basketball rim... that's 10' tall~ If you take his wingspan and cut it in half, that's 3'5", then minus some for the body between his arms...I don't know- but he could probably get like TWELVE AND A HALF FEET INTO THE AIR!!!!
Yo!!! Greg Little is a bad dude, BUT, put Gordon on one side and Little on the other and... it's gonna take the top off the defense... This means that Trent is going to be matched up 1-on-1 for a TD! I don't know about you but I've got my money on Richardson to win that fight DAMN NEAR EVERYTIME!
I'm soo freaking HYPED UP right now and I wish the Fucking Eagles Game Was on TONIGHT.
Yo, this is it though, in a few more days T-3300 will sign and then Weeden will sign and then the commish can sign the superbowl trophy over to the Browns.
The Browns just went into BEASTMODE yo! This cat Gordon will be like a putty, he's so young and raw, but he is just prototype material to be shaped into a killing machine. 6'10" wingspan!@!@ - This kid can could almost hit his head on a basketball rim... that's 10' tall~ If you take his wingspan and cut it in half, that's 3'5", then minus some for the body between his arms...I don't know- but he could probably get like TWELVE AND A HALF FEET INTO THE AIR!!!!
Yo!!! Greg Little is a bad dude, BUT, put Gordon on one side and Little on the other and... it's gonna take the top off the defense... This means that Trent is going to be matched up 1-on-1 for a TD! I don't know about you but I've got my money on Richardson to win that fight DAMN NEAR EVERYTIME!
I'm soo freaking HYPED UP right now and I wish the Fucking Eagles Game Was on TONIGHT.
Easy on the caffeine dude...
Or your choice of upper...
I do applaud this team's push to add potential playmakers onto the team. It seems a little out of the ordinary around here (which is probably a good thing). BUT, you have to remember the key word is POTENTIAL. It's exciting to see some talented young guys come to Cleveland, but don't set expectations too high just yet. We don't need to be booing all of our 1st & 2nd rounders in the home opener if we don't come out and dominate.
This team is starting to look like a 6 to 9 win team. Hard to predict anything more accurate b/c most of these guys on offense haven't played a snap in the NFL. But who knows, if the ball bounces our way a couple times, we might end up on the higher end of that range.
Go Browns!!!!
-
-
Just cut Rod Windsor. I've never even heard of him hahaha
Just cut Rod Windsor. I've never even heard of him hahaha
You may get your wish considering the makeup of the WR corps now.
-
Your FO is good. They don't even have all their 2012 draft picks signed and they already have one from 2013 inked.
-
Your FO is good. They don't even have all their 2012 draft picks signed and they already have one from 2013 inked.
Your FO is good. They don't even have all their 2012 draft picks signed and they already have one from 2013 inked.
nice.
hey we can either cry the blues or act as though we are the baddest MFers on the block.
didn't like this past years draft after the first three picks. hope they are all that they are touted to be.
how about these other guys that we've expected to step up at the WR position in the last couple of years. can the real carlton mitchell pleez stand up? little undoubtedly will be our #1 followed by massaqua, mitchell/norwood and maybe gordon could top both of them if he can buy some weed blocking anabolic enzyme (or whatever it's called).
that with TR and hopefully matured cameron @TE could spell probs for our opponents defense.
let's just get thru training camp without any major injuries.
-
I wonder what number Gordon is going to wear? Colt has 12, but I'm sure if they get rid of Colt soon (which I hope they don't) he'll wear 12.
He is a wide receiver. He needs to wear a number in the 80s. Since 3s are wild (BW3, TR33) make it 83.
He is a wide receiver. He needs to wear a number in the 80s. Since 3s are wild (BW3, TR33) make it 83.
Come on Gip- you should know better than that- they let receivers wear numbers in the teens now. Remember Butterfingers Braylon #17?
-
Dynasty.
-
I think we can expect to see TR signed some time today or tomorrow. RGIII just got his deal done so TR has something to go on now.
-
He is a wide receiver. He needs to wear a number in the 80s. Since 3s are wild (BW3, TR33) make it 83.
Come on Gip- you should know better than that- they let receivers wear numbers in the teens now. Remember Butterfingers Braylon #17?
Come on Gip- you should know better than that- they let receivers wear numbers in the teens now. Remember Butterfingers Braylon #17?
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
-
Come on Gip- you should know better than that- they let receivers wear numbers in the teens now. Remember Butterfingers Braylon #17?
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
Yup Gip, that's exactly what happened.
-
Come on Gip- you should know better than that- they let receivers wear numbers in the teens now. Remember Butterfingers Braylon #17?
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
-
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
Otto wore #60 for a long time.
Galen Fiss was what, #34??
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
What they allow and what they should do are two different things. For most of my life WRs were required to wear numbers in the 80s. Why did that need to change?
(I think it was because some team ended up retiring the numbers of any half way decent player they had on their team and ran out of 80s numbers) Single digit and teen numbers were reserved for QBs and Kickers.
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
College numbers can be all over the place. In the pros however I like the old numbering system.
QBs/K singles or teens
DB/RBs 20s/30s/40s
LBs 50s
Centers/Guards 60s
DTs &OTs 70s
WRs/TEs 80s
DEs/DTs 90s
-
I'm probably in the minority on this one....but I kinda like watching college games and seeing linebackers or DB's with single digit numbers. It's kinda cool seeing numbers all over the place. I want to see a QB with the number 91 at some point in a college game.
Otto wore #60 for a long time.
Galen Fiss was what, #34??
-
I could have sworn that I've seen receivers wearing numbers in the teens in old highlights...
-
I could have sworn that I've seen receivers wearing numbers in the teens in old highlights...
Receivers have been allowed to wear numbers in the teens since the 1973.
It has not been that long, I am almost certain of that. 1993 maybe or even 2003.
-
Receivers have been allowed to wear numbers in the teens since the 1973.
It has not been that long, I am almost certain of that. 1993 maybe or even 2003.
It has not been that long, I am almost certain of that. 1993 maybe or even 2003.
Lance Alworth wore 19 through his whole career.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login