Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. New Spew Thread About Colt Mccoy

New Spew Thread About Colt Mccoy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
27 Posts 12 Posters 2.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T The Cysko Kid

    He also implies in that article that he wants to be with the browns even as a backup, and that he wants to be along for the ride.

    I don't think colt as a backup is going to be a problem. Is sure as hell rather have him backing weeden up than seneca.

    hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 20k Posts
    • 5k Reputation
    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    He also implies in that article that he wants to be with the browns even as a backup, and that he wants to be along for the ride.

    I don't think colt as a backup is going to be a problem. Is sure as hell rather have him backing weeden up than seneca.

    ^+1. The Browns could do a lot worse than McCoy as the backup QB.

    thenew23T 1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    Quote Reply
    • hoortaH hoorta

      @the-cysko-kid said:

      He also implies in that article that he wants to be with the browns even as a backup, and that he wants to be along for the ride.

      I don't think colt as a backup is going to be a problem. Is sure as hell rather have him backing weeden up than seneca.

      ^+1. The Browns could do a lot worse than McCoy as the backup QB.

      thenew23 thenew23T
      • 2k Posts
      • 233 Reputation
      thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @hoorta said:

      ^+1. The Browns could do a lot worse than McCoy as the backup QB.

      Yeah, their backup could be Seneca Wallace

      #Justsayin'
      1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • edromeo edromeoE
        • 17 Posts
        • 1 Reputation
        edromeoE edromeo wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I am a visiting Redskins fan.

        I'm just curious about how Browns fans feel about Colt McCoy and Mike Holmgren.

        From the outside looking in it seems like McCoy had potential but only produced to the level of the talent around and scheme around him.

        And thanks to Holmgren/Shurmur the talent and the coaching wasn't very good.

        And now it seems like they're tieing their lack of success around Colt McCoy's neck to shift the blame away from themselves.

        I find the differing perceptions between Colt McCoy and Sam Bradford interesting.

        Other then McCoy playing in a much more difficult division their career production this far has been similar if not identical.

        Yet McCoy is getting the axe as a starter and Bradford is entering this seasonn as the unquestioned starter.

        Must be good to be a 1st round pick and benefit from being perceived as a franchise QB.

        The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • WRREBEL WRREBELW
          • 2k Posts
          • 87 Reputation
          WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
          #7

          The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

          edromeoE nickersN 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • miktoxic miktoxicM
            • 13k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
            #8

            bradford had some of the same problems surrounding him that mccoy had last year. no protection and no talent (other than steven jackson) .

            hell i couldn't even tell you who the ram's #1 receiver is, just like i doubt anyone could tell you the name of the browns #1.

            all i know is that under the guidance of pat shurmur neither progressed. instead they regressed.

            holmgren is just a FOM (fat old man) collecting a paycheck and bringing along some of his friends for a ride.

            i know he means the best for the team but he is set in his old ways and won't change for nuthin. and the thing with drafting a qb every year bugs the piss out of me.

            DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • choco chocoC
              • 4k Posts
              • 352 Reputation
              chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
              #9

              ^ disgruntled

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • miktoxic miktoxicM
                • 13k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                #10

                no. pissed off.

                don't worry choco we'll all be shiny happy people at the end of the year, just like you are today.

                i guess in your world no one is held accountable for anything. must be nice.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • miktoxicM miktoxic

                  bradford had some of the same problems surrounding him that mccoy had last year. no protection and no talent (other than steven jackson) .

                  hell i couldn't even tell you who the ram's #1 receiver is, just like i doubt anyone could tell you the name of the browns #1.

                  all i know is that under the guidance of pat shurmur neither progressed. instead they regressed.

                  holmgren is just a FOM (fat old man) collecting a paycheck and bringing along some of his friends for a ride.

                  i know he means the best for the team but he is set in his old ways and won't change for nuthin. and the thing with drafting a qb every year bugs the piss out of me.

                  DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                  • 28k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @miktoxic said:

                  bradford had some of the same problems surrounding him that mccoy had last year. no protection and no talent (other than steven jackson) .

                  hell i couldn't even tell you who the ram's #1 receiver is, just like i doubt anyone could tell you the name of the browns #1.

                  all i know is that under the guidance of pat shurmur neither progressed. instead they regressed.

                  holmgren is just a FOM (fat old man) collecting a paycheck and bringing along some of his friends for a ride.

                  i know he means the best for the team but he is set in his old ways and won't change for nuthin. and the thing with drafting a qb every year bugs the piss out of me.

                  You got it wrong Mik. He is not a FOM. He is a FORM (FAT OLD RICH MAN).

                  "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  👍
                  Quote Reply
                  • WRREBELW WRREBEL

                    The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

                    edromeo edromeoE
                    • 17 Posts
                    • 1 Reputation
                    edromeoE edromeo wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @wrrebel said:

                    The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

                    So, if McCoy had what you perceive to be ideal arm and nfl size you would be okay with not drafting Weeden and keeping him as your starter?

                    Also, if Bradford has the ideal arm and size why hasn't he been significantly more productive then McCoy thus far in their careers?

                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • edromeoE edromeo

                      I am a visiting Redskins fan.

                      I'm just curious about how Browns fans feel about Colt McCoy and Mike Holmgren.

                      From the outside looking in it seems like McCoy had potential but only produced to the level of the talent around and scheme around him.

                      And thanks to Holmgren/Shurmur the talent and the coaching wasn't very good.

                      And now it seems like they're tieing their lack of success around Colt McCoy's neck to shift the blame away from themselves.

                      I find the differing perceptions between Colt McCoy and Sam Bradford interesting.

                      Other then McCoy playing in a much more difficult division their career production this far has been similar if not identical.

                      Yet McCoy is getting the axe as a starter and Bradford is entering this seasonn as the unquestioned starter.

                      Must be good to be a 1st round pick and benefit from being perceived as a franchise QB.

                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                      • 57k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @edromeo said:

                      I am a visiting Redskins fan.

                      I'm just curious about how Browns fans feel about Colt McCoy and Mike Holmgren.

                      From the outside looking in it seems like McCoy had potential but only produced to the level of the talent around and scheme around him.

                      And thanks to Holmgren/Shurmur the talent and the coaching wasn't very good.

                      And now it seems like they're tieing their lack of success around Colt McCoy's neck to shift the blame away from themselves.

                      Well, the powers that be, Holmgren and Shurmur are loathe to blame themselves for their failures to provide talent to this team, thus they must find a scapegoat in McCoy....not that McCoy didn't give them ammo to use himself as the scapegoat. I personally put the blame 75/25, the 75 on Shurmur/H&H, half of the rest on McCoy, the other half on other offensive players.

                      Maybe Brandon Weeden will be much superior to Colt...he will need to be, because if they have another do nothing offense, then who will get the blame? A rookie QB/RB or the coach/GM/Pres.

                      I find the differing perceptions between Colt McCoy and Sam Bradford interesting.

                      Other then McCoy playing in a much more difficult division their career production this far has been similar if not identical.

                      Yet McCoy is getting the axe as a starter and Bradford is entering this seasonn as the unquestioned starter.

                      Must be good to be a 1st round pick and benefit from being perceived as a franchise QB.

                      Yes, I agree that quite frankly, there is little else to differentiate them.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • edromeoE edromeo

                        @wrrebel said:

                        The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

                        So, if McCoy had what you perceive to be ideal arm and nfl size you would be okay with not drafting Weeden and keeping him as your starter?

                        Also, if Bradford has the ideal arm and size why hasn't he been significantly more productive then McCoy thus far in their careers?

                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                        • 57k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @edromeo said:

                        So, if McCoy had what you perceive to be ideal arm and nfl size you would be okay with not drafting Weeden and keeping him as your starter?

                        Also, if Bradford has the ideal arm and size why hasn't he been significantly more productive then McCoy thus far in their careers?

                        Because he ain't really that much better?

                        H 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • The GipperT The Gipper

                          @edromeo said:

                          So, if McCoy had what you perceive to be ideal arm and nfl size you would be okay with not drafting Weeden and keeping him as your starter?

                          Also, if Bradford has the ideal arm and size why hasn't he been significantly more productive then McCoy thus far in their careers?

                          Because he ain't really that much better?

                          Horn of Lake Erie H
                          • 115 Posts
                          • 7 Reputation
                          H Horn of Lake Erie wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @the-gipper said:

                          Because he ain't really that much better?

                          Agreed. Bradford is rather underwhelming IMO

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • miktoxic miktoxicM
                            • 13k Posts
                            • 1k Reputation
                            miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            wait a minute. so you're saying bradford is a bust? their whole team has lacked (except at RB) talent ala the browns. their OL is terrible.

                            boy how soon you guys forget. wasn't he the one everyone was clamoring for sorta like luck and RGIII this year? i guess no one can evaluate talent in the NFL.

                            The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • WRREBELW WRREBEL

                              The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

                              nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                              • 14k Posts
                              • 5k Reputation
                              nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              @wrrebel said:

                              The difference is Bradford has the ideal arm and size for the nfl..

                              bradford is not that big..but his arm is decent.

                              Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • edromeo edromeoE
                                • 17 Posts
                                • 1 Reputation
                                edromeoE edromeo wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                What do you guys think is gonna happen to McCoy?

                                Trade? Release?

                                I bet he ends up on the Packers, I remember McCarthy liked him coming out of the draft.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • edromeo edromeoE
                                  • 17 Posts
                                  • 1 Reputation
                                  edromeoE edromeo wrote on last edited by
                                  #19
                                  Maybe Brandon Weeden will be much superior to Colt...he will need to be, because if they have another do nothing offense, then who will get the blame? A rookie QB/RB or the coach/GM/Pres.
                                  Brandon Weeden has a lot going for him that Colt did not:

                                  o Trent Richardson 'nuff said

                                  o Brad Childress as OC instead of Pat Shurmur

                                  o Mitchell Schwartz

                                  o Josh Gordon

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • choco chocoC
                                    • 4k Posts
                                    • 352 Reputation
                                    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Lol....3 of those poibts are rookies....the other has only ever called plays one year of his career. Shurmur is more senior in that regard.

                                    edromeoE 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • chocoC choco

                                      Lol....3 of those poibts are rookies....the other has only ever called plays one year of his career. Shurmur is more senior in that regard.

                                      edromeo edromeoE
                                      • 17 Posts
                                      • 1 Reputation
                                      edromeoE edromeo wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @choco said:

                                      Lol....3 of those poibts are rookies....the other has only ever called plays one year of his career. Shurmur is more senior in that regard.

                                      lol, i'm scratching my head as to what your point is....because the players I mentioned are rookies they can't help the Browns offense?

                                      Your second point is flat out incorrect.

                                      Brad Childress has not only called plays for more then 1 season he has more experience in coaching (even as a HC) then Pat Shurmur.

                                      Get your facts straight.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • choco chocoC
                                        • 4k Posts
                                        • 352 Reputation
                                        chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        is it really necessary to pull the articles to prove a point you should already know? its not like its little known secret in the NFL that chilly didn't call plays in philly...

                                        ok...first of all....chilly is just a pair of eyes in the box. notice how shaw says he didn't call plays in philly?

                                        http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/brad-childress-wont-call-the-plays-in-cleveland/

                                        second, a little blurb about only calling plays in his rookie year.

                                        ill post it so you can read it...very, very slowly.

                                        Childress called the Vikings’ plays in 2006 before assigning those responsibilities to offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell, who’s now with the Seattle Seahawks. Although Bevell assumed play-calling duties for the remainder of Childress’ tenure with the Vikings, Childress was heavily involved with the offense.

                                        -> from http://www.ohio.com/blogs/cleveland-browns/cleveland-browns-1.270107/browns-hire-brad-childress-as-their-offensive-coordinator-1.272731

                                        so what was that again you said about facts? are these "facts" supposed to be open for interpretation, or merely statements that one feels are correct even though they've done no research on the subject?

                                        im trying not to be a dick, but try reading up before getting all contentious. these results were all from the first page of a google search....seems you dont know what you think you know.

                                        wrt 3 rookies being weedens benefit? lets just say colt had a bunch of rookies too....and he sucked. point being, you dont depend on rookies. you hope....but it seems many are expecting things from these kids before even stepping on the field. cart before the horse, methinks.

                                        edromeoE 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • miktoxicM miktoxic

                                          wait a minute. so you're saying bradford is a bust? their whole team has lacked (except at RB) talent ala the browns. their OL is terrible.

                                          boy how soon you guys forget. wasn't he the one everyone was clamoring for sorta like luck and RGIII this year? i guess no one can evaluate talent in the NFL.

                                          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                          • 57k Posts
                                          • 4k Reputation
                                          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @miktoxic said:

                                          wait a minute. so you're saying bradford is a bust? their whole team has lacked (except at RB) talent ala the browns. their OL is terrible.

                                          boy how soon you guys forget. wasn't he the one everyone was clamoring for sorta like luck and RGIII this year? i guess no one can evaluate talent in the NFL.

                                          I don't know what anyone else was saying, but I am saying that having watched Bradford and McCoy in college for the years they played I saw very little if any difference in their capability as a QB. And I think the answer is: they both may be capable of playing/even starting in the NFL, but I saw nothing that would say these guys are extra special and will become stars in the pros.

                                          By the way, the same can be said about Matt Barkley of USC. Overhyped merely because he plays at USC. How well have those USC QBs done lately? Palmer had a few good years, but has been mediocre for longer. Leinert a backup at best. Sanchez....mediocre.

                                          Honest, USC pales in comparison to either Cal or Stanford at producing NFL QBs.

                                          miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better đź’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate