Hurting The Base?
-
So I just looked at evil conservatives and it looks like T has been banned from that too.
I didn't see any photos of me.
WSS
So I just looked at evil conservatives and it looks like T has been banned from that too.
I didn't see any photos of me.
WSS
In the first post. Not sure what prompted it to be posted but something nefarious I assume.
http://www.evilconservatives.net/showthread.php?1357-Think-we-have-it-rough/page3
-
I have all sorts of liberal friends. They
are worried sick that Obamao may get reelected. Know what they say?
He's a disgrace to what their parents' Democratic party used to be.
And, that Obamao is making them fear a race war, based on radical class envy and hate.
Some of them have bought guns, which they don't like, and a few even got their CCW.
And one apologized to me, after she got online and actually looked up Saul Alinski, and
the serious Obamao, Hillary, and Jimmy Carter connections. She said she's sick at heart that
she voted for a racist and socialist. Sound like me? Yep. But it's true, just last Sun at our picnic.
-
So I just looked at evil conservatives and it looks like T has been banned from that too.
I didn't see any photos of me.
WSS
In the first post. Not sure what prompted it to be posted but something nefarious I assume.
http://www.evilconservatives.net/showthread.php?1357-Think-we-have-it-rough/page3
In the first post. Not sure what prompted it to be posted but something nefarious I assume.
http://www.evilconservatives.net/showthread.php?1357-Think-we-have-it-rough/page3
Looks like T has been booted off that site too.
His pic of me has been blocked.
Apparently being a jerk on message boards is some kind of hobby.
Too bad, he seems like a good guy one on one.
WSS
-
We're all guilty of it.
-
We're all guilty of it.
We're all guilty of it.
Undoubtably.
-
I mean, I've seen billboards that say, "America, Bless God... Paid for by Tea Party of Ohio." So there's some sort of coherent organization there. That being said, all of the conservative friends I have that are actually involved in politics seem to hate what the Tea Party is doing to the GOP. The GOP would definitely be stronger and better if it wasn't trying to appease these God-fearing fringe types all the way on the right. So long as they pander to that type of base, they're going to lose support in any place outside of the Bible Belt.
I mean, I've seen billboards that say, "America, Bless God... Paid for by Tea Party of Ohio." So there's some sort of coherent organization there. That being said, all of the conservative friends I have that are actually involved in politics seem to hate what the Tea Party is doing to the GOP. The GOP would definitely be stronger and better if it wasn't trying to appease these God-fearing fringe types all the way on the right. So long as they pander to that type of base, they're going to lose support in any place outside of the Bible Belt.
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
-
I mean, I've seen billboards that say, "America, Bless God... Paid for by Tea Party of Ohio." So there's some sort of coherent organization there. That being said, all of the conservative friends I have that are actually involved in politics seem to hate what the Tea Party is doing to the GOP. The GOP would definitely be stronger and better if it wasn't trying to appease these God-fearing fringe types all the way on the right. So long as they pander to that type of base, they're going to lose support in any place outside of the Bible Belt.
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it.
-
I mean, I've seen billboards that say, "America, Bless God... Paid for by Tea Party of Ohio." So there's some sort of coherent organization there. That being said, all of the conservative friends I have that are actually involved in politics seem to hate what the Tea Party is doing to the GOP. The GOP would definitely be stronger and better if it wasn't trying to appease these God-fearing fringe types all the way on the right. So long as they pander to that type of base, they're going to lose support in any place outside of the Bible Belt.
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
But none of them, as far as I know, made a point to go on facebook and show their support for Chick-Fil-A. The only ones who did are the ones who think that we are and should be a Christian nation. Most everyone else, myself included, think the Chick-Fil-A boycott is making those on the left look like as big of idiots as the morons on the right who boycotted Oreo.
Hell. I stand for what CFA's CEO is doing. I think that his personal views are deplorable, but he has every right to voice them. It's money that he's earned and can spend on whatever he damn well pleases. Whatever his views, they're separate from his restaurant chain seeing as they treat every customer equally.
Comics like this are just complete bullshit. And hot damn do I have a craving for some of those little morsels of chicken goodness.
-
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it. Cysko
*********************************
well, there is a serious lack of integrity on the part of liberals.
They don't care if their leaders rape, pillage, snort cocaine, or move toward a marxist dick...tatorship.
they just want their Obamao bucks.
But, I don't believe it's hurting the overall perception nothin.
Most folks are tired of the lefts' smears that end up being bogus.
The rest of folks have principles. Values, Integrity.
The left has win more $$$ no matter what they have to do.
-
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it. Cysko
*********************************
well, there is a serious lack of integrity on the part of liberals.
They don't care if their leaders rape, pillage, snort cocaine, or move toward a marxist dick...tatorship.
they just want their Obamao bucks.
But, I don't believe it's hurting the overall perception nothin.
Most folks are tired of the lefts' smears that end up being bogus.
The rest of folks have principles. Values, Integrity.
The left has win more $$$ no matter what they have to do.
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it. Cysko
*********************************
well, there is a serious lack of integrity on the part of liberals.
They don't care if their leaders rape, pillage, snort cocaine, or move toward a marxist dick...tatorship.
they just want their Obamao bucks.
But, I don't believe it's hurting the overall perception nothin.
Most folks are tired of the lefts' smears that end up being bogus.
The rest of folks have principles. Values, Integrity.
The left has win more $$$ no matter what they have to do.
I don't know any left leaning people that are getting any "Obama bucks" that's where you're wrong. You keep associating everyone who believes in social equality and sexual freedom and gun control as some scum sucking degenerate taking welfare money, when its just not true. I know democrats from drywallers and painters to teachers and fellow engineers to navy officers, and Vietnam combat veterans. Not a one of them is taking "Obama bucks". Do you think Bill Gates is taking Obama bucks? You think Steve Jobs was? That stereotype you're trying to create just isn't true. Why, that's as crazy as saying all republicans are racist homophobe crazy evil white people. It's just not true.
-
True. I shouldn't paint all liberals with the same brush.
I should have referred to the obamao buck woman,
and the entitlement subculture of progressives/democrats/marxists/who cares people.
But even liberals have to admit, Obamao himself, and biden, and Holder, have severely damanged their base.
-
I agree with you Cysco. But remember too that an awful lot of the super rich, including the movers and shakers in the banking industry, seemed like they got a sweet bailout deal no?
Those might be called obama bucks too!
But sure, we go off the deep end.
WSS
-
I agree with you Cysco. But remember too that an awful lot of the super rich, including the movers and shakers in the banking industry, seemed like they got a sweet bailout deal no?
Those might be called obama bucks too!
But sure, we go off the deep end.
WSS
I agree with you Cysco. But remember too that an awful lot of the super rich, including the movers and shakers in the banking industry, seemed like they got a sweet bailout deal no?
Those might be called obama bucks too!
But sure, we go off the deep end.
WSS
Yes I'm sure many of the super rich got bail out money and also stimulus money. But we have no way of knowing what their personal political stances are. Didn't Paul Ryan get some Obama. Bucks for those energy companies?
-
GM. Obamao bucks...
Solyndra. Obamao bucks.
Mortgage bailout. Obamao bucks.
Refusal to enforce laws he doesn't like (marxist dirtbag),
and implements laws that Congress would never pass (fascist)..
and openly knee jerk sides with the leftist black community when the facts are in. (racist inciter)
and intimidates that company from opening a new factory in S. Carolina - the sole reason being that it's a right to work state... (union benefit for votes)..
says Romney wants to put black people back into chains
tells Russia Mendelev whatever that "he will have more options after the election"
I wish some lib would man up and discuss that last one.
-
GM. Obamao bucks...
Solyndra. Obamao bucks.
Mortgage bailout. Obamao bucks.
Refusal to enforce laws he doesn't like (marxist dirtbag),
and implements laws that Congress would never pass (fascist)..
and openly knee jerk sides with the leftist black community when the facts are in. (racist inciter)
and intimidates that company from opening a new factory in S. Carolina - the sole reason being that it's a right to work state... (union benefit for votes)..
says Romney wants to put black people back into chains
tells Russia Mendelev whatever that "he will have more options after the election"
I wish some lib would man up and discuss that last one.
GM. Obamao bucks...
Solyndra. Obamao bucks.
Mortgage bailout. Obamao bucks.
Refusal to enforce laws he doesn't like (marxist dirtbag),
and implements laws that Congress would never pass (fascist)..
and openly knee jerk sides with the leftist black community when the facts are in. (racist inciter)
and intimidates that company from opening a new factory in S. Carolina - the sole reason being that it's a right to work state... (union benefit for votes)..
says Romney wants to put black people back into chains
tells Russia Mendelev whatever that "he will have more options after the election"
I wish some lib would man up and discuss that last one.
Come on Cal. Of course he'd have more options after the election. You don't think Ronald Reagan minded his p's and q's on the election trail? How about Dick Nixon? Couldn't you imagine him saying that?
-
but vapor - maybe your conservative friends think the bible belt faction also have "closeted public disclosure types " not on the fringe as you say, that are willing to stand up, at least with thier votes and join the tea party? I think all you have to do is look at the Chic fila deal.
I dont think the tea party is all that you hear about as being militantly religious... I agree w/ WSS as being a media slant , and smear job.
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it.
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it.
the irony of course is what social conservatives are believing about the democrats and " its demonizing " traits - the occupiers, the LGBT, the social and leftist elite -
but really dont need anymore help damaging its own said perceptions due to its clown prince Obama.and doofus Biden... just sayin
-
Whether or not its a smear job its hurting the overall perception of the republican party way more than the occupy movement is hurting the democratic party. It would probably help mitt romney a lot more if they disbanded and reformed as something else with less sensationalism already attached to it.
the irony of course is what social conservatives are believing about the democrats and " its demonizing " traits - the occupiers, the LGBT, the social and leftist elite -
but really dont need anymore help damaging its own said perceptions due to its clown prince Obama.and doofus Biden... just sayin
the irony of course is what social conservatives are believing about the democrats and " its demonizing " traits - the occupiers, the LGBT, the social and leftist elite -
but really dont need anymore help damaging its own said perceptions due to its clown prince Obama.and doofus Biden... just sayin
Tv is god in this country. The people will do what tv tells them. Why else would everyone advertise on television instead of thousands of billboards? I'm not suggesting that occupiers are better than tea partiers, far from it. I'm saying they are hurting their respective party more. If its because of TVs liberal agenda, then it is.
Also don't forget that Bush's administration damaged the republican partys reputation to the point where Barack Obama won the election by a huge margin. No need to recount that. It wasn't even close. Maybe Baracks administration will accomplish that as well. I think they probably will...in 2016.
-
No. Bush didn't damage the Republican party.
He took action against enemies who murdered so many
of our fellow Americans and tourists on 9/11.
Action to go to war is always unpopular. Especially
when it is unwarranted, and fraud.
Iraq and Afghanistan were not, except for the fraud
by the CIA about wmd, which Bush, and many, many prominent Dems and Reps
in Congress believed.
LBJ was totally unwarranted in going into Vietnam. He didn't hurt his democratic party.
The American people were ready for a change after that.
And Bush didn't run against Obamao. He ran against a wishy washy, weak and boring Rep nominee
got the nomination, which I knew was a big mistake. I campaigned for Bush twice, and proud he won
and was pres for 4 years. But it's silly to label the left's screaming hysteria and hatred for Bush and Cheney
with "universal" hatred.
The left and the media just made it sound that way.
-
No. Bush didn't damage the Republican party.
He took action against enemies who murdered so many
of our fellow Americans and tourists on 9/11.
Action to go to war is always unpopular. Especially
when it is unwarranted, and fraud.
Iraq and Afghanistan were not, except for the fraud
by the CIA about wmd, which Bush, and many, many prominent Dems and Reps
in Congress believed.
LBJ was totally unwarranted in going into Vietnam. He didn't hurt his democratic party.
The American people were ready for a change after that.
And Bush didn't run against Obamao. He ran against a wishy washy, weak and boring Rep nominee
got the nomination, which I knew was a big mistake. I campaigned for Bush twice, and proud he won
and was pres for 4 years. But it's silly to label the left's screaming hysteria and hatred for Bush and Cheney
with "universal" hatred.
The left and the media just made it sound that way.
No. Bush didn't damage the Republican party.
He took action against enemies who murdered so many
of our fellow Americans and tourists on 9/11.
Action to go to war is always unpopular. Especially
when it is unwarranted, and fraud.
Iraq and Afghanistan were not, except for the fraud
by the CIA about wmd, which Bush, and many, many prominent Dems and Reps
in Congress believed.
LBJ was totally unwarranted in going into Vietnam. He didn't hurt his democratic party.
The American people were ready for a change after that.
And Bush didn't run against Obamao. He ran against a wishy washy, weak and boring Rep nominee
got the nomination, which I knew was a big mistake. I campaigned for Bush twice, and proud he won
and was pres for 4 years. But it's silly to label the left's screaming hysteria and hatred for Bush and Cheney
with "universal" hatred.
The left and the media just made it sound that way.
He was president for 8 years cal. As Obama will likely be. If john mccain was a weak candidate, Mitt Romney is even weaker as evidenced by his failure to secure the republican nomination in 2008. I don't know why you'd expect him to win now.
-
Well, the #1 concern of Americans is...
the runaway budget, completely out of control runaway train toward explosives
on a fiscal bridge.
well, I hope that doesn't get me on a no fly list....@@, but it's my fiscal analogy, ya?
And, Paul Ryan.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login