Filthy Pigs
-
Nope
just gay marriage
There is no reason for gays to not be able to get married.
This is correct. There is no reason. They can only point to religion as a reason for gays to not get married, and if we allow religion to dictate law we are no better or different than Iran or Egypt and the dreaded sharia law.
This is correct. There is no reason. They can only point to religion as a reason for gays to not get married, and if we allow religion to dictate law we are no better or different than Iran or Egypt and the dreaded sharia law.
Exactlly correct.
-
Nope
just gay marriage
There is no reason for gays to not be able to get married.
This is correct. There is no reason. They can only point to religion as a reason for gays to not get married, and if we allow religion to dictate law we are no better or different than Iran or Egypt and the dreaded sharia law.
This is correct. There is no reason. They can only point to religion as a reason for gays to not get married, and if we allow religion to dictate law we are no better or different than Iran or Egypt and the dreaded sharia law.
No one wants to debate this? Cal? Bunker? T? So we can settle this forever? You all agree?
-
Im surprised too!? I was expecting more negative reaction from those guys too . .. huh..... oh well, thread ended
-
Already debated it, and nobody listened. It isnt' just religion. It's scientific studies on the importance of both a female and male
parental influence in a child's life.
Logically, why equate 1-3 percent of the population just as normal and commonplace as the 97 percent?
It is NOT. Female/Male bonding/marriage/mating is commonplace throughout all time. To try to pretend
is hasn't been, is just another way to diminish the natual way life is.
Libs want to diminish everything else in that same line of attack - anything that IS...
must be rendered obsolete, or reversed, or paralleled as much as possible, to make it not common is possible.
That's why the gay activists are not satisfied with the civil union idea. Sure, they would have the benefits, they just won't
be ...married. Marriage is the status that they are trying to denigrate into something worthless. That's why they are angry about
the same rights in a civil union. Those rights were what they agonized about. But the ulterior motive was never really about the same rights.
It was about taking down just another insititution of American life. So, once they got their civil unions and their rights.... they went
on to a phoney "marriage" deal The only reason.... destroying another fundamental institution of civilized society - Marriage.
Especially, REAL Marriage in America. Dissing our Constitution. Dissing gun owners. Dissing SUV's. Dissing wealth.
Dissing God and Christianity. They don't care to diss any other religion - because it isn't a prevalent, long standing institution
in our society from the Founding Father days. Dissing patriotism. Dissing the military. Dissing capitalism. Dissing success.
'the phoney gay "marriage" is just another attack on the rest of us.
Sure, they scream about an alleged "97 percent" of scientists supporting mmgw. (false).
But 97 percent of Americans are not gay, and do not believe in gay marriage for themselves. And of course, the libs
ignore the percentage anytime it doesn't fit their anti agenda.
-
What's the difference to you whether its civil union or marriage. For them its the principal. Marriage is not natural. That's ridiculous. Very few animals mate for life. History is chock full of homosexuals and pedophiles. Once upon a time, that was not viewed as abnormal at all. Said scientific studies are rather desperate attempts to discredit gays as people.
Let me ask you a question: you wholeheartedly disagree with scientists on global warming, but are all in for scientists who discredit gays. On not asking you to rethink your position, but could you please acknowledge the huge double standard there?
-
You are making stuff up. Scientists who discredit gays? Where did that come from?
Truth is, that most all of nature is female/male bonding/mating. Because humans are on a much higher level,
society protects it's own health and well being with rules. And marriage is one of those institutions that are
based on society's rules. You can talk gays all you want, and pretend that that would be a real marriage.
But my point is still there, unrefuted. Civil union gets gays those same rights they SAID they wanted.
But that isn't what they really want, after all, as usual. What they want is to take down society's fundamental
bulwarks of civilized society. That is the difference to me. They wanted the civil union overtly. But, that isn't what
the left really wants. It's just an attack on American society.
The next big thing will be marrying in groups. LIke several people. Who knows, seventeen. A hundred. Then
they could all claim marriage dependent exemptions, right? After all, it "would only be fair" right?
bs. It's all bs.
-
You are making stuff up. Scientists who discredit gays? Where did that come from?
Truth is, that most all of nature is female/male bonding/mating. Because humans are on a much higher level,
society protects it's own health and well being with rules. And marriage is one of those institutions that are
based on society's rules. You can talk gays all you want, and pretend that that would be a real marriage.
But my point is still there, unrefuted. Civil union gets gays those same rights they SAID they wanted.
But that isn't what they really want, after all, as usual. What they want is to take down society's fundamental
bulwarks of civilized society. That is the difference to me. They wanted the civil union overtly. But, that isn't what
the left really wants. It's just an attack on American society.
The next big thing will be marrying in groups. LIke several people. Who knows, seventeen. A hundred. Then
they could all claim marriage dependent exemptions, right? After all, it "would only be fair" right?
bs. It's all bs.
You are making stuff up. Scientists who discredit gays? Where did that come from?
Truth is, that most all of nature is female/male bonding/mating. Because humans are on a much higher level,
society protects it's own health and well being with rules. And marriage is one of those institutions that are
based on society's rules. You can talk gays all you want, and pretend that that would be a real marriage.
But my point is still there, unrefuted. Civil union gets gays those same rights they SAID they wanted.
But that isn't what they really want, after all, as usual. What they want is to take down society's fundamental
bulwarks of civilized society. That is the difference to me. They wanted the civil union overtly. But, that isn't what
the left really wants. It's just an attack on American society.
The next big thing will be marrying in groups. LIke several people. Who knows, seventeen. A hundred. Then
they could all claim marriage dependent exemptions, right? After all, it "would only be fair" right?
bs. It's all bs.
So you have the same problem with mormons? Say, isn't mitt a Mormon? I thought I heard that somewhere
-
PM
'Perverted' penguins shocked biologist so much he hid results http://www.latimes.c...1,0,32225.story
Sounds like something that a lib would get into!!!!
We need to check voters id's so libs don't sign these penguins up to vote
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The above is a post from saint. It's funny because the penguins, in their natural habitat untouched by any liberals are practicing homosexual behaviour.
-
What is all of this talk about raising a kid?
I'm just talking about marriage.
What's all this "hidden secret gay agenda" shit. Cal is just afraid because things are changes. Christians don't get whatever they want anymore, oh no! Things change, get used to it.
Really Cal you have no legitimate reason why gays shouldn't be able to get married. You think you do, but you don't.
Your slippery slope arguments = Retarded
"marriage is one of those institutions that are based on society's rules" ........ Yes Cal, and those "rules" change all the time
-
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
-
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
Because if we eliminated marriage even more people could claim they are single parents and suck money and food stamps off the government.
-
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
The children!
Societies rules!
Real America!
JESUS!
-
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
So you think the rules regarding marriage haven't ever changed?
-
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
Slavery was one of societies rules for hundredes of years. Turns out that changed. Things change. That's what the world does. CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
Well, Little Johnny Pizzant Waste of Time on This Board Gay Flea on a Weasel Woodypeckerhead:
You are a stupidass.
Man-woman marriage is one of societies' rules that hasn't changed in hundreds of years.
Yes, I did, and yes, you reek of shit for brains.
At least heckbunker is a little bit smarter than you, and a little bit worthwhile on the board.
You rate a zero on the IQ scale. You neve listen, and never read, and if you ever do, you
don't comprehend, weasel flea.
Btw, you suck.
Slavery was one of societies rules for hundredes of years. Turns out that changed. Things change. That's what the world does. CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slavery was one of societies rules for hundredes of years. Turns out that changed. Things change. That's what the world does. CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And now look at the price of NFL tickets.....
( Just kidding)
By the way boys just how has marriage changed since the US has around?
And I'll try again: anyone care to try to list of reasons that marriage just should not be abolished?
WSS
-
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
-
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
Well the liberal view point is marriage has nothing to do with procreation.
And we're not having a problem with procreation, are we?
It seems as though we have more people than jobs as it is.
WSS
-
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
for procreation?
People have been procreating for millions of years. Marriage has been around for a lot less time then that
-
for procreation to benefit the society at large..... family structure that harbors communities ... to beget more taxpayers...... sustained society- children are our future.
we are just screwing it up bad big time for them Im afraid.....
Well the liberal view point is marriage has nothing to do with procreation.
And we're not having a problem with procreation, are we?
It seems as though we have more people than jobs as it is.
WSS
Just for the hell of it can anyone give me a good reason not just eliminate marriage all together?
WSS
Well the liberal view point is marriage has nothing to do with procreation.
And we're not having a problem with procreation, are we?
It seems as though we have more people than jobs as it is.
WSS
I must say that if the question is about marriage, then simply dont get married?
And in light of the jobs question, involving too many people? Arent alot of these people "boomers" on the way to the nursing homes and medicare expenditures?
I think the greater question is who's coming along behind us to keep our great society alive and thriving? 30 million aborted babies (gone from the taxpayer rolls)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login