One Year After Dadt Repeal
-
Heck, you don't know jack about what being in the military is. You really don't know jack about all
sorts of things.
Please stop, stick to what you DO know about.
Arguing with Steve and losing.
-
By this standard, you would be restricted to talking about growing tomatoes, being an airman for a couple of years in peace time, and shitting outdoors.
-
By this standard, you would be restricted to talking about growing tomatoes, being an airman for a couple of years in peace time, and shitting outdoors.
By this standard, you would be restricted to talking about growing tomatoes, being an airman for a couple of years in peace time, and shitting outdoors.
Personally knowing many in the service, this is total horseshit. Allowing gays in the military is and will always be a mistake. I hope it is repealed.
-
By this standard, you would be restricted to talking about growing tomatoes, being an airman for a couple of years in peace time, and shitting outdoors.
Personally knowing many in the service, this is total horseshit. Allowing gays in the military is and will always be a mistake. I hope it is repealed.
Personally knowing many in the service, this is total horseshit. Allowing gays in the military is and will always be a mistake. I hope it is repealed.
Personally, knowing many in the service, I respectfully disagree. Oh well, guess you'll have someone to blame when the Chinese take over.
-
Personally knowing many in the service, this is total horseshit. Allowing gays in the military is and will always be a mistake. I hope it is repealed.
Personally, knowing many in the service, I respectfully disagree. Oh well, guess you'll have someone to blame when the Chinese take over.
Personally, knowing many in the service, I respectfully disagree. Oh well, guess you'll have someone to blame when the Chinese take over.
Dude, I served 22 years in the military with Grunts and real people. Not some college boy know it all like you. I think I have the better perspective.
-
Personally, knowing many in the service, I respectfully disagree. Oh well, guess you'll have someone to blame when the Chinese take over.
Dude, I served 22 years in the military with Grunts and real people. Not some college boy know it all like you. I think I have the better perspective.
Dude, I served 22 years in the military with Grunts and real people. Not some college boy know it all like you. I think I have the better perspective.
Oh, my mistake. You're older. You know better.
-
Ah, Vapor. Who would have thought this thread would have turned to mindless chest-thumping and demagoguery so fast?
...Oh, wait. All of us.
-
Ah, Vapor. Who would have thought this thread would have turned to mindless chest-thumping and demagoguery so fast?
...Oh, wait. All of us.
Ah, Vapor. Who would have thought this thread would have turned to mindless chest-thumping and demagoguery so fast?
...Oh, wait. All of us.
May as well join in. I bet I suck more dick than you do, queer.
-
Maybe in raw numbers, sure. But you suck Muslim dick on 9/11 within blocks of Ground Zero. And then you preached your libtard queerbait about the military during the moment of silence? Go back to Kenya.
-
shut up, queers
-
the study from UCLA can be taken as a campaign aid for the call of all LGBT to get out the vote.
Well good for them... not everyone will take this 1 year anniversary of the removal of DADT and the so called findings of this study to be entirely and completely factual from a duly noted liberal think tank...
"Researchers began their study by contacting 553 of those 1,167 retired generals and admirals. Of those 553 contacted, 13 participated in the study. Researchers also conducted interviews with other opponents and dozens of active-duty servicemembers"
only 13? and other opponents how many? and dozens ..... how many dozens? kinda blurry dont you think?...
How about an internal military review? I would rather believe that .....
and cant say much for that sarcastic homophobe swipe on those who are opposed here- vapor and heck.... but you can say whatever you want.
-
the study from UCLA can be taken as a campaign aid for the call of all LGBT to get out the vote.
Well good for them... not everyone will take this 1 year anniversary of the removal of DADT and the so called findings of this study to be entirely and completely factual from a duly noted liberal think tank...
"Researchers began their study by contacting 553 of those 1,167 retired generals and admirals. Of those 553 contacted, 13 participated in the study. Researchers also conducted interviews with other opponents and dozens of active-duty servicemembers"
only 13? and other opponents how many? and dozens ..... how many dozens? kinda blurry dont you think?...
How about an internal military review? I would rather believe that .....
and cant say much for that sarcastic homophobe swipe on those who are opposed here- vapor and heck.... but you can say whatever you want.
How about an internal military review? I would rather believe that .....
Internal military review? Oh, you mean like the one they did in May?
Referenced here: http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116291
The repeal of the law banning gay and lesbian people from open military service took effect Sept. 20, 2011. The secretary [Panetta] said he received the report on repeal implementation yesterday, and it shows repeal is going “very well” and according to the department’s plans.
“It's not impacting on morale. It's not impacting on unit cohesion. It is not impacting on readiness,” he said.
Panetta said he credits military leaders for effective repeal planning.
“Very frankly, my view is that the military has kind of moved beyond it,” he said. “It's become part and parcel of what they've accepted within the military.”
During the same conference, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he has not seen “any negative effect on good order and discipline” resulting from the repeal.
But yeah, what would these guys know? Closet cocksuckers, right?
-
I wouldnt say closet cocksuckers like you just did, but they are party line guys right? they do and say as they are told.....
Panetta and joint Chief of staff General Dempsey used what amounts to commentary.
How about effects on the outed gays / lesbians...? (no mention of any Bi's and/or transgenders yet)
consider the experiment Obama in helping the LGBT by eliminating dadt, the backlash against them is happening in small measures, mainly in outward expressions of the gay love ...
meaning they cannot cuddle, kiss and more (?) in the public arena of official military functions. keep it behind closed doors....
It seems that it will be a distraction in time.... 1 year though? wait for it......
-
What's the policy covering male and female enlistees messing around?
WSS
-
What's the policy covering male and female enlistees messing around?
WSS
What's the policy covering male and female enlistees messing around?
WSS
There isn't any that I know of. The dog ugliest girls I've ever seen go to the military to find a man. With that ratio you can't lose. The only rules I know of concern fraternization. Officers and enlisted.
-
FairHooker had a very excellent post here, don't want it to be missed:
"the study from UCLA can be taken as a campaign aid for the call of all LGBT to get out the vote.
Well good for them... not everyone will take this 1 year anniversary of the removal of DADT and the so called findings of this study to be entirely and completely factual from a duly noted liberal think tank...
"Researchers began their study by contacting 553 of those 1,167 retired generals and admirals. Of those 553 contacted, 13 participated in the study. Researchers also conducted interviews with other opponents and dozens of active-duty servicemembers"
only 13? and other opponents how many? and dozens ..... how many dozens? kinda blurry dont you think?...
How about an internal military review? I would rather believe that .....
and cant say much for that sarcastic homophobe swipe on those who are opposed here- vapor and heck.... but you can say whatever you want.
" -
Well of course most of them aren't going to talk about it. They were proven wrong. People who get to be officers in the military don't like being wrong.
-
"Wrong" in the interim doesn't mean wrong in the long term.
And the long term damage is what is the issue.
-
"Wrong" in the interim doesn't mean wrong in the long term.
And the long term damage is what is the issue.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login