Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Haslem Interview

Haslem Interview

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
27 Posts 20 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @dawg08 said:

    Did anyone hear the Haslem interview during the game Sunday? I didn't realize that there is has to me am owners vote yet for the finalizing of the sale of the team to him(I believe they said the vote is in 2 weeks?), so at this point if he wanted to make changes, he can't. So right now we are in a "sit and watch" horrible football mode it seems. He was asked if he was going to make any changes and he stated probably not seeing that it was in the middle of the season. Apparently he sat in the Dawg pound during one of the preseason games and says that he now understands how important football is to this town and how great the fans are and he vowed to make this team competitive again and would renew that rivalry with the Squealers again.

    I really like what he said(although it was a very short interview) and hopefully he is going to do what he says and does it in a QUICK fashion.

    Where have you been? The owners vote to allow Haslam to take control of the team has been set for Oct. 16 for some time now. So, no, Haslam can do nothing until then.

    Also, in that interview he said he does not think there will be any changes the rest of the year, that it would be imprudent to do anything until the season ends. At that point however...all bets are off.

    Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 30k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @the-gipper said:

    Also, in that interview he said he does not think there will be any changes the rest of the year, that it would be imprudent to do anything until the season ends. At that point however...all bets are off.

    We'll see...

    If he has someone waiting in the wings, he may well wait.... regardless. But if not...

    He has two former HC's on staff, either of whom he may want to audition... say coming out of the bye-week... and see how the team responds.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • ballpeenB ballpeen

      @acmike said:

      If he doesn't clean house then he wasted a cool billion...

      Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

      This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

      The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

      If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

      We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

      Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
      • 3k Posts
      • 241 Reputation
      Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
      #13

      @ballpeen said:

      Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

      This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

      The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

      If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

      We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

      I cant help but feel it is a coaching issue.

      Ruining threads since 1897.
      cambridgehoC 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

        @ballpeen said:

        Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

        This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

        The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

        If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

        We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

        I cant help but feel it is a coaching issue.

        cambridgeho cambridgehoC Very Popular Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 2k Posts
        • 139 Reputation
        cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
        #14

        @harry-buffalo said:

        I cant help but feel it is a coaching issue.

        Play calling yes, but you have to execute your routes and block who you are supposed to. Also being able to tackle someone or catch a ball or overthrow, that is completely on the player. You can only scheme so much for an opponent. If you line up off sides and hold 8 times a game at critical situations then you will lose.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Zombo Z
          • 8k Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
          #15

          We are 9-26 since Mike Holmgren took over, if he doesn't fire him the minute he takes over control then I am going to lose respect for him from the get-go.

          If the team starts to play better and wants to let Shurmur to coach out the schedule, that is one thing. If he thinks Heckert's as good at his job as other guys that are available, that's another thing.

          But Fat Fuck Holmgren needs to go. He is responsible for the overall culture of the franchise ... and it is a very bad one.

          I would imagine the fact the Jim Brown is sitting next to Jimmy in the owners booth means Fat Fuck is already gone.

          Zombo

          kamac19K The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Z Zombo

            We are 9-26 since Mike Holmgren took over, if he doesn't fire him the minute he takes over control then I am going to lose respect for him from the get-go.

            If the team starts to play better and wants to let Shurmur to coach out the schedule, that is one thing. If he thinks Heckert's as good at his job as other guys that are available, that's another thing.

            But Fat Fuck Holmgren needs to go. He is responsible for the overall culture of the franchise ... and it is a very bad one.

            I would imagine the fact the Jim Brown is sitting next to Jimmy in the owners booth means Fat Fuck is already gone.

            Zombo

            kamac19 kamac19K One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 283 Posts
            • 44 Reputation
            kamac19K kamac19 wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Zombo said:

            We are 9-26 since Mike Holmgren took over, if he doesn't fire him the minute he takes over control then I am going to lose respect for him from the get-go.

            If the team starts to play better and wants to let Shurmur to coach out the schedule, that is one thing. If he thinks Heckert's as good at his job as other guys that are available, that's another thing.

            But Fat Fuck Holmgren needs to go. He is responsible for the overall culture of the franchise ... and it is a very bad one.

            I would imagine the fact the Jim Brown is sitting next to Jimmy in the owners booth means Fat Fuck is already gone.

            Zombo

            Well if come 16th October when Jimmy is meant to take over, we are 0-6 then I would expect all of them to be let go Holmgren,Heckert & Shurmur. Going losing 12 in a row is not acceptable especially when he has had a whole season and full pre-season to get the team playing and winning. If Jimmy has someone who is available already to step right in, let him come in and use the remaining 10 games to use as evaluation for all the players and get used to any new Schemes a new coach might be wanting to bring in, by them I think we all wouldnt care what the win-loss at end of season would be so as we are further forward into any new plans that might be forthcoming with Haslam taking over, This lets let it run til the end of the season is just bullshit. If a work employee is doing a crap job at work you sack him, who cares if its a week before christmas you dont let something rot more than it has to. Shurmur needs to be at least 2-4 come Haslam taking over to stand a chance of staying in my opinion. LETS SEE !!!

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • rcr81 rcr81R
              • 33 Posts
              • 1 Reputation
              rcr81R rcr81 wrote on last edited by
              #17

              I say October 17th Holmgren and Shurmer are gone, I would let Ray Rhodes coach it out till the end of the year and his buddy from the Eagles ( I forget his name right now ) takes over as President. Only thing that changes that is we win every game from now till then, and I'm not sure that will even help.

              Mark OM 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • ballpeenB ballpeen

                @acmike said:

                If he doesn't clean house then he wasted a cool billion...

                Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

                This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

                The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

                If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

                We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #18

                @ballpeen said:

                Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

                This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

                The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

                If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

                We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

                I personally would NOT be in favor of either Chili or Jauron becoming HC of the Browns. And I don't see the point of getting rid of an HC and putting in an interim.....unless you do plan to make that interim the HC.

                The only time in history...Browns anyway...where that worked was when Marty took over for Sam.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • rcr81R rcr81

                  I say October 17th Holmgren and Shurmer are gone, I would let Ray Rhodes coach it out till the end of the year and his buddy from the Eagles ( I forget his name right now ) takes over as President. Only thing that changes that is we win every game from now till then, and I'm not sure that will even help.

                  Mark O Mark OM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @rcr81 said:

                  I say October 17th Holmgren and Shurmer are gone, I would let Ray Rhodes coach it out till the end of the year and his buddy from the Eagles ( I forget his name right now ) takes over as President. Only thing that changes that is we win every game from now till then, and I'm not sure that will even help.

                  Where is Ray Rhodes these days? He seemed like a decent coach in the past.

                  rcr81R 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Z Zombo

                    We are 9-26 since Mike Holmgren took over, if he doesn't fire him the minute he takes over control then I am going to lose respect for him from the get-go.

                    If the team starts to play better and wants to let Shurmur to coach out the schedule, that is one thing. If he thinks Heckert's as good at his job as other guys that are available, that's another thing.

                    But Fat Fuck Holmgren needs to go. He is responsible for the overall culture of the franchise ... and it is a very bad one.

                    I would imagine the fact the Jim Brown is sitting next to Jimmy in the owners booth means Fat Fuck is already gone.

                    Zombo

                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                    • 57k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Zombo said:

                    We are 9-26 since Mike Holmgren took over, if he doesn't fire him the minute he takes over control then I am going to lose respect for him from the get-go.

                    If the team starts to play better and wants to let Shurmur to coach out the schedule, that is one thing. If he thinks Heckert's as good at his job as other guys that are available, that's another thing.

                    But Fat Fuck Holmgren needs to go. He is responsible for the overall culture of the franchise ... and it is a very bad one.

                    I would imagine the fact the Jim Brown is sitting next to Jimmy in the owners booth means Fat Fuck is already gone.

                    Zombo

                    What I think would happen Z is that there would be no annoucement before the end of the season that Holmgren has been let go...but there could be a de facto turnover. Holmgren will be allowed to go gracefully in that he will still have the title, but they will transition over to whomever JH puts in charge by the end of the season. (Banner?)

                    Haslam seems class act, so I don't think he will want to embarass Holmgren by publicly canning him. He will be eased out ever so softly and subtlely.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Mark OM Mark O

                      @rcr81 said:

                      I say October 17th Holmgren and Shurmer are gone, I would let Ray Rhodes coach it out till the end of the year and his buddy from the Eagles ( I forget his name right now ) takes over as President. Only thing that changes that is we win every game from now till then, and I'm not sure that will even help.

                      Where is Ray Rhodes these days? He seemed like a decent coach in the past.

                      rcr81 rcr81R
                      • 33 Posts
                      • 1 Reputation
                      rcr81R rcr81 wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      @mark-o said:

                      Where is Ray Rhodes these days? He seemed like a decent coach in the past.

                      He's on our staff...senior assistant on the defense, so in other words dispensable.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • ballpeenB ballpeen

                        @acmike said:

                        If he doesn't clean house then he wasted a cool billion...

                        Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

                        This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

                        The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

                        If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

                        We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

                        hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 20k Posts
                        • 5k Reputation
                        hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        @ballpeen said:

                        Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

                        This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

                        The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

                        If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

                        We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

                        The problem as I see it is Shurmur is a horrible gameday coach in playcalling, down and distance, clock management- and he's too arrogant to admit he sucks at it, and hand the reins over to Childress in that department. Seriously- what was the sense in bringing Brad in if Shurms was still going to call the plays?

                        Well, he's going down with the ship. He loses the next three (likely) he's done in my book. If not on October 17th, certainly at the bye week- doubly if the Browns are still winless at that time

                        And a +1 on Z's comment about Holmgren. Whiffed on McCoy- and then did a desperation pick of Weeden. Thought a WCO would work in Cleveland. The best GMs fit their scheme to the players they have not try and pound square pegs into round holes. We've been down that road before, and it doesn't work.

                        Mark OM 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • avenger9800 A
                          • 5 Posts
                          • 1 Reputation
                          A avenger9800 wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          I for one hated it when the Browns hired Mangini, but after watching him coach the Browns for a couple of years, I liked what I seen from him. If fat ass wouldn't have fired him to bring in his buddy, in my opinion the team would be winning games this year. Lets bring back MANGINI!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • D dawg08

                            Did anyone hear the Haslem interview during the game Sunday? I didn't realize that there is has to me am owners vote yet for the finalizing of the sale of the team to him(I believe they said the vote is in 2 weeks?), so at this point if he wanted to make changes, he can't. So right now we are in a "sit and watch" horrible football mode it seems. He was asked if he was going to make any changes and he stated probably not seeing that it was in the middle of the season. Apparently he sat in the Dawg pound during one of the preseason games and says that he now understands how important football is to this town and how great the fans are and he vowed to make this team competitive again and would renew that rivalry with the Squealers again.

                            I really like what he said(although it was a very short interview) and hopefully he is going to do what he says and does it in a QUICK fashion.

                            BrownsBacker BrownsBackerB
                            • 297 Posts
                            • 20 Reputation
                            BrownsBackerB BrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            @dawg08 said:

                            I didn't realize that there is has to me am owners vote yet for the finalizing of the sale of the team to him

                            What?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • hoortaH hoorta

                              @ballpeen said:

                              Maybe, maybe not, but he doesn't have to make any moves before seasons end. In some ways, it makes sense for him to let it play out. That way people can't claim he made knee jerk decisions.

                              This is non Holmgren.....he's out. That's pretty clear to me. I am talking more about Shurmer and Heckert.

                              The only thing that might change this is if Juaron or Childress is a possible candidate to replace Shurmer. Then we might see a change, say around week 12-13 to give them a 3-4 game audition.

                              If that works, then Heck might be safe as that would indicate it was more a coaching problem over a talent problem.

                              We are already seeing some jockeying by Shurmer with his statement that if Little can't catch, we can't play him. A clear maneuver that coaching isn't the problem....bad players is the problem.....look at Heckert, he is the guy giving him the players.

                              The problem as I see it is Shurmur is a horrible gameday coach in playcalling, down and distance, clock management- and he's too arrogant to admit he sucks at it, and hand the reins over to Childress in that department. Seriously- what was the sense in bringing Brad in if Shurms was still going to call the plays?

                              Well, he's going down with the ship. He loses the next three (likely) he's done in my book. If not on October 17th, certainly at the bye week- doubly if the Browns are still winless at that time

                              And a +1 on Z's comment about Holmgren. Whiffed on McCoy- and then did a desperation pick of Weeden. Thought a WCO would work in Cleveland. The best GMs fit their scheme to the players they have not try and pound square pegs into round holes. We've been down that road before, and it doesn't work.

                              Mark O Mark OM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 6k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              @hoorta said:

                              The problem as I see it is Shurmur is a horrible gameday coach in playcalling, down and distance, clock management- and he's too arrogant to admit he sucks at it, and hand the reins over to Childress in that department. Seriously- what was the sense in bringing Brad in if Shurms was still going to call the plays?

                              Well, he's going down with the ship. He loses the next three (likely) he's done in my book. If not on October 17th, certainly at the bye week- doubly if the Browns are still winless at that time

                              And a +1 on Z's comment about Holmgren. Whiffed on McCoy- and then did a desperation pick of Weeden. Thought a WCO would work in Cleveland. The best GMs fit their scheme to the players they have not try and pound square pegs into round holes. We've been down that road before, and it doesn't work.

                              I truly think if we're winless or even with 1 win by October 16th that he's almost going to have to do something. Maybe it's just a simple move of dumping Holmgren which really wouldn't have any effect on the season but would position him to bring in his own guy in that role. Firing the coach mid season doesn't work unless he's convinced Jauron or Childress or Rhodes is the guy to be the next coach but I imagine with a billion dollar investment, he's going to want his own guys throughout the organization.

                              rcr81R 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Mark OM Mark O

                                @hoorta said:

                                The problem as I see it is Shurmur is a horrible gameday coach in playcalling, down and distance, clock management- and he's too arrogant to admit he sucks at it, and hand the reins over to Childress in that department. Seriously- what was the sense in bringing Brad in if Shurms was still going to call the plays?

                                Well, he's going down with the ship. He loses the next three (likely) he's done in my book. If not on October 17th, certainly at the bye week- doubly if the Browns are still winless at that time

                                And a +1 on Z's comment about Holmgren. Whiffed on McCoy- and then did a desperation pick of Weeden. Thought a WCO would work in Cleveland. The best GMs fit their scheme to the players they have not try and pound square pegs into round holes. We've been down that road before, and it doesn't work.

                                I truly think if we're winless or even with 1 win by October 16th that he's almost going to have to do something. Maybe it's just a simple move of dumping Holmgren which really wouldn't have any effect on the season but would position him to bring in his own guy in that role. Firing the coach mid season doesn't work unless he's convinced Jauron or Childress or Rhodes is the guy to be the next coach but I imagine with a billion dollar investment, he's going to want his own guys throughout the organization.

                                rcr81 rcr81R
                                • 33 Posts
                                • 1 Reputation
                                rcr81R rcr81 wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                @mark-o said:

                                I truly think if we're winless or even with 1 win by October 16th that he's almost going to have to do something. Maybe it's just a simple move of dumping Holmgren which really wouldn't have any effect on the season but would position him to bring in his own guy in that role. Firing the coach mid season doesn't work unless he's convinced Jauron or Childress or Rhodes is the guy to be the next coach but I imagine with a billion dollar investment, he's going to want his own guys throughout the organization.

                                My feelings with bringing in Rhodes is just to send a message and change the thinking. If your still win less by the 17th then the seasons garbage and with an interm coach other prospects won't have to tippy toe about the job in respect to the guy who hasn't been fired yet.

                                You've got to let them know "JIMMIES IN DA HOUSE! "

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Xanthros XanthrosX
                                  • 247 Posts
                                  • 33 Reputation
                                  XanthrosX Xanthros wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  All I want to see is this team be relevant again. Whatever that takes, watching THIS product has been brutal. I do agree with several posters that the coaching and playcalling is worse than the players we have. At least we have a few that will transition good. I just don't see this going on much longer than Oct 16th... Make us YOUR team Jimmy...PLEASE!!!

                                  Who let the DAWGS out??
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Theme
                                  • System
                                  • Light
                                  • Dark
                                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Forums
                                  • Recent
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Donate