Skip to content

Why Is This Man Not Our President?

Political Discussion
27 12 762
  • Paul's simplistic, knee jerk, and outlandish solutions come home to roost.

    That is why he doesn't have a chance - he's a crackpot. Give him up, he's nobody's real hero.

    He's a crank, that says some good things in general terms.

    Big deal? nope.

  • @brownindian said:

    He doesnt back paddle. People cannot take the truth when it is laid out hard and cold. Everybody needs to hear that there is a politician who is a hero who will make all the problems go away. Unfortunately not only does that guy not exist but even if he existed such a solution is not possible. The truth is the govt and the people together need to make sacrifices if we want to get out of the debt situation.

    So when PAul makes a cold statement (which sadly is true), the public cannot stand the truth and they think that he is the problem, not the debt and that by electing for someone else who promises them better things they are making the right choice.

    Ron Paul wants the USA to be isolationist which is old fashioned. Would never vote for him.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Ron Paul wants the USA to be isolationist which is old fashioned. Would never vote for him.

    He never said that? Link. He said he doesn't want to be an imperialist.

  • Sorry, at this point he has my vote.

  • Sorry, at this point he has my vote.

    @kosar_for_president said:

    Sorry, at this point he has my vote.

    Yes.

    +1

  • The only reason he is not president or the republican candidate is because he wants to end foreign aid to Shitrael (Israel). Repukicans love to send foregn aid to Israel

  • I always thought he looked like Mr. Magoo 😆05.jpg

    So how exactly is he an isolationist besides not being in favor of having military bases in foreign lands and occupying Islamic countries?

    Afaik he is perfectly fine with dealing economically with other nations, and with us pulling our nose out of the rest of the worlds business could only help us politically.

    Just because you are not the Earths Police Department,Bank,Hospital,Ambulance doesn't make you an isolationist. Of course then I guess that would limit our ability to control other Governments and their U.N votes.

    I think when it comes down to it whether left of right all the political types can agree on one thing, Israel.

    That's when we see who is full of shit and who isn't.

    Pulling Israel off the American tit is the number one reason he'd never get elected.

    Why is it not feasible to abolish the Fed?

    Do you not think it needs to be abolished?

    Our currency is backed by oil. What are our grandchildren,great grandchildren etc. going to do when all the oil is gone?

    @badnewsbrowns said:

    I always thought he looked like Mr. Magoo 😆05.jpg

    So how exactly is he an isolationist besides not being in favor of having military bases in foreign lands and occupying Islamic countries?

    Afaik he is perfectly fine with dealing economically with other nations, and with us pulling our nose out of the rest of the worlds business could only help us politically.

    Just because you are not the Earths Police Department,Bank,Hospital,Ambulance doesn't make you an isolationist. Of course then I guess that would limit our ability to control other Governments and their U.N votes.

    I think when it comes down to it whether left of right all the political types can agree on one thing, Israel.

    That's when we see who is full of shit and who isn't.

    Pulling Israel off the American tit is the number one reason he'd never get elected.

    Why is it not feasible to abolish the Fed?

    Do you not think it needs to be abolished?

    Our currency is backed by oil. What are our grandchildren,great grandchildren etc. going to do when all the oil is gone?

    We need bases forward deployed. Japan, Germany and South Korea for instance. If we didn't have those bases, our influence would be severely limited.

  • @kosar_for_president said:

    Sorry, at this point he has my vote.

    Yes.

    +1

    @legacy-fan said:

    Yes.

    +1

    Then you may as well not vote.

  • How sad.

    Choosing an invalid choice, so that the seriosly dangerous to America choice wins.

    Unless a group of folks are all Republican and/or Independent, the group has been infiltrated with idiots.

    Paul "voters" need to choose. America....or disaster.

    An Obamao "Present" is a damage, not a vote.

  • Cal

    Our country is racing towards a financial cliff regardless of who is in office. We may fall off it in 3 months, it may be 3 years. Because persons are smart, and people are stupid, whichever party is in office (President) when we go sailing into the abyss is probably finished in American politics.

    I'd prefer that party to be the one with the ability to cause the most damage to the country.

    Romney just doesn't wow me, so I can't vote for him. Plus I don't think he's very honest. I don't like his health care plan, nor his fiscal one(s). Ron Paul has the correct answers to fix both of those problems (plus several others) but they probably just can't get implemented in our current system. Some of his policies are also in a bind of being "too late" which sucks.

  • Well Legacy, That's about as logical a reason as I've heard even though I don't think his policies would be implemented ever even if he won but....

    Still something to consider, when Obama runs deeper and deeper into recession or even worse people may tend to want to stick with the party of free stuff.

    Don't forget Roosevelt.

    Can you imagine the Democrats ever being voted out when it's more like 80 percent of the population on the dole?

    WSS