The Worst Regime Since 1999
-
I could never vote for Shurmur, Heckert, and Holmgren just because of the drafting we've been doing. Other than that, yea it has been going the wrong way.
-
They're all bad in their own ways.
-
I could never vote for Shurmur, Heckert, and Holmgren just because of the drafting we've been doing. Other than that, yea it has been going the wrong way.
I could never vote for Shurmur, Heckert, and Holmgren just because of the drafting we've been doing. Other than that, yea it has been going the wrong way.
outside of a few 1st round picks and sheard, don't see how the drafting has been very good???
-
Mangini's real downfall was not firing Dabol.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Someone asks you........
You have to fuck one of these women
Whoopie Goldberg
Phyllis Diller
Mya Angelou
This is a meaningless choice. The poll is meaningless. How the fuck to you discern between who was the best............ of a bunch of fucking losers?
Sorry, but this is idiotic.
Yup, sort of like asking what kind of turd stinks the least.
Incidentally, I'd only vote Heckert- because he's the only GM I've seen in recent history who hasn't drafted total busts on a regular basis. Holmgren and Shurmur can't get their walking papers soon enough IMHO. Contrast that with Chris Palmer, or Eric Mangini who (could) have been decent coaches but the FO was FUBAR.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Someone asks you........
You have to fuck one of these women
Whoopie Goldberg
Phyllis Diller
Mya Angelou
This is a meaningless choice. The poll is meaningless. How the fuck to you discern between who was the best............ of a bunch of fucking losers?
Sorry, but this is idiotic.
Yup, sort of like asking what kind of turd stinks the least.
Incidentally, I'd only vote Heckert- because he's the only GM I've seen in recent history who hasn't drafted total busts on a regular basis. Holmgren and Shurmur can't get their walking papers soon enough IMHO. Contrast that with Chris Palmer, or Eric Mangini who (could) have been decent coaches but the FO was FUBAR.
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
This is a meaningless choice. The poll is meaningless. How the fuck to you discern between who was the best............ of a bunch of fucking losers?
Yup, sort of like asking what kind of turd stinks the least.
Obviously you read what you want to read. It's about who was the worst.
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Sorry, but this is idiotic.
Now ain't that the pot calling the kettle black.
-
My vote goes for the first staff of 1999.
Instead of taking solid veteran starters in the expansion draft they took a bunch of no names.
They drafted a QB with no offensive line and a horrible choice as coach.
We could of hit the ground running and built a veteran team who were ready to win, instead they went the other route and tried to develop a rookie QB under horrible circumstances.
It's not inconceivable to build a winner in 1-2 years, winning breeds winners and losing breeds losers.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Someone asks you........
You have to fuck one of these women
Whoopie Goldberg
Phyllis Diller
Mya Angelou
Whoopie Goldberg - Fuck
Phyllis Diller - Kill
Mya Angelou - Marry
-
-
Mike Brown is a hands on owner.
So is Jerry Jones but the fact that that Dallas is a high profile market means there are extra incentives for players there.
So that mirigates his stupidity.
If we are going to start over every 2 years we will suck for ever.
Who would have believed that Mike Holmgren would have been such a colossal failure?
WSS
-
Mike Brown is a hands on owner.
So is Jerry Jones but the fact that that Dallas is a high profile market means there are extra incentives for players there.
So that mirigates his stupidity.
If we are going to start over every 2 years we will suck for ever.
Who would have believed that Mike Holmgren would have been such a colossal failure?
WSS
Mike Brown is a hands on owner.
So is Jerry Jones but the fact that that Dallas is a high profile market means there are extra incentives for players there.
So that mirigates his stupidity.
If we are going to start over every 2 years we will suck for ever.
Who would have believed that Mike Holmgren would have been such a colossal failure?
WSS
Actually it is not hard to believe. He was essentially a failure as an executive in Seattle. It was only when he gave that up to just coach that the Seahawks became decent.
As a coach he is quite a success. As a GM/Exec. he is a two time failure.
It just goes to show that sometimes people need to realize what they are good at and what they are not good at.
Holmgren wanting to become a GM/President just because he was a good HC would be like you insisting on playing lead guitar just because you can sing and write music.
You can play the guitar OK, but you can't match the likes of Bones, Russ, or even Marsek o lead. Fair to say?
-
I voted for PCP because they set the losing tone that the others were not able to overcome.
But here's some separate awards:
Worst President: Holmgren. Policy was fricking horrible, but at least that team peaked at 9-7 four years in, Holmgren is on an 11 game losing streak in his third year.
Worst GM: Clark. Savage was no picnic, but he uncovered an occasional gem, Clark had a ton of draftpicks to work with and just grabbed mediocre players over and over.
Worst Coach: Shurmur has lost 11 straight and is 0-8 in the division, he is on pace to be the worst coach in NFL history.
Zombo
-
-
Oh I see your point Gipper but I don't recall hearing all that when we hired him.
seems like after all that time in different positions he'd at least have a grasp of the game?
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đź’—
Register Login