If Obama Wins On Tuesday...
-
Just wondering if anyone in here won't accept the result as valid.
-
His goons and thugs just offer free things to get votes man. The whole thing is fixed and against America. They're also hacking voting machines and making it so good, freedom loving conservatives can't vote!
-
depends if there is a "hanging chad" moment like 2000, but I would except it either Obama or Romney.
-
These are four polls of Ohio that were all released Wednesday:
University of Cincinnati/Ohio Poll: Obama +2.0
PPP: Obama +5.0
NYT/CBS/Quinnipiac: Obama +5.0
Reuters/Ipsos: Obama +3.0
Two of them were trending Obama, two were unchanged. If these hold, Obama is going to win.
-
I'm not getting my hopes up because error bars.
-
I was feeling Romney in the last two weeks, but feeling more Obama now. Romney really can't win without Ohio and it doesn't look like he has it.
No way to know for sure.
-
If he wins, he wins.
Maybe possibly could you guys then STFU about gore versus bush?
I'm guessing you'll be too busy gloatng about 7.6 unemployment and 1.3 GDP.
WSS
-
If.........
We're lucky.
WSS
-
I'm going to try not to come in here at all after the election. I've been covering this stuff nonstop for months. I'm tired of it.
Also, you've got partisan pique/liberals suck/they're ruining the country in just about every one of your posts lately. Maybe you should take a break too.
After all, no matter who wins is going to enjoy the benefit of a nice economic recovery with about 12 million new jobs over the next four years. That's why Romney picked that number - because that's what economists expect anyway.
-
Bloomberg just backed Obama. So did the right-wing magazine "The Economist", which explained that Romney's tax plans are fanciful and would make things worse. Combined with the Powell endorsement and Christie's lavish praise you've got a lot for independents to chew on in these last few days.
Romney's lost the momentum. It's Obama's now.
-
Putin and Chavez are all for Obamao.
With Bloomberg nutjob added in,...
it looks even better for Romney.
-
Bloomberg.
I'm stunned.
WSS
-
And because of global warming too.
"But we can't do it alone. We need leadership from the White House — and over the past four years, President Barack Obama has taken major steps to reduce our carbon consumption, including setting higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks.
Mitt Romney, too, has a history of tackling climate change. As governor of Massachusetts, he signed on to a regional cap-and-trade plan designed to reduce carbon emissions 10 percent below 1990 levels....But since then, he has reversed course, abandoning the very cap-and-trade program he once supported."
...Noooo. Mitt Romney did that?
-
Romney learns. He's smart that way.
Obamao never learns anything.
Hence, his grades are classified.
He's a radical, racist dumbass. Who got a free entry and grades into...
Occidental.
-
-
Romney learns. He's smart that way.
Obamao never learns anything.
Hence, his grades are classified.
He's a radical, racist dumbass. Who got a free entry and grades into...
Occidental.
-
<br /><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/11512_newsstand.jpg?w=225&h=300" /><br />
<br /><br /><br />It is still Hurricane Season ya dumb Fuck!
-
Bloomberg.
I'm stunned.
WSS
Bloomberg.
I'm stunned.
WSS
I think Bloomberg just endorsed him because he's white.
-
<br /><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/11512_newsstand.jpg?w=225&h=300" /><br />
<br /><br /><br />It is still Hurricane Season ya dumb Fuck!
<br /><br /><br />
It is still Hurricane Season ya dumb Fuck!
True but in the last 12 yrs there has only been one year with less than 10 named storms(2009 had 9) and in the 12yrs before that there was 6. The past 3 years(10,11,12) are currently tied for the 3rd most active, 08 is tied for 5th, and 05 was the most active. For one reason or another there has been a definite increase in the frequency of tropical storms.
-
<br /><br /><br />
It is still Hurricane Season ya dumb Fuck!
True but in the last 12 yrs there has only been one year with less than 10 named storms(2009 had 9) and in the 12yrs before that there was 6. The past 3 years(10,11,12) are currently tied for the 3rd most active, 08 is tied for 5th, and 05 was the most active. For one reason or another there has been a definite increase in the frequency of tropical storms.
True but in the last 12 yrs there has only been one year with less than 10 named storms(2009 had 9) and in the 12yrs before that there was 6. The past 3 years(10,11,12) are currently tied for the 3rd most active, 08 is tied for 5th, and 05 was the most active. For one reason or another there has been a definite increase in the frequency of tropical storms.
Out of the past how many millions years do you base your statistics, or only the last 12? See my point.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login