Exit Polls
-
The divisive us vs. them mentality is as ugly as ugly gets, heck. It is prevalent in both republicans and democrats. Think you vs Steve, or Cal vs Woody. Only true moderates like myself seem to be able to see things from both sides. Now is the time for acceptance and the hand of compromise and friendship in all matters. A very famous quote comes to mind. It's as true now as when it was spoken.
"We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."
The divisive us vs. them mentality is as ugly as ugly gets, heck. It is prevalent in both republicans and democrats. Think you vs Steve, or Cal vs Woody. Only true moderates like myself seem to be able to see things from both sides. Now is the time for acceptance and the hand of compromise and friendship in all matters. A very famous quote comes to mind. It's as true now as when it was spoken.
"We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."
To true...
and that was Lincoln right?
-
The divisive us vs. them mentality is as ugly as ugly gets, heck. It is prevalent in both republicans and democrats. Think you vs Steve, or Cal vs Woody. Only true moderates like myself seem to be able to see things from both sides. Now is the time for acceptance and the hand of compromise and friendship in all matters. A very famous quote comes to mind. It's as true now as when it was spoken.
"We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."
To true...
and that was Lincoln right?
To true...
and that was Lincoln right?
Indeed.
-
It gets a lot uglier than me pointing out that the Democrats won big, Cysko. It gets much uglier than that.
-
It gets a lot uglier than me pointing out that the Democrats won big, Cysko. It gets much uglier than that.
It gets a lot uglier than me pointing out that the Democrats won big, Cysko. It gets much uglier than that.
Don't be so self centered. Not everything is about you. It's the country as a whole.
-
But you did prove me right by saying "we beat you big" you didn't beat anyone, nor did you win anything. Neither did Steve lose anything. But you want to associate yourself with the winner and steve with the loser and thereby create further divisiveness by saying ha ha I won you lost
-
That's kind of ridiculous, man. Let's not pretend there aren't two parties, two sides, and that my side didn't just won. I'm not.
He was asking me why I was so angry, and I was telling him why I'm so not. It's really not that big a deal.
-
Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end
-
Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?
Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.
-
Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?
Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.
Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?
Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.
Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?
-
If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.
-
Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?
Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.
Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?
Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?
Busy. But now I'm home sick so I have time to troll.

-
If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.
If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.
I didn't serve, and it still did. But I also try to be informed about an issue before I spout an opinion.
-
If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.
I didn't serve, and it still did. But I also try to be informed about an issue before I spout an opinion.
-
Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end
Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end
The system is inherently partisan, and by design. It's not going to end, nor should it. It's the inability to compromise that's the problem. It's excessive or blind partisanship.
And if you want examples of that, I can probably point you to some threads in here. If you want an example of people having a normal conversation, I'll point you to a thread with me and Tupa.
I hardly think I'm the problem here. When you're a 4 on the political spectrum and you're arguing with 8s, 9s, and 10s it's not going to led to much in the way of healing. Like I always say, Cysko, I rarely even get to the part where I tell people what I think, or what I want to see happen. I usually just take issue with the nutty and lazy and ill-informed utterances of the people in here. Ex: just last night I was trying to point out that the idea that Republicans are the only people who think we face a fiscal crisis are clueless. Everyone knows this.
I mean, we're talking baby steps in here.
Plus, some of these people are fucking crazy, my brother. They're fucking nuts. I have no interest in compromising with them, or healing with them. And I noticed the other day that neither did you.
-
I have interest in solving problems. I wouldn't be an engineer if I didn't. I've voted both republican and democrat, so actually I do have an interest in compromise. Not with crazy people, but most people on both sides aren't dangerously insane. They are dangerously partisan though. To keep pushing us vs. Them will be disastrous. So if the compromising could start in the capitol that would be fine.
-
I'm with you. I just would disagree - completely - that both parties are equally guilty here. The Republican Party has simply gone off the reservation. They need to moderate. They need to be more inclusive. They need to put their rigid ideology aside and return to their history of being a party that solves problems. They've completely given up on that. Now their guiding philosophy is "Don't do anything about anything" and "Shit on people who we don't like."
Just look around in here. Or turn on Fox. Their explanation for why people don't want to vote for them is "minorities want to take shit from the white establishment." This is the prevailing explanation in the fever swamp.
Or look at it this way: there are virtually no moderate Republicans left. Almost none.
This makes the compromise you say you want - that I want - so much harder.
In the end, I think they're going to get this done if only because they have to. Obama knows it. Boehner knows it.
-
By naming we need tom tupa intellectually elite and then pointing to the conversations you have with him, you declare yourself intellectually elite. That's convenient, because it allows you to think every person that disagrees with you is crazy, wrong, and stupid. You're a very intelligent person, clearly, but I've always considered you a narcissist.
-
There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.
-
Democrats engaging in "we're less at fault then Republicans." Are guilty of partisan finger pointing. That's exactly what I mean. You're only proving my statement right. Who cares who's more at fault? They're both at fault.
-
There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.
There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.
I'm talking about in office. There really aren't any left. Moderate Republicans get primaries. They get called RHINOs and lose to other Republicans.
Political scientists measure these things. Both parties have gotten more ideological, but the Republicans have shifted much more to the right than Democrats have to the left. It's simply not correct to say this is a problem that's just as much a problem on the left as on the right.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login