Skip to content

Exit Polls

Political Discussion
110 14 2.9k
  • It gets a lot uglier than me pointing out that the Democrats won big, Cysko. It gets much uglier than that.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    It gets a lot uglier than me pointing out that the Democrats won big, Cysko. It gets much uglier than that.

    Don't be so self centered. Not everything is about you. It's the country as a whole.

  • But you did prove me right by saying "we beat you big" you didn't beat anyone, nor did you win anything. Neither did Steve lose anything. But you want to associate yourself with the winner and steve with the loser and thereby create further divisiveness by saying ha ha I won you lost

  • That's kind of ridiculous, man. Let's not pretend there aren't two parties, two sides, and that my side didn't just won. I'm not.

    He was asking me why I was so angry, and I was telling him why I'm so not. It's really not that big a deal.

  • Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end

  • Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?

    Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.

  • A Alo

    Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?

    Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.

    @alo said:

    Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?

    Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.

    Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?

  • If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.

  • @alo said:

    Is wanting to execute the entire Libyan gov't based on what turned out to be false information a "true moderate" position? Or that one of our foreign policy tenets should be "Fuck Israel"?

    Sometimes, it seems like folks mistake their inchoate political opinions for being part of some sensible, vital center. It sure isn't.

    Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Hey alo, I was a serviceman sometimes you get upset over shit like that. And yes, fuck Israel, if they want us to fight the wars they want won for them. You cherry pick stuff obviously, where were you when we talked gun control and abortion?

    Busy. But now I'm home sick so I have time to troll. 😉

  • If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.

    I didn't serve, and it still did. But I also try to be informed about an issue before I spout an opinion.

  • A Alo

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    If benghazi didn't get your blood up you never served.

    I didn't serve, and it still did. But I also try to be informed about an issue before I spout an opinion.

    @alo said:

    I didn't serve, and it still did. But I also try to be informed about an issue before I spout an opinion.

    Yeah well knee jerk reactions happen. I didn't blame it on democrats but I still think we should have made a statement. And we did. The statement that we can be pushed around.

  • Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Not at all. It's what's necessary for the two sides to heal and work together. Not more cocky we won we won rah rah rah bullshit. I'd be saying the same thing if romney won. The partisanism must end

    The system is inherently partisan, and by design. It's not going to end, nor should it. It's the inability to compromise that's the problem. It's excessive or blind partisanship.

    And if you want examples of that, I can probably point you to some threads in here. If you want an example of people having a normal conversation, I'll point you to a thread with me and Tupa.

    I hardly think I'm the problem here. When you're a 4 on the political spectrum and you're arguing with 8s, 9s, and 10s it's not going to led to much in the way of healing. Like I always say, Cysko, I rarely even get to the part where I tell people what I think, or what I want to see happen. I usually just take issue with the nutty and lazy and ill-informed utterances of the people in here. Ex: just last night I was trying to point out that the idea that Republicans are the only people who think we face a fiscal crisis are clueless. Everyone knows this.

    I mean, we're talking baby steps in here.

    Plus, some of these people are fucking crazy, my brother. They're fucking nuts. I have no interest in compromising with them, or healing with them. And I noticed the other day that neither did you.

  • I have interest in solving problems. I wouldn't be an engineer if I didn't. I've voted both republican and democrat, so actually I do have an interest in compromise. Not with crazy people, but most people on both sides aren't dangerously insane. They are dangerously partisan though. To keep pushing us vs. Them will be disastrous. So if the compromising could start in the capitol that would be fine.

  • I'm with you. I just would disagree - completely - that both parties are equally guilty here. The Republican Party has simply gone off the reservation. They need to moderate. They need to be more inclusive. They need to put their rigid ideology aside and return to their history of being a party that solves problems. They've completely given up on that. Now their guiding philosophy is "Don't do anything about anything" and "Shit on people who we don't like."

    Just look around in here. Or turn on Fox. Their explanation for why people don't want to vote for them is "minorities want to take shit from the white establishment." This is the prevailing explanation in the fever swamp.

    Or look at it this way: there are virtually no moderate Republicans left. Almost none.

    This makes the compromise you say you want - that I want - so much harder.

    In the end, I think they're going to get this done if only because they have to. Obama knows it. Boehner knows it.

  • By naming we need tom tupa intellectually elite and then pointing to the conversations you have with him, you declare yourself intellectually elite. That's convenient, because it allows you to think every person that disagrees with you is crazy, wrong, and stupid. You're a very intelligent person, clearly, but I've always considered you a narcissist.

  • There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.

  • Democrats engaging in "we're less at fault then Republicans." Are guilty of partisan finger pointing. That's exactly what I mean. You're only proving my statement right. Who cares who's more at fault? They're both at fault.

  • There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.

    I'm talking about in office. There really aren't any left. Moderate Republicans get primaries. They get called RHINOs and lose to other Republicans.

    Political scientists measure these things. Both parties have gotten more ideological, but the Republicans have shifted much more to the right than Democrats have to the left. It's simply not correct to say this is a problem that's just as much a problem on the left as on the right.

  • By naming we need tom tupa intellectually elite and then pointing to the conversations you have with him, you declare yourself intellectually elite. That's convenient, because it allows you to think every person that disagrees with you is crazy, wrong, and stupid. You're a very intelligent person, clearly, but I've always considered you a narcissist.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    By naming we need tom tupa intellectually elite and then pointing to the conversations you have with him, you declare yourself intellectually elite. That's convenient, because it allows you to think every person that disagrees with you is crazy, wrong, and stupid. You're a very intelligent person, clearly, but I've always considered you a narcissist.

    Oh no. Trust me. My long conversations with Steve and Cal do nothing but make me hate myself.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    There are many moderate republicans. They just aren't very vocal, especially when Republican has been painted as a near synonym to Racist.

    I'm talking about in office. There really aren't any left. Moderate Republicans get primaries. They get called RHINOs and lose to other Republicans.

    Political scientists measure these things. Both parties have gotten more ideological, but the Republicans have shifted much more to the right than Democrats have to the left. It's simply not correct to say this is a problem that's just as much a problem on the left as on the right.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    I'm talking about in office. There really aren't any left. Moderate Republicans get primaries. They get called RHINOs and lose to other Republicans.

    Political scientists measure these things. Both parties have gotten more ideological, but the Republicans have shifted much more to the right than Democrats have to the left. It's simply not correct to say this is a problem that's just as much a problem on the left as on the right.

    It is, though, because that would be one party flatly refusing to accept any blame. Degrees of blame don't help anyone. Instead of pointing fingers why don't the democrats start using actions to try and pretend like they're interested in compromising on issues. Demanding republicans accept all the blame for years of failing to get ANYTHING done on either side will only increase hard feelings.

    Abe Lincoln also said of the confederates when asked by Robert E. Lee how the vanquished confederates were to be treated

    "Let them up easy" Rubbing their faces in the loss wasn't going to work then and it will not work now.

  • Democrats engaging in "we're less at fault then Republicans." Are guilty of partisan finger pointing. That's exactly what I mean. You're only proving my statement right. Who cares who's more at fault? They're both at fault.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Democrats engaging in "we're less at fault then Republicans." Are guilty of partisan finger pointing. That's exactly what I mean. You're only proving my statement right. Who cares who's more at fault? They're both at fault.

    Well, I just disagree. I care, and it matters. They're not equally at fault and it's worth pointing out.

    I can point you to the use of the filibuster by Republicans versus Democrats. That's a good measure. I mean, let's be real: when President Obama got in to office, he was riding a huge wave. The Republicans, led by Mitch McConnell, devised a strategy to oppose everything he did. Really. Just say no to everything. The theory was that if Obama promised change and a new tone, and then the public saw none of it happen and partisanship, they'd turn on Obama and put Republicans back in charge. And it worked pretty well in 2010.

    "“People were pretty demoralized, and there were two totally opposite thoughts on how to approach the situation,” a McConnell aide recalls. “One was, `we don't like the president, we ought to pop him early.’ The other was, `he’s really popular, we should work with him, because that’s what people want us to do.’ The boss’s take was: Neither." McConnell realized that it would be much easier to fight Obama if Republicans first made a public show of wanting to work with him."

    As Sen. Voinovich recalled, "“He wanted everyone to hold the fort. All he cared about was making sure Obama could never have a clean victory.”

    Or Joe Biden: “I spoke to seven different Republican Senators, who said, `Joe, I’m not going to be able to help you on anything,’ he recalls. His informants said [senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell had demanded unified resistance. “The way it was characterized to me was: `For the next two years, we can’t let you succeed in anything. That’s our ticket to coming back,’” Biden says. The vice president says he hasn’t even told Obama who his sources were, but Bob Bennett of Utah and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania both confirmed they had conversations with Biden along these lines.

    ...Is that the kind of partisanship you're talking about needing to go away? I think so too.