Nra Calls For Armed Police Officer In Every School
-
Divert the funds for lib "diversity training, marxist dogma, and evolution at the expense of religious beliefs, etc,
and it would help correct our curriculum deficiencies, ....towards safety in schools. A simple security system would
do wonders.
Meanwhile, a kid killed his family with gasoline. Not one lib thinks we need to control that dangerous, potentially lethal substance.
Not one lib cares about the deaths.
-
Divert the funds for lib "diversity training, marxist dogma, and evolution at the expense of religious beliefs, etc,
and it would help correct our curriculum deficiencies, ....towards safety in schools. A simple security system would
do wonders.
Meanwhile, a kid killed his family with gasoline. Not one lib thinks we need to control that dangerous, potentially lethal substance.
Not one lib cares about the deaths.
Divert the funds for lib "diversity training, marxist dogma, and evolution at the expense of religious beliefs, etc,
and it would help correct our curriculum deficiencies, ....towards safety in schools. A simple security system would
do wonders.
Meanwhile, a kid killed his family with gasoline. Not one lib thinks we need to control that dangerous, potentially lethal substance.
Not one lib cares about the deaths.
Gasoline does way more good and has more of a positive affect on our society than guns do, just saying.
"Evolution at the expense of religious beliefs"
What the fuck are you talking about? When school teaches sciences, and what you believe has no scientific merit, then guess what, it won't get taught. I would want the correct, scientifically backed principle to be taught at the expense of the incorrect one with no sicence behind it....
-
You mis-spelled "science", btw.....
I'm fine with teaching evolution. But teaching that God doesn't exist because of evolution is part of
the left's misinterpretation of the "separation of church and state".
As in, no mandated religion established by the state.,
It's turned into an anti-God, intimidation of anybody in a school, who has religious beliefs.
If students freely choose to do a school play that has religious basis to it....
the ACLU lawsuit will be threatened fast. There IS science behind evolution.
There is also science behind Christianity. But any science the left doesn't like,
they refuse to accept. As nearly? always. That should have been obvious...
You said
"Gasoline does way more good and has more of a positive affect on our society than guns do, just saying"
Where's the "science" in that? Gasoline ever PROTECT life? It's only taken lives.
Millions of guns, the Castle laws, ccw, - are a huge, huge deterent to violent crime.
Go look at Australia and Great Britain and Wales. They tried it, had the opposite affect that they wanted.
Criminals had the guns in the civilian populace.
Alchohol kills, too. Is there that much benefit to society with alchohol? Why not "ban" it then?
Make it harder to obtain? We have laws ...but underage kids still get it.... and all too often,
bad, and tragic things happen.
Education is the key, and the REestablishment of responsibllity as a cultural American ideal, instead of
one party pandering to the exact opposite. It's called "enabling", and over the decades, it's taken a sad toll on our
country.
-
I don't drink alcohol.
Gas fuels cars. Cars are very important.
Guns kill people in crime. Sometimes they hunt. Sometimes they protect. None of those things get close to the positives of gasoline. Basically, you had a shitty comparison.
I never once was told "there is no God" in school. What you read on conservative sites about the dirty liberal isn't always true. Really, half the shit you say about liberals probably isn't true. This us just the most recent example. No crazy liberal teacher is going around insulting the good Christian students and sating there is no God.
Also, post the science that helps prove Christianity. Really I can't wait. I want to know how 2 of every animal fit on a boat or how the Earth is only 6000 years old.
Finally, link me to a study talking about crime, guns and Whales (or one if those countries) please. I'm not doubting you completely, I just like numbers
-
We can't even pass a levy here lol
Thats a problem leaving school funding to a levy system. At some point elected officials need to make hard decisions, even if unpopular with the voters.
Take Strongsville...I don't know anything about it other than where it is and I like to eat at Don's Pomeroy house.
I would imagine it has 1 HS, 1-2 Middleschools and 3-4 elementary schools. I don't count private schools, they do their own thing. So we are talking 7 schools, which would mean 7-8 positions to fill. I don't see that as a big problem...you are talking 50 or so thousand per school and another one time 15K expense to install 7-8 security cameras at various locations that would be monitored.
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
Guns are also used by city state and federal police, the FBI and all branches of the armed forces.
The comparison between guns cars is only valid in this regard:
Human life is not really a priority.
Of the thousands upon thousands of auto accident deaths in the United States each and every year how many would be prevented with a nation wide 35 mile per hour speed limit?
But it would be inconvenient.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
We can't even pass a levy here lol
Thats a problem leaving school funding to a levy system. At some point elected officials need to make hard decisions, even if unpopular with the voters.
Take Strongsville...I don't know anything about it other than where it is and I like to eat at Don's Pomeroy house.
I would imagine it has 1 HS, 1-2 Middleschools and 3-4 elementary schools. I don't count private schools, they do their own thing. So we are talking 7 schools, which would mean 7-8 positions to fill. I don't see that as a big problem...you are talking 50 or so thousand per school and another one time 15K expense to install 7-8 security cameras at various locations that would be monitored.
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
-
Guns are also used by city state and federal police, the FBI and all branches of the armed forces.
The comparison between guns cars is only valid in this regard:
Human life is not really a priority.
Of the thousands upon thousands of auto accident deaths in the United States each and every year how many would be prevented with a nation wide 35 mile per hour speed limit?
But it would be inconvenient.
WSS
Guns are also used by city state and federal police, the FBI and all branches of the armed forces.
The comparison between guns cars is only valid in this regard:
Human life is not really a priority.
Of the thousands upon thousands of auto accident deaths in the United States each and every year how many would be prevented with a nation wide 35 mile per hour speed limit?
But it would be inconvenient.
WSS
That didn't make sense in the last thread. No one uses the speed limit to kill people. Hell, the speed limit isn't really even what kills people. Really if you guys want to get you pro gun point across it would probably help to NOT bring up these dumb comparisons.
-
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Yeah I agree. Secretly arming teachers in the school is a bad idea. Students will easily find out. Hell, we knew which teachers were gonna get laid off if the levy failed again
-
We can't even pass a levy here lol
Thats a problem leaving school funding to a levy system. At some point elected officials need to make hard decisions, even if unpopular with the voters.
Take Strongsville...I don't know anything about it other than where it is and I like to eat at Don's Pomeroy house.
I would imagine it has 1 HS, 1-2 Middleschools and 3-4 elementary schools. I don't count private schools, they do their own thing. So we are talking 7 schools, which would mean 7-8 positions to fill. I don't see that as a big problem...you are talking 50 or so thousand per school and another one time 15K expense to install 7-8 security cameras at various locations that would be monitored.
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Thats a problem leaving school funding to a levy system. At some point elected officials need to make hard decisions, even if unpopular with the voters.
Take Strongsville...I don't know anything about it other than where it is and I like to eat at Don's Pomeroy house.
I would imagine it has 1 HS, 1-2 Middleschools and 3-4 elementary schools. I don't count private schools, they do their own thing. So we are talking 7 schools, which would mean 7-8 positions to fill. I don't see that as a big problem...you are talking 50 or so thousand per school and another one time 15K expense to install 7-8 security cameras at various locations that would be monitored.
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Oh my god I live there! Yeah the Pomeroy house is great.
Anyway we have 1 high school and 2 middle schools which they are both gonna tear down to make one giant school. They've also been removing some elementary schools lately.
We only were able to pass the levy once by removing buses and making all the parents drive their kids in...
We already have a cop in the school, no idea what he does though .
-
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Are you filling the heads of these poor immature teens with your liberal ideology?
-
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Are you filling the heads of these poor immature teens with your liberal ideology?
Are you filling the heads of these poor immature teens with your liberal ideology?
If that's what Fox is calling science these days, then yes.
-
Guns are also used by city state and federal police, the FBI and all branches of the armed forces.
The comparison between guns cars is only valid in this regard:
Human life is not really a priority.
Of the thousands upon thousands of auto accident deaths in the United States each and every year how many would be prevented with a nation wide 35 mile per hour speed limit?
But it would be inconvenient.
WSS
That didn't make sense in the last thread. No one uses the speed limit to kill people. Hell, the speed limit isn't really even what kills people. Really if you guys want to get you pro gun point across it would probably help to NOT bring up these dumb comparisons.
That didn't make sense in the last thread. No one uses the speed limit to kill people. Hell, the speed limit isn't really even what kills people. Really if you guys want to get you pro gun point across it would probably help to NOT bring up these dumb comparisons.
Just pointing out that nobody really gives a rat's ass about human life.
So I will assume all the whining is merely to score political points.
WSS
-
That didn't make sense in the last thread. No one uses the speed limit to kill people. Hell, the speed limit isn't really even what kills people. Really if you guys want to get you pro gun point across it would probably help to NOT bring up these dumb comparisons.
Just pointing out that nobody really gives a rat's ass about human life.
So I will assume all the whining is merely to score political points.
WSS
Just pointing out that nobody really gives a rat's ass about human life.
So I will assume all the whining is merely to score political points.
WSS
But you at comparing apples and oranges.
-
Just pointing out that nobody really gives a rat's ass about human life.
So I will assume all the whining is merely to score political points.
WSS
But you at comparing apples and oranges.
But you at comparing apples and oranges.
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
But you at comparing apples and oranges.
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
Hey I'd agree to that, no problem. The problem with that lies with guys like diehard who aren't insane and get something out of shooting. I get it, really I do. I don't hate target shooting, its fun. I like history's top shot. It's hard to tell someone who enjoys that that they'd have to live without it, but like I said, plenty of people enjoy/enjoyed smoking but it didn't stop everyone else who hated it from fucking the mighty tobacco industry in their collective ass. The NRA better start lubing up early because I think they'll be in the same boat as big tobacco soon.
-
" but you at "
Scrambled words woodpecker
-
But you at comparing apples and oranges.
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
You are assuming everyone would break the speed limit? If anything it would hinder the economy and society. A longer time in the car is less time buying things in a store.
Its a cost benefit thing...
-
Simply talking about saving innocent lives.
A 35 mile per hour speed limit would save thousands.
And instead of costing tax money it would be a financial cash cow!
How many people are killed with hand guns every year?
Since no 1 really needs 1 to hunt why not ban them all together?
Why be so selective with your altruism?
Wss
You are assuming everyone would break the speed limit? If anything it would hinder the economy and society. A longer time in the car is less time buying things in a store.
Its a cost benefit thing...
You are assuming everyone would break the speed limit? If anything it would hinder the economy and society. A longer time in the car is less time buying things in a store.
Its a cost benefit thing...
Oh, sorry. Didn't realize we couldn't afford it.
Also we can't afford to enforce the gun laws we have now so how the hell are we going to find money for enough officers to confiscate these weapons?
WSS
-
I like the idea of armed teachers. It wouldn't have to be all of them....maybe 4-5 per school....the ones that want to take on the responsibility. Give them a little more pay just like a coach gets a little more pay. Don't even let students know who carries and who doesn't. Get them trained and let them carry. That might give these punks some cause for pause knowing it isn't just a bunch of people who might throw a book at them but possibly 5-6 teachers who might start shooting at them.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Even if they don't know specifically which teacher it is, the kids will know that there are 5 guns in the school. Do they carry them on their person? If so, they can be seen if a teacher bends over the wrong way. I'm a teacher, and a significant amount of time, my back is turned to my class while I'm writing on the board. If I have one of these guns, my job becomes much more stressful because I don't know how my students will react if they realize I'm carrying. Weapons within reach of a bunch of immature teens is not a good idea.
Sounds like you are wanting to disagree on principal and can't argue my point other than a bunch of what if's.
As I said, the teacher would be the one to decide if they were comfortable or not. maybe they don't keep them on them but locked in their desk. There are ways to keep some pimple faced, pencil necked kid from getting the gun.
Where things of value are kept it isn't uncommon to have armed security. Maybe you disagree, but from my chair there is nothing more valuable than our kids.
Are our kids worth protecting. Yes or no is all the reply necessary.
Ok....of course they are. We just disagree on how best to do that. I want to have some security at the schools and you want to wave a magic wand and make the guns and bad guys disappear.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login