Skip to content

Team Of The Decade 2010S

The Browns Board
21 6 735
  • we have had 3 teams win the title. Who would anyone say is the best?

    People could make the case that NE is the best. And they have won 0 titles.

    Of the 3 teams that HAVE won the title, I would put GB 1st, NYG 2nd, Balt 3rd.

    GB has the best chance to win more titles then NYG or Balt.

    They have the best QB and the best coach. Not to mention Balt will have to deal with NE, Pitt, and Den the next 2-4 years.

  • And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

  • And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

    @ravensfan1996 said:

    And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

    Did you beat GB or Pitt i the playoffs?

    ANd how many times do you think you can beat Brady and Manning in the same season? You got one, do you REALLY think you can beat both of them again?

  • @ravensfan1996 said:

    And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

    Did you beat GB or Pitt i the playoffs?

    ANd how many times do you think you can beat Brady and Manning in the same season? You got one, do you REALLY think you can beat both of them again?

    @browns149 said:

    Did you beat GB or Pitt i the playoffs?

    ANd how many times do you think you can beat Brady and Manning in the same season? You got one, do you REALLY think you can beat both of them again?

    We didn't have to beat Pittsburgh in the playoffs because guess what....they didn't make it. And I don't know if you know this or not, but we beat the team that beat Green Bay. To win the Super Bowl. Brady and Manning are soft and I like our chances every time we go against them.

  • Brady and Manning are soft? They have 4 titles, Flacco has 1

  • if you would rather have Flacco, then Manning or Brady, you are INSANE.

  • To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.

  • And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.

  • Flacco has had a hell of a run, no joke. But taking him over Peyton and Brady? You're lying to yourself through your team bias.

  • It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.

    But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.

  • It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.

    But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.

    @calfoxwc said:

    It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.

    But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.

    Pitiful? I don't get your argument there. I have been a Ravens fan since 1996. I was a Colts fan until they left. I was a Buffalo Bills fan because of Jim Kelly, and I became a fan of the Ravens when they returned football to the best football town in the country. In regards to Flacco, all he has done since he was drafted is win, especially in the postseason. He has won more postseason games and has as many rings as the NFL's Golden Boy, Peyton.

  • Only thanks to his defense. Seriously.... I just meant how can ya be a ratbird fan, when the same thing happened to your team, that

    was stolen from you? Can't see it. And, you wouldn't have appreciated an Indinnapolis Colts fan coming to your old board, and laughing

    and bragging on how their Colts went to the superbowl, would ya?

    So, that's why I said "pitiful". That's all.

    Is Joe Flacco "The Answer"? | Bleacher Report bleacherreport.com/articles/146829-is-joe-flacco-the-an... Mar 29, 2009 ... This wasn't enough for the critics, as some still believe that Joe Flacco is a bust. They say that his success is because of that stifling defense, ...

  • Great thread Gipper. But the only point I will leave you with, is the Baltimore Colts won twice in the 1950's. Cleveland owned the decade, no doubt about it, but Baltimore deserves to be in second place behind them.

    @ravensfan1996 said:

    Great thread Gipper. But the only point I will leave you with, is the Baltimore Colts won twice in the 1950's. Cleveland owned the decade, no doubt about it, but Baltimore deserves to be in second place behind them.

    No, actually, the Lions are in second place in the 50s behind the Browns. Here are the point totals for the 1950s. Remember, there was usually one and only one postseason game played in those years, though a couple of times there were play in games:

    Browns: 10+6+6+6+10+10+6+3 for 57 points

    Lions: 10+10+6+10 for 36 points

    Rams: 6+10+3+6 for 25 points

    Giants: 3+10+6+6 for 25 points

    Colts: 10+10 for 20 points

    Bears: 3+6 for 9 pts

    49ers: 3 for 3 pts.

    The Colts didn't come into existance until the middle of that decade, so they had little time to "count up points". They certainly did well in the limited time they had, winning the last 2 titles of that decade, but those other teams did squeeze in more postseason play.

  • we have had 3 teams win the title. Who would anyone say is the best?

    People could make the case that NE is the best. And they have won 0 titles.

    Of the 3 teams that HAVE won the title, I would put GB 1st, NYG 2nd, Balt 3rd.

    GB has the best chance to win more titles then NYG or Balt.

    They have the best QB and the best coach. Not to mention Balt will have to deal with NE, Pitt, and Den the next 2-4 years.

    @browns149 said:

    we have had 3 teams win the title. Who would anyone say is the best?

    People could make the case that NE is the best. And they have won 0 titles.

    Of the 3 teams that HAVE won the title, I would put GB 1st, NYG 2nd, Balt 3rd.

    GB has the best chance to win more titles then NYG or Balt.

    They have the best QB and the best coach. Not to mention Balt will have to deal with NE, Pitt, and Den the next 2-4 years.

    Your point is taken. A "Team of the Decade" cannot be determined until the end of the decade. Who knows who will emerge as dominant. Take the 70s: through 1972 no one would have predicted that the Steelers would be the dominant team. It looked like the Dolphins would carry that mantle...but as we know that was not the case.

  • To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.

    @ravensfan1996 said:

    To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.

    The Cleveland area has won 13 titles in its history. Tied with Green Bay for the most. Of course none in a long while.

    But, hell, who knows...any team, even the Browns could end up being the Team of the Decade before the decade is over.

    Ravens have a slight lead right now. But this is only the quarter pole.

  • And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.

    @ravensfan1996 said:

    And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.

    For the future, sure you would take Flacco. He is only what? 27-28? Those others are in their late 30s.

    The question is: what kind of team will he have around him if he gobbles up all the cap space with his salary?

  • Just to advise, here is the complete list of Teams of the Decades going back to the formation of the NFL:

    2000s

    Patriots 41 points

    Steelers 28 pts.

    Colts 25 pts

    Eagles 21 pts

    Giants 20 pts

    1990s

    Cowboys 37 pts

    Bills 28 pts

    49ers 25 pts

    Broncos 25 pts

    Packers 22 pts

    1980s

    49ers 46 pts

    Redskins 30 pts

    Raiders 23 pts

    Broncos 20 pts

    Bears 18 pts

    1970s

    Steelers 48 pts

    Cowboys 46 pts

    Dolphins 30 pts

    Raiders 26 pts

    Vikings 25 pts

    1960s

    Packers 56 pts

    Chargers 34 pts (1st AFL)

    Oilers 30 pts (2d AFL)

    Chiefs 27 pts (3rd AFL)

    Bills 26 pts (4th AFL)

    Browns 23 pts (2d NFL)

    1950s

    Browns 57 pts

    Lions 36 pts

    Giants 25 pts

    Rams 25 pts

    Colts 20 pts

    1940s

    Bears 46 pts

    Browns 40 pts

    Redskins 28 pts

    Eagles 26 pts

    Giants 21 pts

    1930s

    Packers 52 pts

    Giants 44 pts

    Bears 32 pts

    Lions 16 pts

    Redskins 16 pts

    1920s

    Bears 43 pts

    Bulldogs 30 pts

    Packers 19 pts

    Yellow Jackets 19 pts

    Giants 16 pts.

  • And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

    @ravensfan1996 said:

    And we shall beat them again.

    Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.

    I don't think Denver is scared about Baltimore. Jones hail Mary was more fluke than tebows slant against the steelers.

    Baltimore will probly not make it back to playoffs. lossing way to much retirement/Fa + super bowl hangover. plus I can see them phucking up flacco situation which can certainly me problems early