Team Of The Decade 2010S
-
To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.
-
And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.
-
Flacco has had a hell of a run, no joke. But taking him over Peyton and Brady? You're lying to yourself through your team bias.
-
It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.
But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.
-
It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.
But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.
It wasn't that long ago, when Flatulence Flacco was a "BUST" discussion most everywhere.
But, somebody who thinks they have been a stinkin ratbird fan since 1996 ...that's just plain pitiful.
Pitiful? I don't get your argument there. I have been a Ravens fan since 1996. I was a Colts fan until they left. I was a Buffalo Bills fan because of Jim Kelly, and I became a fan of the Ravens when they returned football to the best football town in the country. In regards to Flacco, all he has done since he was drafted is win, especially in the postseason. He has won more postseason games and has as many rings as the NFL's Golden Boy, Peyton.
-
Only thanks to his defense. Seriously.... I just meant how can ya be a ratbird fan, when the same thing happened to your team, that
was stolen from you? Can't see it. And, you wouldn't have appreciated an Indinnapolis Colts fan coming to your old board, and laughing
and bragging on how their Colts went to the superbowl, would ya?
So, that's why I said "pitiful". That's all.
Is Joe Flacco "The Answer"? | Bleacher Report bleacherreport.com/articles/146829-is-joe-flacco-the-an... Mar 29, 2009 ... This wasn't enough for the critics, as some still believe that Joe Flacco is a bust. They say that his success is because of that stifling defense, ...
-
Great thread Gipper. But the only point I will leave you with, is the Baltimore Colts won twice in the 1950's. Cleveland owned the decade, no doubt about it, but Baltimore deserves to be in second place behind them.
Great thread Gipper. But the only point I will leave you with, is the Baltimore Colts won twice in the 1950's. Cleveland owned the decade, no doubt about it, but Baltimore deserves to be in second place behind them.
No, actually, the Lions are in second place in the 50s behind the Browns. Here are the point totals for the 1950s. Remember, there was usually one and only one postseason game played in those years, though a couple of times there were play in games:
Browns: 10+6+6+6+10+10+6+3 for 57 points
Lions: 10+10+6+10 for 36 points
Rams: 6+10+3+6 for 25 points
Giants: 3+10+6+6 for 25 points
Colts: 10+10 for 20 points
Bears: 3+6 for 9 pts
49ers: 3 for 3 pts.
The Colts didn't come into existance until the middle of that decade, so they had little time to "count up points". They certainly did well in the limited time they had, winning the last 2 titles of that decade, but those other teams did squeeze in more postseason play.
-
we have had 3 teams win the title. Who would anyone say is the best?
People could make the case that NE is the best. And they have won 0 titles.
Of the 3 teams that HAVE won the title, I would put GB 1st, NYG 2nd, Balt 3rd.
GB has the best chance to win more titles then NYG or Balt.
They have the best QB and the best coach. Not to mention Balt will have to deal with NE, Pitt, and Den the next 2-4 years.
we have had 3 teams win the title. Who would anyone say is the best?
People could make the case that NE is the best. And they have won 0 titles.
Of the 3 teams that HAVE won the title, I would put GB 1st, NYG 2nd, Balt 3rd.
GB has the best chance to win more titles then NYG or Balt.
They have the best QB and the best coach. Not to mention Balt will have to deal with NE, Pitt, and Den the next 2-4 years.
Your point is taken. A "Team of the Decade" cannot be determined until the end of the decade. Who knows who will emerge as dominant. Take the 70s: through 1972 no one would have predicted that the Steelers would be the dominant team. It looked like the Dolphins would carry that mantle...but as we know that was not the case.
-
To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.
To correct you, Manning has 1. Just like Flacco. Brady has 3, and more power to him. How many does Cleveland have??? And yes, they are soft. Just watch the second half of the AFC Championship Game, and you will see how soft Brady is.
The Cleveland area has won 13 titles in its history. Tied with Green Bay for the most. Of course none in a long while.
But, hell, who knows...any team, even the Browns could end up being the Team of the Decade before the decade is over.
Ravens have a slight lead right now. But this is only the quarter pole.
-
And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.
And yes, I would take Flacco over those two any day of the week. His time is now.
For the future, sure you would take Flacco. He is only what? 27-28? Those others are in their late 30s.
The question is: what kind of team will he have around him if he gobbles up all the cap space with his salary?
-
Just to advise, here is the complete list of Teams of the Decades going back to the formation of the NFL:
2000s
Patriots 41 points
Steelers 28 pts.
Colts 25 pts
Eagles 21 pts
Giants 20 pts
1990s
Cowboys 37 pts
Bills 28 pts
49ers 25 pts
Broncos 25 pts
Packers 22 pts
1980s
49ers 46 pts
Redskins 30 pts
Raiders 23 pts
Broncos 20 pts
Bears 18 pts
1970s
Steelers 48 pts
Cowboys 46 pts
Dolphins 30 pts
Raiders 26 pts
Vikings 25 pts
1960s
Packers 56 pts
Chargers 34 pts (1st AFL)
Oilers 30 pts (2d AFL)
Chiefs 27 pts (3rd AFL)
Bills 26 pts (4th AFL)
Browns 23 pts (2d NFL)
1950s
Browns 57 pts
Lions 36 pts
Giants 25 pts
Rams 25 pts
Colts 20 pts
1940s
Bears 46 pts
Browns 40 pts
Redskins 28 pts
Eagles 26 pts
Giants 21 pts
1930s
Packers 52 pts
Giants 44 pts
Bears 32 pts
Lions 16 pts
Redskins 16 pts
1920s
Bears 43 pts
Bulldogs 30 pts
Packers 19 pts
Yellow Jackets 19 pts
Giants 16 pts.
-
And we shall beat them again.
Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.
And we shall beat them again.
Ask Denver and New England about Baltimore.
I don't think Denver is scared about Baltimore. Jones hail Mary was more fluke than tebows slant against the steelers.
Baltimore will probly not make it back to playoffs. lossing way to much retirement/Fa + super bowl hangover. plus I can see them phucking up flacco situation which can certainly me problems early
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login