Desmond Bryant
-
I see us trading one of those guys. My bet is on Taylor. I think we might be able to get a 2 and something else for him.
no fucking way.
what we add to subtract?
dumbest thing i've seen you post in a long time. you keep everybody.
now the light is getting a little more precise on how we draft next month.
no fucking way.
what we add to subtract?
dumbest thing i've seen you post in a long time. you keep everybody.
now the light is getting a little more precise on how we draft next month.
Sorry mik, you're stupid if you think the FO isn't even going to consider trading one of them. Like I said in a later post, I think we should stick with the depth we have, but you're telling me they aren't going to entertain trade offers? Riiiight.
Kindly, take the stick out of your ass and open your eyes the next time you read and respond to something I post.
-
no fucking way.
what we add to subtract?
dumbest thing i've seen you post in a long time. you keep everybody.
now the light is getting a little more precise on how we draft next month.
Sorry mik, you're stupid if you think the FO isn't even going to consider trading one of them. Like I said in a later post, I think we should stick with the depth we have, but you're telling me they aren't going to entertain trade offers? Riiiight.
Kindly, take the stick out of your ass and open your eyes the next time you read and respond to something I post.
Sorry mik, you're stupid if you think the FO isn't even going to consider trading one of them. Like I said in a later post, I think we should stick with the depth we have, but you're telling me they aren't going to entertain trade offers? Riiiight.
Take the stick out of your ass and open your eyes the next time you read and respond to something I post.
No, you're living in fantasy land. Just because "we're offering" doesn't mean that offer is going to be good.
Of course every player is always available to be traded. McCoy has been made available for the past 18 months, and the FO has received exactly zero offers for him.
I would never trade Rubin for a sixth or seventh round pick.. and that's as high of an offer as we are going to receive.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
34 million for a guy with 18 career starts & 11.5 sacks in 4 years just seems like a big overpay to me.
Not true.
He had the fourth most QB pressures of all DT's in the NFL last season. He only started 8 games, meaning that he was just a substitute for the other 8, limiting his opportunities.. and yet he still produced.
Not true.
He had the fourth most QB pressures of all DT's in the NFL last season. He only started 8 games, meaning that he was just a substitute for the other 8, limiting his opportunities.. and yet he still produced.
Could it be he was richard seymore's back up? That could be the reason for the lack of starts, Idk.
-
Sorry mik, you're stupid if you think the FO isn't even going to consider trading one of them. Like I said in a later post, I think we should stick with the depth we have, but you're telling me they aren't going to entertain trade offers? Riiiight.
Take the stick out of your ass and open your eyes the next time you read and respond to something I post.
No, you're living in fantasy land. Just because "we're offering" doesn't mean that offer is going to be good.
Of course every player is always available to be traded. McCoy has been made available for the past 18 months, and the FO has received exactly zero offers for him.
I would never trade Rubin for a sixth or seventh round pick.. and that's as high of an offer as we are going to receive.
No, you're living in fantasy land. Just because "we're offering" doesn't mean that offer is going to be good.
Of course every player is always available to be traded. McCoy has been made available for the past 18 months, and the FO has received exactly zero offers for him.
I would never trade Rubin for a sixth or seventh round pick.. and that's as high of an offer as we are going to receive.
No, this isn't fantasy land at all. The front office is going to entertain trade offers. Rubin is one of the league's top defensive linemen and he's only 26. He demands at least a 2nd or 3rd rounder and change.
-
If we could somehow manage a 2nd out if Rubin, I wouldn't mind it at all.
But nobody is hurting bad enough at DT to offer a second for a 6th round draft pick.
-
Still don't know why people want to trade starters.
We just filled a hole, now they want to create one?
Zombo
Zombo said:
Still don't know why people want to trade starters.
We just filled a hole, now they want to create one?
Zombo
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
-
Zombo said:
Still don't know why people want to trade starters.
We just filled a hole, now they want to create one?
Zombo
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
-
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
Zombo said:
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
The reports are sounding like he was brought in to be a 5tech D.E. not play nose tackle.
-
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
Zombo said:
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
I see Bryant,Winn and Rubin starting.
Winn was a highly rated 3-4 DE prospect drafted by a 4-3 team. He'll do well in the 3-4 and will eventually be our starter if not starting by week 1.
While I am an advocate of building in the trenches, if trading one of our now 5 DL can move us into the second, I would do it in a heartbeat.
-
Zombo said:
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
The reports are sounding like he was brought in to be a 5tech D.E. not play nose tackle.
The reports are sounding like he was brought in to be a 5tech D.E. not play nose tackle.
Exactly.
So please, let's not trade Rubin or Taylor.
Our DL could be a real strength, and these big bodies will get Kruger, Sheard et al a lot of sacks.
Zombo
-
Zombo said:
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
I see Bryant,Winn and Rubin starting.
Winn was a highly rated 3-4 DE prospect drafted by a 4-3 team. He'll do well in the 3-4 and will eventually be our starter if not starting by week 1.
While I am an advocate of building in the trenches, if trading one of our now 5 DL can move us into the second, I would do it in a heartbeat.
I see Bryant,Winn and Rubin starting.
Winn was a highly rated 3-4 DE prospect drafted by a 4-3 team. He'll do well in the 3-4 and will eventually be our starter if not starting by week 1.
While I am an advocate of building in the trenches, if trading one of our now 5 DL can move us into the second, I would do it in a heartbeat.
Phil Taylor is a beast. No way he is not on our line next year.
Zombo
-
I see Bryant,Winn and Rubin starting.
Winn was a highly rated 3-4 DE prospect drafted by a 4-3 team. He'll do well in the 3-4 and will eventually be our starter if not starting by week 1.
While I am an advocate of building in the trenches, if trading one of our now 5 DL can move us into the second, I would do it in a heartbeat.
Phil Taylor is a beast. No way he is not on our line next year.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Phil Taylor is a beast. No way he is not on our line next year.
Zombo
He will when Rubin gets traded.
-
Ok, 6th round draft pick Billy Winn, 6'4 295 lbs with 26 career tackles is going to be a starting 3-4 defensive end for us and we are going to trade a proven commodity like Rubin to open up a spot for him.
Zombo
-
Ok, 6th round draft pick Billy Winn, 6'4 295 lbs with 26 career tackles is going to be a starting 3-4 defensive end for us and we are going to trade a proven commodity like Rubin to open up a spot for him.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Ok, 6th round draft pick Billy Winn, 6'4 295 lbs with 26 career tackles is going to be a starting 3-4 defensive end for us and we are going to trade a proven commodity like Rubin to open up a spot for him.
Zombo
We might. His numbers aren't bad for the time that he saw and considering the fact that Taylor and Rubin were ahead of him on the depth chart. Both he and Hughes, imo have the potential to be starter quality players, and they will be if they keep playing as well as they did this year. If we do happen to retain everyone, I think we're going to have to trade one of them away in the future before they walk to start somewhere else.
Again, I'm not saying we should do it. I'd much rather us keep this talent and just wear down opposing O-lines. Regardless, the Browns are going to listen to whatever offers they might get (and I guarantee that someone will be showing interest in at least one of these guys).
-
Ok, 6th round draft pick Billy Winn, 6'4 295 lbs with 26 career tackles is going to be a starting 3-4 defensive end for us and we are going to trade a proven commodity like Rubin to open up a spot for him.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Ok, 6th round draft pick Billy Winn, 6'4 295 lbs with 26 career tackles is going to be a starting 3-4 defensive end for us and we are going to trade a proven commodity like Rubin to open up a spot for him.
Zombo
It's things like this that make you realized how stupid some of the people on this board are. Everyone thinks every years 7th round pick is going to be the next HoFer.
-
Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Winn, Hughes... That's a lot of talent for our front 3. Word is Rubin may be expendable now, but I disagree, even if we draft a true 3-4 DE. These 5 guys make up an excellent DL rotation for a 3-4, in my opinion. Plus, Kruger and/or Sheard moves up to DE at times. Pretty vicious... on paper
Let's see what else happens... desperately NEED at least one quality CB
Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Winn, Hughes... That's a lot of talent for our front 3. Word is Rubin may be expendable now, but I disagree, even if we draft a true 3-4 DE. These 5 guys make up an excellent DL rotation for a 3-4, in my opinion. Plus, Kruger and/or Sheard moves up to DE at times. Pretty vicious... on paper
Let's see what else happens... desperately NEED at least one quality CB
I don't see where having 5 guys in a rotation for 3 positions is an "overabundance" of talent. In fact, I still see Sheard at DE, even in the 3-4. That would make 6 players in that rotation. Keep them fresh, keep them nasty.
At LB now we have DQ, Kruger, Groves, Gocong, Fort, Acho, Robertson, JMJ,..and I suppose I am missing someone. That is also a decent rotation of 8 players for the 4 LB spots.
That makes 14 potential players for the defensive front 7 spot. Is that about right for an NFL roster?
-
If it means getting a second round pick out of it, then yes.
There are many offensive players predicted to go in the second that can really help our team.
But really I'm just thinking about EJ Manuel.
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
Zombo said:
I guess I'm seeing Bryant, Rubin and Taylor all starting with Winn and Hughes rotating in as depth.
If we trade one of those guys, we've created a weakness.
That article suggests the Browns see all three as interior linemen, I don't think that's how the Browns see it.
Zombo
I agree with Zombo. Why fill a hole then just open a new one. Why turn a strength into a potential weakness.
Give me that 5-6 man rotation and let them play fresh and play mean.
-
Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Winn, Hughes... That's a lot of talent for our front 3. Word is Rubin may be expendable now, but I disagree, even if we draft a true 3-4 DE. These 5 guys make up an excellent DL rotation for a 3-4, in my opinion. Plus, Kruger and/or Sheard moves up to DE at times. Pretty vicious... on paper
Let's see what else happens... desperately NEED at least one quality CB
I don't see where having 5 guys in a rotation for 3 positions is an "overabundance" of talent. In fact, I still see Sheard at DE, even in the 3-4. That would make 6 players in that rotation. Keep them fresh, keep them nasty.
At LB now we have DQ, Kruger, Groves, Gocong, Fort, Acho, Robertson, JMJ,..and I suppose I am missing someone. That is also a decent rotation of 8 players for the 4 LB spots.
That makes 14 potential players for the defensive front 7 spot. Is that about right for an NFL roster?
I don't see where having 5 guys in a rotation for 3 positions is an "overabundance" of talent. In fact, I still see Sheard at DE, even in the 3-4. That would make 6 players in that rotation. Keep them fresh, keep them nasty.
At LB now we have DQ, Kruger, Groves, Gocong, Fort, Acho, Robertson, JMJ,..and I suppose I am missing someone. That is also a decent rotation of 8 players for the 4 LB spots.
That makes 14 potential players for the defensive front 7 spot. Is that about right for an NFL roster?
How do you see the 250 lb Sheard at DE while the 280 lb Kruger is at OLB? I think both of these players will be moved back and forth between DE and OLB, but their position the majority of the time will be OLB.
Ruining threads since 1897. -
I don't see where having 5 guys in a rotation for 3 positions is an "overabundance" of talent. In fact, I still see Sheard at DE, even in the 3-4. That would make 6 players in that rotation. Keep them fresh, keep them nasty.
At LB now we have DQ, Kruger, Groves, Gocong, Fort, Acho, Robertson, JMJ,..and I suppose I am missing someone. That is also a decent rotation of 8 players for the 4 LB spots.
That makes 14 potential players for the defensive front 7 spot. Is that about right for an NFL roster?
How do you see the 250 lb Sheard at DE while the 280 lb Kruger is at OLB? I think both of these players will be moved back and forth between DE and OLB, but their position the majority of the time will be OLB.
How do you see the 250 lb Sheard at DE while the 280 lb Kruger is at OLB? I think both of these players will be moved back and forth between DE and OLB, but their position the majority of the time will be OLB.
Maybe. All I know is that heretofore Sheard has been a DE. He doesn't seem like a LB to me.
So, as far as I am concerned, these guys are all interchangeable somewhat.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login