Skip to content

Knock Knock

Political Discussion
37 10 1.1k
  • Probably a good thing you aren't on the jury then. If a white man were being followed by a black man would that be sufficient reason for the white man to turn around and attack?

    WSS

  • A man with wannabe cop issues who is carrying a loaded gun gets out of his car, unadvisedly, and follows an unarmed teen until some sort of confrontation ensues, and then he doesn't just pull the gun on him, but shoots the unarmed teen dead with a single shot.

    If I were on the jury, he'd have a long way to go to prove to me that he doesn't deserve any jail time.

    And forget the knock knock joke. If a defense attorney tried to suggest that the teen really was armed because the pavement is a deadly weapon, he'd have even longer to go.

    That's fucking laughable.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    A man with wannabe cop issues who is carrying a loaded gun gets out of his car, unadvisedly, and follows an unarmed teen until some sort of confrontation ensues, and then he doesn't just pull the gun on him, but shoots the unarmed teen dead with a single shot.

    If I were on the jury, he'd have a long way to go to prove to me that he doesn't deserve any jail time.

    And forget the knock knock joke. If a defense attorney tried to suggest that the teen really was armed because the pavement is a deadly weapon, he'd have even longer to go.

    That's fucking laughable.

    Your response is laughable.

  • Probably a good thing you aren't on the jury then. If a white man were being followed by a black man would that be sufficient reason for the white man to turn around and attack?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Probably a good thing you aren't on the jury then. If a white man were being followed by a black man would that be sufficient reason for the white man to turn around and attack?

    WSS

    What a silly question.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Probably a good thing you aren't on the jury then. If a white man were being followed by a black man would that be sufficient reason for the white man to turn around and attack?

    WSS

    What a silly question.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    What a silly question.

    One would think. But you seem to think that if the races are reversed it's an acceptable action.

    WSS

  • Talk about straw man. dang. I thought you despised those straw men?

    Ah, only when YOU get to use them.

    Meanwhile, the main witness's cred is wracked into pieces.

  • The star witness was a joke. Some ghetto girl who couldn't even speak english. They had to repeatedly ask her to repeat herself. This whole trial is a waste of money.

  • @heckofajobbrownie said:

    What a silly question.

    One would think. But you seem to think that if the races are reversed it's an acceptable action.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    One would think. But you seem to think that if the races are reversed it's an acceptable action.

    WSS

    Oh, stop it. You'll notice I didn't mention race at all. You did. And then you assume that I believe the opposite of your supposition. One of these days you're going to get why it's so irritating to discuss these issues with you. It's not going to be soon, but maybe someday.

    I'm saying something different. I'm saying that when you're packing heat and decide to follow someone against the wishes of the 911 dispatcher, and the fact that you followed someone is part of what initiates a confrontation, and then you use lethal force to end the confrontation, you've got to go a long way to prove that you really, really needed to take that person's life in order to save yours.

    He was armed, and knew that when he followed him. Then he took another man's life. That's a substantial burden to overcome in my eyes.

  • @westside-steve said:

    One would think. But you seem to think that if the races are reversed it's an acceptable action.

    WSS

    Oh, stop it. You'll notice I didn't mention race at all. You did. And then you assume that I believe the opposite of your supposition. One of these days you're going to get why it's so irritating to discuss these issues with you. It's not going to be soon, but maybe someday.

    I'm saying something different. I'm saying that when you're packing heat and decide to follow someone against the wishes of the 911 dispatcher, and the fact that you followed someone is part of what initiates a confrontation, and then you use lethal force to end the confrontation, you've got to go a long way to prove that you really, really needed to take that person's life in order to save yours.

    He was armed, and knew that when he followed him. Then he took another man's life. That's a substantial burden to overcome in my eyes.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    Oh, stop it. You'll notice I didn't mention race at all. You did. And then you assume that I believe the opposite of your supposition. One of these days you're going to get why it's so irritating to discuss these issues with you. It's not going to be soon, but maybe someday.

    I'm saying something different. I'm saying that when you're packing heat and decide to follow someone against the wishes of the 911 dispatcher, and the fact that you followed someone is part of what initiates a confrontation, and then you use lethal force to end the confrontation, you've got to go a long way to prove that you really, really needed to take that person's life in order to save yours.

    He was armed, and knew that when he followed him. Then he took another man's life. That's a substantial burden to overcome in my eyes.

    Only problem with your opinion is that it is the prosecutions duty to prove he is guilty, not the other way around genius. I don't see it happening. Of course, after the OJ trial anything is possible.

  • With libs, if they don't like you, you are guilty, and if you can't prove you

    are innocent with no doubt, then you are still guilty.

    Unless you are one of them, then you are innocent no matter what the evidence.

  • Joke star witness, blech, ends up with a lot of deleted Twitter messages.

    Hide facts, they want to convict Zimmerman.

    She was a mistake to put on the stand. Interesting, when she got miffed at the

    prosecutor's questioning...she all of a sudden spoke louder and clearer.

    "oops", main witness.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/zimmerman-witness-gets-twitter-scrub-748092

  • Burden of proof is to prove he's guilty.

    But he's claiming self defense

    So I would think some portion of that burden is now proving he had to act in self defense.

  • Burden of proof is to prove he's guilty.

    But he's claiming self defense

    So I would think some portion of that burden is now proving he had to act in self defense.

    @mld-woody said:

    Burden of proof is to prove he's guilty.

    But he's claiming self defense

    So I would think some portion of that burden is now proving he had to act in self defense.

    Nope, not at all. They have to prove he WASN'T acting in self defense.

  • If this shooting had been black on black, white one white, or hispanic on hispanic, , this would be a non story. The shooter would have not been charged based on the stand your ground law...case closed...or if it did somehow go to trial, it would not be covered nationally.

    It would also be a non story if Trayvon was white and Z was black.

    Sensationalism sells. This was clearly race baiting by the liberal media to promote a political agenda.

    Newspapers printing a photo of a young innocent Trayvon when he was 13yrs. old next to a scruff looking Zimmerman

    Describing Z as a "white hispanic".

    The unconscionable act by liberal run CBS of editing the conversation between Z and 911....

    The edited and actual exchange between Z and 911...

    Gotta keep pandering to the black community by concluding that all wrongs committed against them are because of racism... and lest we forget that the conditions the black community find themselves is not their fault, but rather its the white man "keeping them down".

  • 581739_468130326591250_1832591737_n.jpgTreyvon who? Treyvon theTHUG caught a slug.

  • Oh boy, are you going to start posting pictures named things like "deadnigger.jpg" again?

  • Oh, when are you ever going to start posting some legit content on this board, Woody? Seriously.

  • When?