Skip to content

Also Ran Qbs? #mcnabb?

The Browns Board
17 6 503
  • He was a a very good QB on a very good team. But he wasn't great.

    He was never "the best" at his position for a single period of time.

    He didn't lead his team to a championship.

    He never threw for 4,000 yards in a season.

    Completion percentage under 60% in an era where 60% was average.

    His "good years" basically spanned the decade 2000-2009.

    But if I am picking an "all decade team" for those years, he is riding the pine behind:

    1. Manning

    2. Brady

    3. Warner

    He would be fourth best, and I think you draw the HOF line after the top three.

    And then you have Ben and Eli, who came in the middle of the decade and have two rings a piece, and Brees who came into prominence later in the decade, has a ring and still going strong.

    There's six contemporaries who will have better resumes coming Hall voting time.

    I think McNabb joins McNair in the "very good, but not Hall of Famers" category, although I would have him above McNair.

    Zombo

  • He was a a very good QB on a very good team. But he wasn't great.

    He was never "the best" at his position for a single period of time.

    He didn't lead his team to a championship.

    He never threw for 4,000 yards in a season.

    Completion percentage under 60% in an era where 60% was average.

    His "good years" basically spanned the decade 2000-2009.

    But if I am picking an "all decade team" for those years, he is riding the pine behind:

    1. Manning

    2. Brady

    3. Warner

    He would be fourth best, and I think you draw the HOF line after the top three.

    And then you have Ben and Eli, who came in the middle of the decade and have two rings a piece, and Brees who came into prominence later in the decade, has a ring and still going strong.

    There's six contemporaries who will have better resumes coming Hall voting time.

    I think McNabb joins McNair in the "very good, but not Hall of Famers" category, although I would have him above McNair.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    He was a a very good QB on a very good team. But he wasn't great.

    He was never "the best" at his position for a single period of time.

    He didn't lead his team to a championship.

    He never threw for 4,000 yards in a season.

    Completion percentage under 60% in an era where 60% was average.

    His "good years" basically spanned the decade 2000-2009.

    But if I am picking an "all decade team" for those years, he is riding the pine behind:

    1. Manning

    2. Brady

    3. Warner

    He would be fourth best, and I think you draw the HOF line after the top three.

    And then you have Ben and Eli, who came in the middle of the decade and have two rings a piece, and Brees who came into prominence later in the decade, has a ring and still going strong.

    There's six contemporaries who will have better resumes coming Hall voting time.

    I think McNabb joins McNair in the "very good, but not Hall of Famers" category, although I would have him above McNair.

    Zombo

    I agree..McNabb never did anything for Me..I thought he was just slightly better than average. But always found a way to choke in the big games...

  • I kinda think you are right Z. Here are the QBs who so far have not been inducted into the HOF who have had the most productive careers. A few are obviously not eligible yet. These are the PFR career production numbers:

    Favre 254

    P. Manning 235

    Brady 178

    Ken Anderson 161

    Brees 160

    John Hadl 144

    Vinny Testaverde 142

    John Brodie 141

    Dave Kreig 138

    Donovan McNabb 138

    Drew Bledsoe 137

    Jim Hart 136

    Boomer Esiason 135

    Randall Cunningham 134

    Roman Gabriel 132

    Steve McNair 126

    Rich Gannon 120

    Mark Brunell 120

    Phil Simms 118

    Craig Morton 117

    So, you can see where he fits on total career productivity. (Yes, for this, longevity helps some guys...like Vinny)

    FYI, McNabb's productivity stats are actually better than the following: Bart Starr, Aikman, Jim Kelly, Van Brocklin, Staubach.

    Another interesting note here: Ken Anderson is #2 on the list of most productive career players who are not in the HOF, yet who are eligible. Jim Marshall DE is #1.

    I for one would probably advocate that Anderson is more HOF worthy than McNabb. Then there is Hadl, who actually won an AFL title.

  • And who should go in first: McNabb..or Plunkett, Stabler, Theisman?

  • And who should go in first: McNabb..or Plunkett, Stabler, Theisman?

    @the-gipper said:

    And who should go in first: McNabb..or Plunkett, Stabler, Theisman?

    None of them.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    And who should go in first: McNabb..or Plunkett, Stabler, Theisman?

    None of them.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    None of them.

    Zombo

    What about Anderson?

  • Zombo said:

    None of them.

    Zombo

    What about Anderson?

    @the-gipper said:

    What about Anderson?

    Nope, very good QB, not a HOF.

    Zombo

  • Randall Cunningham did play in an NFC Title Game with the Vikings in 1998 (the infamous Gary Anderson miss)

  • Randall Cunningham did play in an NFC Title Game with the Vikings in 1998 (the infamous Gary Anderson miss)

    @marcus said:

    Randall Cunningham did play in an NFC Title Game with the Vikings in 1998 (the infamous Gary Anderson miss)

    I was trying to piece these stats together from different sources, so I may have missed a few.

  • No worries partner just trying to add to the convo

  • @the-gipper said:

    And who should go in first: McNabb..or Plunkett, Stabler, Theisman?

    None of them.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    None of them.

    Zombo

    agree completely. All these other greats are going to basically be slapped in the face when you start putting "above average" guys in the hall. How do think all the other Nobel prize winners felt when fucking Barack Obama won it. Same way I see it
  • Zombo said:

    None of them.

    Zombo

    agree completely. All these other greats are going to basically be slapped in the face when you start putting "above average" guys in the hall. How do think all the other Nobel prize winners felt when fucking Barack Obama won it. Same way I see it

    @comeonman said:

    agree completely. All these other greats are going to basically be slapped in the face when you start putting "above average" guys in the hall. How do think all the other Nobel prize winners felt when fucking Barack Obama won it. Same way I see it

    Have you seen the list of people who HAVE won it? The answer is: they feel honored:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

  • @comeonman said:

    agree completely. All these other greats are going to basically be slapped in the face when you start putting "above average" guys in the hall. How do think all the other Nobel prize winners felt when fucking Barack Obama won it. Same way I see it

    Have you seen the list of people who HAVE won it? The answer is: they feel honored:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

    @the-gipper said:

    Have you seen the list of people who HAVE won it? The answer is: they feel honored:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

    sure they do
  • @the-gipper said:

    Have you seen the list of people who HAVE won it? The answer is: they feel honored:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

    sure they do

    @comeonman said:

    sure they do

    Well, some do. 3/4ths of them are dead.

  • If you put Mcnanny in the hall, it lessens it for everyone else IMO

  • McNabb isn't getting into the Hall. As has been said many times, it's the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Very Good.

    However, worms everywhere are rejoicing that he's retiring.