Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"
-
One of the alleged murderers is said to be white and the other two are black.
Why make this a racial thing? They're all just pieces of shit, and their color doesn't seem to have anything to do with the motivation.
Why make this a racial thing? They're all just pieces of shit, and their color doesn't seem to have anything to do with the motivation.
Cuz it is DieHard's thing...
-
One of the alleged murderers is said to be white and the other two are black.
Why make this a racial thing? They're all just pieces of shit, and their color doesn't seem to have anything to do with the motivation.
Why make this a racial thing? They're all just pieces of shit, and their color doesn't seem to have anything to do with the motivation.
I just quoted the facts, you made it racial. One was white, 2 black. They sad they did it for fun.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Sick and twisted. Seems they were crips wannabees or something.
-
Why make this a racial thing? They're all just pieces of shit, and their color doesn't seem to have anything to do with the motivation.
I just quoted the facts, you made it racial. One was white, 2 black. They sad they did it for fun.
I just quoted the facts, you made it racial. One was white, 2 black. They sad they did it for fun.
No, you made it racial by making the title: Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"
I can't believe I had to point that out.
-
Racial to you, not me.
-
Racial to you, not me.
Racial to you, not me.
This statement says a lot.
-
Racial to you, not me.
This statement says a lot.
This statement says a lot.
You put race in the title. You are therefore framing the story with a racial undertone. If this was not a racial thing to you, then why wouldn't you just say "australian shot by 3 teens?" Not only does your title introduce racial bias, but it's also misleading and inaccurate.
-
I don't see it. Hiding the races of the murderers is not racist?
Wouldn't hiding those facts be racially hiding 2/3 of the responsibility?
Facts are not racial.
-
I just quoted the facts, you made it racial. One was white, 2 black. They sad they did it for fun.
No, you made it racial by making the title: Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"
I can't believe I had to point that out.
No, you made it racial by making the title: Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"
I can't believe I had to point that out.
Look up..the purpose of this thread went over yours and woodys heads.
This thread topic IS about race, regardless of him using "black" or not, otherwise there was no reason for Diehard to post this story right?
It is about the double standards and media hypocrisy regarding race.
Seems even DieHard lost track of why he posted it.
George Zimmerman killing Travon Martin wasn't supposed to be about race either, but the media and black "leaders" made it a race thing.
But 2 blacks killing a white..a non story, no racism at all, nothing to see here. That should have been the same for Zim and Tray as well.
Kinda get the idea?
-
I don't see it. Hiding the races of the murderers is not racist?
Wouldn't hiding those facts be racially hiding 2/3 of the responsibility?
Facts are not racial.
I son't see it. Hiding the races of the murderers is not racist?
Wouldn't hiding those facts be racially hiding 2/3 of the responsibility?
Facts are not racial.
Saying that black teens killed an innocent man is different than saying two black teens and a white teen killed an innocent man. But apparently that's over all of your heads.
Look up..the purpose of this thread went over yours and woodys heads.
This thread topic IS about race, regardless of him using "black" or not, otherwise there was no reason for Diehard to post this story right?
It is about the double standards and media hypocrisy regarding race.
Seems even DieHard lost track of why he posted it.
George Zimmerman killing Travon Martin wasn't supposed to be about race either, but the media and black "leaders" made it a race thing.
But 2 blacks killing a white..a non story, no racism at all, nothing to see here. That should have been the same for Zim and Tray as well.
Kinda get the idea?
I agree that the GZ trial shouldn't have been covered at all, Diehard is doing the same thing that the media did with the Zimmerman trial. Sorry I'm not sorry that I doubt that he used this title as a juxtaposition to Trayvon.
-
Actually, the actual shooter/murderer...
posted racist tweets:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/black-teen-who-murdered-australian-jogger-posted-racist-tweets/
-
Actually, the actual shooter/murderer...
posted racist tweets:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/black-teen-who-murdered-australian-jogger-posted-racist-tweets/
Actually, the actual shooter/murderer...
posted racist tweets:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/black-teen-who-murdered-australian-jogger-posted-racist-tweets/
This has been plain out ignored. Not sure how you can't see racial tensions there unless you're blind
-
He said only 90% of whites were nasty. He's not racist, see? He's got a white friend.
-
mr.president care to weigh in on this?
-
Because this guy could not have been his son.
-
So Michael Jones is white.....right
-
So Michael Jones is white.....right
So Michael Jones is white.....right
He can't be racist. See? He has a white friend. He only hates "90%" of whites.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login