Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"

DieHardBrownsFan

Racial to you, not me.

sadbrownsfan

@diehardbrownsfan said:
Racial to you, not me.

This statement says a lot.

VaporTrail

@sadbrownsfan said:

This statement says a lot.

You put race in the title. You are therefore framing the story with a racial undertone. If this was not a racial thing to you, then why wouldn't you just say "australian shot by 3 teens?" Not only does your title introduce racial bias, but it's also misleading and inaccurate.

calfoxwc

I don't see it. Hiding the races of the murderers is not racist?

Wouldn't hiding those facts be racially hiding 2/3 of the responsibility?

Facts are not racial.

Stewy

@vaportrail said:

No, you made it racial by making the title: Black teens kill Australian ballplayer in Oklahoma ''for the fun of it"

I can't believe I had to point that out.

Look up..the purpose of this thread went over yours and woodys heads.

This thread topic IS about race, regardless of him using "black" or not, otherwise there was no reason for Diehard to post this story right?

It is about the double standards and media hypocrisy regarding race.

Seems even DieHard lost track of why he posted it.

George Zimmerman killing Travon Martin wasn't supposed to be about race either, but the media and black "leaders" made it a race thing.

But 2 blacks killing a white..a non story, no racism at all, nothing to see here. That should have been the same for Zim and Tray as well.

Kinda get the idea?

VaporTrail

@calfoxwc said:

I son't see it. Hiding the races of the murderers is not racist?

Wouldn't hiding those facts be racially hiding 2/3 of the responsibility?

Facts are not racial.

Saying that black teens killed an innocent man is different than saying two black teens and a white teen killed an innocent man. But apparently that's over all of your heads.

@stewy said:

Look up..the purpose of this thread went over yours and woodys heads.

This thread topic IS about race, regardless of him using "black" or not, otherwise there was no reason for Diehard to post this story right?

It is about the double standards and media hypocrisy regarding race.

Seems even DieHard lost track of why he posted it.

George Zimmerman killing Travon Martin wasn't supposed to be about race either, but the media and black "leaders" made it a race thing.

But 2 blacks killing a white..a non story, no racism at all, nothing to see here. That should have been the same for Zim and Tray as well.

Kinda get the idea?

I agree that the GZ trial shouldn't have been covered at all, Diehard is doing the same thing that the media did with the Zimmerman trial. Sorry I'm not sorry that I doubt that he used this title as a juxtaposition to Trayvon.

calfoxwc

Actually, the actual shooter/murderer...

posted racist tweets:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/black-teen-who-murdered-australian-jogger-posted-racist-tweets/

calfoxwc

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/21/hate-them-heres-what-teen-accused-of-murdering-australian-student-had-to-say-about-white-people-guns-and-killing-on-twitter/

The Cysko Kid

@calfoxwc said:

Actually, the actual shooter/murderer...

posted racist tweets:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/black-teen-who-murdered-australian-jogger-posted-racist-tweets/

This has been plain out ignored. Not sure how you can't see racial tensions there unless you're blind

The Cysko Kid

He said only 90% of whites were nasty. He's not racist, see? He's got a white friend.

FairHooker11

mr.president care to weigh in on this?

DieHardBrownsFan

Because this guy could not have been his son.

Richiswhere

So Michael Jones is white.....right

The Cysko Kid

@richiswhere said:
So Michael Jones is white.....right

He can't be racist. See? He has a white friend. He only hates "90%" of whites.