Let's Lay to Rest the Myth that the Browns are...
-
... so much less talented than the Bengals. Didn't we beat them last year, too? You can't just keep saying something when it doesn't play out on the football field. Did it look like Ginger was better than Brian Hoyer? Did it look like either of their TEs were better than Cameron? Did it look like A.J. was just miles beyond Josh Gordon?
Did their front 7 look as good as our front 7? Do they have a corner as good as Joe Haden? A left tackle as good as Joe Thomas? Any pass rusher as good as Mingo? It's a passing league and I think we're better at QB, left tackle, pass rusher, TE, and #1 corner. So, uh...
The Bengals are undeniably strong at interior DL... but we're better. We just are, statistically and to the eyeball test. No DL is playing better than Taylor, Rubin, and Bryant. Taylor looks like a first-team All Pro to me. He's special. Bryant is an ideal 5-tech. And Rubin is Rubin, year after year one of the best all around DL in the NFL.
Buster Skrine is gradually sanding off his edges and if you blink you might miss the moment when he's officially a middle-of-the-league 2nd corner on his way to being more than that. DQJ is top 10 ILB in the NFL. Robertson, Kruger, Ward, and Gipson (great game) are all excellent football players. Our center is easily top 10.
Yes, we'll upgrade at RB and WR. Yes, we'll bring in a high level right-side blocker. Yes, we'll bring in a corner with size. We'll draft a quarterback somewhere... up to Hoyer how high. It's becoming a VERY deep group (welcome to the party, Carr and Morris).
This is a pretty damn good football team sitting on about 30 mill and 10 draft picks including 2 firsts... one acquired for a guy who can't seem to get more than 3 yards a carry under any situation in any uniform. Again... that trade, Mingo, and Hoyer are making Lombardi a candidate for Executive of the Year. I am not kidding.
-
Browns are on the up and up. I didn't think once the Bengals would beat us. I don't think they will this year. And I hope Hoyer is the real deal. I don't want to go qb first in the draft.
Browns are on the up and up. I didn't think once the Bengals would beat us. I don't think they will this year. And I hope Hoyer is the real deal. I don't want to go qb first in the draft.
That would be the perfect scenario for the Browns. They could fill holes in most of the positions they lack in now if they don't have to use picks to trade up to get
the QB they may want. I watched the replay of the Bungles game today, and he looks like he's in charge on the field. Can't read the coaches and front office's minds
but I do hope they would be flexible if Hoyer continues to impress. He is one of their guys after all.
-
... so much less talented than the Bengals. Didn't we beat them last year, too? You can't just keep saying something when it doesn't play out on the football field. Did it look like Ginger was better than Brian Hoyer? Did it look like either of their TEs were better than Cameron? Did it look like A.J. was just miles beyond Josh Gordon?
Did their front 7 look as good as our front 7? Do they have a corner as good as Joe Haden? A left tackle as good as Joe Thomas? Any pass rusher as good as Mingo? It's a passing league and I think we're better at QB, left tackle, pass rusher, TE, and #1 corner. So, uh...
The Bengals are undeniably strong at interior DL... but we're better. We just are, statistically and to the eyeball test. No DL is playing better than Taylor, Rubin, and Bryant. Taylor looks like a first-team All Pro to me. He's special. Bryant is an ideal 5-tech. And Rubin is Rubin, year after year one of the best all around DL in the NFL.
Buster Skrine is gradually sanding off his edges and if you blink you might miss the moment when he's officially a middle-of-the-league 2nd corner on his way to being more than that. DQJ is top 10 ILB in the NFL. Robertson, Kruger, Ward, and Gipson (great game) are all excellent football players. Our center is easily top 10.
Yes, we'll upgrade at RB and WR. Yes, we'll bring in a high level right-side blocker. Yes, we'll bring in a corner with size. We'll draft a quarterback somewhere... up to Hoyer how high. It's becoming a VERY deep group (welcome to the party, Carr and Morris).
This is a pretty damn good football team sitting on about 30 mill and 10 draft picks including 2 firsts... one acquired for a guy who can't seem to get more than 3 yards a carry under any situation in any uniform. Again... that trade, Mingo, and Hoyer are making Lombardi a candidate for Executive of the Year. I am not kidding.
... so much less talented than the Bengals. Didn't we beat them last year, too? You can't just keep saying something when it doesn't play out on the football field. Did it look like Ginger was better than Brian Hoyer? Did it look like either of their TEs were better than Cameron? Did it look like A.J. was just miles beyond Josh Gordon?
Did their front 7 look as good as our front 7? Do they have a corner as good as Joe Haden? A left tackle as good as Joe Thomas? Any pass rusher as good as Mingo? It's a passing league and I think we're better at QB, left tackle, pass rusher, TE, and #1 corner. So, uh...
The Bengals are undeniably strong at interior DL... but we're better. We just are, statistically and to the eyeball test. No DL is playing better than Taylor, Rubin, and Bryant. Taylor looks like a first-team All Pro to me. He's special. Bryant is an ideal 5-tech. And Rubin is Rubin, year after year one of the best all around DL in the NFL.
Buster Skrine is gradually sanding off his edges and if you blink you might miss the moment when he's officially a middle-of-the-league 2nd corner on his way to being more than that. DQJ is top 10 ILB in the NFL. Robertson, Kruger, Ward, and Gipson (great game) are all excellent football players. Our center is easily top 10.
Yes, we'll upgrade at RB and WR. Yes, we'll bring in a high level right-side blocker. Yes, we'll bring in a corner with size. We'll draft a quarterback somewhere... up to Hoyer how high. It's becoming a VERY deep group (welcome to the party, Carr and Morris).
This is a pretty damn good football team sitting on about 30 mill and 10 draft picks including 2 firsts... one acquired for a guy who can't seem to get more than 3 yards a carry under any situation in any uniform. Again... that trade, Mingo, and Hoyer are making Lombardi a candidate for Executive of the Year. I am not kidding.
Well, there is that "On paper" issue:
On paper:
Andy Dalton is better than Hoyer
AJ Green is one of the best WRs in the business
Gresham and Eifert are better combined than JC and whoever else also plays TE for the Browns
Their RBs Green-Ellis and Bernardi are better than whatever we have.
Their OL is about on par with our OL
Their DL seems better or at least on par with our DL
The LB corps seems better than our LB corps.
The DB corps seems better or on par with our DB corps.
So given that...on paper...they seem to have the advantage or at least equality with the Browns at every position, yes, they should have easily handled the Browns.
But they didn't....because why?
They really ARE NOT better as you imply?
Or because despite having the apparent advantages the Browns match up better? Or play more inspired?
To what do you attribute it?
-
By the way, Skrine leads the team with 7 PDs and is second with 19 solo tackles (DQJ, of course, has 22). Also has a pick. He's a keeper. I'd love to get a bigger #2 and move him into the slot but he might make it impossible to bench him pretty soon.
By the way, Skrine leads the team with 7 PDs and is second with 19 solo tackles (DQJ, of course, has 22). Also has a pick. He's a keeper. I'd love to get a bigger #2 and move him into the slot but he might make it impossible to bench him pretty soon.
Also the pass interference on him didn't look like a problem. The ball was under thrown and Skrine just happened to bump into the receiver as he stopped. Skrine has looked a lot better.
-
Stats support Browns defensive improvement thru games 4 (yards allowed by defense)
passing yards rushing yards average total/game
2012 1144 469 403
2013 850 316 291
-
Stats support Browns defensive improvement thru games 4 (yards allowed by defense)
passing yards rushing yards average total/game
2012 1144 469 403
2013 850 316 291
Stats support Browns defensive improvement thru games 4
passing yards rushing yards average total/game
2012 1144 469 403
2013 850 316 291
I don't know how to read this.
-
I don't know how to read this.
They're yards allowed by the defense.
-
Jury is still out on a lot of these guys.
Mingo has played great so far. Let's revisit this at the end of the season before we start ranking him. He's only got three games to his name.
Cameron has also been outstanding. But let's not forget that we had two years of no production before this and TE's go in and out of popularity faster than plaid shorts. Kyle Rudolph was a playmaker two years ago.
Skrine had a great game against Cincy. That's how you expect a #2 to play. His PI call was bogus. But he's also had a year of garbage, so let's wait until the end of the year on him as well.
Gordon is becoming a great WR. If he keeps this up he could easily be a top 5 receiving threat. If he keeps this up, though.
Mack is Mack. Thomas is Thomas. DQJ is DQJ. Haden is Haden. All top 10 at their position, Haden and Thomas in the top 5.
We have a solid corps but we still have holes and we still have a big learning curve. Hoyer had been an unexpected surprise and I really hope he continues playing as well as he has.
-
Jury is still out on a lot of these guys.
Mingo has played great so far. Let's revisit this at the end of the season before we start ranking him. He's only got three games to his name.
Cameron has also been outstanding. But let's not forget that we had two years of no production before this and TE's go in and out of popularity faster than plaid shorts. Kyle Rudolph was a playmaker two years ago.
Skrine had a great game against Cincy. That's how you expect a #2 to play. His PI call was bogus. But he's also had a year of garbage, so let's wait until the end of the year on him as well.
Gordon is becoming a great WR. If he keeps this up he could easily be a top 5 receiving threat. If he keeps this up, though.
Mack is Mack. Thomas is Thomas. DQJ is DQJ. Haden is Haden. All top 10 at their position, Haden and Thomas in the top 5.
We have a solid corps but we still have holes and we still have a big learning curve. Hoyer had been an unexpected surprise and I really hope he continues playing as well as he has.
Jury is still out on a lot of these guys.
Mingo has played great so far. Let's revisit this at the end of the season before we start ranking him. He's only got three games to his name.
Cameron has also been outstanding. But let's not forget that we had two years of no production before this and TE's go in and out of popularity faster than plaid shorts. Kyle Rudolph was a playmaker two years ago.
Skrine had a great game against Cincy. That's how you expect a #2 to play. His PI call was bogus. But he's also had a year of garbage, so let's wait until the end of the year on him as well.
Gordon is becoming a great WR. If he keeps this up he could easily be a top 5 receiving threat. If he keeps this up, though.
Mack is Mack. Thomas is Thomas. DQJ is DQJ. Haden is Haden. All top 10 at their position, Haden and Thomas in the top 5.
We have a solid corps but we still have holes and we still have a big learning curve. Hoyer had been an unexpected surprise and I really hope he continues playing as well as he has.
I agree. But you have to understand, this is Cleveland and we are starved for a winner.
-
Offensive line dominated on the drive resulting in the Ogbo TD. McGaheheehee showed his still has a some left in the tank. Lewis proved in 07 and 08 that a thirty yo running back can compete although I would be feeling a lot better about McGahee with a Browns training camp under his belt. Big question mark on Rainey. I don't know if the could could physically handle 15-20 runs/game. He isn't at Western Kentucky anymore.
I would like to see the Browns make a deal on a RB before trade deadline next month. Ginger might be worth something, after all.
-
My call? There isn't really a talent gap between the Bengals and Browns. I didn't believe it, personally... and when the theory ("on paper") was put to the test, your eyeballs could tell you that the Bengals simply were NOT more talented than the Browns.
Yes, the matchups work: The Bengals have a clear-cut #1 WR and the Browns have a clear-cut #1 CB... as opposed to the Browns playing a team that throws to everybody, like the Packers. The Browns have the league's best LT and a quarterback who gets the ball out fast, neutralizing two excellent pass rush teams in a row. The Browns have underrated cover safeties and 'backers like Gipson and Robertson to their 12 formations (two TEs) weren't really effective.
And if you read the above, "great gameplan" flows right out of it. The Browns were able to get heat mostly rushing 4, BTW, which gave us numbers in the defensive backfield. Ginger's numbers were dreadful.
Look, everything is always "as of now," and subject to change... but I came into the season thinking the Browns had quite a few potential Pro Bowl types (is there a Pro Bowl?): Kruger, Mingo, DQJ, Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Haden and Ward on defense; Thomas, Mack, Cameron, and Gordon on offense. Now I really like Hoyer and I've always thought PFF had it right on Greco: He's good.
It's not a perfect team. We aren't the Broncos or Seahawks. But I think it's a good football team that could win 9 games. I think we'll be 3-2 after Thursday night. Then, those resources for the offseason can't be matched.
-
My call? There isn't really a talent gap between the Bengals and Browns. I didn't believe it, personally... and when the theory ("on paper") was put to the test, your eyeballs could tell you that the Bengals simply were NOT more talented than the Browns.
Yes, the matchups work: The Bengals have a clear-cut #1 WR and the Browns have a clear-cut #1 CB... as opposed to the Browns playing a team that throws to everybody, like the Packers. The Browns have the league's best LT and a quarterback who gets the ball out fast, neutralizing two excellent pass rush teams in a row. The Browns have underrated cover safeties and 'backers like Gipson and Robertson to their 12 formations (two TEs) weren't really effective.
And if you read the above, "great gameplan" flows right out of it. The Browns were able to get heat mostly rushing 4, BTW, which gave us numbers in the defensive backfield. Ginger's numbers were dreadful.
Look, everything is always "as of now," and subject to change... but I came into the season thinking the Browns had quite a few potential Pro Bowl types (is there a Pro Bowl?): Kruger, Mingo, DQJ, Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Haden and Ward on defense; Thomas, Mack, Cameron, and Gordon on offense. Now I really like Hoyer and I've always thought PFF had it right on Greco: He's good.
It's not a perfect team. We aren't the Broncos or Seahawks. But I think it's a good football team that could win 9 games. I think we'll be 3-2 after Thursday night. Then, those resources for the offseason can't be matched.
My call? There isn't really a talent gap between the Bengals and Browns. I didn't believe it, personally... and when the theory ("on paper") was put to the test, your eyeballs could tell you that the Bengals simply were NOT more talented than the Browns.
Yes, the matchups work: The Bengals have a clear-cut #1 WR and the Browns have a clear-cut #1 CB... as opposed to the Browns playing a team that throws to everybody, like the Packers. The Browns have the league's best LT and a quarterback who gets the ball out fast, neutralizing two excellent pass rush teams in a row. The Browns have underrated cover safeties and 'backers like Gipson and Robertson to their 12 formations (two TEs) weren't really effective.
And if you read the above, "great gameplan" flows right out of it. The Browns were able to get heat mostly rushing 4, BTW, which gave us numbers in the defensive backfield. Ginger's numbers were dreadful.
Look, everything is always "as of now," and subject to change... but I came into the season thinking the Browns had quite a few potential Pro Bowl types (is there a Pro Bowl?): Kruger, Mingo, DQJ, Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Haden and Ward on defense; Thomas, Mack, Cameron, and Gordon on offense. Now I really like Hoyer and I've always thought PFF had it right on Greco: He's good.
It's not a perfect team. We aren't the Broncos or Seahawks. But I think it's a good football team that could win 9 games. I think we'll be 3-2 after Thursday night. Then, those resources for the offseason can't be matched.
Half of your list won't get Pro Bowl nods.
Realistically, it's more like Haden, Rubin, (maybe) Bryant and possibly Mingo on defense. On offense, it's Thomas, Cameron and possibly Gordon. Mack is a toss up, but there's still some very good veteran centers that will get it over him based on name alone.
I don't see a talent gap between us and any team in the NFL, excluding the Broncos and maybe the 49ers. We have the talent to hang with anybody and, where we don't have the talent, the play calling can make up for it.
But we need to temper our expectations a bit. Hoyer is going to have a bad game. Yes, it will happen. And then the "Bench Hoyer, Bridgewater 2014" threads will start. Gordon will have a bad game and we'll see "Trade Gordon while he has value". Cameron will drop a TD pass and we'll get "Antonio Gates available?"
We're so high to glorify guys when they do well and quick to dismiss them when they don't.
All in all, we have a young and talented team. Some are going to fizzle out. Others will be perennial Pro Bowlers.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Regardless of who has what talent on paper, I saw a team that was out coached. And that was especially evident on the defensive side of it. We had an answer for everything Lewis could think of(not saying much) and able to keep them guessing all day
-
Regardless of who has what talent on paper, I saw a team that was out coached. And that was especially evident on the defensive side of it. We had an answer for everything Lewis could think of(not saying much) and able to keep them guessing all day
Regardless of who has what talent on paper, I saw a team that was out coached. And that was especially evident on the defensive side of it. We had an answer for everything Lewis could think of(not saying much) and able to keep them guessing all day
Or, would you say that Ray Horton outcoached Jay Gruden?
-
Regardless of who has what talent on paper, I saw a team that was out coached. And that was especially evident on the defensive side of it. We had an answer for everything Lewis could think of(not saying much) and able to keep them guessing all day
Or, would you say that Ray Horton outcoached Jay Gruden?
Or, would you say that Ray Horton outcoached Jay Gruden?
Most likely, his schemes have made us vastly improved.
Do you guys think Horton had anything to do with Hoyer getting the nod over Campbell? He saw him in AZ, maybe he got into Chud & Norv's ear.
-
Regardless of who has what talent on paper, I saw a team that was out coached. And that was especially evident on the defensive side of it. We had an answer for everything Lewis could think of(not saying much) and able to keep them guessing all day
Or, would you say that Ray Horton outcoached Jay Gruden?
Or, would you say that Ray Horton outcoached Jay Gruden?
I would say that plus Chud out coached Marv. These things do tend to start at the top.
-
My call? There isn't really a talent gap between the Bengals and Browns. I didn't believe it, personally... and when the theory ("on paper") was put to the test, your eyeballs could tell you that the Bengals simply were NOT more talented than the Browns.
Yes, the matchups work: The Bengals have a clear-cut #1 WR and the Browns have a clear-cut #1 CB... as opposed to the Browns playing a team that throws to everybody, like the Packers. The Browns have the league's best LT and a quarterback who gets the ball out fast, neutralizing two excellent pass rush teams in a row. The Browns have underrated cover safeties and 'backers like Gipson and Robertson to their 12 formations (two TEs) weren't really effective.
And if you read the above, "great gameplan" flows right out of it. The Browns were able to get heat mostly rushing 4, BTW, which gave us numbers in the defensive backfield. Ginger's numbers were dreadful.
Look, everything is always "as of now," and subject to change... but I came into the season thinking the Browns had quite a few potential Pro Bowl types (is there a Pro Bowl?): Kruger, Mingo, DQJ, Taylor, Rubin, Bryant, Haden and Ward on defense; Thomas, Mack, Cameron, and Gordon on offense. Now I really like Hoyer and I've always thought PFF had it right on Greco: He's good.
It's not a perfect team. We aren't the Broncos or Seahawks. But I think it's a good football team that could win 9 games. I think we'll be 3-2 after Thursday night. Then, those resources for the offseason can't be matched.
Half of your list won't get Pro Bowl nods.
Realistically, it's more like Haden, Rubin, (maybe) Bryant and possibly Mingo on defense. On offense, it's Thomas, Cameron and possibly Gordon. Mack is a toss up, but there's still some very good veteran centers that will get it over him based on name alone.
I don't see a talent gap between us and any team in the NFL, excluding the Broncos and maybe the 49ers. We have the talent to hang with anybody and, where we don't have the talent, the play calling can make up for it.
But we need to temper our expectations a bit. Hoyer is going to have a bad game. Yes, it will happen. And then the "Bench Hoyer, Bridgewater 2014" threads will start. Gordon will have a bad game and we'll see "Trade Gordon while he has value". Cameron will drop a TD pass and we'll get "Antonio Gates available?"
We're so high to glorify guys when they do well and quick to dismiss them when they don't.
All in all, we have a young and talented team. Some are going to fizzle out. Others will be perennial Pro Bowlers.
We have the talent to hang with anybody and, where we don't have the talent, the play calling can make up for it.
NE went into Atl last night with a pair of third stringers at WR (Thomkins, Edelman). Not a big deal when you factor in a bellichik and a Brady. Bellichik continues to to get the best out of his players and Brady has a knack of getting his receivers to believe in themselves. this is another good example of coaching(Playcalling) and (QB's) being one of the major gaps between average teams and perennial winners. I am not sold on Turner by a long shot. His history with Rivers was not all that great and Rivers has actually improved since Turners departure from San Diego. The play calling in the 4th qtr yesterday was masterful. I have a hunch Chud had a lot of input. Hoyer showed poise. I see a lot of potential if this relationship continues to develop.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login