Skip to content

Josh Gordon to 49ers discussed according to Adam Schefter

The Browns Board
67 38 3.8k
  • I'm going to punch you if this isn't real.

    Zombo

  • Why us? May as well trade the Joes, Mack, Ward, Sheard, Cameron, Jackson, and Rubin as well. Burn it all down Banner


  • Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.


  • "discussed"

    I'm sure they want him, but I highly doubt they are going to get him.

    Zombo

  • Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.

    shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".

    still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done

  • Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.

    shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".

    still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done

    @booty-loaf said:

    Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.

    shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".

    still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done

    Relax.

    Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.

    But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.

    Zombo

  • I heard it on TV. But Zombo's right.

  • @booty-loaf said:

    Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.

    shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".

    still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done

    Relax.

    Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.

    But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Relax.

    Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.

    But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.

    Zombo

    Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.

    Again, to me, this seems just a case of Lombardi NOT caring about winning unless it is done with players he has chosen.

    Clearly Gordon is a beast....an outstanding receiver. Anyone that would trade him would be doing it out of pure hubris for his own ego.

    Fear that he is going to go off and get suspended? STUPID. Even if he does, so what.

  • Zombo said:

    Relax.

    Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.

    But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.

    Zombo

    Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.

    Again, to me, this seems just a case of Lombardi NOT caring about winning unless it is done with players he has chosen.

    Clearly Gordon is a beast....an outstanding receiver. Anyone that would trade him would be doing it out of pure hubris for his own ego.

    Fear that he is going to go off and get suspended? STUPID. Even if he does, so what.

    @the-gipper said:

    Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.

    I find that difficult to believe.

    And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.

    I find that difficult to believe.

    And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    I find that difficult to believe.

    And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.

    Zombo

    OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.

  • Zombo said:

    I find that difficult to believe.

    And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.

    Zombo

    OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.

    @the-gipper said:

    OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

    Precisely.

  • @the-gipper said:

    OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

    Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?

  • I will go ballistic if they trade Gordon. Who would be next? Cameron? Haden?

  • Zombo said:

    Well, that would be awful.

    Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.

    We are three and o with him.

    HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:

    96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs

    I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.

    Zombo

    Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?

    They haven't done anything stupid yet.

    They've been brilliant, actually.

    Zombo

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?

    They haven't done anything stupid yet.

    They've been brilliant, actually.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    They haven't done anything stupid yet.

    They've been brilliant, actually.

    Zombo

    with an extremely small amount of time they've had... cant judge off this small a sample size. but i do really like what i see. it looks like they actually have a blue print set for what they want and it looks like we are going in the right direction.

  • I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?

  • Yep, gotta listen when someone offers to buy your car parked in the driveway, you'd be stupid not to. That doesn't mean you're actively trying to sell it or don't want it anymore.

  • i just hope they aren't trigger happy because of his past off the field issues.

    go ballistic? they wouldn't be enough security guards in cleveland and berea for what would happen.

    he/they would truly look like the biggest schmucks in cleveland football history if they were to gut this team of our legit pro talent.

    right behind

    modell

    holmgren

    shurmur

    (i'm sure there are others but i'm too high right now to look anything up).

    great. they got us a #1 for TR. they did good in FA and did ok in the draft. what else do you have to prove that you are the brett maverick of nfl wheeler and dealers?

  • I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?

    @topdawg31 said:

    I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?

    It's hard to sell him higher than a second considering he was a second rounder and he's one strike away from a full suspension.

    That's the bargaining chip any offering team has.