Josh Gordon to 49ers discussed according to Adam Schefter
-
Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.
shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".
still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done
-
Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.
shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".
still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done
Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.
shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".
still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done
Relax.
Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.
But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.
Zombo
-
I heard it on TV. But Zombo's right.
-
Browns-49ers have discussed trade for WR Josh Gordon. Deal unlikely with Mario Manningham coming off PUP, Crabtree slated to return in Nov.
shefter just tweeted about it. says deal "unlikely".
still pisses me off to no end that they're even seeking a trade. fuck the browns im done
Relax.
Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.
But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Relax.
Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.
But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.
Zombo
Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.
Again, to me, this seems just a case of Lombardi NOT caring about winning unless it is done with players he has chosen.
Clearly Gordon is a beast....an outstanding receiver. Anyone that would trade him would be doing it out of pure hubris for his own ego.
Fear that he is going to go off and get suspended? STUPID. Even if he does, so what.
-
Zombo said:
Relax.
Just because other teams offer, and we listen, doesn't mean we are shopping him. Ya gotta listen.
But I wouldn't trade him for Two #1's right now ... he's a franchise receiver.
Zombo
Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.
Again, to me, this seems just a case of Lombardi NOT caring about winning unless it is done with players he has chosen.
Clearly Gordon is a beast....an outstanding receiver. Anyone that would trade him would be doing it out of pure hubris for his own ego.
Fear that he is going to go off and get suspended? STUPID. Even if he does, so what.
Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.
I find that difficult to believe.
And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.
Zombo
-
Except, of course, the rumors are that it was the Browns that have been initiating the trade talks.
I find that difficult to believe.
And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.
Zombo
Zombo said:
I find that difficult to believe.
And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.
Zombo
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
-
Zombo said:
I find that difficult to believe.
And it is Banner that is running this franchise, not Lombardi.
Zombo
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
-
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Precisely.
-
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
-
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
-
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
Zombo said:
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
with an extremely small amount of time they've had... cant judge off this small a sample size. but i do really like what i see. it looks like they actually have a blue print set for what they want and it looks like we are going in the right direction.
-
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
-
i just hope they aren't trigger happy because of his past off the field issues.
go ballistic? they wouldn't be enough security guards in cleveland and berea for what would happen.
he/they would truly look like the biggest schmucks in cleveland football history if they were to gut this team of our legit pro talent.
right behind
modell
holmgren
shurmur
(i'm sure there are others but i'm too high right now to look anything up).
great. they got us a #1 for TR. they did good in FA and did ok in the draft. what else do you have to prove that you are the brett maverick of nfl wheeler and dealers?
-
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
It's hard to sell him higher than a second considering he was a second rounder and he's one strike away from a full suspension.
That's the bargaining chip any offering team has.
-
Has anything Schefter reported ever actually happened? How does he get this information? It sounds like propaganda to me.
-
I think were good on picks now.
-
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Just got a tweet alert from "who gives a fuck"# Gordon seen drinking cough syrup and snorting blow off Moly Cyrus' cleavage at Larry Flynts club on west bank.
My ex-wife have been in "discussion" regarding her giving up some trim for weeks. Just cause you talk about sho don't mean it's gonnn happen. so it goes
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
