Josh Gordon to 49ers discussed according to Adam Schefter
-
OK, so it may be Banner, moreso than Lombardi that has a hard on about getting rid of Heckert chosen players. Because I believe he has some sort of grudge against Heckert from Philly days, and he takes it out on Heckert's players.
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
-
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
-
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
Zombo said:
They haven't done anything stupid yet.
They've been brilliant, actually.
Zombo
with an extremely small amount of time they've had... cant judge off this small a sample size. but i do really like what i see. it looks like they actually have a blue print set for what they want and it looks like we are going in the right direction.
-
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
-
i just hope they aren't trigger happy because of his past off the field issues.
go ballistic? they wouldn't be enough security guards in cleveland and berea for what would happen.
he/they would truly look like the biggest schmucks in cleveland football history if they were to gut this team of our legit pro talent.
right behind
modell
holmgren
shurmur
(i'm sure there are others but i'm too high right now to look anything up).
great. they got us a #1 for TR. they did good in FA and did ok in the draft. what else do you have to prove that you are the brett maverick of nfl wheeler and dealers?
-
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
I believe our FO wants the NFL public to know they will listen to any offer hoping that a blockbuster "DITKA" offer just might come along. I believe Gordon should be valued higher that a 2nd round. Can you imagine the type of year he would have with Brees or P. Manning?
It's hard to sell him higher than a second considering he was a second rounder and he's one strike away from a full suspension.
That's the bargaining chip any offering team has.
-
Has anything Schefter reported ever actually happened? How does he get this information? It sounds like propaganda to me.
-
I think were good on picks now.
-
Zombo said:
Well, that would be awful.
Josh Gordon has been simply spectacular and has the all the characteristics of a #1 receiver ... hands, speed, size ... he is probably the best draft pick we have made since 1999.
We are three and o with him.
HIs stats in those three games prorated to a 16-game schedule:
96 catches, 1,648 yards 11 TDs
I simply can't imagine the Browns wouldn't want to keep a 22 year old receiver with those tools, playing that well.
Zombo
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Really? You can't imagine that the Browns FO would do something stupid?
Just got a tweet alert from "who gives a fuck"# Gordon seen drinking cough syrup and snorting blow off Moly Cyrus' cleavage at Larry Flynts club on west bank.
My ex-wife have been in "discussion" regarding her giving up some trim for weeks. Just cause you talk about sho don't mean it's gonnn happen. so it goes
-
Bone head move of the century if they trade him away. The draft is a crap shoot and Gordon is a proven player.
-
Now, the kid has trade value. Next time he pops positive he is adios......with zilch trade value. Obviously the Browns FO does not have a lot of faith that he can stay clean. If the Browns don't have a good feeling about his long term sobriety you gotta ask yourself why any other FO would. Any team that makes an offer won't risk much and will offer a pittance. Browns should keep him and hope for the best in terms of his substance abuse issues. They already know he can make plays and help them win games.
If a Gordon trade could come to fruition, and if it were up to me, I would look for RB's to shore up our questionable run game. McGeeheehee, a damaged Ogbo and Rainey prolly won't get it done. Oops, I forgot,, it doesn't matter how good your running game is since it is a totally QB driven league. What the hell was I thinking? FWIW, I would try to get Giovani Bernard. The bungholes would most likely not give him up to an AFC north foe but it's ok to at least dream
-
Trading him is nothing short of tanking the season. The risk is there for sure but we will never get the right offer commensurate with his skill level. You could draft WR in the 1st round for the next 10 years and not get a Josh Gordon caliper receiver. You have to assume the risk on him and hope for the best. If you win the roll you have an elite WR who could become the best in the game. If you lose the roll you blew a 2nd round pick. That is not such a rare occurrence.
-
Trading him is nothing short of tanking the season. The risk is there for sure but we will never get the right offer commensurate with his skill level. You could draft WR in the 1st round for the next 10 years and not get a Josh Gordon caliper receiver. You have to assume the risk on him and hope for the best. If you win the roll you have an elite WR who could become the best in the game. If you lose the roll you blew a 2nd round pick. That is not such a rare occurrence.
Trading him is nothing short of tanking the season. The risk is there for sure but we will never get the right offer commensurate with his skill level. You could draft WR in the 1st round for the next 10 years and not get a Josh Gordon caliper receiver. You have to assume the risk on him and hope for the best. If you win the roll you have an elite WR who could become the best in the game. If you lose the roll you blew a 2nd round pick. That is not such a rare occurrence.
Where have I heard this first sentance before?
-
Gordon is one of three players on this team you absolutely cannot trade. I wouldn't let him go for two first rounders. Would any other team give up an elite WR, which Gordon is, for any kind of draft pick? No, why should Cleveland be the only stupid one. I know it's just discussion but it still pisses me off
-
Trading him is nothing short of tanking the season. The risk is there for sure but we will never get the right offer commensurate with his skill level. You could draft WR in the 1st round for the next 10 years and not get a Josh Gordon caliper receiver. You have to assume the risk on him and hope for the best. If you win the roll you have an elite WR who could become the best in the game. If you lose the roll you blew a 2nd round pick. That is not such a rare occurrence.
Where have I heard this first sentance before?
Where have I heard this first sentance before?
The difference is that, this time, we'll be trading a player who's actually shown he's capable of being a true top 10 player at his position.
-
The only thing that could justify this is if the Browns organization had some serious dirt on Gordon, something Hernandez-esque.
-
Trading him is nothing short of tanking the season. The risk is there for sure but we will never get the right offer commensurate with his skill level. You could draft WR in the 1st round for the next 10 years and not get a Josh Gordon caliper receiver. You have to assume the risk on him and hope for the best. If you win the roll you have an elite WR who could become the best in the game. If you lose the roll you blew a 2nd round pick. That is not such a rare occurrence.
Where have I heard this first sentance before?
Where have I heard this firstytsentance before?
I never said anything remotely close to that regarding the T-Rich trade. He was and appears to continue to be average. You can't possibly think Gordon is average. He is worth more than any team will offer. It could take us many years to secure another receiver like him.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login