Skip to content

Force the debt limit, NO INCREASES

Political Discussion
61 9 1.6k
  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    We have treaties with countries and that is why there are bases. We need 'boots on ground' globally as our socialist allies prefer to spend their money on free health care, etc. Why do you think they willingly let us have bases in their country? And if you think wars will be settled with missiles your a fool. MAD is still in existence. Most of the expenses of base are paid for by the host country, such as Japan which pays for the buildings, housing, etc. No cuts, increase I say.

    Let's keep the discussion on ideas (cut or spend on military), not on the people discussing them ("And if you think wars will be settled with missiles your a fool").

    I know MAD is still in existence, that was my point. Because of the threat of MAD, no one is going to invade a country that has nuclear missiles. That's one reason Iran wants them so badly, because none of their neighbors (except Syria) like them. The quality of our current military hardware is light years ahead of anyone else, meaning we maintain a military advantage even with fewer troops/tanks/jets/bombers. Heck the F-15, a 1970s technology, has never been shot down in air-to-air combat, yet has shot down dozens of fighters. The Cold-War Doctrine of quality over quantity (Russia observed quantity over quality) has served the USA well, and we can afford to rely more on our technology and less on boots on the ground.

    And while the host country may pay for the base facility, they are not paying for the personnel salaries, training, supplies, military hardware, maintenance, etc. The employees in any organization are one of the biggest expenses, and I doubt the military is any different.

    @osiris said:

    Let's keep the discussion on ideas (cut or spend on military), not on the people discussing them ("And if you think wars will be settled with missiles your a fool").

    I know MAD is still in existence, that was my point. Because of the threat of MAD, no one is going to invade a country that has nuclear missiles. That's one reason Iran wants them so badly, because none of their neighbors (except Syria) like them. The quality of our current military hardware is light years ahead of anyone else, meaning we maintain a military advantage even with fewer troops/tanks/jets/bombers. Heck the F-15, a 1970s technology, has never been shot down in air-to-air combat, yet has shot down dozens of fighters. The Cold-War Doctrine of quality over quantity (Russia observed quantity over quality) has served the USA well, and we can afford to rely more on our technology and less on boots on the ground.

    And while the host country may pay for the base facility, they are not paying for the personnel salaries, training, supplies, military hardware, maintenance, etc. The employees in any organization are one of the biggest expenses, and I doubt the military is any different.

    truth.jpg

  • Osirus - we've always spoken of the good that cutting wasteful spending in the military.

    But it's odd you silly people never want to talk about the wasteful spending in entitlements.

    Fraud. Food stamp fraud. Welfare fraud.

    A lot of us are about both. Some only want to cut wasteful spending in parts of gov they don't support.

    Right there, is a glaring problem with the left - contradicting their own alleged principles. They flip flop

    more than a catfish out of water....

  • Osirus - we've always spoken of the good that cutting wasteful spending in the military.

    But it's odd you silly people never want to talk about the wasteful spending in entitlements.

    Fraud. Food stamp fraud. Welfare fraud.

    A lot of us are about both. Some only want to cut wasteful spending in parts of gov they don't support.

    Right there, is a glaring problem with the left - contradicting their own alleged principles. They flip flop

    more than a catfish out of water....

    @calfoxwc said:

    Osirus - we've always spoken of the good that cutting wasteful spending in the military.

    But it's odd you silly people never want to talk about the wasteful spending in entitlements.

    Fraud. Food stamp fraud. Welfare fraud.

    A lot of us are about both. Some only want to cut wasteful spending in parts of gov they don't support.

    Right there, is a glaring problem with the left - contradicting their own alleged principles. They flip flop

    more than a catfish out of water....

    What proof do you have of this? Do you work for SNAP?

  • Osirus - we've always spoken of the good that cutting wasteful spending in the military.

    But it's odd you silly people never want to talk about the wasteful spending in entitlements.

    Fraud. Food stamp fraud. Welfare fraud.

    A lot of us are about both. Some only want to cut wasteful spending in parts of gov they don't support.

    Right there, is a glaring problem with the left - contradicting their own alleged principles. They flip flop

    more than a catfish out of water....

    @calfoxwc said:

    Osirus - we've always spoken of the good that cutting wasteful spending in the military.

    But it's odd you silly people never want to talk about the wasteful spending in entitlements.

    Fraud. Food stamp fraud. Welfare fraud.

    A lot of us are about both. Some only want to cut wasteful spending in parts of gov they don't support.

    Right there, is a glaring problem with the left - contradicting their own alleged principles. They flip flop

    more than a catfish out of water....

    I already said there should be cuts to both military and welfare waste. You'd just need to read earlier posts in this thread.

  • Yes, I know;. I was referring to what you said here:

    "We've gone from 'don't cut military spending' to 'let's cut what isn't needed' and suddenly our opinions aren't so far apart, as it comes down to deciding what's needed and not needed. "

    I read it, as you are saying we never talked about cutting wasteful spending in the military, but now we are.

    That's just not true.

  • Notice how he didn't address his food stamps conspiracy when questioned...

  • Notice woodykoala is still screwing up threads with boring, off subject crap.

  • Notice how Cal is still an idiot

  • Notice how Cal is still an idiot

    @mld-woody said:

    Notice how Cal is still an idiot

    2 thumbs up.

    23CUT%20OUT1.jpg

  • Notice that koala and woodypeckerhead have the same mo.

  • Notice that koala and woodypeckerhead have the same mo.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Notice that koala and woodypeckerhead have the same mo.

    What, reasonable discussion? No Obam*o rhetoric?

  • If you aren't shitting on dirty liberals you're probably a dirty liberal. And since the overwhelming majority of real America aren't dirty liberals, we're probably the same person

  • I prefer to think of it as you have split personalities.

    Probably a lot like a michigan student buttcrack.

  • I prefer to think of it as you have split personalities.

    Probably a lot like a michigan student buttcrack.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I prefer to think of it as you have split personalities.

    Probably a lot like a michigan student buttcrack.

    What?

  • Yes, I know;. I was referring to what you said here:

    "We've gone from 'don't cut military spending' to 'let's cut what isn't needed' and suddenly our opinions aren't so far apart, as it comes down to deciding what's needed and not needed. "

    I read it, as you are saying we never talked about cutting wasteful spending in the military, but now we are.

    That's just not true.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Yes, I know;. I was referring to what you said here:

    "We've gone from 'don't cut military spending' to 'let's cut what isn't needed' and suddenly our opinions aren't so far apart, as it comes down to deciding what's needed and not needed. "

    I read it, as you are saying we never talked about cutting wasteful spending in the military, but now we are.

    That's just not true.

    Perhaps you have, but DieHardBrownsFan said we should increase, not decrease, military spending, and it was to his original comment that I was responding to.

    Anyway, everyone ought to get off the dirty liberals/dirty republicans shtick. Unless everyone is using it as some sort of catharsis, it isn't productive. What's the point in hating each other here? We're all Browns fans, right?

  • Not if you're a liberal, queer. Then you're woodenhorseypeckerpoopyface!

  • Not if you're a liberal, queer. Then you're woodenhorseypeckerpoopyface!

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Not if you're a liberal, queer. Then you're woodenhorseypeckerpoopyface!

    GOT EM!

  • Okay, things are getting out of hand here.

    Os, good post. In the -right way-, I would also increase military spending in certain

    areas..

    after our budget is more under control.

    And Cysko, you aren't allowed to be funny - I forgot what I was going to post, dammit. LOL