Global warming is real.
-
Well, several of us non wussie libs around here realized long ago, that
facts don't matter,
like the British portrayed.
And as most of the time, woody jumps in as an ignorant would be smart ass,
to criticize any site, and any group that disagrees with his bandwagon lib bs.
IOW's, he can't muster up references to prove his point, so he just attacks
the sources of opposing points.
It's a lib weinie knee jerk reaction. They can't help it. I've said that long before.
It is true, that those who claim mmgw/not mmgw in the hot summer, and really cold winter,
respectively,
are really being foolish opportunists, grabbing at straws.
-
Yes, I should have put a hyphen in between "non", "wussie", and "libs".
I have a ton of farm work to do before goin on vacation in Dec, and decided intelligent
posters on this board would know what I meant....
-
My "..." had nothing to do with "non wussie libs" FYI
-
Oh. I got that wrong, then.
But my point was that all the facts from the conservative point of view are completely ignored, or bashed.
Libs tend to avoid discussion of facts that contradict their emotionalist idealogical refrains.
-
Oh. I got that wrong, then.
But my point was that all the facts from the conservative point of view are completely ignored, or bashed.
Libs tend to avoid discussion of facts that contradict their emotionalist idealogical refrains.
Oh. I got that wrong, then.
But my point was that all the facts from the conservative point of view are completely ignored, or bashed.
Libs tend to avoid discussion of facts that contradict their emotionalist idealogical refrains.
It's problematic that you call it "The conservative point of view" because that reveals that you will not deviate from the party line for any reason nor will you expect your fellows to deviate from it. I think conservatives and liberals ought to have minds of their own.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
Oh. I got that wrong, then.
But my point was that all the facts from the conservative point of view are completely ignored, or bashed.
Libs tend to avoid discussion of facts that contradict their emotionalist idealogical refrains.
It's problematic that you call it "The conservative point of view" because that reveals that you will not deviate from the party line for any reason nor will you expect your fellows to deviate from it. I think conservatives and liberals ought to have minds of their own.
It's problematic that you call it "The conservative point of view" because that reveals that you will not deviate from the party line for any reason nor will you expect your fellows to deviate from it. I think conservatives and liberals ought to have minds of their own.
I agree
-
There isn't any "party" line. dems and reps disagree with mmgw.
The trend is more conservatives disagree, I think. Inadvertently, that's just
my theory about libs - they latch onto emotionist lib talking points as fact,
and conservates do far more critical thinking on issues.
-
There isn't any "party" line. dems and reps disagree with mmgw.
The trend is more conservatives disagree, I think. Inadvertently, that's just
my theory about libs - they latch onto emotionist lib talking points as fact,
and conservates do far more critical thinking on issues.
-
There isn't any "party" line. dems and reps disagree with mmgw.
The trend is more conservatives disagree, I think. Inadvertently, that's just
my theory about libs - they latch onto emotionist lib talking points as fact,
and conservates do far more critical thinking on issues.
There isn't any "party" line. dems and reps disagree with mmgw.
The trend is more conservatives disagree, I think. Inadvertently, that's just
my theory about libs - they latch onto emotionist lib talking points as fact,
and conservates do far more critical thinking on issues.
I just think it is funny you ONLY think liberals do the whole "emotions" thing. Yet in literally every thread you make it is from TheBlaze, or FoxNews, or Breitbart or whatever and the article is exactly what you want. You are reading about what you feel to give yourself confirmation you're right. Searching out articles with lines like "The Obama admistration is terrible" or "liberals blh blah blah bad thing" are emotional too. Then, you turn around in your thread and make it even more sensational, with "big serious trouble" this and "dirty liberals" that.
Apparently critical thinking and understanding hypocrisy/irony aren't one in the same.
Plus, on the critical thinking thing, doesn't the average liberal have a higher IQ than the average conservative? Idk, I may be wrong about that, and I don't really affiliate with either, but I thought that's how the data shook out.
Edit: I googled it, found some stuff on it. Not gonna post it though, not worth going down that wormhole. To just say that all conservatives do far more critical thinking though is ridiculous. If anything there is less critical thinking in keeping things the same...
But either way, your blanket statements about how bad every liberal is and how they cause everything wrong in the country are stupid, and I am pretty sure they require very little critical thinking.
-
Oh. I got that wrong, then.
But my point was that all the facts from the conservative point of view are completely ignored, or bashed.
Libs tend to avoid discussion of facts that contradict their emotionalist idealogical refrains.
It's problematic that you call it "The conservative point of view" because that reveals that you will not deviate from the party line for any reason nor will you expect your fellows to deviate from it. I think conservatives and liberals ought to have minds of their own.
It's problematic that you call it "The conservative point of view" because that reveals that you will not deviate from the party line for any reason nor will you expect your fellows to deviate from it. I think conservatives and liberals ought to have minds of their own.
I agree
I don't know why, but this made me laugh.
-
-
We need to remember, also, that regardless of whether or not global warming/climate change is a real and dangerous thing or not, the earth is running out of fossil fuels to burn, so we need to look at ways to be more efficient in the energy we produce, the energy we use, and also try to use as many renewables as we can. Of course there's a limit on that - sure, we could just cover the sahara with solar panels and power the world, but we need to try to not infringe on nature too much! Things like covering every roof with solar panels, wind farms where possible etc.
-
Nuclear power.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Nuclear power.
Nuclear power.
Is a very viable option. I agree
-
-
Nuclear power.
Nuclear power.
Is a very viable option. I agree
Seconded. I'm not sure where we are on the 'clean-ness' of it all though - there's still a large amount of waste to dispose of that afaik hasn't been accounted for yet.
-
I'm pretty sure all that stuff is going to happen. It seems everyone wants to believe history began 10 years ago. It seems to me that over just the last few hundred years there have been a complete 360 turn arounds. That's quite a bit considering how long the planet has been here. What like six thousand years or something?
But in a couple hundred years everything will be completely different than it is today. One thing we could do today is switch every light fixture in every stadium factory School Street business office home etc to.led.
that would take probably 90 percent of the burden of of the coal and nuclear and wind and whatever energy producing plants that exist.
But right now, today, fossil fuel is probably the most efficient and cost effective method available. That will change. Right now, at least in my opinion, global warming and the Doom that it might bring is just an excuse for political posturing and more taxation.
regardless of how it's caused and how much and by whom.
WSS
-
now THATS irony!
now THATS irony!
I don't see it...
So, even though I'm the one with a dissenting opinion to the majority opinion on this board most of the time, I'm the one that cant think for himself?
I'm not the one that posts articles around "Mexicans are bad", or from the same 3 conservative sites/blogs every time.... but I'm totally the one that can't think for themselves, lol . OK.
-
Woody, you don't back up what you "think". That means you emotionally take the lib side of things,
without ever having figured out what all the information on an issue really means.
And nobody is "posting articles around "mexicans are bad"...blah blah blah.
Posting articles about BAD mexicans, is saying we have a serious illegal immigration problem.
I know, you don't get it. BTW, you lol at every consonant and vowel in anybody's post you don't like.
Get a grip.
-
Woody, you don't back up what you "think". That means you emotionally take the lib side of things,
without ever having figured out what all the information on an issue really means.
And nobody is "posting articles around "mexicans are bad"...blah blah blah.
Posting articles about BAD mexicans, is saying we have a serious illegal immigration problem.
I know, you don't get it. BTW, you lol at every consonant and vowel in anybody's post you don't like.
Get a grip.
Woody, you don't back up what you "think". That means you emotionally take the lib side of things,
without ever having figured out what all the information on an issue really means.
And nobody is "posting articles around "mexicans are bad"...blah blah blah.
Posting articles about BAD mexicans, is saying we have a serious illegal immigration problem.
I know, you don't get it. BTW, you lol at every consonant and vowel in anybody's post you don't like.
Get a grip.
You are such a hypocritical idiot... my god. I don't even care if I'll get shit for my normal insulting of you.
My god... it is like you post these things you dislike about people you disagree with, but completely miss those characteristics in yourself. It is such a selective view of things it is astounding.
You act like reading an article on the Blaze, which you already know you'll agree with, is "figuring out what all the information on an issue really means".......... jesus christ
In your mind posting an editorial from a conservative blog = backing up what you think but posting scientific articles from real sources = emotional liberal nonsense
You are fucking unbelievable... Part of me still thinks you are just some character, just some guy trolling us at his keyboard.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login