Skip to content

Worst mock draft

The Browns Board
37 22 1.5k
  • I saw this and was scratching my head. I usually just check these out to see what people are thinking. This guy........... well don't know about him.

    http://walterfootball.com/draft2014charlie.php

  • Yeah, I generally keep an eye on mock drafts and that site has been consistently rubbish.

  • I don't think the FO is going to take a chance on a QB falling to them with the second 1st round pick. Their is going to be a big run on QBs in the draft this year because of all the teams that have a need for the positon. No way Cleveland waits, they draft QB first.

  • I don't think the FO is going to take a chance on a QB falling to them with the second 1st round pick. Their is going to be a big run on QBs in the draft this year because of all the teams that have a need for the positon. No way Cleveland waits, they draft QB first.

    @sheepdog said:

    I don't think the FO is going to take a chance on a QB falling to them with the second 1st round pick. Their is going to be a big run on QBs in the draft this year because of all the teams that have a need for the positon. No way Cleveland waits, they draft QB first.

    In current draft order:

    Bucs - Yes

    Jags - Yes

    Vikings - Need to find an answer, but maybe the like freeman

    Steelers - no

    Falcons - no

    Rams - I think they stick with bradford

    Texans - yep

    Giants - no

    Redskins - no

    Ravens - no

    Raiders - maybe

    Eagles - probably

    Bills - no

    Browns - probably

    ...

    other teams:

    Bears - if Cutler goes

    Cardinals - maybe not round 1

    so I make that about 4 or 5 teams looking for a franchise QB in the draft. Bridgewater, Mariota, Manziel will all go and start from day 1. Boyd might too. Other will probably need to sit for a bit. That being said, I don't think we need a guy to come in and start week 1, we need a guy to win us a superbowl in 2-3 years.

  • The updated version of this mock draft is currently going on. I like this version a lot better.

    1a) Derek Carr, QB Fresno State

    1b) AJ Johnson, ILB Tennessee

    2) Jordan Matthews, WR Vanderbilt

    They are still in round 2. I'll update it throughout the day as they get to the Browns' next pick

  • I don't think there's a chance in hell that the Browns wait until pick 27 to get their quarterback (or trade up to 20). It would be mirroring that 2012 draft Banner and Lombardi so obviously loath.

    The first pick will be a QB. Just matter of which one and how high.

  • I don't think there's a chance in hell that the Browns wait until pick 27 to get their quarterback (or trade up to 20). It would be mirroring that 2012 draft Banner and Lombardi so obviously loath.

    The first pick will be a QB. Just matter of which one and how high.

    @shep said:

    I don't think there's a chance in hell that the Browns wait until pick 27 to get their quarterback (or trade up to 20). It would be mirroring that 2012 draft Banner and Lombardi so obviously loath.

    The first pick will be a QB. Just matter of which one and how high.

    Right, which they've since changed. I probably should have included the link to the current mock in progress.

    http://walterfootball.com/draft2014.php

    They selected Carr at 10, Johnson at 28 and Matthews at 41.

  • Seeing a lot of ILB picks for a team giving up 3.5 YPC, third best in the NFL. Odd.

  • Seeing a lot of ILB picks for a team giving up 3.5 YPC, third best in the NFL. Odd.

    @shep said:

    Seeing a lot of ILB picks for a team giving up 3.5 YPC, third best in the NFL. Odd.

    As they mentioned in the mock, the Browns are pretty susceptible to coverage over the middle. They've noted before that Robertson is good at tackling and in run-stopping formations, but struggles in coverage. Johnson seems to be a much better overall linebacker, and can cover pretty well.

    I would still personally see a WR in that slot, but I'm ok with BPA (as long as that BPA coincides with a position of need)

  • I really don't see how that is that bad of a mock draft. Right now I'd bet my left nut the brass is going to take a QB with a first round pick. I personally dislike Manziel a lot but there's a growing trend of people his build getting drafted high. Walterfootball is one of the most reputable mock draft sites out there, and none of those picks are really questionable IMO.

  • Don't be surprised if the Squealers go for a QB in the first round. Knowing our luck, they'll pick right before us and grab their franchise QB for the next decade and we'll get stuck with another QB bust.

  • I think it's a little high for an ILB who would be hard pressed to beat out Robertson or DQJ next year (I really think Robertson can cover and has in the past). I do think we need someone in the pipeline there, but not in round one. I think the guys we draft especially with our first three picks need to "move the dial," and I'm not sure we can do all that much more on defense.

    Hell, we again shut down the Bengals offense. Few first downs, shitty passer rating, dreadful YPC. I think our early picks need to help us become a more consistently formidable offense. To me, that feels like QB, WR, RB or TE, RB or TE... in that order from 1a to 3a (not accounting for trades or what we've already done in f/a).

  • I think it's a little high for an ILB who would be hard pressed to beat out Robertson or DQJ next year (I really think Robertson can cover and has in the past). I do think we need someone in the pipeline there, but not in round one. I think the guys we draft especially with our first three picks need to "move the dial," and I'm not sure we can do all that much more on defense.

    Hell, we again shut down the Bengals offense. Few first downs, shitty passer rating, dreadful YPC. I think our early picks need to help us become a more consistently formidable offense. To me, that feels like QB, WR, RB or TE, RB or TE... in that order from 1a to 3a (not accounting for trades or what we've already done in f/a).

    @shep said:

    I think it's a little high for an ILB who would be hard pressed to beat out Robertson or DQJ next year (I really think Robertson can cover and has in the past). I do think we need someone in the pipeline there, but not in round one. I think the guys we draft especially with our first three picks need to "move the dial," and I'm not sure we can do all that much more on defense.

    Hell, we again shut down the Bengals offense. Few first downs, shitty passer rating, dreadful YPC. I think our early picks need to help us become a more consistently formidable offense. To me, that feels like QB, WR, RB or TE, RB or TE... in that order from 1a to 3a (not accounting for trades or what we've already done in f/a).

    Agreed, we need to focus on our offense in this order QB, Line, WR, RB, then ILB

  • I think it's a little high for an ILB who would be hard pressed to beat out Robertson or DQJ next year (I really think Robertson can cover and has in the past). I do think we need someone in the pipeline there, but not in round one. I think the guys we draft especially with our first three picks need to "move the dial," and I'm not sure we can do all that much more on defense.

    Hell, we again shut down the Bengals offense. Few first downs, shitty passer rating, dreadful YPC. I think our early picks need to help us become a more consistently formidable offense. To me, that feels like QB, WR, RB or TE, RB or TE... in that order from 1a to 3a (not accounting for trades or what we've already done in f/a).

    @shep said:

    I think it's a little high for an ILB who would be hard pressed to beat out Robertson or DQJ next year (I really think Robertson can cover and has in the past). I do think we need someone in the pipeline there, but not in round one. I think the guys we draft especially with our first three picks need to "move the dial," and I'm not sure we can do all that much more on defense.

    Hell, we again shut down the Bengals offense. Few first downs, shitty passer rating, dreadful YPC. I think our early picks need to help us become a more consistently formidable offense. To me, that feels like QB, WR, RB or TE, RB or TE... in that order from 1a to 3a (not accounting for trades or what we've already done in f/a).

    Robertson was literally the worst coverage linebacker in the NFL last season, as referenced by the site I linked in a response to the last time you claimed Robertson is a good linebacker. Here it is again:

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/01/29/signature-stats-first-downs-allowed-linebackers/

    Robertson gave up 26 first downs and 1 TD to players he was covering last season, leading the league at a conversion percentage of 7.38%. What's worse is that he was on the field for only a third of the snaps as DQJ (366 vs. 1,154), yet he gave up 7 more 1st downs/TD's (26 vs. 19).

    Robertson is a liability. He's a bottom level starter at the very best.

    Meanwhile, DQJ was a top 10 LB in 1st downs and TD's (probably because Robertson was so awful).

    I fail to see how you can continue to call him a strong coverage linebacker, or even a strong linebacker in general. As you love to say, the NFL is a passing league. As the worst coverage linebacker in the NFL last season, in a passing league such as it is, I think it's safe to say that he is a big detriment to the team.

  • This might be the worst I've seen 😵😵

    http://www.draftsite.com/nfl/mock-draft/2014/

  • The Browns will identify the best QB and throw the Stadium at him to ensure that they get him.

  • This might be the worst I've seen 😵😵

    http://www.draftsite.com/nfl/mock-draft/2014/

    @b86b said:

    This might be the worst I've seen 😵😵

    http://www.draftsite.com/nfl/mock-draft/2014/

    That is absolutely the worst mock I've seen.

    That guy clearly was just picking Cle's picks based off overall BPA.

  • The Browns will identify the best QB and throw the Stadium at him to ensure that they get him.

    @poeticg said:

    The Browns will identify the best QB and throw the Stadium at him to ensure that they get him.

    im afraid they will try. They will either miss, which is much more probable, or overpay with three first rounders and a second
  • I would take a RG and WR in the first round. I think a QB can still be had in the 2nd round. We have just ignored the offense altogether and we're paying the price for it. Fullback? Kicker? O-line? No, we were busy putting 17 guys on the front 7. So what do we have now? Campbell goes down and the season's over (not that it isn't already). We have maybe 4 guys on the offense who'd start anywhere else. The rest? Meh. We don't have the talent to play out of a hole like we generated last Sunday.

    I just want respectability. Last Sunday shows we still don't have it. We have plenty of draft picks and my fear is they'll ball up 5 of those for a QB, then once again we'll have nothing left to address gapping holes in the offense.

  • It's a Richardson cock draft