Skip to content

Remarks about gays prompt suspension of 'Duck Dynasty' star

Political Discussion
109 15 3.7k
  • ugh.

    Didn't we already go through this with Chic-Fil-a?

  • I think it's hilarious that he got interviewed by GQ, of all magazines.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You are right, you do post a lot of "scary mexican" posts

    Ha! Yes, this tickled me. Does this also mean cal is a closet homosexual with undying love for Obama? And Mao? And Woody?

    @gftchris said:

    Ha! Yes, this tickled me. Does this also mean cal is a closet homosexual with undying love for Obama? And Mao? And Woody?

    Lol, the Freudian implications.

  • How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

  • How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

    @koalabazooka said:

    How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

    I wondered why my phone kept telling me it was spelled wrong ...

  • How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

    @koalabazooka said:

    How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

    How ironic that you used irony wrong.

  • @koalabazooka said:

    How ironic that everyone here's spelling bestiality wrong...

    How ironic that you used irony wrong.

    @gftchris said:

    How ironic that you used irony wrong.

    How is my use of irony ironic?

  • @gftchris said:

    How ironic that you used irony wrong.

    How is my use of irony ironic?

    @koalabazooka said:

    How is my use of irony ironic?

    Misspelling a word is not ironic in any way. Calling something ironic when it isn't, probably is.

  • @koalabazooka said:

    How is my use of irony ironic?

    Misspelling a word is not ironic in any way. Calling something ironic when it isn't, probably is.

    @gftchris said:

    Misspelling a word is not ironic in any way. Calling something ironic when it isn't, probably is.

    Everyone is trying to be so authoritative on this Thread, especially concerning the bestiality comment Robertson made. Thus, the lack of consensus on the spelling is ironic.

  • Another PR nightmare for the hunter, years before his TV show. The controversial comments start at the 17-minute mark; he later makes an implicitly racist comment at the 26:36 mark:

  • Who gives a flying fuck?

  • Another PR nightmare for the hunter, years before his TV show. The controversial comments start at the 17-minute mark; he later makes an implicitly racist comment at the 26:36 mark: Koala

    *******************************

    Seriously? "pr nightmare" ???

    Sorry, but who cares about "pr" ? Or "pc" ? Controversial? To WHO? Truly believing like he does is bad?

    Come on, man. There is serious good in that entire message. In his experience, and in Bradshaw's, do you doubt

    that Bradshaw or he ever faced defensive lines that happened to be all black? Would it be fine if he said

    "chased by a bunch of great big white guys trying to stomp you into the turf" ??? Perhaps, since Bradshaw

    and he are white. Imagine that the "great big black defensive linemen" said racial things to them, and that's

    why Bradshaw perhaps made a point of it?

    It's always controversy to libs and those who, albeit subconciously, follow libs' lead - "if you think differently,

    you are bad. We always get to decide what is special and acceptable."

    Nah. I don't care a flying fig, either, that anybody thinks there was "controversy" about Phil's speech here,

    and it is very similar to the speeches he's given in California, and many other places.

    I've seen Phil in person, and he exudes gentleness, humor, and sincere love for God, his way of life, his family,

    and the rest. "pr nightmare" is just somebody's hateful way of trying to diminish someone being and believing

    and thinking differently than the person who just can't stand other people being, and believing, and thinking

    outside of what is "accepted" by the hateful "clique".

  • He said "great big black men and white men". That video didn't show me anything offensive. However, the guy is still a backwards hillbilly.

  • Cal, just because something isn't offensive to you, doesn't mean it is only offensive to a small lib brainwashed clique....

    It is bad PR for A&E. They are a company.

  • Cal, just because something isn't offensive to you, doesn't mean it is only offensive to a small lib brainwashed clique....

    It is bad PR for A&E. They are a company.

    @mld-woody said:

    Cal, just because something isn't offensive to you, doesn't mean it is only offensive to a small lib brainwashed clique....

    It is bad PR for A&E. They are a company.

    This. If I owned a restaurant, I wouldn't want my waiters outside talking about how they think black people are disgusting. They have a right to that dipshit opinion but I will not let them push away customers on my time or dime.

  • Little bit of difference in the situations hoss. Duck Dynasty is about 3 redneck brothers who hunt. Everyone who watches, knows this. Do you really thinks these guys like gays? And did A&E? Hell no. This is just catering to the queer Lesbians and gay and freak show community, bottom line.

  • Too bad you can't be on TV diehard

  • Too bad you can't be on TV diehard

    @mld-woody said:

    Too bad you can't be on TV diehard

    Why is that? I'd be a hell of lot more interesting then you lazy boy.

  • You would be entertaining. In the same way some people liked jersey shore

    But then again without being anonymous you might not be as entertaining.

  • Nielson ratings are going to surge in a big way. Only in America can some booray (from wherever he's from) espouse his views in a leading metrosexual periodical..... the end result being a

    increased awareness of his brand and a fattening of his wallet. So it goes.