Five Browns To Pro Bowl
-
Idk if Joe Thomas had a pro-bowl year, but he seems like an auto in every year.
-
Joe Haden was beat all season by lesser Wr's. But he did play well against an injured Calvin Johnson, and an inconsistant Mike Wallace, so I guess he qualifies
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
Joe Haden was beat all season by lesser Wr's. But he did play well against an injured Calvin Johnson, and an inconsistant Mike Wallace, so I guess he qualifies
Joe Haden was beat all season by lesser Wr's. But he did play well against an injured Calvin Johnson, and an inconsistant Mike Wallace, so I guess he qualifies
Haden also totally shut down AJ Green and didn't allow a 100 yard WR all year, so STFU boo bird.
-
Haden had a great year, he actually did better last year but was ineligible. He's still great and a top 3 CB in the NFL.
Joe Thomas is an automatic because he's yet to miss a game, maybe even a snap?
Mack was consistent as always except for the one snap.
Gordon redeemed himself and he missed the beginning of the season, what a stud. Probably the best receiver we've had since the return, well worth the second rounder it cost to get him in the supplemental draft. Thank you Tom Heckert, my man!
Jordan Cameron. I knew you had it in you all along! Great job, but I wonder how many records he would have broken had Hoyer played all season? He's still a beast and should be our Dallas Clark for our new Peyton Manning...
-
Just curious, last year Haden had a suspension, but was ineligible for the Pro Bowl. So why this year was Gordon available for the Pro Bowl with a suspension? Is it because it was only two games? I'm not complaining I was just wondering about the rules for that.
-
one was for performance enhancing the other was for recreational drugs. The PED is a no no.
-
Just curious, last year Haden had a suspension, but was ineligible for the Pro Bowl. So why this year was Gordon available for the Pro Bowl with a suspension? Is it because it was only two games? I'm not complaining I was just wondering about the rules for that.
Just curious, last year Haden had a suspension, but was ineligible for the Pro Bowl. So why this year was Gordon available for the Pro Bowl with a suspension? Is it because it was only two games? I'm not complaining I was just wondering about the rules for that.
Haden was ineligible last year because he took Aderall which is performance-enhancing. Gordon's suspension wasnt for a performance enhancer so he doesnt lose eligibilty.
-
so pot is good and aderall is bad kids, mmmhhhh kay!
-
voice of counsler on southpark
-
I'm curious to know if you play for Denver after Jan 1, are you allowed to smoke weed since it will be legal there on Jan 1?
-
Joe Haden was beat all season by lesser Wr's. But he did play well against an injured Calvin Johnson, and an inconsistant Mike Wallace, so I guess he qualifies
Joe Haden was beat all season by lesser Wr's. But he did play well against an injured Calvin Johnson, and an inconsistant Mike Wallace, so I guess he qualifies
Cleveland is also near the top in the league against #1 WR's.
I believe they're giving up something like 40 yards per game to #1's.
But don't let that get in the way of your point.
-
I'm curious to know if you play for Denver after Jan 1, are you allowed to smoke weed since it will be legal there on Jan 1?
I'm curious to know if you play for Denver after Jan 1, are you allowed to smoke weed since it will be legal there on Jan 1?
That´s a question I´ve been thinking about too. I suppose for this season it will still remain the same, but starting next season we´ll have to wait and see how that plays out.
-
I'm curious to know if you play for Denver after Jan 1, are you allowed to smoke weed since it will be legal there on Jan 1?
I'm curious to know if you play for Denver after Jan 1, are you allowed to smoke weed since it will be legal there on Jan 1?
No, because they are still contractually obliged to stay away from marijuana, regardless if it's legal.
Unless the wording of the contract is vague, they won't be able to.
-
This goes back to my hypothesis:
The Browns are LESSER than the sum of their parts.
They have some really talented players at a lot of positions: Pro Bowlers at LT, C, WR, TE, CB, alternate at SS.
They also have some good players on the D Line: Taylor/Rubin
And they have players that should be good at LB: Kruger/Mingo/Sheard.
But two things: 1. Yes, the position QB is not amongst those mentioned above, and 2. Beyond that, for some reason this team just cannot "congeal". Instead of a cohesive group, this talent seems at odds with itself. I am not sure why, but it is.
I don't know if it is coaching, of if these guys just can't get along like they should.
-
QB killed drives, constantly. Just when this team seems ready to gel the QB shakes the pot. We'll never settle into our mold until the QB is solidified and believe me when I say that it's coming. That will be the foremost of our decisions going forward.
Just as an aside- What does this and other Browns news, or should I say, how, does this correspond to the new Browns movie coming in April? Surely, Haslam being the businessman that he is will capitalize on any advantages that Chud being on a supposed "hotseat" will entail...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login