NorrinRadd12 will be released by The Browns Board today
-
browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)
browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)
I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.
We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.
-
browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)
I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.
We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.
I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.
We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.
Word is we're signing Whitner.
-
now reports are dansby and whitner coming to the browns.... our new identity... bone crushing defense
-
Mack doesn't want to be here (my opinion). His agent is trying to produce a deal that the browns can't match.
-
I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.
I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.
Mack for Revis straight up is reasonable- throwing in picks on top of it? Bite me. They both would have to restructure.
-
I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.
We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.
Word is we're signing Whitner.
-
Per source, IF Browns trade for Revis, they could send Alex Mack to TB in the deal. Basic swap of salaries after restructure w/Revis.
that would be awesome
-
Daryl Ruiter @RuiterWrongFAN 19s
Hearing Donte Whitner is a done deal #Browns
-
Shit is happening...
-
I don't like to toot my own horn but 'toot, toot'. If this happens I called it first yesterday ... If it doesn't happen though? I was just messing around.
-
Profootballtalk reports Darrelle Revis is unwilling to take a pay cut to facilitate a trade.
It's hardly a surprise. Revis' best card is to refuse any and all requests to take a pay cut, forcing his release. He'd then be free to pick his own team, and get some guarantees beyond 2014. Even the Browns would reportedly insist on a pay cut in any potential trade. It's unclear what the Raiders' stance is. The Raiders have the cap room to absorb Revis' $16 million salary.I highly doubt browns will go after him after reading this!
-
We don't need Revis, what we DO need to be doing is looking for the next Revis.
-
While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning
-
-
While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning
Hardy Har. I get it. Everyone wants the next Manning etc. My point is that Revis' best days may be behind him. You want to throw 10 mil a year for a guy who is on the downslope? I'd rather take shots getting young talent. Adding a veteran to an already established team is one thing. You can't rebuild with also-rans. Hey while we're at it, we can lock up Chris Johnson and Steve Smith.
-
A Revis/Witner Safety Duo would surely put the dome back on the Defense, right?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login