Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. WR help ... Crabtree or Roddy White?

WR help ... Crabtree or Roddy White?

The Browns Board
72 25 4.2k

  • Watch our 7th rounder be our best pick in a couple of years. LOL

  • @walterwhite said:

    What would we have to give up for Crabtree?

    Million dollar question. Only 1 year left on his rookie deal, some injury history. I wouldn't give more than a mid round pick.

    Ruining threads since 1897.
    Tour2maT 1 Reply

  • Sheard is still on his rookie deal which would be doable for the 49ers.. Not a suggestion, just an example of what COULD be an option..

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
  • B Bummie

    @jcam222 said:

    Jeff Janis

    ^^^This. He's the only name on my radar right now.

    @bummie said:

    ^^^This. He's the only name on my radar right now.

    I like Coleman for his height advantage. If we brought him and Janis in I'd be happy.

    "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta
  • OsirisO Osiris

    @bummie said:

    ^^^This. He's the only name on my radar right now.

    I like Coleman for his height advantage. If we brought him and Janis in I'd be happy.

    @osiris said:

    I like Coleman for his height advantage. If we brought him and Janis in I'd be happy.

    Janis got grabbed by the Packers, but they also grabbed 3 WR, so at least two are likely to be cut at some point.

    Ruining threads since 1897.

  • Dion Bailey, S (spelling?) and Christian Jones. Both projected as a mid round pick.

  • Wrong thread

  • I seen 1 or 2 tweets last night from journalists saying we are looking at trading for Michael Crabtree and Roddy White ....any buzz in Cleveland on these rumors ?

  • I havent heard anything about that, but I hope something happens, we need wrs bad

  • I haven't heard anything either. I highly doubt any trade is made until AFTER we have rookie mini camp. The FO is going to want to see who is worth keeping from the rookie stock before it clears to room it needs to trade for a player. That is unless the trade includes us trading away a play, in which case news could start speeding up on this issue.

    However, without any Browns beat writters picking this up, I feel it is just more local speculation in San Fan and Atlanta at this point.

    Ruining threads since 1897.

  • heres the problem all teams now will try up there price being they know we need a reciever bad

    DownSouthKCD Harry BuffaloH 2 Replies
  • B beare

    heres the problem all teams now will try up there price being they know we need a reciever bad

    @beare said:

    heres the problem all teams now will try up there price being they know we need a reciever bad

    And if they do then fuck em. They can be without Crabtree next year and nothing to show for it. He's worth a 3rd rounder.

  • B beare

    heres the problem all teams now will try up there price being they know we need a reciever bad

    @beare said:

    heres the problem all teams now will try up there price being they know we need a reciever bad

    I don't think so. Value is value and if teams are looking to move a WR, they will move them for what they think is fair value. In Crabtree's situation, the team is not out of cap room and they really have no hope of resigning him after the season. Given that he only really has mid level production and has injury concerns, I would have to think that the 49ers wouldn't be able to net anything more than a 3rd round pick for him. They are going to want to get something for him instead of letting him walk, and that can work towards OUR advantage in any possible trade talks.

    Ruining threads since 1897.

  • @walterwhite said:

    What would we have to give up for Crabtree?

    I could see using that 2015 6th we got from Baltimore to pick up either Crabtree or White. We won't be trading any players until we closer to the cut dates...

    Either way, a trade like this might not happen for a while, but it is the type of move we need to make to bring in a vet WR that can "act like" our WR1 this season just as a stop-gap.

    #Justsayin'
    jcam222J 1 Reply

  • I don't think a 6th for White is going to get a call back from the ATL.

  • No, not even close with the 6th with Roddy White. I doubt the 4th from Buffalo would get it done. Roddy White is a good WR. I would give up a 3rd for him in a heartbeat

  • Here are some stats for Roddy White. Just took them off ESPN.

    In 13 games last year, 63 catches for 711 yards and 3 TD's. That was also with Julio Jones so no threat on other side

    In 16 games in 2012, 92 catches for 1351 yards and 7 TD's.

    In 141 Career games, 685 catches for 9436 yards and 55 TD's. That would average out to 68 catches for 943 yards and 5 TD's.

    If he can have that kind of year, that for sure warrants a 3rd or 4th round pick if ATL is trying to trade him. Doesn't replace Gordon, but about the best we can hope for.

  • My only issue is his age. Do we want to give a 3rd rounder for a receiver who is starting to show his age? It's a coin toss as to whether he is going to have a 2012 year or a 2013 year.

    Ruining threads since 1897.

  • Well think of it this way HB, even considering his age. I would say he would still have a good 3-4 years left. I do think he can still produce at a high level. He may not put up 2012 numbers, depends on the other receiver across from him AND the QB throwing to him. But who would you rather have at this point, Roddy White or one of the following (3- Josh Huff, Donte Moncrief, John Brown;4- Jalen Saunders, Bruce Ellington, Shaq Evans, Martavis Bryant, Kevin Norwood or so on). I know what my answer would be at this point. Maybe one of those comes out and becomes the next Roddy White or better, but I would go with the proven commodity who is still producing. This team has a chance to be special, and remember, this FO passed on every single one of these guys already.

    Harry BuffaloH 1 Reply

  • a 6th rd pick will get you neither 1 of them!

Log in to reply