Jonathan Paul Manziel
-
Unfortunately, sick people seem to stalk people like JFF. Kid better watch his back.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Fake Lawsuit Against Johnny
-
LOL, Only in Florida:
Federal court in Florida accepts hoax lawsuit against ManzielPosted by Mike Florio on May 23, 2014, 10:02 AM EDT
APYes, Johnny Manziel technically has been sued for sexual harassment in a Florida federal court.
No, it’s not a real lawsuit. It’s a hoax. An obvious hoax. A hoax so obvious that the clerk of the court should have refused to dignify it with a date stamp or with an assignment of the case to both a judge and a magistrate.
Courts typically accept whatever comes in, and then they sort it all out later. But it may be time for courts to revisit that approach, given that anyone can put together anything and send it in and have it become officially filed — which gives it a weird sense of credibility and legitimacy, even when it’s clearly a hoax.
The lawsuit, which was field on May 16, 2014, was sent to us last night by a reader. The named plaintiff is Samatha Schacher. Whoever drafted the hoax lawsuit has tried to create the impression that it’s the same Samantha Schacher who serves as an HLN contributor and co-host of the network’s Dr. Drew show. (There’s a reference in the lawsuit to Manziel suggesting a “threesome with Dr. Drew.”)
Before sharing any specifics from the hoax lawsuit, I need to point out once that it’s clearly a hoax.
“Defendant Manziel has been sexually harassing me since Valentine’s Day, 2013, calling me non-stop on my Samsung Phone and sending me naked selfies of himself showing me his penis,” the lawsuit alleges. (The folks at Samsung may or may not appreciate the gratuitous plug.)
The lawsuit — again, it’s a hoax — also claims that Manziel sent a naked picture of himself with his penis in a hotdog bun, that he sent a photo with a “ruler next to his erect penis that measured 4-1/2 inches,” that he “keeps asking me to strip for him at his boy, Lebron James’ crip [sic] in Miami,” that Manziel “told me he does steroids and lifts weights,” and that “if another man ever talks to me, he would beat them up and get away with it because he’s famous.”
The lawsuit — again, hoax — says that Manziel confessed that he cheated on his college exams, that he’ll “get a penis enlargement and be my Long John Silvers [sic],” that he smoked marijuana before games in the locker room, that he received “lavish gifts” from Texas A&M, that he’d buy the plaintiff “sex toys with secret money Kevin Sumlin provides him,” and that he “refers to his penis as his Vienna Sausage.”
The lawsuit — again, hoax — says that “Judereon” Clowney sent Manziel a picture of Clowney’s nine-inch penis, and that Manziel showed the picture to the plaintiff and “asked me if I could handle that monster.”
“I had to see a Psychologist because I have nightmares of Manziel’s penis,” the lawsuit — hoax — states. “Manziel sent me a homemade video of himself at Walt Disney World on ‘It’s a Small Word’ ride in the Magic Kingdom, and while the song is on, he puts the camera down unbuttons his pants, pulls his penis out and jingles [sic] his penis to the music. ESPN owns Disney and ESPN promotes Manziel, knowing he did this in ‘It’s a Small World.’”
Again, the lawsuit is a hoax. It never should have been stamped for filing, and it should be thrown out of court today.
LOL, Only in Florida:
Federal court in Florida accepts hoax lawsuit against Manziel
Posted by Mike Florio on May 23, 2014, 10:02 AM EDT
AP
Yes, Johnny Manziel technically has been sued for sexual harassment in a Florida federal court.
No, its not a real lawsuit. Its a hoax. An obvious hoax. A hoax so obvious that the clerk of the court should have refused to dignify it with a date stamp or with an assignment of the case to both a judge and a magistrate.
Courts typically accept whatever comes in, and then they sort it all out later. But it may be time for courts to revisit that approach, given that anyone can put together anything and send it in and have it become officially filed which gives it a weird sense of credibility and legitimacy, even when its clearly a hoax.
The lawsuit, which was field on May 16, 2014, was sent to us last night by a reader. The named plaintiff is Samatha Schacher. Whoever drafted the hoax lawsuit has tried to create the impression that its the same Samantha Schacher who serves as an HLN contributor and co-host of the networks Dr. Drew show. (Theres a reference in the lawsuit to Manziel suggesting a threesome with Dr. Drew.)
Before sharing any specifics from the hoax lawsuit, I need to point out once that its clearly a hoax.
Defendant Manziel has been sexually harassing me since Valentines Day, 2013, calling me non-stop on my Samsung Phone and sending me naked selfies of himself showing me his penis, the lawsuit alleges. (The folks at Samsung may or may not appreciate the gratuitous plug.)
The lawsuit again, its a hoax also claims that Manziel sent a naked picture of himself with his penis in a hotdog bun, that he sent a photo with a ruler next to his erect penis that measured 4-1/2 inches, that he keeps asking me to strip for him at his boy, Lebron James crip [sic] in Miami, that Manziel told me he does steroids and lifts weights, and that if another man ever talks to me, he would beat them up and get away with it because hes famous.
The lawsuit again, hoax says that Manziel confessed that he cheated on his college exams, that hell get a penis enlargement and be my Long John Silvers [sic], that he smoked marijuana before games in the locker room, that he received lavish gifts from Texas A&M, that hed buy the plaintiff sex toys with secret money Kevin Sumlin provides him, and that he refers to his penis as his Vienna Sausage.
The lawsuit again, hoax says that Judereon Clowney sent Manziel a picture of Clowneys nine-inch penis, and that Manziel showed the picture to the plaintiff and asked me if I could handle that monster.
I had to see a Psychologist because I have nightmares of Manziels penis, the lawsuit hoax states. Manziel sent me a homemade video of himself at Walt Disney World on Its a Small Word ride in the Magic Kingdom, and while the song is on, he puts the camera down unbuttons his pants, pulls his penis out and jingles [sic] his penis to the music. ESPN owns Disney and ESPN promotes Manziel, knowing he did this in Its a Small World.
Again, the lawsuit is a hoax. It never should have been stamped for filing, and it should be thrown out of court today.
Hahahaha now that's funny. I'm not sure what would drive someone to take the time necessary to write and submit it but that's damn funny.
-
Manziel Jar
Almost like a swear jar. Every non football mention about Manziel. should go into a fund that goes into a good cause. Too many Manziel cock jockeys here. Manziel plays for the BROWNS.
-
You mean for example stuff like this? LOL
-
I lol'd
-
You guys are so keen to shit on these stat lines and tell me to stop living in the miserable last, yet Brian Hoyer's 2013 season is nestled in there and nobody noticed.
Brian's 2013 is in there? Where? Here are his numbers per http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HoyeBr00.htm...
Year 2013 28 CLE G 3 GS 3 QBrec 3-0-0 Cmp 57 Att 96 Cmp% 59.4 Yds 615
TD 5 TD% 5.2 Int 3 Int% 3.1 Lng 47 Y/A 6.4 AY/A 6.0 Y/C 10.8 Y/G 205.0 Rate 82.6
I think you copied his career totals by mistake my friend...
Nonetheless the resume is thin to be sure, but even you said you felt a twinge of "it" watching him vs. MN and Cinci last year.
Brian's 2013 is in there? Where? Here are his numbers per http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HoyeBr00.htm...
Year 2013 28 CLE G 3 GS 3 QBrec 3-0-0 Cmp 57 Att 96 Cmp% 59.4 Yds 615
TD 5 TD% 5.2 Int 3 Int% 3.1 Lng 47 Y/A 6.4 AY/A 6.0 Y/C 10.8 Y/G 205.0 Rate 82.6
I think you copied his career totals by mistake my friend...
Nonetheless the resume is thin to be sure, but even you said you felt a twinge of "it" watching him vs. MN and Cinci last year.
Yeah, I misspoke. I tried to compare season statistics of Browns QB's in similar scenarios (3-8 games, season cut short by injury, etc.) to Hoyer's entire career.
Regardless, the point is the same. Fans are misremembering how Hoyer performed. They were so happy to see an average quarterback that they glorify the performance of Hoyer without actually breaking it down.
I admit, I did get that "it" feeling from him against Minnesota. I knew the entire time that we were going to win that game. Hoyer was a breath of fresh air and I would absolutely love for him to earn the starting role.
But a world-beater, he has yet to be. He's competing against three other quarterbacks who are more mobile than him, fit our offensive coordinators scheme bettter, are not coming off major injury, and are either winners at their respective schools or have more NFL experience than him.
1 of them won't make it. Someone will get cut. Logic would say that it would be Shaw, but he wouldn't clear waivers and he might be a fantastic backup NFL QB...Farmer might not want to risk losing that.
It's not Hoyer's job to lose...it's any of the four's to win.
This is dumb. Stats? meaning....what?
that Lauvau sp? played poorly at RG on pass plays?
That Little dropped passes?
Going back further, Robieski and Massaquoi sp/sp?
And the "stats" are supposed to reflect how good the qb is?
Really dumb thread. Just more histerical historical bitch festing.
Tired of it, already.
You put stats in quotes like they're fake. They are real. Those are what stats are...numbers that categorically gauge how a player plays.
The rest of the shit you listed? Those are excuses.
"Oh, but if so and so didn't blah blah blah, then we'd be the best in the world!"
It's the crutch that Cleveland fans have been using as support for the past 15 years.
I absolutely DID notice Hoyer's stats were in there- but I was working until 4 hours after you posted it.
OK, fine, you don't like Hoyer and think he's a career backup. You're entitled to you opinion. Maybe he is just another Scott Mitchell 3 game wonder, then again, maybe not. Too bad I get blasted for questioning Manziel, who hasn't even played a snap yet in the NFL.
There are a few instances of qbs being nothing but mediocre their first 5-6 years or so, and finally the light goes on. In my book, Hoyer at least deserves the benefit of the doubt. Unless you think JF stands a better chance of winning the first three games before the bye. We've been down that road before- rushing a high potential qb into a starting role, and seeing him fold line an accordion.
I think we've tried every conceivable option since '99 in the qb market- draft 'em high (Couch, Quinn, We-done) middle (Frye, McCoy) low Wynn. FA's Garcia, Anderson, Delhomme. Trades (Dilfer, Wallace). So I guess why not bring in the mega-hyped Heisman winner, and see if he can break the streak? I'm not holding my breath.
This isn't Hoyer v. Manziel. This is Hoyer v. Manziel v. Thigpen v. Shaw.
Hoyer doesn't deserve benefit of the doubt. He deserves a fair and equal shot, just like the rest of the quarterbacks on the roster. Whoever performs best should get the job, plain and simple. It should be "Oh, well Manziel is clearly better than Hoyer but he's a rookie, so let's give the job to Hoyer" or " Hoyer has outperformed Manziel, but we have to start Manziel."
I do like Hoyer. I don't know how many times I can say it.
I. Like. Brian. Hoyer.
But he "deserves" a shot just as much as you or I deserve one. He needs to earn his keep...and he's not the best suited for this offense. There's three other QB's who fit this offense better. One of them has more NFL experience, the other two have a shitload more wins and upside.
Hoyer's only asset is that he learned under Tom Brady and that he seems to make quick decisions, thats it. Manziel and Thigpen are more mobile. Manziel, Shaw and Thigpen were all winners in college and the BMOC. Thigpen has more experience. Manziel has the media attention.
Thigpen was brought on by Pettine for a reason. He must have seen something he liked in Buffalo.
i looked at his numbers (all of them) last night. wtf am i supposed to be impressed with? one season he had decent numbers where he started 14 games 18 tds and 12 ints with a just over 50% completion rate?the season where KC put up their franchise worse record of 2-14? in every other season he has thrown the same or more interceptions as TDs?
that tyler thigpen?
why, all of a sudden, have you turned into some thigpen groupie? what do you mean "hoyer deserves the shot"? they all deserve the shot dude. no one is putting hoyer in the driver's seat yet. thigpen has as much chance as hoyer and manziel do to be the starting QB.
you (and the JF fans) take the fact that if someone says "we liked what we saw from hoyer last year" as a diss towards 'your' boy. it's not like that. do you see me posting about how 'hoyer is the shit' and 'he'll take us to the promised land' and blah blah blah? no. how many threads/posts have there been saying brian hoyer is a future pro-bowler and hall of famer and is the number one QB on this team? none from me.
don't group yourself in with the man/boy love shit going on in this forum right now. i think you're better than that.
and i'll go on record now so you and mike and all the JF queefs understand this.......... i don't give a flying F who QBs this team. hoyer great. thigpen great. manziel great.
you got the starting gig, now win.
I don't take "we like what we saw from Hoyer" as a slight to any of the quarterbacks. I liked what I saw from Hoyer, to a certain extent.
I take "its Hoyer's job to lose" as a slight. Or "let's have Hoyer start this year and Manziel next year". Those are slights.
Yes, I like Tyler Thigpen. He's from my school and I played football with him. I don't apologize for liking him.
He also has more NFL experience, is more mobile, isn't coming off an injury, and is just about the same age as Hoyer. So my question is...why is it Hoyer's job to lose?
As for Thigpen's record at KC...I'm pretty impressed with it, to be honest. For having the worst defense in the league, no runningback and no receivers other than Dwayne Bowe, Thigpen still performed admirably.
What's really important to me is how Thigpen performed when Herm Edwards switched from a run-heavy offense to a spread offense (similar in philosophy to Shanahan's).
Hoyer's first three starts: 57-96 59.4% 615 yds 5 TD 3 INT Rat 82.6
Thigpen's first three starts: 66-102 63.6% 710 yds. 6 TD 0 INT Rat 102.9
So, yes...that Tyler Thigpen.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Sorry, TCPO, I just can't see anyone but Hoyer, and maybe Manziel being the opening day starter. All through the interviews we've had, Farmer/Pettine have been saying Hoyer's the starter, Hoyer's ahead of everyone else, Manziel will sit and learn - have you once heard them mention Thigpen? He's clearly not in their thoughts for starting, and I personally expect him to not take the field at any point barring injury crisis worse than last year. We'll possibly have him as third string, and keep Shaw on the practise squad if we can do it.
-
Unless you're talking about fantasy football, the only stat that matters is wins. NFL level wins. Not counting Buffalo since he only played part of the first quarter, Hoyer won both games he started and played the full game. Anyone who couldn't see a major difference in the way the entire team played with him under center is blind or unwilling to see what was right in their face. Was that a fluke? Maybe, but maybe not. Football IQ and quick decision making is a huge positive for a QB. It means a hell of a lot more than stats. Everyone is aware the sample size was small, but the last time we were winning games was with Hoyer playing. Of course it makes it all the better that he's a home town guy. People who shit on that are just being assholes for the sake of being an asshole. With Hoyer playing, we were tied at the top of the division and had wasted a division rival that ended up in the playoffs by the end of the season. What fool wouldn't want to see if it was real? Someone else pointed out that Kurt Warner was bagging groceries the year before he won the Super Bowl. Why is it so hard to let our hometown guy have the shot to continue where he left off? There is not a QB on the roster who wants to win for Cleveland more than he does. You all are so quick to point out that he hasn't done anything to deserve the starting role. Well WTF did he do to deserve to lose it? Being as he was the starter til he got hurt and the other two losers are gone, doesn't that make him the starter until he shits all over himself in a game? The guy started three games...he won two of them and lost ZERO! There's a stat for you.
-
@douche-nozzle said:
Over the last 15 years for sure, and debatably over the last 40, the Browns have earned higher draft picks, and done less with those draft picks, than any team with the possible exception of Detroit. This is proven by the fact that despite having the highest average draft picks, they are still at the bottom of the league. That really shouldn't be that hard to follow.
I love the emphasis some of you put on luck to explain why the Browns suck and the Steelers excel.
There is some luck to it...good or bad. BR could have turned out like Weeden and Quinn. You got lucky that he didn't.
You didn't get lucky when you drafted Gabe Rivera many years ago.
I don't think you have been particularly lucky at drafting All Pros for the last few years. A pretty average lot.
You (not the team) ARE lucky that you have ownership and front office competency which the Browns/Lions/Bengals have not had.
There is nothing about Pittsburgh that warrants the kind of success you have had over any of these other similar cities. Your fan base is lucky you had Dan Rooney et al in place.
Just like we were lucky to have the Paul Browns and Blanton Collier's when you were unlucky to have whomever you had running things. As nice a guy as Art Rooney was I am sure and as many positive things there may to be said about him, he wasn't a very competent team manager. for 40 years.
-
Unless you're talking about fantasy football, the only stat that matters is wins. NFL level wins. Not counting Buffalo since he only played part of the first quarter, Hoyer won both games he started and played the full game. Anyone who couldn't see a major difference in the way the entire team played with him under center is blind or unwilling to see what was right in their face. Was that a fluke? Maybe, but maybe not. Football IQ and quick decision making is a huge positive for a QB. It means a hell of a lot more than stats. Everyone is aware the sample size was small, but the last time we were winning games was with Hoyer playing. Of course it makes it all the better that he's a home town guy. People who shit on that are just being assholes for the sake of being an asshole. With Hoyer playing, we were tied at the top of the division and had wasted a division rival that ended up in the playoffs by the end of the season. What fool wouldn't want to see if it was real? Someone else pointed out that Kurt Warner was bagging groceries the year before he won the Super Bowl. Why is it so hard to let our hometown guy have the shot to continue where he left off? There is not a QB on the roster who wants to win for Cleveland more than he does. You all are so quick to point out that he hasn't done anything to deserve the starting role. Well WTF did he do to deserve to lose it? Being as he was the starter til he got hurt and the other two losers are gone, doesn't that make him the starter until he shits all over himself in a game? The guy started three games...he won two of them and lost ZERO! There's a stat for you.
Unless you're talking about fantasy football, the only stat that matters is wins. NFL level wins.
This is true. I guess everyone that started those two games should be our opening day starters this year, then... right? I mean, because it only matters that you're on the field when the team wins. It doesn't actually matter what you do during that win, only that you're playing.
Not counting Buffalo since he only played part of the first quarter, Hoyer won both games he started and played the full game. Anyone who couldn't see a major difference in the way the entire team played with him under center is blind or unwilling to see what was right in their face.
The good ol' "if you can't see the difference, you're blind" argument. That's what people rely on when they have literally no other course of action.
Was that a fluke? Maybe, but maybe not. Football IQ and quick decision making is a huge positive for a QB. It means a hell of a lot more than stats. Everyone is aware the sample size was small, but the last time we were winning games was with Hoyer playing. Of course it makes it all the better that he's a home town guy.
Mental acuity is one of the things you cannot test in a QB. The Wonderlic tries but, ultimately, fails in this regard. Hoyer has exhibited decisiveness and an ability to read defenses.
People who shit on that are just being assholes for the sake of being an asshole.
People who think that the place where your born somehow affects whether or not you should start are pussies for the sake of not having anything else to hang their hat on.
With Hoyer playing, we were tied at the top of the division and had wasted a division rival that ended up in the playoffs by the end of the season. What fool wouldn't want to see if it was real? Someone else pointed out that Kurt Warner was bagging groceries the year before he won the Super Bowl.
Tied for top of the division through less than a month! Yippee! No team wins a Super Bowl in October.
Why is it so hard to let our hometown guy have the shot to continue where he left off? There is not a QB on the roster who wants to win for Cleveland more than he does.
This is a weasel statement. It means nothing. You don't know how much any of them want to win, nor can you empirically prove it. This statement means jack shit.
You all are so quick to point out that he hasn't done anything to deserve the starting role. Well WTF did he do to deserve to lose it? Being as he was the starter til he got hurt and the other two losers are gone, doesn't that make him the starter until he shits all over himself in a game? The guy started three games...he won two of them and lost ZERO! There's a stat for you.
He didn't do anything to deserve to lose the job. He deserves a shot at it just like anyone else. But to hand him the job before he even throws a football in camp...fuck that nonsense.
He beat a terrible defense and threw three interceptions...man, he sure did dominate those Vikes.
The Bengals were able to muster 63 yards rushing and Andy Dalton had a bad day. I'm sure that has nothing to do with the game outcome, though. It was all Hoyer. It was Hoyer who intercepted a Dalton pass late in the game, it was Hoyer who stuffed every single Bengal run.
-
This forum now reminds me of walking into a bar sober, and having to listen to the drunks argue nonsensically about what year Camaro is best.
-
This forum now reminds me of walking into a bar sober, and having to listen to the drunks argue nonsensically about what year Camaro is best.
This forum now reminds me of walking into a bar sober, and having to listen to the drunks argue nonsensically about what year Camaro is best.
So you equate Hoyer and Thigpen to the piece of shit car that is a Camaro?
I basically agree with that sentiment.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
@douche-nozzle said:
Over the last 15 years for sure, and debatably over the last 40, the Browns have earned higher draft picks, and done less with those draft picks, than any team with the possible exception of Detroit. This is proven by the fact that despite having the highest average draft picks, they are still at the bottom of the league. That really shouldn't be that hard to follow.
I love the emphasis some of you put on luck to explain why the Browns suck and the Steelers excel.
There is some luck to it...good or bad. BR could have turned out like Weeden and Quinn. You got lucky that he didn't.
You didn't get lucky when you drafted Gabe Rivera many years ago.
I don't think you have been particularly lucky at drafting All Pros for the last few years. A pretty average lot.
You (not the team) ARE lucky that you have ownership and front office competency which the Browns/Lions/Bengals have not had.
There is nothing about Pittsburgh that warrants the kind of success you have had over any of these other similar cities. Your fan base is lucky you had Dan Rooney et al in place.
Just like we were lucky to have the Paul Browns and Blanton Collier's when you were unlucky to have whomever you had running things. As nice a guy as Art Rooney was I am sure and as many positive things there may to be said about him, he wasn't a very competent team manager. for 40 years.
There is some luck to it...good or bad. BR could have turned out like Weeden and Quinn. You got lucky that he didn't.
You didn't get lucky when you drafted Gabe Rivera many years ago.
I don't think you have been particularly lucky at drafting All Pros for the last few years. A pretty average lot.
You (not the team) ARE lucky that you have ownership and front office competency which the Browns/Lions/Bengals have not had.
There is nothing about Pittsburgh that warrants the kind of success you have had over any of these other similar cities. Your fan base is lucky you had Dan Rooney et al in place.
Just like we were lucky to have the Paul Browns and Blanton Collier's when you were unlucky to have whomever you had running things. As nice a guy as Art Rooney was I am sure and as many positive things there may to be said about him, he wasn't a very competent team manager. for 40 years.
Luck is a factor, certainly.
But when it continues to happen, I don't think it's exactly luck. Its stability and good scouting. Just like when we continue to take shit prospects its not a string of bad luck. It's instability and bad scouting.
The instability comes in in changing schemes every two years. For example, Manziel could be a great prospect for us and this Shanahan-style offense. But if a shit season happens, we clean house, and the next coach implements a pro-style offense with very little movement and a traditional pocket...we're fucked again.
However, Brandon Weeden was put into a system that played to his strengths, a vertical route, shotgun spread offense and he still stunk to high heaven. That's where the bad scouting comes in.
Wouldn't it be great to have a set offensive philosophy filled with the players that fit it, and keep that same mentality for 10 years? I'm sure we'd be able to amass some great talent over that time like the Steelers have.
-
@douche-nozzle said:
Over the last 15 years for sure, and debatably over the last 40, the Browns have earned higher draft picks, and done less with those draft picks, than any team with the possible exception of Detroit. This is proven by the fact that despite having the highest average draft picks, they are still at the bottom of the league. That really shouldn't be that hard to follow.
I love the emphasis some of you put on luck to explain why the Browns suck and the Steelers excel.
I don't disagree completely with you here. I'm also pointing out (both here and in your Myopia thread, which your name change had me confused for a moment) that you want to chest-thump that the Browns are at the bottom and the Steelers are the best and can do no wrong. Your extremes of homerism is where I'm calling BS. I don't know very little about the Steelers history and stats, but I don't recall QB drafts like Bubby Brister or Kordell Stewart being "great draft picks".
I was calling out luck about the 4 HOF's picked in the '74 draft. That was damn lucky, no one can contest that. As for the rest, TCPO makes a good point that I agree with.
The point of this discussion was that you think the Steelers are the best ever at everything...since the 1970 merger...and the Browns are the worst of everything in that same time frame. It's pure BS, because you don't want to include the entire history of pro football and the Browns have not been on the bottom for the last 40 years.
-
So you equate Hoyer and Thigpen to the piece of shit car that is a Camaro?
I basically agree with that sentiment.
Thank you for proving my point lol. Carry on.
-
This forum now reminds me of walking into a bar sober, and having to listen to the drunks argue nonsensically about what year Camaro is best.
-
Brian's 2013 is in there? Where? Here are his numbers per http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HoyeBr00.htm...
Year 2013 28 CLE G 3 GS 3 QBrec 3-0-0 Cmp 57 Att 96 Cmp% 59.4 Yds 615
TD 5 TD% 5.2 Int 3 Int% 3.1 Lng 47 Y/A 6.4 AY/A 6.0 Y/C 10.8 Y/G 205.0 Rate 82.6
I think you copied his career totals by mistake my friend...
Nonetheless the resume is thin to be sure, but even you said you felt a twinge of "it" watching him vs. MN and Cinci last year.
Yeah, I misspoke. I tried to compare season statistics of Browns QB's in similar scenarios (3-8 games, season cut short by injury, etc.) to Hoyer's entire career.
Regardless, the point is the same. Fans are misremembering how Hoyer performed. They were so happy to see an average quarterback that they glorify the performance of Hoyer without actually breaking it down.
I admit, I did get that "it" feeling from him against Minnesota. I knew the entire time that we were going to win that game. Hoyer was a breath of fresh air and I would absolutely love for him to earn the starting role.
But a world-beater, he has yet to be. He's competing against three other quarterbacks who are more mobile than him, fit our offensive coordinators scheme bettter, are not coming off major injury, and are either winners at their respective schools or have more NFL experience than him.
1 of them won't make it. Someone will get cut. Logic would say that it would be Shaw, but he wouldn't clear waivers and he might be a fantastic backup NFL QB...Farmer might not want to risk losing that.
It's not Hoyer's job to lose...it's any of the four's to win.
This is dumb. Stats? meaning....what?
that Lauvau sp? played poorly at RG on pass plays?
That Little dropped passes?
Going back further, Robieski and Massaquoi sp/sp?
And the "stats" are supposed to reflect how good the qb is?
Really dumb thread. Just more histerical historical bitch festing.
Tired of it, already.
You put stats in quotes like they're fake. They are real. Those are what stats are...numbers that categorically gauge how a player plays.
The rest of the shit you listed? Those are excuses.
"Oh, but if so and so didn't blah blah blah, then we'd be the best in the world!"
It's the crutch that Cleveland fans have been using as support for the past 15 years.
I absolutely DID notice Hoyer's stats were in there- but I was working until 4 hours after you posted it.
OK, fine, you don't like Hoyer and think he's a career backup. You're entitled to you opinion. Maybe he is just another Scott Mitchell 3 game wonder, then again, maybe not. Too bad I get blasted for questioning Manziel, who hasn't even played a snap yet in the NFL.
There are a few instances of qbs being nothing but mediocre their first 5-6 years or so, and finally the light goes on. In my book, Hoyer at least deserves the benefit of the doubt. Unless you think JF stands a better chance of winning the first three games before the bye. We've been down that road before- rushing a high potential qb into a starting role, and seeing him fold line an accordion.
I think we've tried every conceivable option since '99 in the qb market- draft 'em high (Couch, Quinn, We-done) middle (Frye, McCoy) low Wynn. FA's Garcia, Anderson, Delhomme. Trades (Dilfer, Wallace). So I guess why not bring in the mega-hyped Heisman winner, and see if he can break the streak? I'm not holding my breath.
This isn't Hoyer v. Manziel. This is Hoyer v. Manziel v. Thigpen v. Shaw.
Hoyer doesn't deserve benefit of the doubt. He deserves a fair and equal shot, just like the rest of the quarterbacks on the roster. Whoever performs best should get the job, plain and simple. It should be "Oh, well Manziel is clearly better than Hoyer but he's a rookie, so let's give the job to Hoyer" or " Hoyer has outperformed Manziel, but we have to start Manziel."
I do like Hoyer. I don't know how many times I can say it.
I. Like. Brian. Hoyer.
But he "deserves" a shot just as much as you or I deserve one. He needs to earn his keep...and he's not the best suited for this offense. There's three other QB's who fit this offense better. One of them has more NFL experience, the other two have a shitload more wins and upside.
Hoyer's only asset is that he learned under Tom Brady and that he seems to make quick decisions, thats it. Manziel and Thigpen are more mobile. Manziel, Shaw and Thigpen were all winners in college and the BMOC. Thigpen has more experience. Manziel has the media attention.
Thigpen was brought on by Pettine for a reason. He must have seen something he liked in Buffalo.
i looked at his numbers (all of them) last night. wtf am i supposed to be impressed with? one season he had decent numbers where he started 14 games 18 tds and 12 ints with a just over 50% completion rate?the season where KC put up their franchise worse record of 2-14? in every other season he has thrown the same or more interceptions as TDs?
that tyler thigpen?
why, all of a sudden, have you turned into some thigpen groupie? what do you mean "hoyer deserves the shot"? they all deserve the shot dude. no one is putting hoyer in the driver's seat yet. thigpen has as much chance as hoyer and manziel do to be the starting QB.
you (and the JF fans) take the fact that if someone says "we liked what we saw from hoyer last year" as a diss towards 'your' boy. it's not like that. do you see me posting about how 'hoyer is the shit' and 'he'll take us to the promised land' and blah blah blah? no. how many threads/posts have there been saying brian hoyer is a future pro-bowler and hall of famer and is the number one QB on this team? none from me.
don't group yourself in with the man/boy love shit going on in this forum right now. i think you're better than that.
and i'll go on record now so you and mike and all the JF queefs understand this.......... i don't give a flying F who QBs this team. hoyer great. thigpen great. manziel great.
you got the starting gig, now win.
I don't take "we like what we saw from Hoyer" as a slight to any of the quarterbacks. I liked what I saw from Hoyer, to a certain extent.
I take "its Hoyer's job to lose" as a slight. Or "let's have Hoyer start this year and Manziel next year". Those are slights.
Yes, I like Tyler Thigpen. He's from my school and I played football with him. I don't apologize for liking him.
He also has more NFL experience, is more mobile, isn't coming off an injury, and is just about the same age as Hoyer. So my question is...why is it Hoyer's job to lose?
As for Thigpen's record at KC...I'm pretty impressed with it, to be honest. For having the worst defense in the league, no runningback and no receivers other than Dwayne Bowe, Thigpen still performed admirably.
What's really important to me is how Thigpen performed when Herm Edwards switched from a run-heavy offense to a spread offense (similar in philosophy to Shanahan's).
Hoyer's first three starts: 57-96 59.4% 615 yds 5 TD 3 INT Rat 82.6
Thigpen's first three starts: 66-102 63.6% 710 yds. 6 TD 0 INT Rat 102.9
So, yes...that Tyler Thigpen.
Regardless, the point is the same. Fans are misremembering how Hoyer performed. They were so happy to see an average quarterback that they glorify the performance of Hoyer without actually breaking it down.
We can only remember what we saw... and Hoyer's 3-game stretch last season was the first I have seen him since his days at Michigan State.
But a world-beater, he has yet to be.
True, and he may never be, but I want to see.
I do like Hoyer. I don't know how many times I can say it. I. Like. Brian. Hoyer.
Stop it before Brian gets a restraining order.
But he "deserves" a shot just as much as you or I deserve one. He needs to earn his keep...and he's not the best suited for this offense. There's three other QB's who fit this offense better. One of them has more NFL experience, the other two have a shitload more wins and upside. Hoyer's only asset is that he learned under Tom Brady and that he seems to make quick decisions, thats it. Manziel and Thigpen are more mobile. Manziel, Shaw and Thigpen were all winners in college and the BMOC. Thigpen has more experience. Manziel has the media attention.
That's a pretty fucking big it. And it's not like Hoyer is immobile. Brian had more than adequate roll-out skills and moved nicely in the pocket. We'll see if he still does. At Michigan State Brian was 9-4 his Senior year and 7-6 his Junior. His BMOC status is not available at College Football Ref
Thigpen was brought on by Pettine for a reason. He must have seen something he liked in Buffalo.
And Pettine had to game plan against Hoyer in 2013, so I feel pretty sure his giving Brian the #1's snaps is due to more than just a default position.
He also has more NFL experience, is more mobile, isn't coming off an injury, and is just about the same age as Hoyer. So my question is...why is it Hoyer's job to lose?
Because Pettine says so... as of now.
Hoyer's first three starts: 57-96 59.4% 615 yds 5 TD 3 INT Rat 82.6
Thigpen's first three starts: 66-102 63.6% 710 yds. 6 TD 0 INT Rat 102.9
And mine is: what happened that Thigpen lost his starting job in KC and was ulitimately traded, and then ended up out of football entirely in 2013? Seriously... I don't know why...
This forum now reminds me of walking into a bar sober, and having to listen to the drunks argue nonsensically about what year Camaro is best.
Hands down it was '68! Wanna fight aboudit? Pass the beer nuts, please...
-
He also has more NFL experience, is more mobile, isn't coming off an injury, and is just about the same age as Hoyer. So my question is...why is it Hoyer's job to lose?
Wanted to expand on this just a bit...
Remembering that Pettine is a Defensive minded coach, and that (setting my LB questions aside) we are staring at what promises to be a very, very good D in 2014. With that combination the logical choice for QB is one that will not lose games, i.e., a "game manager". Of all the QBs currently in Berea who best fits this description?
I think that criteria immediately eliminates both rookies simply because they are rookies.
Of the two vets I know that Hoyer matched this description when last seen... the Cinci game showed me that. Did Thigpen when last seen?
-
@douche-nozzle said:
Over the last 15 years for sure, and debatably over the last 40, the Browns have earned higher draft picks, and done less with those draft picks, than any team with the possible exception of Detroit. This is proven by the fact that despite having the highest average draft picks, they are still at the bottom of the league. That really shouldn't be that hard to follow.
I love the emphasis some of you put on luck to explain why the Browns suck and the Steelers excel.
I don't disagree completely with you here. I'm also pointing out (both here and in your Myopia thread, which your name change had me confused for a moment) that you want to chest-thump that the Browns are at the bottom and the Steelers are the best and can do no wrong. Your extremes of homerism is where I'm calling BS. I don't know very little about the Steelers history and stats, but I don't recall QB drafts like Bubby Brister or Kordell Stewart being "great draft picks".
I was calling out luck about the 4 HOF's picked in the '74 draft. That was damn lucky, no one can contest that. As for the rest, TCPO makes a good point that I agree with.
The point of this discussion was that you think the Steelers are the best ever at everything...since the 1970 merger...and the Browns are the worst of everything in that same time frame. It's pure BS, because you don't want to include the entire history of pro football and the Browns have not been on the bottom for the last 40 years.
I don't disagree completely with you here. I'm also pointing out (both here and in your Myopia thread, which your name change had me confused for a moment) that you want to chest-thump that the Browns are at the bottom and the Steelers are the best and can do no wrong. Your extremes of homerism is where I'm calling BS. I don't know very little about the Steelers history and stats, but I don't recall QB drafts like Bubby Brister or Kordell Stewart being "great draft picks".
I was calling out luck about the 4 HOF's picked in the '74 draft. That was damn lucky, no one can contest that. As for the rest, TCPO makes a good point that I agree with.
The point of this discussion was that you think the Steelers are the best ever at everything...since the 1970 merger...and the Browns are the worst of everything in that same time frame. It's pure BS, because you don't want to include the entire history of pro football and the Browns have not been on the bottom for the last 40 years.
As I pointed out, it is really only since the "Lerner era" began that things have been so bad. From 1964 to 1994 the Browns still had like the 7th best overall record in the league during those years.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login