Skip to content

Radical Muslims on the March

Political Discussion
135 12 2.7k
  • @mld-woody said:

    One situation is urging someone to do something because you THINK it is in their best interest

    The other situation is urging them to do something because you KNOW it is in their best interest

    "evangelism" ... lol

    Both situations are urging your friends family or neighbors to do things that are in their best interest. Now I realize you've got some sort of a hard on against religion. Which makes whatever you have to say meaningless. If you don't believe in it then shut the fuck up. but if you do, really do, I think it's your responsibility to tell others.

    Kinda like squealing about man made global warming, for example.. If you really think we are going to destroy the world or harm ourselves then you should fight the good fight. If you don't really think so and you're just bitching for the sake of bitching then who cares?

    I think if you aren't serious just leave everyone else alone.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Both situations are urging your friends family or neighbors to do things that are in their best interest. Now I realize you've got some sort of a hard on against religion. Which makes whatever you have to say meaningless. If you don't believe in it then shut the fuck up. but if you do, really do, I think it's your responsibility to tell others.

    Kinda like squealing about man made global warming, for example.. If you really think we are going to destroy the world or harm ourselves then you should fight the good fight. If you don't really think so and you're just bitching for the sake of bitching then who cares?

    I think if you aren't serious just leave everyone else alone.

    WSS

    "Both situations are urging your friends family or neighbors to do things that are in their best interest."

    Yes but in one situation its based off of an established fact. The other is based off of faith. The two situations are not the same.

    I don't have a "hard on against religion"... I think we'd be better off without it, but people are free to do what they want. I just want important decisions that affect me being made based on facts and evidence, not blind faith. I've said this many times. You and some others act like I'm on a crusade against religion because I'll bring up something like seleration of church and state, or because I don't think Christians should get whatever they want. That's not true. I don't know how many times I have to say it ...

    Also, I'm not sure what the climate change content has to do with anything. Its your same old take on the subject, and I've responded to it at length before...

  • It's pretty simple. If you truly believe the global warming is putting the planets in serious peril then I think you should try to get others to see it. If you don't really think it's that big a deal, danger wise, then don't bother.

    I would imagine you have the mental ability to discern between something someone truly believes and something they just like to argue about.

    WSS

  • It's pretty simple. If you truly believe the global warming is putting the planets in serious peril then I think you should try to get others to see it. If you don't really think it's that big a deal, danger wise, then don't bother.

    I would imagine you have the mental ability to discern between something someone truly believes and something they just like to argue about.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It's pretty simple. If you truly believe the global warming is putting the planets in serious peril then I think you should try to get others to see it. If you don't really think it's that big a deal, danger wise, then don't bother.

    I would imagine you have the mental ability to discern between something someone truly believes and something they just like to argue about.

    WSS

    You're making the point on the basis that they're both faith based. One has the backing of around 99% of scientists, the other has no basis in science at all.

  • @westside-steve said:

    It's pretty simple. If you truly believe the global warming is putting the planets in serious peril then I think you should try to get others to see it. If you don't really think it's that big a deal, danger wise, then don't bother.

    I would imagine you have the mental ability to discern between something someone truly believes and something they just like to argue about.

    WSS

    You're making the point on the basis that they're both faith based. One has the backing of around 99% of scientists, the other has no basis in science at all.

    @gftchris said:

    You're making the point on the basis that they're both faith based. One has the backing of around 99% of scientists, the other has no basis in science at all.

    I am NOT. I don't personally give a rats ass if you believe in God or not. But many who do feel they should help their fellow man find the truth. Not truth in your eyes, truth in their eyes.

    I think maybe bitterness keeps some people from understanding that not everyone sees the world in the same way.

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    You're making the point on the basis that they're both faith based. One has the backing of around 99% of scientists, the other has no basis in science at all.

    I am NOT. I don't personally give a rats ass if you believe in God or not. But many who do feel they should help their fellow man find the truth. Not truth in your eyes, truth in their eyes.

    I think maybe bitterness keeps some people from understanding that not everyone sees the world in the same way.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    I am NOT. I don't personally give a rats ass if you believe in God or not. But many who do feel they should help their fellow man find the truth. Not truth in your eyes, truth in their eyes.

    I think maybe bitterness keeps some people from understanding that not everyone sees the world in the same way.

    WSS

    You're trying to convince us that telling someone to stop smoking (or other science based issues) and telling someone to believe in god both have the same basis.

  • @westside-steve said:

    I am NOT. I don't personally give a rats ass if you believe in God or not. But many who do feel they should help their fellow man find the truth. Not truth in your eyes, truth in their eyes.

    I think maybe bitterness keeps some people from understanding that not everyone sees the world in the same way.

    WSS

    You're trying to convince us that telling someone to stop smoking (or other science based issues) and telling someone to believe in god both have the same basis.

    @gftchris said:

    You're trying to convince us that telling someone to stop smoking (or other science based issues) and telling someone to believe in god both have the same basis.

    no I'm not but I'm bored with the conversation now.

    (I am saying that if someone truly believes that they should try and help others but your bitterness gets in the way of seeing that.)

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    You're trying to convince us that telling someone to stop smoking (or other science based issues) and telling someone to believe in god both have the same basis.

    no I'm not but I'm bored with the conversation now.

    (I am saying that if someone truly believes that they should try and help others but your bitterness gets in the way of seeing that.)

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    no I'm not but I'm bored with the conversation now.

    (I am saying that if someone truly believes that they should try and help others but your bitterness gets in the way of seeing that.)

    WSS

    About what am I bitter?

  • @westside-steve said:

    no I'm not but I'm bored with the conversation now.

    (I am saying that if someone truly believes that they should try and help others but your bitterness gets in the way of seeing that.)

    WSS

    About what am I bitter?

    @gftchris said:

    About what am I bitter?

    if you are too blind to see that Christians believe differently than you I can only imagine bitterness. I don't think my point is all that outrageous nor unfair.

    (nor hard to understand)

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    About what am I bitter?

    if you are too blind to see that Christians believe differently than you I can only imagine bitterness. I don't think my point is all that outrageous nor unfair.

    (nor hard to understand)

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    if you are too blind to see that Christians believe differently than you I can only imagine bitterness. I don't think my point is all that outrageous nor unfair.

    (nor hard to understand)

    WSS

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian.

  • Steve nailed it. It's true.

  • @westside-steve said:

    if you are too blind to see that Christians believe differently than you I can only imagine bitterness. I don't think my point is all that outrageous nor unfair.

    (nor hard to understand)

    WSS

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian.

    @gftchris said:

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being a jerk off.

    fixed.

  • @westside-steve said:

    if you are too blind to see that Christians believe differently than you I can only imagine bitterness. I don't think my point is all that outrageous nor unfair.

    (nor hard to understand)

    WSS

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian.

    @gftchris said:

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian.

    That is certainly possible. Easy to confuse since you spend so much time propping up our resident atheist evangelist.

    But if I am indeed mistaken then I'm even more puzzled by your inability to understand my very simple statement beind that I think those of faith are perfectly correct in trying to convince their friends of the truth. Unless, of course, they don't really believe it.

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian.

    That is certainly possible. Easy to confuse since you spend so much time propping up our resident atheist evangelist.

    But if I am indeed mistaken then I'm even more puzzled by your inability to understand my very simple statement beind that I think those of faith are perfectly correct in trying to convince their friends of the truth. Unless, of course, they don't really believe it.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    That is certainly possible. Easy to confuse since you spend so much time propping up our resident atheist evangelist.

    But if I am indeed mistaken then I'm even more puzzled by your inability to understand my very simple statement beind that I think those of faith are perfectly correct in trying to convince their friends of the truth. Unless, of course, they don't really believe it.

    WSS

    I stand up for science over blind faith, which is mostly what Woody does, with the occasional insult thrown in there. I've known hundreds and possibly even thousands of christians through my charity work, and none of them is an evangelist. To a man (woman or child), the approach is 'this is what I believe, you're free to believe what you like; if you want to talk about it more I'd be very willing' rather than 'you must believe what I believe, or you'll go to hell!'

    I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian.

  • @westside-steve said:

    That is certainly possible. Easy to confuse since you spend so much time propping up our resident atheist evangelist.

    But if I am indeed mistaken then I'm even more puzzled by your inability to understand my very simple statement beind that I think those of faith are perfectly correct in trying to convince their friends of the truth. Unless, of course, they don't really believe it.

    WSS

    I stand up for science over blind faith, which is mostly what Woody does, with the occasional insult thrown in there. I've known hundreds and possibly even thousands of christians through my charity work, and none of them is an evangelist. To a man (woman or child), the approach is 'this is what I believe, you're free to believe what you like; if you want to talk about it more I'd be very willing' rather than 'you must believe what I believe, or you'll go to hell!'

    I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian.

    @gftchris said:

    I stand up for science over blind faith, which is mostly what Woody does, with the occasional insult thrown in there. I've known hundreds and possibly even thousands of christians through my charity work, and none of them is an evangelist. To a man (woman or child), the approach is 'this is what I believe, you're free to believe what you like; if you want to talk about it more I'd be very willing' rather than 'you must believe what I believe, or you'll go to hell!'

    I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian.

    And of course you are exaggerating to argue with the point I've never made.

    So do you believe Jesus Christ was born of the Virgin Mary and is the Son of God sent to Earth to die on the cross for the sins of humanity? Also do you believe in a caring and loving God who has a plan for us and understands us?

    And do you believe that if you accept Jesus Christ as your Savior you will be able to experience eternal life?

    Or not?

    None of the other ancillary stuff matters at least in this question.

    WSS

  • Some people here have a hard time believing that two people can disagree on one issue and agree on another. Crazy right?

    I mean... Stop propping up my radical atheist agenda Chris! I clearly hate all Christians and am actively trying to wipe them out. Muslims are cool though because I'm a white guilt apologist... Or something.

  • "You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian."



    "I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian."


    **************************************************


    Really? This makes no sense. It is only by Grace we can enter Heaven.



    John 316 - "For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting."



    I'm stunned. Is this where a liberal simply changes the meaning of a word to suit his own argument?


  • What makes a passage from an old book more believable than Chris and Osiris's personal belief? How does one take precedence over another? Unless you have proof that 1, heaven exists and 2, only Christians go there.

    (Plus I got my first Communion. That counts for something, right?)

  • @gftchris said:

    I stand up for science over blind faith, which is mostly what Woody does, with the occasional insult thrown in there. I've known hundreds and possibly even thousands of christians through my charity work, and none of them is an evangelist. To a man (woman or child), the approach is 'this is what I believe, you're free to believe what you like; if you want to talk about it more I'd be very willing' rather than 'you must believe what I believe, or you'll go to hell!'

    I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian.

    And of course you are exaggerating to argue with the point I've never made.

    So do you believe Jesus Christ was born of the Virgin Mary and is the Son of God sent to Earth to die on the cross for the sins of humanity? Also do you believe in a caring and loving God who has a plan for us and understands us?

    And do you believe that if you accept Jesus Christ as your Savior you will be able to experience eternal life?

    Or not?

    None of the other ancillary stuff matters at least in this question.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And of course you are exaggerating to argue with the point I've never made.

    So do you believe Jesus Christ was born of the Virgin Mary and is the Son of God sent to Earth to die on the cross for the sins of humanity? Also do you believe in a caring and loving God who has a plan for us and understands us?

    And do you believe that if you accept Jesus Christ as your Savior you will be able to experience eternal life?

    Or not?

    None of the other ancillary stuff matters at least in this question.

    WSS

    What I believe in is what Jesus taught. I find the concept of the Virgin Mary highly improbable, and Jesus as the son of God not much more likely. But I do believe in a God watching over me, generally guiding me in a way that allows me to learn from my own mistakes, and pass on such wisdom to the generations coming after me.

    I'm a little fuzzy on the eternal life part, and what that would constitute - some concept of heaven? I mean, some good Christians' idea of heaven probably includes a couple of things that would be banned in a literal interpretation of the bible. Further, does everyone inhabit the same heaven, and at what age? Are most people in heaven old, or do they appear there as a younger version of themselves? In which case, do we have a heaven full of 25 year-olds where I see what my parents looked like when they were young? Or do we have an infinite amount of heavens, one for each person? Or, do we go for perpetual reincarnation? In which case, is there a limited supply of souls? Or do we have a finite stock of souls waiting to be sent to earth when a baby is born?

    I believe in a God that watches over me and everybody. I'm just trying to find a logical explanation for some of the things stated as fact.

  • "You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian."



    "I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian."


    **************************************************


    Really? This makes no sense. It is only by Grace we can enter Heaven.



    John 316 - "For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting."



    I'm stunned. Is this where a liberal simply changes the meaning of a word to suit his own argument?


    @calfoxwc said:

    "You may have missed the multiple times where I've professed to being Christian."

    "I happen to feel the same as Osiris, that a good, kind atheist is much more likely to end up in heaven than a 'bad' christian."

    **************************************************

    Really? This makes no sense. It is only by Grace we can enter Heaven.

    John 316 - "For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting."

    I'm stunned. Is this where a liberal simply changes the meaning of a word to suit his own argument?

    this idea that only Christians get in to heaven is ridiculous, to be honest. Supposing you believe that it's God's plan for every human to be born, as seems to be the general consensus in pro-lifers such as yourself (correct me if I'm wrong). How, then, do we reconcile the fact that he has put some people in these remote villages in the Amazon forest, untouched by civilisation, let alone western philosophy and religion and therefore denied the chance to become a Christian, with the fact that only Christians can get in to heaven? If that is your belief system, surely you're believing that God has planned for these people to go to hell?

    We're way in to the realms of theological debate here, and god help me I love this shit.

  • Never mind the fact that the Christian god is the same as the Jewish god, and the god of Islam is essentially the same god with a different interpretation of the original teachings.