Skip to content

TEAM AMERICA: World Cup

Barber Shop Talk
252 20 8.2k
  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by


    Brazilian voodoo priest to curse Germany


    d19448d6-6aaa-4359-a768-eadacf5fbca9_afp
    12 hours ago





























    4d3d6866fa911589081b2519d575c10d636f2973

    .

    View photo



    Brazil football player dolls set inside a special box to enhance power and luck on them as part of the Afro-Brazilian religious ritual in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 3, 2014 (AFP Photo/Yasuyoshi Chiba)








    Rio de Janeiro (AFP) - Germany will have to contend with black magic as well Brazil's Selecao in Tuesday's World Cup semi-final as a voodoo priest plans to curse die Mannschaft.






    US_WORLDCUP_COVERAGE_300x125.jpg





    Brazil will be without injured superstarNeymar in Belo Horizonte, but black magic enthusiast Helio Sillman from Rio de Janeiro says his curse will hinder Joachim Loew's team in the semi-final.


    "I'll take their top player and bind his legs so he can't run on the pitch," said Sillman, referring to the voodoo doll of an undisclosed German player that will be cursed in a ceremony before the game.


    In his shop "World of Orixas" in the northern neighborhood of Madureira, Sillman carries out a ritual before each Selecao game.


    Using a a small football pitch-shaped box as his alter, he puts inside lit candles in the colours of the opposing team and the voodoo doll of their most important player.


    Sillman's curse on James Rodriguez did not stop the Colombian star from scoring in his team's 2-1 defeat to Brazil in Friday's quarter-finals.



    And he was powerless to prevent Selecao star Neymar from suffering a fractured vertebrae against the Colombians that has ruled him out of the World Cup.


    But Sillman points to Brazil's results against Cameroon,Chile, Croatia andMexico as testimony to the influence of his magic.


    Voodoo dolls representing a player from each of the Selecao's opponents sit in a bowl.


    "Those are the four teams that Brazil have overcome," he said.


    Germany's Thomas Mueller, Manuel Neuer and Mats Hummels have been warned.





    Copy+of+FantasyFootball_BN_NM_Q2_2014_63





    View Comments (118)

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    Isn't religion crazy?

  • So Belgium, Argentina, The Netherlands, and France are all that lies between us and the title. Hrmph.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @vaportrail said:

    So Belgium, Argentina, The Netherlands, and France are all that lies between us and the title. Hrmph.

    I am afraid that Germany will blitzkrieg those nations, just like 1940.

  • @mld-woody said:

    That was nerve racking and I didn't even care about the two teams lol

    My uneducated thinking on the Brazil- Chile match. If you're going to play all that time, and go down to penalty kicks- at least make it like tennis- you gotta win by 2.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    My uneducated thinking on the Brazil- Chile match. If you're going to play all that time, and go down to penalty kicks- at least make it like tennis- you gotta win by 2.

    Just an ignorant, stupid gimmick to get a game over with. They should play until someone scores. That is how they do it in real sports. Like Hockey.

    It would make teams far more aggressive at attempting to score. Right now there is too much laying back.

  • Zombo said:

    It's always fun to root for the USA, like Mik says, especially when we are an underdog.

    The gay part is flopping and writhing in pain anytime someone touches your shoulder. C'mon Man.

    I didnt sit through any games but I caught bits and pieces and rooted for the USA.

    In the end, they lost two, tied one and beat a small Third World country by one goal.

    Still a ways to go.

    1980 Hockey Team is still The Great American Sports Story.

    Soccer will continue on in the suburbs and the hispanic neighborhoods ... but it wont see my TV for another 4 years.

    Z

    your loss

    you also will be in a shrinking group

    also hard for you to make any comments, when you say you didnt sit through any games...

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @mld-woody said:

    your loss

    you also will be in a shrinking group

    also hard for you to make any comments, when you say you didnt sit through any games...

    Eliminate the offside rule. It promotes lazy defense, and the refs get it wrong at least 50% of the time and disallow goals that should count, or they allow goals that shouldn't. I watched enough of these game to still see absolutely no reason for that rule.

    Eliminate the stupid penalty kicks......have them play the real game until someone wins. Or else just eliminate the actual way the game is played and just have each team take penalty kicks. First one to 100 wins.

    Allow for more free substitution. Players will be fresher, you could use an entire roster, and the game will move faster.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    Again, your "analysis" of the offsides rule just shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

  • Again, your "analysis" of the offsides rule just shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @mld-woody said:

    Again, your "analysis" of the offsides rule just shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    As for the officials getting wrong half the time....I simply need to listen to the commentators who are constantly pointing out that the officials are getting it wrong all the time.

  • T Taco918 wrote on last edited by

    7-1. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Germany is now the favorite.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    When was the last time Germany killed the collective hopes and dreams of so many people?

  • @mld-woody said:

    Again, your "analysis" of the offsides rule just shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    As for the officials getting wrong half the time....I simply need to listen to the commentators who are constantly pointing out that the officials are getting it wrong all the time.

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    That's wrong. I'm also guessing you haven't watched or played in enough games to use the phrase "many cases".

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    God bless the Fatherland!

  • @mld-woody said:

    Again, your "analysis" of the offsides rule just shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    As for the officials getting wrong half the time....I simply need to listen to the commentators who are constantly pointing out that the officials are getting it wrong all the time.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    As for the officials getting wrong half the time....I simply need to listen to the commentators who are constantly pointing out that the officials are getting it wrong all the time.

    It punishes lazy and incompetent defenses, and rewards those that are well drilled enough to be able to hold a line.

    Example: you would traditionally have four defenders; the rule generally means that there needs to be at least one defender between you and the goal (assuming the goalkeeper is there) - or level with you; if you have your four defenders in a straight line, then all attackers must be behind the defensive line. If you have a crooked looking line - picture one of the middle guys being 2 yards ahead, for example - then the guy he is marking can have that 2 yards head start because the rest of the defensive line is in line with him, so he's onside.

    Without the offside rule in place, the striker can stand as far up the pitch as he likes, while the other team attacks, waiting for the keeper to get the ball and punt it to him...

    Side note: this isn't a part of the game that anyone would consider 'beautiful' - it doesn't take any real skill or talent to kick the ball as far as you can to get it to the attacker and then for him to score like that. When I'm playing 5-a-side, where there are no offsides, nobody really enjoys scoring those goals. It's not what you play for.

    Back on track...that meant that at least one defender (probably two) had to stay back with him, and that meant that the team as a whole became more split, and you would have defenders specialising in only defensive play. Now, with the rule in place, you can move everyone higher up the pitch, resulting in the evolution of defenders from purely destructive players to having the ability to take a full part in the offensive element of the game as well, becoming much more technically adept and thus improving the overall attacking quality of the team.

    So not only does the offside rule eliminate the boring goals, it also had the side effect of improving the quality of the game. Similarly, the elimination of the backpass improved the ball skills of the goal keeper since he couldn't just use his hands, while also cutting down on time wasting.

    I hope this helps you to understand the positive impact of the offside rule - if you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Damn straight. Men should not touch other men. If you absolutely have to, make sure it's a handshake. With gloves on, preferably.

    Thank god real american men play a sport where they dress up in spandex, wear a load of padding and wait for one man to reach under another man's ass and grab a ball before running for 20 seconds and then having a break.

    Perspective is everything.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Damn straight. Men should not touch other men. If you absolutely have to, make sure it's a handshake. With gloves on, preferably.

    Thank god real american men play a sport where they dress up in spandex, wear a load of padding and wait for one man to reach under another man's ass and grab a ball before running for 20 seconds and then having a break.

    Perspective is everything.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @gftchris said:

    Damn straight. Men should not touch other men. If you absolutely have to, make sure it's a handshake. With gloves on, preferably.

    Thank god real american men play a sport where they dress up in spandex, wear a load of padding and wait for one man to reach under another man's ass and grab a ball before running for 20 seconds and then having a break.

    Perspective is everything.

    You mad?

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    Well put about the offsides rule. His assessment that it promoted lazy defense could not be more wrong. I've played defense my entire life, offsides is just another element I need to consider. Also, completely opening the game up and turning it into kickball would ruin it.

    But, like we've said before, his limited knowledge of the game isn't stopping him from trying to impose rule changes. Though it should, because he has no idea what he's talking about.

  • @gftchris said:

    Damn straight. Men should not touch other men. If you absolutely have to, make sure it's a handshake. With gloves on, preferably.

    Thank god real american men play a sport where they dress up in spandex, wear a load of padding and wait for one man to reach under another man's ass and grab a ball before running for 20 seconds and then having a break.

    Perspective is everything.

    You mad?

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You mad?

    Nope, just pointing out the perspective thing. I'm aware that in america it's seen as a girly sport. Not a big deal to me, because I (and the rest of the world) know otherwise.

  • Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    As a smart dude as you are I find it funny that you can't see why it is seen as a "gay" sport in the USA. Because the big 3 want you to think that way to have the already dwindling (not NFL) attendance and TV ratings to have their market share cut into to more. I thought you were smarter than that dude. What other reason do 5 billion people outside of the USA don't have the short vision like you fags do?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    As a smart dude as you are I find it funny that you can't see why it is seen as a "gay" sport in the USA. Because the big 3 want you to think that way to have the already dwindling (not NFL) attendance and TV ratings to have their market share cut into to more. I thought you were smarter than that dude. What other reason do 5 billion people outside of the USA don't have the short vision like you fags do?

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @kosar_for_president said:

    As a smart dude as you are I find it funny that you can't see why it is seen as a "gay" sport in the USA. Because the big 3 want you to think that way to have the already dwindling (not NFL) attendance and TV ratings to have their market share cut into to more. I thought you were smarter than that dude. What other reason do 5 billion people outside of the USA don't have the short vision like you fags do?

    Just playing Kosar, just playing.

  • @the-gipper said:

    I know what the rule is about....and I see that in fact it rewards lazy and incompetent defense in many many cases.

    That's wrong. I'm also guessing you haven't watched or played in enough games to use the phrase "many cases".

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @mld-woody said:

    That's wrong. I'm also guessing you haven't watched or played in enough games to use the phrase "many cases".

    I have seen these games....and they are supposed to be the best of the best.....and in these games, the refs are constantly getting it wrong.