Skip to content

Most Productive Browns by position

The Browns Board
24 9 786
  • Rubin has played DE and NT, not DT.

    Zombo

  • Galen fiss was a DB I think,as well..

  • Galen was an LB...

    But what "stats"?

  • Rubin has played DE and NT, not DT.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Rubin has played DE and NT, not DT.

    Zombo

    Well, a Nose Tackle is kind of a DT. That is what PFR had him as.

  • Galen fiss was a DB I think,as well..

    @nickers said:

    Galen fiss was a DB I think,as well..

    I think there may have been a DB named Fisk

  • @nickers said:

    Galen fiss was a DB I think,as well..

    I think there may have been a DB named Fisk

    @the-gipper said:

    I think there may have been a DB named Fisk

    A Jason Fisk played NT for us in '05...

    Is the "stat" you are using PFR's Weighted Career thing?

  • what happened to jamir miller on that list?

  • @the-gipper said:

    I think there may have been a DB named Fisk

    A Jason Fisk played NT for us in '05...

    Is the "stat" you are using PFR's Weighted Career thing?

    @tour2ma said:

    A Jason Fisk played NT for us in '05...

    Is the "stat" you are using PFR's Weighted Career thing?

    Yes, that is it, I believe. It supposedly is a number at which you can compare the productivity of all players against each other regardless of position. I am certain that this statistic is not infallible....and don't ask me how they mathematically arrive at these numbers. Suffice it to say it is the one thing that seeming allows comparison between all positions and all eras.....though of course the stat has not been applied to earlier times....pre-1960ish...or at least mid 50s.

    If there is a better stat out there that can do the job of this better, I am more than interested in hearing about it.

    As noted, it is a career stat.....and a cumulative stat, but it is also broken down by years for each player. Here is the link to the Browns players relative to that statistic.

    Here are the Browns with the highest overall Career Production Average, regardless of position (anyone with a 75 or above score):

    Clay Matthews 124

    Jim Brown 122

    Dick Shafrath 115

    GEne Hickerson 111

    Leroy Kelly 102

    Doug Dieken 92

    Brian Sipe 88

    Gary Collins 87

    Frank Ryan 80

    Hanford Dixon 80

    Cody Risien 78

    Greg Pruitt 78

    Jim Houston 78

    Michael Dean Perry 78

    Clarence Scott 78

    Ozzie Newsome 77

    Walter Johnson 76

    Bernie Kosar 75

    Paul Warfield 75 (Browns only stats)

  • what happened to jamir miller on that list?

    @clevfan4life said:

    what happened to jamir miller on that list?

    It is a total career production stat. While Jamir had a good year once, that was about it....one good year.

  • @tour2ma said:

    A Jason Fisk played NT for us in '05...

    Is the "stat" you are using PFR's Weighted Career thing?

    Yes, that is it, I believe. It supposedly is a number at which you can compare the productivity of all players against each other regardless of position. I am certain that this statistic is not infallible....and don't ask me how they mathematically arrive at these numbers. Suffice it to say it is the one thing that seeming allows comparison between all positions and all eras.....though of course the stat has not been applied to earlier times....pre-1960ish...or at least mid 50s.

    If there is a better stat out there that can do the job of this better, I am more than interested in hearing about it.

    As noted, it is a career stat.....and a cumulative stat, but it is also broken down by years for each player. Here is the link to the Browns players relative to that statistic.

    Here are the Browns with the highest overall Career Production Average, regardless of position (anyone with a 75 or above score):

    Clay Matthews 124

    Jim Brown 122

    Dick Shafrath 115

    GEne Hickerson 111

    Leroy Kelly 102

    Doug Dieken 92

    Brian Sipe 88

    Gary Collins 87

    Frank Ryan 80

    Hanford Dixon 80

    Cody Risien 78

    Greg Pruitt 78

    Jim Houston 78

    Michael Dean Perry 78

    Clarence Scott 78

    Ozzie Newsome 77

    Walter Johnson 76

    Bernie Kosar 75

    Paul Warfield 75 (Browns only stats)

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, that is it, I believe.

    Paul Warfield 75 (Browns only stats)

    Thanks... vaguely familiar with PFR's career weighted "number"... in that I have seen it and wondered, "how do they come up with that?"

    So if Browns' longevity is key... maybe too much so, e.g., Paul Warfield's Overall Career number is 106, then games in a season might be too significant a factor as well.

    Also Michael Dean Perry a 78 vs. Jerry Sherk at 55? Appears that Jerry gets penalized because there is no sack data for his career.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yes, that is it, I believe.

    Paul Warfield 75 (Browns only stats)

    Thanks... vaguely familiar with PFR's career weighted "number"... in that I have seen it and wondered, "how do they come up with that?"

    So if Browns' longevity is key... maybe too much so, e.g., Paul Warfield's Overall Career number is 106, then games in a season might be too significant a factor as well.

    Also Michael Dean Perry a 78 vs. Jerry Sherk at 55? Appears that Jerry gets penalized because there is no sack data for his career.

    @tour2ma said:

    Thanks... vaguely familiar with PFR's career weighted "number"... in that I have seen it and wondered, "how do they come up with that?"

    So if Browns' longevity is key... maybe too much so, e.g., Paul Warfield's Overall Career number is 106, then games in a season might be too significant a factor as well.

    Also Michael Dean Perry a 78 vs. Jerry Sherk at 55? Appears that Jerry gets penalized because there is no sack data for his career.

    Maybe, but there is no sack data for the likes of Paul Wiggin, Bob Gain, Jim Houston, Walter Johnson yet there scores are high up there. Yea, I cannot explain the math. I suspect there is some explanation on the PFR site.....but at this point it seems a possible thumb nail stat. Not absolute, but somewhat useful.

    I believe, if you look at who had the highest per season average you would likely come up with the fact that one Mr. Jim Brown takes that cake, but I am not sure.

    The pinball stats that recent QBs put up probably vastly increase their production numbers. I do believe that the guys that are #1 and #2 on this career list are Brett Favre and Peyton Manning. Both with obviously long productive careers.

    The guys with the top single seasons though are: LaDanian Tomlinson 2006, Marshall Faulk 1999, and OJ Simpson 1975.

    Here is the link to the all time career leaders:

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/av_career.htm

  • These #'s are a bit skewed, if you ask me, but probably still a fair indicator on the players full career.....

    For example, I loved Clay Mathews, but there is no way he was the best player the Browns ever had....rated above Jim Brown?....really?

    Mathews(like Sherk) is another one of those who didn't get the full accounting for his sacks.....I can't remember when they started counting(82-83?), but it was well into his career....think he got jipped out about 4 or 5 years worth....

  • These #'s are a bit skewed, if you ask me, but probably still a fair indicator on the players full career.....

    For example, I loved Clay Mathews, but there is no way he was the best player the Browns ever had....rated above Jim Brown?....really?

    Mathews(like Sherk) is another one of those who didn't get the full accounting for his sacks.....I can't remember when they started counting(82-83?), but it was well into his career....think he got jipped out about 4 or 5 years worth....

    @mudfly said:

    These #'s are a bit skewed, if you ask me, but probably still a fair indicator on the players full career.....

    For example, I loved Clay Mathews, but there is no way he was the best player the Browns ever had....rated above Jim Brown?....really?

    Mathews(like Sherk) is another one of those who didn't get the full accounting for his sacks.....I can't remember when they started counting(82-83?), but it was well into his career....think he got jipped out about 4 or 5 years worth....

    Two points: This is a career production number. Yes, a guy like Clay Matthews, if he is any good, and who played for like 20 years is going to surpass the number that a Jim Brown had in only a 9 year career. (of course, note that Clay only had a 2 pt. edge on JB despite a career twice the length likely).

    Also....as I said before, I am not sure the sack number enhance this number over the career of a guy who played when the sack stat was kept. ...so I don't know if we can go there.

  • 1982 was the official start of the sack stat, but game tape/ film and even play-by-play accounts have retroactively generated data for sack legends like Deacon Jones.

    Here's a pretty good read from 2006...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/04/sports/football/04giants.html?fta=y&_r=0

    Love the comments and work of Jim Turney.

    As the Hall of Fame defensive end Deacon Jones once reportedly said, "Since when does 'all-time' begin in 1982?"

    The issue has long annoyed Jones, and long fascinated Turney. Since 1993, Turney has pored over play-by-play accounts of games played decades ago, adding up sacks that no one had counted before. He studied game tape at N.F.L. Films to fill gaps in the data.

    The research never ends; Turney occasionally catches a replay of an old game on television and wonders if a sack that he sees was recorded. He goes and checks.

    In a telephone interview Friday, Turney said he had 'no beef" with starting in 1982.

    "I dont know why they won't grandfather folks in who were playing in 1981," he said. "You can find sacks back to 1970 in a very accurate way."

    For example, Turney has calculated that Jones, whose career ended in 1974, had 173.5 sacks, and the longtime Rams defensive end Jack Youngblood had 151.5 .

  • @clevfan4life said:

    what happened to jamir miller on that list?

    It is a total career production stat. While Jamir had a good year once, that was about it....one good year.

    oh....I thought he was good for a couple years than blew out his Achilles. Oh well. Still the best LB, imo, we've had since 99.

    @the-gipper said:

    It is a total career production stat. While Jamir had a good year once, that was about it....one good year.

  • oh....I thought he was good for a couple years than blew out his Achilles. Oh well. Still the best LB, imo, we've had since 99.

    @the-gipper said:

    It is a total career production stat. While Jamir had a good year once, that was about it....one good year.

    @clevfan4life said:

    oh....I thought he was good for a couple years than blew out his Achilles. Oh well. Still the best LB, imo, we've had since 99.

    Maybe it was two years. But it wasn't very long. Not long enough to get him on the Top Ten career wise list.

    Though....if Kameron Wimbley can be on the Top Ten of DEs.....??? I think it just shows that the Browns have really been weak at that position over the years. The same can be said for a couple of other positions....Linebacker is one. If Jamir had lasted another year or two without injury he probably could have cracke the Top Ten

    FYI, Jamir would have been #17 on the LB list above. The Top 15 are listed there. Bob Babich is #16, Miller #17...with only 3 years of play.

    D'Qwell is the only other LB who has played since 1999 who ranks above Jamir.

  • Jamir Miller

    Career weighted AV: 45

    8 seasons total: 5 AZ, 3 CLE

    1994 thru 2001

    Made Pro Bowl in 2001.

    In his 3 seasons with us he missed 1 game in year 1.

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MillJa01.htm

    Per his wiki page he blew out his Achilles in a 2002 pre-season game. Spent 2002 on IR and was cut after season ended.

  • Galen Fiss was certainly a linebacker - if it wasn't for his tackle on Lenney Moore in the 2nd Qtr of the 1964 championship game, Moore was free for a TD and the game would have opened up for baltimore. I have his bubble gum card.

  • Galen Fiss was certainly a linebacker - if it wasn't for his tackle on Lenney Moore in the 2nd Qtr of the 1964 championship game, Moore was free for a TD and the game would have opened up for baltimore. I have his bubble gum card.

    @howiedawg said:

    Galen Fiss was certainly a linebacker - if it wasn't for his tackle on Lenney Moore in the 2nd Qtr of the 1964 championship game, Moore was free for a TD and the game would have opened up for baltimore. I have his bubble gum card.

    Nice research Howie for a guy that came late to the game and probably wasn't alive to see that game...at least in the UK. (I was alive to see it.)

  • Me too.....not sure how things were rated and don't have many beefs, but for my money, I take Sherk over MDP. Jerry Sherk was a heck of a player until a staph infection nearly killed him. He came back for another 2-3 seasons, but his career was over.