Is the defensive scheme the problem? Or is it the players?
-
Defense is talking tough huh? Oh boy look out. That last 100 yard game put up by scrubs must have been the final straw.

I'd kind of rather they just stfu and tackle this week.
-
Here's a follow up to the presser I heard :
Of note as I mentioned :
So when defensive coordinator Jim O’Neil points out that the successful system run by the Browns started slowly in its first seasons with the Jets in 2009 and the Bills in 2013, it’s worth checking.
Here are the numbers:
The Jets gave up 303 yards per game and 17 points per game in the first six games in ’09, the year Rex Ryan was hired and Mike Pettine was defensive coordinator.
They gave up 221.7 yards per game and 13.2 points per game the final 10 games.
Things got better as the season progressed: In ’09, the Jets ended the season on a playoff run by giving up 6, 13, 3, 13, 15 and 0 points, respectively, in the final six games -- an average of 8.3 per game.
In Buffalo in 2013, with Pettine as defensive coordinator and O’Neil his right-hand man, the Bills gave up 395 yards and 22.7 points in the first six games.
The final 10, they gave up an average of 296.4 yard and 23.1 points.
Clearly, the points-against numbers in Buffalo were not good, as the Bills gave up more than 20 points in four of the last five games, and more than 30 in two.
But the trend in yardage with both teams (and in points with one of the teams) was positive as the season progressed. -
Cleveland Browns
Pettine defenses have tendency to start slowly. Browns defensive coordinator Jim O'Neil wants fans to know that the defensive system he and head coach Mike Pettine run has a history of starting slowly and then gaining momentum. It happened with the Jets in 2009 and again with the Bills in 2013.
Gilbert's snaps declining. A look at the snaps played in each game by first-round pick Justin Gilbert tells you everything you need to know about how his season is going: 59, 46, 14, 9.
New fan-made logo concepts. Gridiron Labs created a new visual identity for the Browns, including over a dozen concepts for a new logo. The designs are definitely worth a look.
-
With the way the D performed with some new faces having to step in for the injured, it looks like the needle edges towards the "player" side rather than scheme.
With the way the D performed with some new faces having to step in for the injured, it looks like the needle edges towards the "player" side rather than scheme.
True, but it is also about week 6 (even though it's game 5) when they say things start to come together.
They went more coverage today than pass rush and it helped a bit - at least it was better than last weeks D.
Curious to see how they play when/if the normal Starters come back.
We're gettin' thin at a few spots - lots of injuries this game.
-
all you naysayers can now suck my dick....bitches.
bunch of pinthy perfumes punces.
you know jack about shite.
where's cbus, where's walter where's everyone that said our D sucks?
suck this.
-
all you naysayers can now suck my dick....bitches.
bunch of pinthy perfumes punces.
you know jack about shite.
where's cbus, where's walter where's everyone that said our D sucks?
suck this.
-
all you naysayers can now suck my dick....bitches.
bunch of pinthy perfumes punces.
you know jack about shite.
where's cbus, where's walter where's everyone that said our D sucks?
suck this.
bunch of pinthy perfumes punces.
Alliterative... and a new to me word... punces.
Scoring D was vastly below YTD average... in large part due to two 4th-down stops.
I suspect 3rd down D was also significantly improved. (PTG converted only 6 of 16)
Yardage D on the other hand... better, but not vastly... in part no doubt due to some garbage time plays.
I'd say good situational D by a work still in progress.
Here's to progress... and more garbage time in our flippin' foes futures...
-
bunch of pinthy perfumes punces.
Alliterative... and a new to me word... punces.
Scoring D was vastly below YTD average... in large part due to two 4th-down stops.
I suspect 3rd down D was also significantly improved. (PTG converted only 6 of 16)
Yardage D on the other hand... better, but not vastly... in part no doubt due to some garbage time plays.
I'd say good situational D by a work still in progress.
Here's to progress... and more garbage time in our flippin' foes futures...
-
They adjusted the Defensive scheme for this game. Less blitz. More cover. Less men up front. More men back. Yes, the players executed, but our coaching made the adjustments that threw big ben off his game. Gotta credit them for finding an answer to the poor play leading up to this game.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login