Skip to content

Deep Thoughts ... By Berniedenslow

The Browns Board
166 38 4.2k
  • @berniedenslow said:

    We need your permission to have more than one favorite team?

    no but you should have asked permission to put a pic of yourself as your avatar.

    @miktoxic said:

    no but you should have asked permission to put a pic of yourself as your avatar.

    @berniedenslow said:

    That's not me - sorry.

    Really??

    And to think that I backed off because I saw that picture....read your posts....and honestly thought you were a "special" child....

  • tell Bridgewater to play the game without gloves on... then see how shitty his game gets

    or let the d backs use "stick-um" again!

  • tell Bridgewater to play the game without gloves on... then see how shitty his game gets

    or let the d backs use "stick-um" again!

    @fairhooker11 said:

    tell Bridgewater to play the game without gloves on... then see how shitty his game gets

    or let the d backs use "stick-um" again!

    At least you get to see him play living in Minnesota - aside from the Browns weekly, we get a steady diet of the fuckin' Packers, 49ers, Cowboys..........BORING!

  • yea well, dont care-

    oh and Charles Johnson is lighting it up too.... remember him?

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Brandon Weeden threw for just about 3,400 yds his rookie year and set the Browns rookie record for passing, what's your point? He broke a Vikings record of 2,000 yards passing by Fran Tarkenton. What QB is today's NFL doesn't throw for at least that much? This is just a slanted stat to try to bolster the "look at me" complex. Bridgewater is showing some good things but at least make a relevant point, like Osiris did above.

    Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?

    @berniedenslow said:

    Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?

    This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.

  • @berniedenslow said:

    Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?

    This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.

    @jrb12711 said:

    This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.

    I said "might have struck gold." I've been following the NFL since 1969 and the only surprises in the NFL are NO surprise. I count on nothing.

  • I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.

    Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.

  • Oh good, more 'witty' nicknames, we were short on those.

  • I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.

    Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.

    @bbedward said:

    I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.

    Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.

    I think he could have a solid, albeit quiet career like a Phil Rivers. Bongwater's had a torn up team around him all year too, and for some reason Minnesota won't put the ball in Cordarrell Patterson's hands. I'll never get that one.

  • For the third, and last, time I have to ask:

    Can't members be restricted from starting threads?

  • For the third, and last, time I have to ask:

    Can't members be restricted from starting threads?

    @tour2ma said:

    For the third, and last, time I have to ask:

    Can't members be restricted from starting threads?

    Who else is going to start them then, Ethel Berman on ESPN?

  • Zombo said:

    Ya, you're a pussy and we dont care. Im sure Brandon Weeden has rookie records too. Its what happens when rookies throw a lot of passes.

    Z

    I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here? The other 31 teams don't factor in?

    @berniedenslow said:

    I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here?

    We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.

    Zombo

  • @berniedenslow said:

    I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here?

    We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.

    Zombo

    YOU can take a swan dive off the top of the Terminal Tower!

  • I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.

  • I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.

  • I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.

    @masterdog said:

    I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.

    That's my hope, and he WAS thrown to the dogs this year with a patched up team mostly. I kind of put him in the Hoyer-Manziel catagory "wondering what could have been" without all the injuries around them. One thing that's odd about following the Browns and the Vikings is how similiar their fates seem to match (injuries, records, bad luck).

  • I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.

    @berniedenslow said:

    I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.

    If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.

    edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?

  • @berniedenslow said:

    I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.

    If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.

    edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?

    @tiamat63 said:

    If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.

    edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?

    Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.

    edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?

    Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.

    @berniedenslow said:

    Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.

    They're rookies. Good line play and good RB play go hand in hand. Emmitt Smith isn't Emmitt without the Cowboys dominant Oline. Can't expect to be an effective runner with a NT in your lap while still in the backfield.

  • You don't have to start a thread every time your Mom lets you play with her IPad.

    Z