Deep Thoughts ... By Berniedenslow
-
Brandon Weeden threw for just about 3,400 yds his rookie year and set the Browns rookie record for passing, what's your point? He broke a Vikings record of 2,000 yards passing by Fran Tarkenton. What QB is today's NFL doesn't throw for at least that much? This is just a slanted stat to try to bolster the "look at me" complex. Bridgewater is showing some good things but at least make a relevant point, like Osiris did above.
Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?
Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?
This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.
-
Do you have your own manual on "How to Post On Forums?" Can you share a copy with all of us?
This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.
This thread brings nothing relevant to the Browns Forum and are almost always started as a "we should have drafted this guy!". I was simply pointing out that the stat itself is clear as day to see through as short-sighted and unimportant to the Cleveland Browns and anyone outside of Minnesota. It's not hard to deduce that by yourself. To say they "struck gold" from a guy who broke a record of 2,000 yards in a season is just laughable.
I said "might have struck gold." I've been following the NFL since 1969 and the only surprises in the NFL are NO surprise. I count on nothing.
-
I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.
Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.
-
Oh good, more 'witty' nicknames, we were short on those.
-
I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.
Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.
I think Bridgewater will be solid, and the vikings will become relevant fairly soon if they hit on the next couple drafts.
Bridgewater hasn't had the greatest rookie year, despite the franchise record, but he's been solid. Turner is good at grooming young QBs and Zimmer is a good coach.
I think he could have a solid, albeit quiet career like a Phil Rivers. Bongwater's had a torn up team around him all year too, and for some reason Minnesota won't put the ball in Cordarrell Patterson's hands. I'll never get that one.
-
For the third, and last, time I have to ask:
Can't members be restricted from starting threads?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
For the third, and last, time I have to ask:
Can't members be restricted from starting threads?
-
Zombo said:
Ya, you're a pussy and we dont care. Im sure Brandon Weeden has rookie records too. Its what happens when rookies throw a lot of passes.
Z
I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here? The other 31 teams don't factor in?
I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here?
We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.
Zombo
-
I'll lose tons of sleep now knowing you don't care. What, we're only allowed to talk about one team here?
We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.
Zombo
Zombo said:
We can talk about anything we want. You may only talk about the Browns, and only in existing threads, because you are too stupid to know how to write a headline.
Zombo
YOU can take a swan dive off the top of the Terminal Tower!
-
I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.
-
I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.
-
I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.
I wish we had Bridgewater too. He looks like a real QB and a potential star in this league.
That's my hope, and he WAS thrown to the dogs this year with a patched up team mostly. I kind of put him in the Hoyer-Manziel catagory "wondering what could have been" without all the injuries around them. One thing that's odd about following the Browns and the Vikings is how similiar their fates seem to match (injuries, records, bad luck).
-
I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.
I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.
If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
-
I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.
If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.
-
If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.
Typed that sentence in a hurry - my error. I meant in relation to the two rookie RB's we have. They were playing well before the O-Line was struck - losing Mack was major. So I was actually refering to the running backs (rookies), accounting of course for the departure of Tate.
They're rookies. Good line play and good RB play go hand in hand. Emmitt Smith isn't Emmitt without the Cowboys dominant Oline. Can't expect to be an effective runner with a NT in your lap while still in the backfield.
-
You don't have to start a thread every time your Mom lets you play with her IPad.
Z
-
I absolutely DO take into consideration all the injuries to the O-Line, but I'm not sure I'm sold on the two rookies who did so well earlier this year when the whole team was. I think they have the potential if and when the O-Line gets healthy and set. Any draft ideas? I'd love to see Wisconsin's Gordon in Brown and Orange. Or do with stick with what we got when the next season starts with (hopefully) a healthy O-Line.
If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
Tiamat, do you read Zacheriah Sitchen?If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
Bernie means West and Crowell. I'm not sold on West but we haven't seen enough of Crowell. With all our losing seasons and draft picks you'd think we'd have a Le'Veon Bell, JJ Watt or somebody. Thank God they got it right trading T Rich. But got it wrong in the draft. It will be different in April
DAMN THE TORPEDOES! FULL SPEED AHEAD! -
That's not me - sorry.
Quit apologizing! Go to scout.com, you can say what you want without being scrutinized and called juvenile names.
DAMN THE TORPEDOES! FULL SPEED AHEAD! -
Tiamat, do you read Zacheriah Sitchen?If this sentence was true, there would be no use for this thread.
edit: Whom is the other rookie on the Oline?
Bernie means West and Crowell. I'm not sold on West but we haven't seen enough of Crowell. With all our losing seasons and draft picks you'd think we'd have a Le'Veon Bell, JJ Watt or somebody. Thank God they got it right trading T Rich. But got it wrong in the draft. It will be different in April
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login