Skip to content

49'ers ask for permission to speak to Shanahan

The Browns Board
67 25 2.8k
  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #45
  • I hope we don't have to endure another 1st year offense next year. I heard Charlie Weis's name being thrown around as a possible replacement for SHanny "if" he takes the 9'ers or Bills job. I guess the Browns have already made contact with him. What does Weis run?

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @clevfan4life said:

    What does Weis run?

    i would guess like a 10.50 40.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #47

    HA! I'd guess he couldn't run 10 yards let alone 40.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @westside-steve said:

    oh fucking great, does that mean Haslem was trying to call in plays from the owners box? Fuck me running pls don't let this have any ring of truth to it.

  • @westside-steve said:

    oh fucking great, does that mean Haslem was trying to call in plays from the owners box? Fuck me running pls don't let this have any ring of truth to it.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @clevfan4life said:

    oh fucking great, does that mean Haslem was trying to call in plays from the owners box? Fuck me running pls don't let this have any ring of truth to it.

    This has already been refuted by a 'source' within the organisation, saying that the person suggesting this just has a case of sour grapes after leaving.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #50

    well ofc they "have" to refute it. I mean they abs have to.

  • ManzierM Manzier wrote on last edited by
    #51

    story says the texts were suggestions and came from a "high ranking staffer in the press box". Haslem isnt a staffer and probably wasn't in the press box. And suggestions are just suggestions.

    Shanahan was making shit calls and we all saw it. So did the staffer in the press box. I know i was screaming some suggestions at my Tv too.

    my guess is that shanahan already knows he's out and thats why all this talk is happening. Hes under contract for 3 years, so the Browns could nip this all in the bud right now if they wanted to.

    Apparently they dont.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #52

    I was fine with shanny's play calling. Beginning of the season it was working when Hoyer was apparently not Retarded.

  • bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by bbedward
    #53

    My guess is we don't mind keeping Shanahan and this is all just blowing up from nothing.

    I think he showed many good things and many bad things. My guess is we wouldn't mind someone else and could prefer it, but only if he takes another job so we don't have to pay him.

    I think Shanahans scheme is pretty good, but the play calling and execution on some of them was questionable.

    People complain about the cuteness of passing of 3rd and short constantly but weren't we still a top 5 team on 3rd and short this year conversion percentage wise?

    If Shanahan could get players that can successfully operate in the ZBS he'd look better, but once Mack went down we lost it.

  • My guess is we don't mind keeping Shanahan and this is all just blowing up from nothing.

    I think he showed many good things and many bad things. My guess is we wouldn't mind someone else and could prefer it, but only if he takes another job so we don't have to pay him.

    I think Shanahans scheme is pretty good, but the play calling and execution on some of them was questionable.

    People complain about the cuteness of passing of 3rd and short constantly but weren't we still a top 5 team on 3rd and short this year conversion percentage wise?

    If Shanahan could get players that can successfully operate in the ZBS he'd look better, but once Mack went down we lost it.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @bbedward said:

    but once Mack went down we lost it.

    and that's a big problem. I understand a drop off but it's like the next guy up didn't belong in the NFL. Your backups on every position need to be people who won't be utterly manhandled out of their shoes when they get in there.

  • @bbedward said:

    but once Mack went down we lost it.

    and that's a big problem. I understand a drop off but it's like the next guy up didn't belong in the NFL. Your backups on every position need to be people who won't be utterly manhandled out of their shoes when they get in there.

    bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @clevfan4life said:

    and that's a big problem. I understand a drop off but it's like the next guy up didn't belong in the NFL. Your backups on every position need to be people who won't be utterly manhandled out of their shoes when they get in there.

    Depth doesn't come in one off season. At least not at every unit.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    and that's a big problem. I understand a drop off but it's like the next guy up didn't belong in the NFL. Your backups on every position need to be people who won't be utterly manhandled out of their shoes when they get in there.

    Depth doesn't come in one off season. At least not at every unit.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @bbedward said:

    Depth doesn't come in one off season. At least not at every unit.

    that o line's been around now for a few. What if, god forbid, JT were to go down? Who would we move over to LT? Schwartzz? Dear god

  • cdl15C cdl15 wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Brown's look real bad here. After the first cinncy game I thought "man we are finally looking like a real football team". Still looking for that quiet drama free off season. Shoulda figured!!

  • @bbedward said:

    Depth doesn't come in one off season. At least not at every unit.

    that o line's been around now for a few. What if, god forbid, JT were to go down? Who would we move over to LT? Schwartzz? Dear god

    bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @clevfan4life said:

    that o line's been around now for a few. What if, god forbid, JT were to go down? Who would we move over to LT? Schwartzz? Dear god

    Bitonio.

    They'll address it I'm sure.

  • i think tailoring anything for manziel at this point, is not goint to happen.

    manziel and gordon are on thinner ice than an ice fisherman on the hudson.

    one more screw up from either of them and you can count them GONE.

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by
    #59

    @miktoxic said:

    i think tailoring anything for manziel at this point, is not goint to happen.

    manziel and gordon are on thinner ice than an ice fisherman on the hudson.

    one more screw up from either of them and you can count them GONE.

    what a fucked up football organization this is...good lord...

  • I was fine with shanny's play calling. Beginning of the season it was working when Hoyer was apparently not Retarded.

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #60

    @clevfan4life said:

    I was fine with shanny's play calling. Beginning of the season it was working when Hoyer was apparently not Retarded.

    So you believe that the reason for the second half decline is because Hoyer went Retarded? Based on that when exactly did you become handicapped? You don't suppose it had something to do with Mack going to IR and teams having a better handle on how to game plan him?

  • Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #61

    If Shanny leaves, Brian Sipe is available. Just fired as SD st. Qb coach.

    Z

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #62

    Here we go Brownies, here we GO,AGAIN.. Yes we all remember a lot of Shanny's play calling from when we use to play, But it's Stay the Course and player's execute the plays or Scrap it and Learn A New System. Anybody see us running a Chip Kelley Offense Yet. Who's out there to replace Shanny??

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #63

    Who cares? Not only will you have a learning curve and a tough as hell schedule you need personnel no matter what system you run. Bitching about the play calling has been going on forever. Personally I would call nothing but 20 yard runs 40 yard passes and touchdowns

    WSS

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #64

    And keep in mind the accuracy and quality of the reporting we get on a regular basis. (remember the reports that it was Shanahan who wanted Johnny to start and was being overruled by Mike?) If someone offers Shanahan a head coaching job of course he would want it. If his old man gets a head coaching job on a team that seems poised for a championship of course he would want the OC job and could easily get it even if the Browns try to block him by being designated assistant head coach.

    WSS