Skip to content

Mariota is a joke

The Browns Board
51 23 2.3k
  • @edwardejw said:

    Without a playoff they never would have got that chance. The system worked for once.

    It worked for OSU but it did not work for TCU. Until the Big 12 minus 2 has a real end of season championship game it will not work for them unless one of those teams goes undefeated or they switch to an 8 team playoff. Their commissioner is doggedly stating they will not add teams nor have a championship game. Until then, this will not be a fair system for that league.

    @texasag1969 said:

    It worked for OSU but it did not work for TCU. Until the Big 12 minus 2 has a real end of season championship game it will not work for them unless one of those teams goes undefeated or they switch to an 8 team playoff. Their commissioner is doggedly stating they will not add teams nor have a championship game. Until then, this will not be a fair system for that league.

    Until the Big 12 commissioner stops being moronic about not having a championship game I won't feel bad about them being left out in similar circumstances. The selection group made it patently clear that in close decisions a true conference championship game carries a ton of weight and is the reason OSU moved up. It's not hard, there's about 35 million football teams in Texas just add a couple and call it a day.

  • As far as the playoffs - I think it would be good for Div I to go to 10 (11 max) regular season games, a conference championship and then an eight team playoff. That way, OSU could have demolished TCU, Alabama, and then Oregon....

  • tOSU would have murdered TCU. Want to go to the playoffs? Don't give up 61 points and blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead.

  • @edwardejw said:

    Without a playoff they never would have got that chance. The system worked for once.

    It worked for OSU but it did not work for TCU. Until the Big 12 minus 2 has a real end of season championship game it will not work for them unless one of those teams goes undefeated or they switch to an 8 team playoff. Their commissioner is doggedly stating they will not add teams nor have a championship game. Until then, this will not be a fair system for that league.

    @texasag1969 said:

    It worked for OSU but it did not work for TCU. Until the Big 12 minus 2 has a real end of season championship game it will not work for them unless one of those teams goes undefeated or they switch to an 8 team playoff. Their commissioner is doggedly stating they will not add teams nor have a championship game. Until then, this will not be a fair system for that league.

    In January 2015, TCU loses to OSU 10 times out of 10.

    Oklahoma.. got stomped by Clemson.

    OSU.. barely beat Washington?

    Baylor.. lost to MSU.

    WVU.. lost to TA&M.

    KSU.. lost to UCLA.

    TCU stomps Miss.. but "SEC dominance" was running on fumes the last 2 years, and this year that thought has [mercifully] been vanquished.

    Should TCU have replaced FSU in the game vs OU? That's a legit question, and I say yes.

    But TCU at no point beats OSU.

  • TCU is a good reason to expand the college playoff to 8 teams. I'm sure it could be worked out.

  • Wow you Tcu fags just need to get the hell over it. Queers.

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Wow you Tcu fags just need to get the hell over it. Queers.

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

  • This clown is not an NFL QB.

    @dr.footwear said:

    This clown is not an NFL QB.

    that means we will probably draft him....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA...FUCKING CLEVELAND CLOWNS....

  • @dr.footwear said:

    This clown is not an NFL QB.

    that means we will probably draft him....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA...FUCKING CLEVELAND CLOWNS....

    @browns52 said:

    that means we will probably draft him....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA...FUCKING CLEVELAND CLOWNS....

    I am guessing with a good miners helmet you could see your colon pretty damn good

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    Wow you Tcu fags just need to get the hell over it. Queers.

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

    @texasag1969 said:

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

    I thought all of Texas shared the same DNA - the family tree looks like a telephone pole...... 😁

    You can tell by the smileys that in Ohio we have teeth - whereas you self selected for a dark gumbed toothless grin....

  • TCU is a good reason to expand the college playoff to 8 teams. I'm sure it could be worked out.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    TCU is a good reason to expand the college playoff to 8 teams. I'm sure it could be worked out.

    I suggested reducing the season to 10 games and expanding the playoffs.

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    Wow you Tcu fags just need to get the hell over it. Queers.

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

    @texasag1969 said:

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

    TU

    TCU

    TAMU

    TTU

    WTFU

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Hmmmm. Very interesting. You apparently know nothing about A&M fans being TCU fans. Just is not in the DNA. LOL! 😆

    I thought all of Texas shared the same DNA - the family tree looks like a telephone pole...... 😁

    You can tell by the smileys that in Ohio we have teeth - whereas you self selected for a dark gumbed toothless grin....

    @mohican said:

    I thought all of Texas shared the same DNA - the family tree looks like a telephone pole...... 😁

    You can tell by the smileys that in Ohio we have teeth - whereas you self selected for a dark gumbed toothless grin....

    I know false teeth when I see 'em gumby. 😛

  • A 4-team playoff is just fine.

    But let's say you add TCU... and likely Baylor. Who else? Would you dip into two-loss teams? All that is accomplished by adding more is diluting the competition.

    No matter how many are eligible there will always be at least one team on the outside looking in that will have a legitimate case for 'being included".

    Only thing I would change is the time between the semi's and the final. Just seems like two-weeks would be more fitting.

  • A 4-team playoff is just fine.

    But let's say you add TCU... and likely Baylor. Who else? Would you dip into two-loss teams? All that is accomplished by adding more is diluting the competition.

    No matter how many are eligible there will always be at least one team on the outside looking in that will have a legitimate case for 'being included".

    Only thing I would change is the time between the semi's and the final. Just seems like two-weeks would be more fitting.

    @tour2ma said:

    A 4-team playoff is just fine.

    But let's say you add TCU... and likely Baylor. Who else? Would you dip into two-loss teams? All that is accomplished by adding more is diluting the competition.

    No matter how many are eligible there will always be at least one team on the outside looking in that will have a legitimate case for 'being included".

    yep...agreed...4 teams is plenty

    No matter what....the "next guy" that doesn't make it will always feel slighted......whether he's #5, #9 or #73....