Skip to content

Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw

Political Discussion
44 10 989
  • Some global warming tonight when Obama spewed his State of the Union hot air.

  • I haven't seen a State of the Union by a president yet that wasn't just complete horse shit. Every president does it but the thing that irritates me the most is the "...and that reminds me of (insert male name) and (insert female name) from Podunk, Iowa who sent me a letter...." It could be on any subject and all of a sudden they can go to the mail bag and come back with some great or awful tale for the audience to gasp or applaud.

  • Don't worry guys, I predict there will be a SOTU thread soon enough...

  • @calfoxwc said:

    I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.

    CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.

    Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with

    asinine, politically oriented alarmism.

    It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...

    which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was

    the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.

    Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,

    to the "end justifies the means".

    You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.

    You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.

    @mld-woody said:

    You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.

    You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.

    Woody, the slow down was addressed in a link Cal posted as well.

  • Look, here is all you need to know about mmgw.

    It's a farce. All these idiots flew in all these JETS, to

    go to this Davos conference.

    And the other big item on their agenda? Wait for it......

    http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/20/1700-private-jets-fly-to-davos-to-discuss-global-warming/

  • "40 heads of state and 2,500 top business executives"

    Note the lack of scientists...

  • So, there ya go.....

    "Another big theme of the mega-rich confab will be combating “income inequality” and how the world’s rich can pay their fair share to reduce the gap between top earners and the lower class. Admission price for Davos: roughly $40,000 a ticket."

    See that? INCOME INEQUALITY. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.

    That's why they demand that mmgw be accepted as an absolute, immediate crisis.

    To expedite, facilitate... redistributing wealth from the richer countries to the poorer countries.

    That is what I've been saying again and again all this time.

  • Note the lack of scientists...

  • Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

    That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

    one is far, far too many on this board already.

  • Oh, this is good. There's a new consensus global warming wonks can quote

    24/7, "eight days a week"...

    http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/19/the-new-consensus-100-of-scientists-agree-that-global-warming-stopped-or-slowed-down/

  • Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

    That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

    one is far, far too many on this board already.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

    That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

    one is far, far too many on this board already.

    How many times do we need to hammer on that head of yours to get to the actual point? We shouldn't be listening to politicians, or 'heads of businesses' - we should be listening to scientists. Maybe it needs to be on the end of a woodpecker's beak to help up get it in there 😉

  • Oh hey, I was just about to type what Chris basically did, refreshed it first, and BOOM

    oh, and I agree with Heck

  • Then don't be a moron, The point is, that all these mmgw activists JET to

    vacation and go to a mmgw conference. Of course I'm not listening to the politicians.

    It's a hyprocitical bunch of bs. And they had REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

    on their agenda, while they JET to that vacationland conference.

    This isn't an argument about what scientists agree/don't agree.

    That isn't the point here. It has ....nothing...to...do...with....scientists.

  • Man Made Climate Change, a scientific issue, has nothing to do with scientists?

  • Oh hey, I was just about to type what Chris basically did, refreshed it first, and BOOM

    oh, and I agree with Heck

    @mld-woody said:

    Oh hey, I was just about to type what Chris basically did, refreshed it first, and BOOM

    oh, and I agree with Heck

    🥷

  • My point was about the hypocrisy of the activists, Chris.

    That's all. There, I just gave you a quack to the head with my

    Duck Dynasty Uncle Si duck call special.