Skip to content

How good Is Hoyer?

The Browns Board
54 22 1.9k
  • Conditions have been perfect for Hoyer going 10-6 vs. 1-15 with anyone else?

    @andruw-u said:

    Conditions have been perfect for Hoyer going 10-6 vs. 1-15 with anyone else?

    I liked Hoyer when I saw him come in and win games when nobody else was getting the job done. I'm hoping he will be reasonable on a contract and we resign him.

  • Short answer: not very good but the best shot we have unless we commit to fail for cardale

  • I don't know how you can lose drafting Cardale. If he doesn't work out as QB, defensive end would work next.

  • @andruw-u said:

    Conditions have been perfect for Hoyer going 10-6 vs. 1-15 with anyone else?

    I liked Hoyer when I saw him come in and win games when nobody else was getting the job done. I'm hoping he will be reasonable on a contract and we resign him.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    I liked Hoyer when I saw him come in and win games when nobody else was getting the job done. I'm hoping he will be reasonable on a contract and we resign him.

    Instead of "perfect" I like to think "we can win with Hoyer if there are enough right ideas around him" with all other facets of the team and within a game. If there's a better FA or a trade that can be made, go for it, but at this point, bringing Hoyer back is the best "bridge" - and like it or not, the bridge could be all the way to Sept. 2017 - and "best chance to win the next game."

    The most optimistic way of looking at JFF and JFF vs. Hoyer/Shaw/whomever is he's entering his rookie year again. He flunked last year and is having to repeat the grade level.

  • Anderson may have been our best but even with him he didn't go somewhere else and start. We just haven't found the right QB since 99.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Anderson may have been our best but even with him he didn't go somewhere else and start. We just haven't found the right QB since 99.

    Except that he did?

    He went to Arizona and started for two years.

    Then he went to Carolina the same year they drafted Cam.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Anderson may have been our best but even with him he didn't go somewhere else and start. We just haven't found the right QB since 99.

    Except that he did?

    He went to Arizona and started for two years.

    Then he went to Carolina the same year they drafted Cam.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Except that he did?

    He went to Arizona and started for two years.

    Then he went to Carolina the same year they drafted Cam.

    1 year.

  • I was wrong he did start some with the Cardinals but bottom line he was no success story:

    On March 17, 2010, Anderson signed a two-year deal worth $7.25 million with the Arizona Cardinals.[6] After Kurt Warner retired and Matt Leinart was released, Anderson became the starting quarterback for the Cardinals. After struggling in his first few games, Anderson was benched in favor of rookie Max Hall on October 6. Anderson was named the starting quarterback again for the November 7 game against the Minnesota Vikings after Hall struggled.[7] However in week 14 he was benched again after suffering a concussion and was replaced with Hall, whose season ended with a separated shoulder later in the game. Rookie John Skelton finished the game and succeeded Anderson as the Cardinals' starting quarterback. Anderson also created a notable soundbite after being caught on national TV laughing with teammate Deuce Lutui while he and his team were playing poorly. His subsequent anger toward the reporter who asked why he was laughing made national news and was featured on several sports shows.[8]

    Anderson was released by the Cardinals on July 28, 2011.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Except that he did?

    He went to Arizona and started for two years.

    Then he went to Carolina the same year they drafted Cam.

    1 year.

    @gftchris said:

    1 year.

    Eesh, seemed like two.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    I liked Hoyer when I saw him come in and win games when nobody else was getting the job done. I'm hoping he will be reasonable on a contract and we resign him.

    Instead of "perfect" I like to think "we can win with Hoyer if there are enough right ideas around him" with all other facets of the team and within a game. If there's a better FA or a trade that can be made, go for it, but at this point, bringing Hoyer back is the best "bridge" - and like it or not, the bridge could be all the way to Sept. 2017 - and "best chance to win the next game."

    The most optimistic way of looking at JFF and JFF vs. Hoyer/Shaw/whomever is he's entering his rookie year again. He flunked last year and is having to repeat the grade level.

    @andruw-u said:

    Instead of "perfect" I like to think "we can win with Hoyer if there are enough right ideas around him" with all other facets of the team and within a game. If there's a better FA or a trade that can be made, go for it, but at this point, bringing Hoyer back is the best "bridge" - and like it or not, the bridge could be all the way to Sept. 2017 - and "best chance to win the next game."

    The most optimistic way of looking at JFF and JFF vs. Hoyer/Shaw/whomever is he's entering his rookie year again. He flunked last year and is having to repeat the grade level.

    That is how I see it too. I just have seen nothing from JM he will make it. If we could get a decent trade for him I would be all for it.

  • A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:


    Rex Grossman

    Jake Delhomme

    Rich Gannon

    Brad Johnson

    Kerry Collins

    Trent Dilfer

    Steve McNair

    Chris Chandler

    Drew Bledsoe

    Neil O'Donnell

    Stan Humphries

    Jeff Hostetler

    Mark Rypien


    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

  • A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:


    Rex Grossman

    Jake Delhomme

    Rich Gannon

    Brad Johnson

    Kerry Collins

    Trent Dilfer

    Steve McNair

    Chris Chandler

    Drew Bledsoe

    Neil O'Donnell

    Stan Humphries

    Jeff Hostetler

    Mark Rypien


    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    @gernthefish said:

    A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:
    Rex Grossman
    Jake Delhomme
    Rich Gannon
    Brad Johnson
    Kerry Collins
    Trent Dilfer
    Steve McNair
    Chris Chandler
    Drew Bledsoe
    Neil O'Donnell
    Stan Humphries
    Jeff Hostetler
    Mark Rypien
    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    and I count 12 more ....making it about 25 journeyman/average QB's to play in Superbowl......actually more than 1/2 that have played(in my book) are fairly avg

  • A mediocre quarterback? Within the context of the entire NFL, regardless of positioning within a depth chart, perhaps. But let's not create revisionist history and pretend that Hoyer was an average starting NFL signal caller this season because he was not. The fact remains that Brian rounded out 2014 near to last in every individual statistical category applicable to starting quarterbacks, many of whom were significantly younger and more inexperienced than him.

    Did the team scratch out a collection of nice wins while he steered the ship (and nearly crashed it at some points)? Sure. Did he play marginally better than some past quarterbacks employed by the Browns? Yes. Unfortunately, football is not judged in a vacuum and neither of these answers is exclusive or even a strong indicator of prolonged quarterback success going forward. Do we appreciate the professionalism and exemplary work ethic that Hoyer brought to the team? Of course, however those qualities and a credit card are only good enough to get you season tickets. The fact remains that outside of a limited sample when nearly every other positional unit of the Browns was functioning at an incredible pace Hoyer performed well below the average NFL starting quarterback.

    Now, if folks are campaigning for Hoyer because they simply feel as if the alternatives will never amount to anything better then I'd understand it to an extent but to suggest that Brian Hoyer will suddenly secrete some sort of new skill level at the age of 30 that four NFL teams have been unable to unearth? How does that definition of insanity, falsely attributed to Einstein, read again?

    My personal opinion is that we all can reasonably project what the Browns ceiling is with Brian Hoyer at the helm and this projection falls substantially short of a Super Bowl, which is the ultimate goal. Does treading water in mediocrity bring the Browns closer to their end goal? I dont believe so, in fact I believe that finding that critical component necessary to charter a championship club (ie. difference maker at QB) will simply become that much more elusive as the organization becomes complacent enough with mediocracy and too fearful of losing to have the fortitude to make a change at that point.

    I'd rather take a chance on the unknown that at one point was at least thought to have the upside to be a difference maker at the quarterback position. We can debate the merits and skill of Manziel until next year but the fact remains that a 22 year old with his pedigree does have upside. Did Johnny give any on-field indications of future success in his 7 quarters? He did not (outside of one Buffalo drive). Has Johnny acted like a petulant child? Yes. Thankfully we can rattle off past examples of young quarterbacks that also faltered early and/or refused their professional responsibilities only to eventually develop into quality starting quarterbacks. Even considering the high probability of default we still enjoy a material possibility for healthy returns on investment into this player.

    I'd prefer that the organization fail in taking a chance of developing a champion to committing to a future that realistically has a ceiling lower than that of which we'd like.

    @nggator60 said:

    Now, if folks are campaigning for Hoyer because they simply feel as if the alternatives will never amount to anything better then I'd understand it to an extent but to suggest that Brian Hoyer will suddenly secrete some sort of new skill level at the age of 30 that four NFL teams have been unable to unearth?

    My personal opinion is that we all can reasonably project what the Browns ceiling is with Brian Hoyer at the helm and this projection falls substantially short of a Super Bowl, which is the ultimate goal.

    Thankfully we can rattle off past examples of young quarterbacks that also faltered early and/or refused their professional responsibilities only to eventually develop into quality starting quarterbacks.

    I'd prefer that the organization fail in taking a chance of developing a champion to committing to a future that realistically has a ceiling lower than that of which we'd like.

    A cluster of very, very familiar themes stated in very familiar words...

    Secrete? No... sustain. If you want to pretend that his early performance was the outlier and accept the latter "in a vacuum", have at it.

    The goal is the playoffs. Once there, once you are in the hunt, then anything is possible. The top seeds held serve this year, but that is not the norm.

    Please rattle away on that list of young QBs "we all know" that faltered by refusing to accept their professional responsibilities before succeeding. A half-dozen will do...

    I'd prefer that any prospect prove his worth by actually preforming in Camp. If that happens then Hoyer's presence matters not.

    @jrb12711 said:

    You can win with guys like that in conditions are perfect but when have the Browns ever had that?

    1964? More recently 1986?

    @andruw-u said:

    Instead of "perfect" I like to think "we can win with Hoyer if there are enough right ideas around him" with all other facets of the team and within a game. If there's a better FA or a trade that can be made, go for it, but at this point, bringing Hoyer back is the best "bridge" - and like it or not, the bridge could be all the way to Sept. 2017 - and "best chance to win the next game."

    The most optimistic way of looking at JFF and JFF vs. Hoyer/Shaw/whomever is he's entering his rookie year again. He flunked last year and is having to repeat the grade level.

    Excepting scenarios that involve trades, I agree, this is the best path I can see.

  • If the team can fill its weaknesses at receiver and in the front seven, there's nothing keeping the Browns from the playoffs even with Hoyer at quarterback. This team has a good core, lots of draft picks and plenty of cap space. As much as I would like Manziel to turn out to be a franchise caliber QB, the Browns would be smart to stick with Hoyer until they can find the right guy under center.

    Build a strong team around the QB and once you find the guy, you'll be playing football in late January. Even with a mediocre QB at best, like Hoyer, you'll be fighting year in and year out to make the postseason if you have a solid defense and a solid running game.

  • I have enjoyed posting here. I consider myself a good Browns fan but some of you guys could be working for the Browns. Within minutes of the hiring of Defilippo you were talking about it. I asked some friends (huge Browns fans) days after the hiring what they thought about the new OC and they said "what happened to the other guy? " lol

    I like Hoyer. I have seen him do things with the Browns I haven't seen for a while with other Browns quarterbacks such as bringing the team back from a deficit. He had a pretty good record until the last half of the season. My concern is he will go to another team and do well and we will lose out. I am for over paying to keep him. I see him at least being a bridge until we find the right quarterback. I read things like Hoyer spending hours on a Saturday night going over the play book with Gordon and I like his work ethic.

    I am hoping we can sign him as a FA. I don't see any veteran qb I would prefer over him.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    I have enjoyed posting here. I consider myself a good Browns fan but some of you guys could be working for the Browns. Within minutes of the hiring of Defilippo you were talking about it. I asked some friends (huge Browns fans) days after the hiring what they thought about the new OC and they said "what happened to the other guy? " lol

    I like Hoyer. I have seen him do things with the Browns I haven't seen for a while with other Browns quarterbacks such as bringing the team back from a deficit. He had a pretty good record until the last half of the season. My concern is he will go to another team and do well and we will lose out. I am for over paying to keep him. I see him at least being a bridge until we find the right quarterback. I read things like Hoyer spending hours on a Saturday night going over the play book with Gordon and I like his work ethic.

    I am hoping we can sign him as a FA. I don't see any veteran qb I would prefer over him.

    if he doesn't leave, i will have no respect for him...after what these jackass's did by throwing him under the bus by benching him while we still had a shot...long shot at best but still a shot.at making the playoffs.for a frigging dweeeb who didn't know one single play in the playbook...i know i'd go tell the fo morons to go pound sand...and yes, i hope he does go to a real football team and succeed...i know i'll be rooting for him...i like hoyer...thought he was the best qb i have seen with this team since 99..he has alot of potential given a good team built around him.....

  • @gernthefish said:

    A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:
    Rex Grossman
    Jake Delhomme
    Rich Gannon
    Brad Johnson
    Kerry Collins
    Trent Dilfer
    Steve McNair
    Chris Chandler
    Drew Bledsoe
    Neil O'Donnell
    Stan Humphries
    Jeff Hostetler
    Mark Rypien
    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    and I count 12 more ....making it about 25 journeyman/average QB's to play in Superbowl......actually more than 1/2 that have played(in my book) are fairly avg

    @mudfly said:

    and I count 12 more ....making it about 25 journeyman/average QB's to play in Superbowl......actually more than 1/2 that have played(in my book) are fairly avg

    Quite a mixture of mediocre QBs with some you terribly underrate IMHO

    Rich Gannon and Drew Bledsoe, as examples, were very good QBs

    Better than Kosar ever was, as an example.

  • @gernthefish said:

    A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:
    Rex Grossman
    Jake Delhomme
    Rich Gannon
    Brad Johnson
    Kerry Collins
    Trent Dilfer
    Steve McNair
    Chris Chandler
    Drew Bledsoe
    Neil O'Donnell
    Stan Humphries
    Jeff Hostetler
    Mark Rypien
    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    and I count 12 more ....making it about 25 journeyman/average QB's to play in Superbowl......actually more than 1/2 that have played(in my book) are fairly avg

    @mudfly said:

    and I count 12 more ....making it about 25 journeyman/average QB's to play in Superbowl......actually more than 1/2 that have played(in my book) are fairly avg

    That is exactly where I was going at with my question about Hoyer. Somebody else posted that in recent history it has been the teams with the elite quarterbacks winning the super bowl so I thought maybe Hoyer wouldn't be the qb to take the Browns to the SB. But like Tour posted and I agree with once a team makes the play offs anything can happen. My gut feeling tells me with improvements on the Browns offense Hoyer can get this team into the playoffs and once in the playoffs they could make a run at going to the SB. Even if Hoyer is an average QB with a good O line, running game and receivers an average qb who is smart and Hoyer is smart can go elevate his game into being an above average QB. Hoping he returns next season.

  • A lot of great QBs have never won a superbowl. Also, there have been lots of mediocre QBs that have taken their teams to a super bowl. A few examples:


    Rex Grossman

    Jake Delhomme

    Rich Gannon

    Brad Johnson

    Kerry Collins

    Trent Dilfer

    Steve McNair

    Chris Chandler

    Drew Bledsoe

    Neil O'Donnell

    Stan Humphries

    Jeff Hostetler

    Mark Rypien


    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    @gernthefish said:

    Rex Grossman - lost Super Bowl

    Jake Delhomme- lost Super Bowl

    Rich Gannon - lost Super Bowl

    Brad Johnson - won by default because he was playing Gannon

    Kerry Collins - lost Super Bowl

    Trent Dilfer - won

    Steve McNair - lost Super Bowl

    Chris Chandler - lost Super Bowl

    Drew Bledsoe - lost Super Bowl

    Neil O'Donnell - lost Super Bowl

    Stan Humphries - lost Super Bowl

    Jeff Hostetler - won because of a shitty field goal attempt

    Mark Rypien - won

    Conclusion - Although it helps to have a Peyton Manning, it's not all about the QB. He has do his job and have a supporting cast.

    Only 4 of those 12 ever won a Super Bowl, one of which by default.

    Those guys still lost to the likes of John Elway and Brett Favre. So, yeah, you can get there with a "mediocre" QB if everything falls into place...but it's tough to win.

  • @nggator60 said:

    Now, if folks are campaigning for Hoyer because they simply feel as if the alternatives will never amount to anything better then I'd understand it to an extent but to suggest that Brian Hoyer will suddenly secrete some sort of new skill level at the age of 30 that four NFL teams have been unable to unearth?

    My personal opinion is that we all can reasonably project what the Browns ceiling is with Brian Hoyer at the helm and this projection falls substantially short of a Super Bowl, which is the ultimate goal.

    Thankfully we can rattle off past examples of young quarterbacks that also faltered early and/or refused their professional responsibilities only to eventually develop into quality starting quarterbacks.

    I'd prefer that the organization fail in taking a chance of developing a champion to committing to a future that realistically has a ceiling lower than that of which we'd like.

    A cluster of very, very familiar themes stated in very familiar words...

    Secrete? No... sustain. If you want to pretend that his early performance was the outlier and accept the latter "in a vacuum", have at it.

    The goal is the playoffs. Once there, once you are in the hunt, then anything is possible. The top seeds held serve this year, but that is not the norm.

    Please rattle away on that list of young QBs "we all know" that faltered by refusing to accept their professional responsibilities before succeeding. A half-dozen will do...

    I'd prefer that any prospect prove his worth by actually preforming in Camp. If that happens then Hoyer's presence matters not.

    @jrb12711 said:

    You can win with guys like that in conditions are perfect but when have the Browns ever had that?

    1964? More recently 1986?

    @andruw-u said:

    Instead of "perfect" I like to think "we can win with Hoyer if there are enough right ideas around him" with all other facets of the team and within a game. If there's a better FA or a trade that can be made, go for it, but at this point, bringing Hoyer back is the best "bridge" - and like it or not, the bridge could be all the way to Sept. 2017 - and "best chance to win the next game."

    The most optimistic way of looking at JFF and JFF vs. Hoyer/Shaw/whomever is he's entering his rookie year again. He flunked last year and is having to repeat the grade level.

    Excepting scenarios that involve trades, I agree, this is the best path I can see.

    @tour2ma said:

    Please rattle away on that list of young QBs "we all know" that faltered by refusing to accept their professional responsibilities before succeeding. A half-dozen will do...

    Sure, I'll play....

    Off the top of my head:

    Brett Favre- Drank himself out of Atlanta

    Ben Roethlisberger- He may have sexually assaulted more women than passes completed in SB XL. Talented motorcyclist as well

    Joe Namath- Broadway Joe gave Walt Clyde a serious run for drinks, drugs, and women as King of NYC

    Kerry Collins- Rehabilitated racist and alcoholic that led the Giants to a SB

    Jay Cutler- Popular figure on the Denver social scene until shipped off to Chicago

    Mike Vick- Alpha of the NFL's first family of scumbag quarterbacks

    Jake Plummer- Party boy that almost drove himself out of the NFL before finding success with the Cards and Donkeys

    Dan Marino- If it werent for his penchant for nose powder the Jets may have actually drafted Dan rather than Ken O'brien

    Duante Culpepper- Great deep ball but just dont let him borrow your yacht

    Kyle Orton- Drink Like A Champion

    I'd imagine that we'd gladly sign up for having a quarterback on our roster that plays out their career with similar success to any of the aforementioned with the possible exception of Orton and Plummer. What do I win?

  • Let's take a look at the teams that have won the Superbowl since the turn of the millenium....

    Rams- Kurt

    Ravens- Dilfer, Flacco

    Patriots- Tom

    Bucs- Gannon

    Colts- Manning

    Steelers- Roethlisberger

    Giants- Manning

    Saints- Brees

    Packers- Rodgers

    Seahawks- Wilson

    Which of these franchises had anything less than a clear upper-echelon QB? In fact, the list reads like a "who's who" of the top quarterbacks that have presided over offenses for 15 years.

    Hell, it took a near-historic season from Rich Gannon along with a defense littered with HOFers for Gruden to bring a championship to Tampa. The only outlier remains, of course, with Baltimore and Trent Dilfer. Well, when the Browns field a roster with enough HOFers or borderline HOFers to qualify for group rates through Starwood then we can talk about Hoyer leading the organization to a championship.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Please rattle away on that list of young QBs "we all know" that faltered by refusing to accept their professional responsibilities before succeeding. A half-dozen will do...

    Sure, I'll play....

    Off the top of my head:

    Brett Favre- Drank himself out of Atlanta

    Ben Roethlisberger- He may have sexually assaulted more women than passes completed in SB XL. Talented motorcyclist as well

    Joe Namath- Broadway Joe gave Walt Clyde a serious run for drinks, drugs, and women as King of NYC

    Kerry Collins- Rehabilitated racist and alcoholic that led the Giants to a SB

    Jay Cutler- Popular figure on the Denver social scene until shipped off to Chicago

    Mike Vick- Alpha of the NFL's first family of scumbag quarterbacks

    Jake Plummer- Party boy that almost drove himself out of the NFL before finding success with the Cards and Donkeys

    Dan Marino- If it werent for his penchant for nose powder the Jets may have actually drafted Dan rather than Ken O'brien

    Duante Culpepper- Great deep ball but just dont let him borrow your yacht

    Kyle Orton- Drink Like A Champion

    I'd imagine that we'd gladly sign up for having a quarterback on our roster that plays out their career with similar success to any of the aforementioned with the possible exception of Orton and Plummer. What do I win?

    @nggator60 said:

    Sure, I'll play....

    Off the top of my head:

    Brett Favre- Drank himself out of Atlanta

    Ben Roethlisberger- He may have sexually assaulted more women than passes completed in SB XL. Talented motorcyclist as well

    Joe Namath- Broadway Joe gave Walt Clyde a serious run for drinks, drugs, and women as King of NYC

    Kerry Collins- Rehabilitated racist and alcoholic that led the Giants to a SB

    Jay Cutler- Popular figure on the Denver social scene until shipped off to Chicago

    Mike Vick- Alpha of the NFL's first family of scumbag quarterbacks

    Jake Plummer- Party boy that almost drove himself out of the NFL before finding success with the Cards and Donkeys

    Dan Marino- If it werent for his penchant for nose powder the Jets may have actually drafted Dan rather than Ken O'brien

    Duante Culpepper- Great deep ball but just dont let him borrow your yacht

    Kyle Orton- Drink Like A Champion

    I'd imagine that we'd gladly sign up for having a quarterback on our roster that plays out their career with similar success to any of the aforementioned with the possible exception of Orton and Plummer. What do I win?

    Favre didn't drink himself out of Atlanta. Check your facts.

    Roethlisberger has never lost starting time nor struggled because of off the field problems.

    Kerry Collins is atop the list for "worst quarterbacks to play in a Super Bowl" along with Grossman and Dilfer. Never really a franchise guy, his erratic play led to him being more of a journeyman than franchise player.

    Why is Kyle Orton even on this list?