Mike Iupati. Give him his asking price and watch the running game go.
-
Schwartz isn't bad. he's just not good either. replace him, put him as the #1 backup, and that's how our numbers increase.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
sorry tour. throw all the statistical mumbo jumbo at us all you want.
schwartz sucks and everyone knows it.
-
Schwartz isn't bad. he's just not good either. replace him, put him as the #1 backup, and that's how our numbers increase.
Schwartz isn't bad.....
Nope.....he's not.
Now, Nick McDonald?......he was bad(real bad)....- 28.3......yet there were 2 others who were worse....is that even possible?
No, not really...and had our guy played all 16, he'd be minus 70 or so......maybe worse....?
-
Maybe, but you have to remember that Nick actually improved quite a bit in his last couple games. Then got his ankle rolled vs. BUF.
Fortunately Seymore was there to set us back when Nick went down...
It is only when you toss MqQuistan's utter failure at RG into the mix that you begin to appreciate how truly thin we were in the O-line.
-
we need 2 OLmen (RG and a general backup/C) and 2 DLmen. i don't care where they come from just sign them.
-
Why can't we move Mitchell Schwartz inside?fixed it. (was raging war yesterday).
i like unsympathic's idea of replacing schwartz with someone better and keeping him as a backup lineman.
WSS
-
Why can't we move Mitchell Schwartz inside?
No reason why you can't. Question is, why would you want to?
Personally I've never seen anything in him that makes me think he'd be more successful at OG.
-
We have 2 tackles who haven't missed a snap EVER and our whole offense collapsed this season because we didn't have a viable Guard or Center back up.....yet I keep hearing we should draft tackle.....
My theory is the only OT that is gonna replace Schwartz is gonna come 1st round. And THAT isnt our primary need on o line. Guard/Center is.....so we still have to correct THIS, so that means yet another high OL pick?.....
If we do that, then it leaves very little for D line, LB, WR, etc......
So.....for me.....OT early this year is a mistake.....
-
While running the ball is a very effective way to control clock and move the ball you have to be able to throw the ball to keep teams honest.
-
While running the ball is a very effective way to control clock and move the ball you have to be able to throw the ball to keep teams honest.
While running the ball is a very effective way to control clock and move the ball you have to be able to throw the ball to keep teams honest.
.... And when this team was running the ball for 150+ a game the passing lanes were opening right up.
-
Why can't we move Mitchell Schwartz inside?
No reason why you can't. Question is, why would you want to?
Personally I've never seen anything in him that makes me think he'd be more successful at OG.
No reason why you can't. Question is, why would you want to?
Personally I've never seen anything in him that makes me think he'd be more successful at OG.
Well he isn't horrible at tackle just not an all pro. I just assumed guard was a bit less demanding and it seems that tackles can move to guard with success. I remember Ryan Tucker.
WSS
-
one guy who looks like he may come available via FA is Stephen Wisniewski....C/G from Oakland.....wold cost a touch more than a rookie, but brings starter quality at both positions(and good genes)......Im thinking $2.5 - 3m would get him...
one guy who looks like he may come available via FA is Stephen Wisniewski....C/G from Oakland.....wold cost a touch more than a rookie, but brings starter quality at both positions(and good genes)......Im thinking $2.5 - 3m would get him...
Interesting name and not one I'd noticed on the FA list. Hurt his knee in late 2013, but came back to start all 16 last season. How does PFF rate him?
Well he isn't horrible at tackle just not an all pro. I just assumed guard was a bit less demanding and it seems that tackles can move to guard with success. I remember Ryan Tucker.
No, Mitch is not "horrible" and, yes, some OTs have enjoyed greater success inside. For every Ryan Tucker there's an Oniel Cousins.
While a move inside reduces agility requirements due to the reduced space to cover, success is far from a given. Strength and/or leverage requirements are magnified and speed/acceleration requirements are equal or greater.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
one guy who looks like he may come available via FA is Stephen Wisniewski....C/G from Oakland.....wold cost a touch more than a rookie, but brings starter quality at both positions(and good genes)......Im thinking $2.5 - 3m would get him...
Interesting name and not one I'd noticed on the FA list. Hurt his knee in late 2013, but came back to start all 16 last season. How does PFF rate him?
Well he isn't horrible at tackle just not an all pro. I just assumed guard was a bit less demanding and it seems that tackles can move to guard with success. I remember Ryan Tucker.
No, Mitch is not "horrible" and, yes, some OTs have enjoyed greater success inside. For every Ryan Tucker there's an Oniel Cousins.
While a move inside reduces agility requirements due to the reduced space to cover, success is far from a given. Strength and/or leverage requirements are magnified and speed/acceleration requirements are equal or greater.
Interesting name and not one I'd noticed on the FA list. Hurt his knee in late 2013, but came back to start all 16 last season. How does PFF rate him?
Personally, I think he's the perfect pick up for us......played all 16 of 2011 as OG and rated out fairly decent......then 3 years at C, where he grades out even better......"above avg - but not great"......2014 was by far his worst year, with a -2 overall.....but he was +6 and +8 the other 2 years....
Apparently, he has now turned down 2 contract offers and the Raiders say they are gonna let him test the FA waters.....word is he's looking for $3m.....
The main issue I see with us getting him are he probably wants to start......other than that, I say he's worth the $, even as a back up, because he pretty much solves the OL issues on his own......
-
Solves the issue on his own? I reckon we'd have pretty huge issues if one of our OTs went down, as big a with Mack (or bigger if JT).
-
Solves the issue on his own? I reckon we'd have pretty huge issues if one of our OTs went down, as big a with Mack (or bigger if JT).
Solves the issue on his own? I reckon we'd have pretty huge issues if one of our OTs went down, as big a with Mack (or bigger if JT).
Well, I would disagree to a point.....while we certainly could use an upgrade at Tackle, that wasn't the issue we had last year.
Bitonio is a natural OT and would certainly step in and serve as backup without much drop off if Schwartz or Thomas went down....heck, he's probably better than Schwartz straight up....
But last year we collapsed because we had no interior help and Wis would fill both those roles......
So, Id say he DOES correct the issue we had last year......
-
Solves the issue on his own? I reckon we'd have pretty huge issues if one of our OTs went down, as big a with Mack (or bigger if JT).
Well, I would disagree to a point.....while we certainly could use an upgrade at Tackle, that wasn't the issue we had last year.
Bitonio is a natural OT and would certainly step in and serve as backup without much drop off if Schwartz or Thomas went down....heck, he's probably better than Schwartz straight up....
But last year we collapsed because we had no interior help and Wis would fill both those roles......
So, Id say he DOES correct the issue we had last year......
Well, I would disagree to a point.....while we certainly could use an upgrade at Tackle, that wasn't the issue we had last year.
Bitonio is a natural OT and would certainly step in and serve as backup without much drop off if Schwartz or Thomas went down....heck, he's probably better than Schwartz straight up....
But last year we collapsed because we had no interior help and Wis would fill both those roles......
So, Id say he DOES correct the issue we had last year......
We had issue in the interior because Mack was injured. Mack, like JT, had never missed a snap, so wasn't considered an injury risk. There's no reason why this year, it isn't JT that gets injured. If he does, we all of a sudden can't protect whoever the QB is - Bitonio played OT at college, but there's a reason every report on him said he would have to move inside in the NFL. It's a bit ridiculous to think that a kid who has played a year of OG in the NFL can fill in for a future HOF LT.
Schwartz is a different case, and isn't an elite player, but is still a big upgrade on any of the OL we had filling last year.
-
Well, I would disagree to a point.....while we certainly could use an upgrade at Tackle, that wasn't the issue we had last year.
Bitonio is a natural OT and would certainly step in and serve as backup without much drop off if Schwartz or Thomas went down....heck, he's probably better than Schwartz straight up....
But last year we collapsed because we had no interior help and Wis would fill both those roles......
So, Id say he DOES correct the issue we had last year......
We had issue in the interior because Mack was injured. Mack, like JT, had never missed a snap, so wasn't considered an injury risk. There's no reason why this year, it isn't JT that gets injured. If he does, we all of a sudden can't protect whoever the QB is - Bitonio played OT at college, but there's a reason every report on him said he would have to move inside in the NFL. It's a bit ridiculous to think that a kid who has played a year of OG in the NFL can fill in for a future HOF LT.
Schwartz is a different case, and isn't an elite player, but is still a big upgrade on any of the OL we had filling last year.
We had issue in the interior because Mack was injured. Mack, like JT, had never missed a snap, so wasn't considered an injury risk. There's no reason why this year, it isn't JT that gets injured. If he does, we all of a sudden can't protect whoever the QB is - Bitonio played OT at college, but there's a reason every report on him said he would have to move inside in the NFL. It's a bit ridiculous to think that a kid who has played a year of OG in the NFL can fill in for a future HOF LT.
Schwartz is a different case, and isn't an elite player, but is still a big upgrade on any of the OL we had filling last year.
I guess Im not sure what your saying.....so you're saying Wiesnewski isnt the answer to our inside issues???(cause thats what my post said)...
Dont think there is any player thats gonna fill all our needs......
And, yes, Bito can play tackle(Seymour too)....and no, he wont be HOFer Joe Thomas, but nobody will......he also wont be horrid like McQuistan or McDonald were, which was my point......
-
My point was that our interior issues last year were because of a freak injury. There's nothing to suggest that those issues are going to be here again next year *more* than OT issues. We need depth both inside and outside.
I agree, we would have no interior issues if we sign the guy (and he comes as advertised).
-
My point was that our interior issues last year were because of a freak injury. There's nothing to suggest that those issues are going to be here again next year *more* than OT issues. We need depth both inside and outside.
I agree, we would have no interior issues if we sign the guy (and he comes as advertised).
My point was that our interior issues last year were because of a freak injury. There's nothing to suggest that those issues are going to be here again next year *more* than OT issues. We need depth both inside and outside.
I agree, we would have no interior issues if we sign the guy (and he comes as advertised).
Correct....depth is a good thing(inside and out).....heck, we could argue that ANY position is at risk if the starter goes down. Im just trying to create an answer for the "first to worst" melt down the O line had last year....
and Im thinking if a tackle goes down, it would hurt us, but we wouldn't fall off the face of the earth like when Mack went down....
And if we dont sign a FA like Wis, then what?....draft 2 OL early, instead of filling D needs?....and then hope they are both instantly good?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login