Get Real
-
I could post a large number of stats on Bridgewater but I'm not going there. It's done. It's just beating a dead horse. The bigger picture for me is all the good things I see the Browns doing right now. That is my focus.
-
Bailing on them and simply not caring what shenanigans they get up to anymore isn't the same thing. I'll be damned if I'm going to sit around and watch these idiots play clown shoes on a beautiful Sunday in September when I could be out playing with my sons
-
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
-
Bailing on them and simply not caring what shenanigans they get up to anymore isn't the same thing. I'll be damned if I'm going to sit around and watch these idiots play clown shoes on a beautiful Sunday in September when I could be out playing with my sons
Bailing on them and simply not caring what shenanigans they get up to anymore isn't the same thing. I'll be damned if I'm going to sit around and watch these idiots play clown shoes on a beautiful Sunday in September when I could be out playing with my sons
Denial is not just a river in Egypt. See you draft night.
-
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
-
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
12 of 20 would've been a dream first game for JM. The bigger problem with Manziel in his first start wasn't the numbers or even the horrible int's. It was that he looked completely overmatched. I would've liked to see at least one play in that Cincy game that showed a glimpse of NFL talent.
-
But to answer the OP's question: I believe the Browns are in a good position. We can speculate and what-if forever, but the fact of the matter is that last year this FO used FA and the draft to make this team better.
Complain about the first round if you will, but compare rosters of '13 and '14 Browns and tell me which you'd prefer.
I don't see why Farmer couldn't use this offseason to take another step forward. I wouldn't mind seeing 12 and 19 both being spent on the D line and LB corps. Add Cecil Shorts in FA and another WR in the midrounds as well as some O line depth.
I also expect the continuity of the coaching staff to be very helpful. Overall, the Browns very well could compete for the division.
-
Comparing Bridgewaters first game to manziel's is like comparing a ham sandwich to a scab on a cracker.
-
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
And there's the old race card. Let me voice my opinion. Bridgewater will never ever be a superstar elite qb so who cares. He had a better first season than manziel had a first game. Good for him. I don't care what he did what he does. We don't have him and never will and frankly I don't see his ceiling ever being all that high. Regardless of skin color we need a big strong qb not some skinny running shrimp like bridgewater or manzielAnyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
-
I usually cringe at the race card, I'm surprised at myself for pulling it. I guess it's reserved for sheer lunacy that can't be explained in any other way. I'm not saying that Bridgewater is the next Aaron Rodgers, all I'm saying is that showed good growth as a rookie and has promise moving into the future, something Manziel hasn't even come close to doing. Furthermore, Bridgewater isn't a running QB, he had fewer rushing attempts than Andrew Luck. He's a guy who looks to pass first but has the ability to escape the pocket if needed.
-
I could post a large number of stats on Bridgewater but I'm not going there. It's done. It's just beating a dead horse. The bigger picture for me is all the good things I see the Browns doing right now. That is my focus.
I could post a large number of stats on Bridgewater but I'm not going there. It's done. It's just beating a dead horse. The bigger picture for me is all the good things I see the Browns doing right now. That is my focus.
Yes and no one cares about the Twat.
-
Comparing Bridgewaters first game to manziel's is like comparing a ham sandwich to a scab on a cracker.
Comparing Bridgewaters first game to manziel's is like comparing a ham sandwich to a scab on a cracker.
To be fair a ham sandwich is ok but it will never be a porterhouse
-
But to answer the OP's question: I believe the Browns are in a good position. We can speculate and what-if forever, but the fact of the matter is that last year this FO used FA and the draft to make this team better.
Complain about the first round if you will, but compare rosters of '13 and '14 Browns and tell me which you'd prefer.
I don't see why Farmer couldn't use this offseason to take another step forward. I wouldn't mind seeing 12 and 19 both being spent on the D line and LB corps. Add Cecil Shorts in FA and another WR in the midrounds as well as some O line depth.
I also expect the continuity of the coaching staff to be very helpful. Overall, the Browns very well could compete for the division.
But to answer the OP's question: I believe the Browns are in a good position. We can speculate and what-if forever, but the fact of the matter is that last year this FO used FA and the draft to make this team better.
Complain about the first round if you will, but compare rosters of '13 and '14 Browns and tell me which you'd prefer.
I don't see why Farmer couldn't use this offseason to take another step forward. I wouldn't mind seeing 12 and 19 both being spent on the D line and LB corps. Add Cecil Shorts in FA and another WR in the midrounds as well as some O line depth.
I also expect the continuity of the coaching staff to be very helpful. Overall, the Browns very well could compete for the division.
It all hinges on the decisions they will be making soon. I just don't see it as being far fetched this team being able to compete for the division next season.
-
we as fans will always dissect past drafts and the shouldas, couldas wouldas........
hell last year's draft was a dream sequence for me with gilbert and then they picked manziel and i thought..........'same old browns'....but farmer pushed up his sleeves and drafted a defensive secondary class that should be there for many many years to come. get us a NT a beast ILB and depth on the OL and we'll talk a ted stickwater next year. 'cept he'll be about 50 lbs. heavier, stronger arm, a bulldog run-over-a-LB stuff it up the gut QB in cardale jones.
somebody 'HIT ME'
-
But to answer the OP's question: I believe the Browns are in a good position. We can speculate and what-if forever, but the fact of the matter is that last year this FO used FA and the draft to make this team better.
Complain about the first round if you will, but compare rosters of '13 and '14 Browns and tell me which you'd prefer.
I don't see why Farmer couldn't use this offseason to take another step forward. I wouldn't mind seeing 12 and 19 both being spent on the D line and LB corps. Add Cecil Shorts in FA and another WR in the midrounds as well as some O line depth.
I also expect the continuity of the coaching staff to be very helpful. Overall, the Browns very well could compete for the division.
It all hinges on the decisions they will be making soon. I just don't see it as being far fetched this team being able to compete for the division next season.
It all hinges on the decisions they will be making soon. I just don't see it as being far fetched this team being able to compete for the division next season.
I think it is extremely far fetched to expect this team to compete for the division as long as the big bads have quarterbacks and we do not. I also don't trust winston to be good or Mariota to have enough nfl talent. I think we have to build the defense, and expect to suck balls next season.
Fail for cardale.
-
It all hinges on the decisions they will be making soon. I just don't see it as being far fetched this team being able to compete for the division next season.
I think it is extremely far fetched to expect this team to compete for the division as long as the big bads have quarterbacks and we do not. I also don't trust winston to be good or Mariota to have enough nfl talent. I think we have to build the defense, and expect to suck balls next season.
Fail for cardale.
I think it is extremely far fetched to expect this team to compete for the division as long as the big bads have quarterbacks and we do not. I also don't trust winston to be good or Mariota to have enough nfl talent. I think we have to build the defense, and expect to suck balls next season.
Fail for cardale.
Did you think the Browns would compete with the big bads last season? They did compete with them. We had one of them on the ropes going into the fourth quarter with our little old third string QB. So why it is far fetched to think they won't compete this season?
-
Anyone who would suggest that manziel was a better pick than bridgewater has to be a racist. Minnesota has a young QB who put up good numbers and developed nicely on his way to rookie of the year honors. Manziel looked like a clueless glue-head until he got injured in his second game.
I'm not saying don't give the kid another chance, but Vikings fans certainly aren't the ones having discussions about trading up for Mariota or Winston.
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
Well the realization that not only did JF not know what was going on the defensive side of the ball he didn't even know what was going on in his own back field. Hoyer looked like Montana compared to JF and that is hardly a stretch.
-
And Bridgewater's first game he was 12-20 150 yds, no TD's in a 20-9 loss (all points by FG of Minn.).
Bridgewater got most of a season to prove himself. JM got a depleted O line that Hoyer could not move the O with either.
Well the realization that not only did JF not know what was going on the defensive side of the ball he didn't even know what was going on in his own back field. Hoyer looked like Montana compared to JF and that is hardly a stretch.
Well the realization that not only did JF not know what was going on the defensive side of the ball he didn't even know what was going on in his own back field. Hoyer looked like Montana compared to JF and that is hardly a stretch.
We were not comparing a veteran to a rookie. Just a rookie to a rookie who played 14 games.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login