T Rich Cut
-
the turd continues to circle the drain. Poetic Gizz, do you still have your trich fathead posted in your granny's basement?
-
Since Indy signed Cole they have a glut of OLB'ers. One of them's getting cut, my guess is Werner since he got healthy scratched from the Patriots game. He didn't have a great pass rushing season but if I read right him and Walden were both in the upper echelon of run stoppers at their position. We need another big Jack back to spell Kruger. I loved that kid in College, he was a "beast" DE at FS. If the Browns put 10 or so pounds back on him and made him more of a hybrid end where he got to put his hands down more....he could very productive for us. He has one of the best snap reactions in all of football, just needs to keep polishing his pass rush tech. But run stopping was a major weakness of his so if he's figured that out then he's not an absolute liability on the field anymore...like Kruger was at Blt and look how Krugs stops the run now.
-
The Browns past three years first round picks:
Trent Richardson
Brandon Weeden
Barkevious Mingo
Justin Gilbert
Johnny Manziel
And people wonder why the team can't turn the corner.
-
I remember when Jim Brown initially said it, there was an outcry against him. Turned out he was being generous to him by calling him ordinary.
-
for people to even entertain the thought of him coming back here is beyond me.
-
Old news, old FOs...
The potential, yes, potential, 1st round misses in 2014 are hovering, but everything else the FO did in 2014's draft and FA was damn good.
This year the disappointed decry our reluctance to shell out money hand over fist. Many are likely the same folks that said Haslam order the drafting of JM so he could sell jerseys. Where they see reluctance I see fiscal restraint.
And McGahee was an emergency signing in late Septmeber. Not a lot of prime, FA RBs waiting by the phone in late Sept. So there's that...
Old news, old FOs...
The potential, yes, potential, 1st round misses in 2014 are hovering, but everything else the FO did in 2014's draft and FA was damn good.
This year the disappointed decry our reluctance to shell out money hand over fist. Many are likely the same folks that said Haslam order the drafting of JM so he could sell jerseys. Where they see reluctance I see fiscal restraint.
And McGahee was an emergency signing in late Septmeber. Not a lot of prime, FA RBs waiting by the phone in late Sept. So there's that...
Yeah, I don't disagree there. The team has seemingly had good luck with later round picks, but the point is you can't miss that badly in the first round especially when you got more than one pick. Thinking about the 2012 first round draft is straight up pathetic. We could have thrown darts at a board and gotten better players.
-
Trent signing with Oakland lol, of course, who else. . .
-
Signing with Raiders
-
Seriously, though Mik, Richardson coming back to run for the New Cleveland Browns F.O.
- would that not be redemption if he produced?
I was only slightly kidding about Colt. I'd love to have him back to mentor Manziel. I think Colt is very smart, and even a better QB than McCown. You seriously telling me you wouldn't consider this?
Seriously, though Mik, Richardson coming back to run for the New Cleveland Browns F.O.
- would that not be redemption if he produced?
I was only slightly kidding about Colt. I'd love to have him back to mentor Manziel. I think Colt is very smart, and even a better QB than McCown. You seriously telling me you wouldn't consider this?
In a word- no.
I would bring him back, for sure.
There has to be a peanut vendor who needs to be replaced.
Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.
-
Seriously, though Mik, Richardson coming back to run for the New Cleveland Browns F.O.
- would that not be redemption if he produced?
I was only slightly kidding about Colt. I'd love to have him back to mentor Manziel. I think Colt is very smart, and even a better QB than McCown. You seriously telling me you wouldn't consider this?
In a word- no.
I would bring him back, for sure.
There has to be a peanut vendor who needs to be replaced.
Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.
In a word- no.
Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.
$3.9m 2 year deal
-
well, that didn't take long...gotta say Im a bit surprised he was signed so fast and for that kind of $.....
Raider nation will eat his fat slow ass for breakfast, so he better come to play this time...
well, that didn't take long...gotta say Im a bit surprised he was signed so fast and for that kind of $.....
Raider nation will eat his fat slow ass for breakfast, so he better come to play this time...
Raider nation don't eat nothing but greasy home fries for breakfast.....why do you think they would eat him up.....when that team has been full of nothing but a bunch of TRs for the past decade.
While I enjoy their antics, they are perhaps the most overrated fan base in the league (or 2d most overrated behind Pittsburgh). Isn't their stadium only usually about half full. (which is what Pittsburgh's would be if they had the Raider's record that same decade)?
-
In a word- no.
Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.
$3.9m 2 year deal
-
In a word- no.
Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.
$3.9m 2 year deal
$3.9m 2 year deal
That is not Vet minimum.$1.5 million was all he's worth, that's vet minimum for TR. Seriously overpaid for the bum.
If you can't do better than 3.3 ypc with a qb like Andrew Luck to take the pressure off, and get demoted behind the likes of Bradshaw and Herron- who both posted better ypc - you SUCK.
I've seen enough to realize the guy has no field vision, no burst, and no breakaway gear.
-
$3.9m 2 year deal
That is not Vet minimum.$1.5 million was all he's worth, that's vet minimum for TR. Seriously overpaid for the bum.
If you can't do better than 3.3 ypc with a qb like Andrew Luck to take the pressure off, and get demoted behind the likes of Bradshaw and Herron- who both posted better ypc - you SUCK.
I've seen enough to realize the guy has no field vision, no burst, and no breakaway gear.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login